15 Things You Never Knew Your Xbox Could Do






The Xbox Series X and S are not just little boxes for playing games; They are thoughtfully engineered, comprehensive entertainment hubs. You should stop thinking your console is only built for good graphics and start seeing it as a deep, flexible computer. Its operating system is always being fine-tuned, updated, and expanded. Like your smartphone, these devices are packed with hidden capabilities, smart service integrations, and crucial quality-of-life tweaks that let you do much more than just game.

That’s easy to forget when this console generation brought huge power and incredible graphics. Systems like the Xbox Series X or Series S offer a quick, solid-state drive (SSD), 4K gaming, and 120 frames per second (fps). These high-impact specs are the core selling points and make a difference with big titles, but they’re not the only factor.

If you don’t explore the available options, you’re missing out on huge hidden convenience, faster performance, and great customization. We look beyond the initial flashy launch specs and dive into the clever, useful, and unexpected features baked right into the operating system.

Suspend multiple games with quick resume

One of the best parts of the current console generation is the ability to suspend several games at once using Quick Resume. While the PS5 can only handle pausing a single session, leaving you tethered to one active game, the Xbox Series X/S lets you use this feature to keep multiple digital adventures running in the background simultaneously.

Think of it as creating a save state for the entire application rather than just some internal checkpoint within the game world. You won’t have to deal with those menu screens or loading prompts that typically kill the immersion of the gaming experience.

Since the system writes the game state directly to the internal storage, it can survive a complete loss of power. This means you can pack up your system for a trip or move it to a new room without losing your exact spot in a game.

Link two controllers as one with Controller Assist

You’re probably used to standard multiplayer where everyone gets their own character, but Copilot is completely different. This mode lets you tie two controllers together. The system sees this merger as just one input device, so both devices are sending commands to the exact same character or menu screen at the same time.

If you want to link two controllers on your Xbox, the first thing you need to do is get both devices connected. Grab your main gamepad, hit the Xbox button, and go to Profile & system, then Settings. You’ll find the Controller settings under Accessibility. Once you’re there, select Turn on Controller Assist.

It’s fantastic if you need to help your kid finish a frustrating level, but you don’t want to actually snatch the controller away from them. There are many creative uses for an Xbox controller, but this is a good one for siblings or parents who want to help their kids in hard sections or simply bond over a game.

Turn your console into a dev kit

Sure, the regular Xbox Series X/S retail interface is great for hitting up the Microsoft Store and Game Pass, but there is a hidden part of the console that ramps up what it can do beyond just playing games. You can shift your device into a special sandbox environment that was initially created for those making software. It lets the hardware operate like an open platform for you to mess around with.

You have to sign up on the official Windows site and pay a small $19 fee, but you’ll get an account you can use from then on. That formally registers your specific machine for dev purposes.

This whole thing is completely legit, and it makes sure that the regular retail side of your console is entirely separate from the development part, so your game library stays safe while you check out the new potential. What this does is unlock the power to install and run homebrew software. These are community-made apps and tools that Microsoft doesn’t distribute through the regular storefront, and you can then sideload them into the console.

Download games you do not own yet

One of the most underrated things the modern Xbox ecosystem does is let you separate installing a game’s data from actually owning the license for it. That feature really cuts down on the frustration between buying a game and getting to play it right away. The key to doing this is the Xbox mobile app. It’s incredibly helpful because you can queue up a download for basically any game available in the Microsoft Store, even if you haven’t bought it yet.

After dealing with shipping, you normally put in the disc just to sit through hours of installation and patching before you can actually start playing. However, this feature allows you to proactively install the physical title while you wait for your copy to arrive.

Just search for the title in the mobile app and push the installation to your console ahead of time. This handles those truly huge file sizes associated with current AAA games long before the package even shows up. This forward-thinking approach means that once the disc finally shows up, your console just needs it to receive the disc to play.

Dim the lights with night mode

One of the most practical tools actually fixes a huge physical annoyance you find when gaming in the dark. That Xbox logo on the controller and the console itself is notoriously bright. If you like to game in a dimly lit home theater or bedroom, that static, piercing light seriously breaks the immersion and becomes genuinely distracting.

Fortunately, the System Settings have a Night Mode that lets you easily dim these LEDs or just switch them off completely. This customization gives the setup a much stealthier aesthetic, making sure the device isn’t stealing focus from the action on screen. It also brings in a blue-tint filter, which really helps cut down on eye strain when you’re gaming late at night.

While Dolby Vision and Auto HDR use smart processes to make game highlights brighter and contrast look sharper, Night Mode acts as a necessary counterbalance. This feature is more beneficial for your health, as it helps prevent eye strain and overuse.

Double the frame rate of old games

The console has this tool called FPS Boost, and it completely changes what it feels like to play older favorites. FPS Boost operates at the system level, changing how backward-compatible games run without requiring the original developers to modify the code. This is one of those underused features that can improve your games.

FPS Boost fixes these old limitations outright. It can grab those classic titles that were locked at 30 frames per second (fps) and force them to run much faster overall, pushing them to 60 or even 120 on your new hardware. The frame rate jump isn’t just about things looking smooth, though; it also seriously cuts down on input latency. This makes the game feel tighter and more precise than it ever could have on the original system.

Since this process uses the power of the new machine to simply override those previous locks, you get a performance that can match what we expect today. This feature makes sure that backward compatibility doesn’t mean dated, and some claim it doubles the frame rate.

Add HDR to non-HDR titles

Auto HDR uses machine learning to apply High Dynamic Range imaging to older games that were created long before HDR was even a thing. This makes original Xbox and Xbox 360 titles look better by automatically balancing highlights and shadows. Back when these retro titles were first released, developers were constrained by the limitations of Standard Dynamic Range, which offered a much narrower spectrum of brightness and color.

Lighting in older games often looked flatter because they were in SDR. Standard Definition lacks that sharp distinction between the darkest shadows and the brightest whites compared to modern releases. However, by using an algorithm trained on high-dynamic-range imagery, the system can identify distinct elements within a frame. This could be the shining glare of the sun or the subtle glow of a streetlight, but it will boost peak brightness and contrast values without any code changes from the creators.

This basically modernizes the graphical output of titles that are sometimes decades old. Unlike a generic filter that might oversaturate the entire screen, the machine learning technique ensures the improvement is always accurate.

Project your PC to the Xbox

Everyone knows you can pull your Xbox games over to your PC, but the reverse is possible, too. This really bumps up what your hardware can do beyond just playing console games, and if you’re a PC gamer who prefers the feel of a controller on a couch, you don’t have to settle.

To get this going, you just need to hit up the digital store and grab the Wireless Display app for your console. If you’ve been using Microsoft stuff for a while, you might remember this utility as the Connect tool. It’s the same basic idea; it switches your Xbox into a Miracast receiver. Once that feature is on, your console basically turns into a wireless hub. You can beam your Windows PC or Android display right to your TV, no annoying cables necessary.

That wireless freedom means you skip the hassle of lugging around desktop towers or messing with HDMI cords just to use a bigger screen. This works perfectly for throwing up a browser window, which is awesome for watching stuff together, practicing a presentation, or getting to web media that doesn’t have its own Xbox app.

Transfer games over the local network

If you’ve got a couple of Xbox consoles in your house, you don’t have to download the same game repeatedly. With modern games easily hitting 100GB or more, moving full games from one machine to another is time-consuming. Luckily, the Xbox operating system has a clever fix for this problem, creating a connection right there between your devices.

This feature, called Network Transfer, lets one Xbox copy games and apps straight over to the other console on your home network. Instead of making both machines grab that massive data from Microsoft’s servers, the system finds the files already on your local environment and zips them across your LAN connection. That’s usually much faster than relying on your standard internet speed. Just make sure to enable it in your backup & transfer settings.

Not only is this method quicker overall compared to downloading from the public internet, but it also helps you save bandwidth. If you have a metered connection, downloading something huge could eat into your data allowance, which could hurt your speed even if you speed up your Wi-Fi.

Customize the guide tabs

You might not realize it, but one of the most useful navigation tools is right there on your console’s main screen. Xbox Guide is that convenient menu that immediately appears when you tap the Xbox button on your controller. You could just stick with the factory settings for this menu, but you should know that the Guide is completely customizable to match exactly what you need and how you play.

You can rearrange the tabs so your favorite features are easy to reach, instead of constantly scrolling past things you never use. You can do this by going into your Account Settings, heading to General, and then Personalization. Use the Customize the Guide option to modify the layout.

You can reorganize the interface so the tools you rely on most are instantly available. This adjustment is crucial if you’re trying to document your gameplay, because it guarantees much faster access to recording tools the second something awesome happens. It’s also great for players who are focused on boosting their Gamerscore since you can change it so it shows achievements first.

Control the console with digital assistants

If you’ve been using Microsoft stuff for a while, when you think about talking to your Xbox, your mind probably jumps straight to the old Kinect sensor. That really defined what the Xbox One was supposed to be when it first launched. Things have changed quite a bit since then, but the idea of hands-free navigation is still really important and still lives on in other devices.

Voice commands definitely haven’t vanished; They’ve just moved over to the smart devices you already have sitting around your house. Xbox chose to fully support Google Assistant and Amazon Alexa instead of making you use a specialized microphone.

If you want to get voice control working, head to your console’s Settings, then Devices & Connections, and finally Digital Assistants. Make sure you check the Enable Digital Assistants box. Set your power mode to sleep from there. Then, open your phone and link the accounts in the mobile app for whichever ecosystem you prefer.

If you’re using Google Assistant, fire up the Google Home app. Tap the plus icon, select Set Up Device, and then choose Works With Google. Search for “Xbox” in the list, and then sign in using your Microsoft account. If you prefer Amazon Alexa, open the Alexa app, go to More, and hit Skills & Games. Search for the specific Xbox skill, hit Enable To Use, and sign in to finish the pairing process.

Find teammates with built-in LFG

Throwing yourself into random matchmaking usually just lands you in frustrating sessions full of people who won’t cooperate or lobbies so silent you wonder if anyone’s actually there. A lot of us just accept this unpredictable chaos, but the Xbox system has a smart fix that many players miss. The Looking for Group (LFG) feature is built right into the console to help you find friends and good teammates.

You can basically post detailed wanted ads or browse existing ones, specifying exactly the kind of player needed. This guarantees everyone who jumps into your party is clear on the expected playstyle, how hard you want to go, and what the goals are for that session. You can access the whole thing right from the game hub.

You can filter your potential teammates using specific requirements. For instance, you can demand they have a “microphone required” tag or “no trash talk.” This could be a great way to make new friends, but keep in mind that you should never give your personal information to anyone you don’t know. This is still a situation of playing with a stranger.

Record hour-long clips to an external USB

If you’re a content creator or just like saving your recordings, you probably find the default recording limits on modern consoles totally restrictive. While the Share button made capturing gameplay easy, sticking to the console’s built-in SSD creates a serious bottleneck if you want high-quality video. You have to either drop the video quality just to capture longer clips or deal with the totally frustrating situation where your session stops after a short time.

The Xbox Series X/S setup actually has an awesome workaround that people often miss. The trick is simply moving that data to an external source. Once you connect a USB 3.0 drive and format it for media capture, you completely get around those file size restrictions that the internal storage imposes.

It’s absolutely crucial that the drive use the USB 3.0 standard, since you need those fast data transfer rates for real-time video encoding. Also, remember it has to be set aside only for media, not for storing games. When you’re done, you can capture a full hour of uninterrupted 4K gameplay if you have the space.

Improve visuals with Dolby Vision

Next-generation visual fidelity tends to focus heavily on pixel counts and resolution, but the true leap in graphics comes from how a system handles light and color. HDR is designed to expand the contrast and color palette of video games to look much closer to what the human eye actually sees. Just make sure your settings on the console are right.

Microsoft’s hardware carves out a distinct advantage, especially for people focused on building a great home theater setup. The Xbox Series X/S was the first console to support Dolby Vision for gaming, bringing cinema-grade visual standards right into your games. Dolby Vision is just one of the types of HDR.

Instead of relying on one global setting for your whole play session, this technology uses metadata to adjust things like brightness, contrast, and color on a frame-by-frame basis. This lets the console tell the display to change its tone mapping instantly. This perfectly optimizes the picture for the specific scene being rendered at that exact millisecond. Just remember, you’ll need a compatible TV to do this.

Smart Delivery gives the best version

Buying games when you own multiple generations can be confusing, especially when digital stores are clogged with multiple copies of the same game for different systems. This lack of clarity means you have to be really vigilant, checking menus and file details constantly just to make sure you aren’t missing out on those crucial graphical tweaks or performance improvements.

Luckily, Microsoft uses Smart Delivery to guarantee the console only grabs the assets it needs, which basically removes human error from the installation process entirely. This intelligent system acts like a guard between the Microsoft Store and your hard drive. It scans your hardware and delivers the exact data package specifically tailored for what that device can handle.

What’s great is that you aren’t wasting precious SSD space downloading those huge, high-resolution textures your console can’t even display. Also, you’re not stuck installing a lower-quality, compressed version when you have a powerful machine.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Semiconductors are everywhere. They power your phone, your car, your refrigerator. They enable AI models, cloud computing, and modern manufacturing. Advanced chips control weapons systems, telecommunications networks, and financial infrastructure. No technology is more central to modern economic activity.

This makes competition in semiconductor manufacturing a question of enormous importance. Yet the industry presents a puzzle that challenges conventional thinking about competition and market power.

Moore’s Law, the observation (then prediction) that chip performance doubles roughly every two years, has held steady for five decades.

Meanwhile, the industry has consolidated dramatically. By 2020, dozens of  chip manufacturers from the 1980s had evolved into three leading players, with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC) now producing most of the world’s advanced processors.

By standard antitrust metrics, the semiconductor industry appears problematic. Market concentration has risen steadily. The largest firms command dominant market shares. Entry barriers appear massive: a new fabrication facility costs more than $20 billion. These metrics suggest competition is weak or weakening, creating the conditions for stagnation. 

But that’s not what’s happened. Instead, innovation thrived as the industry consolidated, maintaining the pace predicted by Moore’s Law (meaning, generally, more computing power at lower prices) even as the industry concentrated into fewer hands. 

The question is—how can an industry be both highly concentrated and intensely competitive? How can fewer firms produce constant innovation? And what should this teach us about using standard measures of competition, as well as the appropriate focus of antitrust enforcement?

These are the questions David Teece, Geoffrey Manne, Mario Zúñiga, and I explore in a new paper on competition in semiconductor manufacturing. In this post, I want to augment that analysis, using the framework developed by two of this year’s Nobel Prize winners, Philippe Aghion and Peter Howitt. Their model of Schumpeterian creative destruction, which I wrote about recently, explains why the chip-manufacturing industry simultaneously exhibits both constant, relentless competition and high concentration.

Smooth Growth from Turbulent Churn

Before getting to the specifics of semiconductors, start with the macroeconomic patterns. Advanced economies show smooth, steady GDP growth; in the United States, this has meant roughly 2% annual growth for decades. The semiconductor industry has maintained similarly smooth exponential productivity improvements through Moore’s Law for five decades. 

Yet underneath that smoothness, individual markets experience dramatic upheaval. How do we get steady macro-level growth from such turbulent micro dynamics?

Semiconductors present a similar puzzle. Transistors got smaller, chips got faster, and it all happened at a remarkably steady pace. If one were to plot chip performance over the years, you would see a smooth, predictable curve.

But in both the macroeconomy and the semiconductor industry, while the trend looks smooth, the firm-level picture is chaotic. In 2015, Intel led logic-chip manufacturing with its 14-nanometer process. Samsung and TSMC raced to catch up and, by 2017, they had matched Intel. Then TSMC pulled ahead with 7-nanometer in 2018. Intel stumbled on 10-nanometer for years. TSMC maintained its lead through 5-nanometer and 3-nanometer. Apple abandoned Intel processors entirely, switching to TSMC-manufactured chips. Intel’s market capitalization reflected this fall from grace.

This pattern of one firm innovating, others catching up, someone else pulling ahead, and yesterday’s leader falling behind repeats constantly. Netflix enters, and Blockbuster collapses. The iPhone launches and BlackBerry disappears. The semiconductor industry follows the same pattern of creative destruction: TSMC displaced Intel from the lead, and Intel is now investing billions to try to recapture its position.

Each transition reshuffles market leadership among firms. In semiconductors, each new process generation (about every two years) displaces the last, so it is a new opportunity for a new firm to take the lead. We have smooth aggregate growth built on creative destruction at the firm level. How does this actually work?

Serial Monopoly in Action

The Aghion-Howitt framework provides the answer: serial monopoly. Firms take turns being monopolists as each new leader displaces the last.

Success brings temporary monopoly profits. When TSMC got to 7-nanometer before Intel, it captured most of the market for advanced-logic chips. Those profits are substantial, with gross margins above 50% on leading-edge chip manufacturing. 

These temporary monopoly profits are central to how innovation works in the semiconductor industry. Developing a new process node requires billions in upfront investment, with no guarantee of success. The possibility of capturing the market and earning substantial profits for a period of time is what justifies these massive bets. Without the prospect of temporarily high returns, no firm would make such risky investments. The monopoly profit is the carrot that motivates massive R&D investment.

But the monopoly remains temporary because rivals keep investing to displace the current leader. Even the current leader must invest billions to maintain its position. Despite leading advanced manufacturing, TSMC spent $6.4 billion on R&D in 2024. It cannot rest on its current position because it faces the same pressure to innovate as its challengers, knowing that any stumble means displacement. Intel, trying to regain its technological edge, spent $16.5 billion (31% of its revenue) on R&D. Samsung invests similar amounts.

If we zoom out beyond manufacturing to consider the broader industry, with better data, the semiconductor sector as a whole is one of the most R&D-intensive industries in the world. In 2024, overall U.S. semiconductor-industry investment in R&D totaled $62.7 billion, representing 18% of U.S. semiconductor firms’ revenue.

This is competition working, but it looks nothing like the textbook model. Firms in this industry don’t compete primarily by cutting prices on identical products to capture a bit more market share. They compete by racing to develop better products that make existing ones obsolete, capturing the market entirely. That is, at least, until the next innovation comes along. The competition happens through innovation, not just price.

This pattern creates what economists call “competition for the market,” rather than “competition in the market.” But it is competition nonetheless. Each new process node requires billions in research spending. These investments fund thousands of engineers working on photolithography, materials science, and manufacturing processes. The firm that gets to the next node first captures most of the market for that generation. Every competitor aims to displace it at the next node. For its part, TSMC knows that a single missed transition could reverse years of leadership.

Why Standard Competition Metrics Fail

Our paper examines how dynamic competition operates, which helps to explain why traditional antitrust metrics miss what’s actually happening.

The old structure-conduct-performance paradigm in antitrust assumes that market structure determines competitive behavior and, ultimately, market performance. Under this view, concentrated markets with few firms should produce higher prices, lower output, and reduced innovation because firms face less competitive pressure. When regulators see three firms controlling advanced semiconductor manufacturing, the paradigm suggests these firms can coordinate behavior, raise prices, and avoid the costly investments that competition would otherwise force. 

While economists abandoned the strong form of this paradigm decades ago, modern antitrust analysis still relies heavily on structural metrics: how many firms, what market shares, what concentration ratios. These metrics would assume that  the semiconductor industry is problematic. Three firms controlling advanced manufacturing looks like an oligopoly that should be earning excessive profits and underinvesting in R&D.

But inferring weak competition and poor performance from this structure misreads the competitive dynamics, especially in semiconductor manufacturing. Indeed, the semiconductor-manufacturing industry’s consolidated structure emerged from competition, not in spite of it. Competition led to consolidation around a few highly capable firms. In fact, that’s a standard result across many industries: competition increases concentration

This mechanism is consistent with the Aghion-Howitt framework. Developing advanced manufacturing processes requires massive fixed costs. While a new fabrication facility costs $20 billion or more, chips sell for around $50 to a few thousand dollars each, depending on their complexity. Only firms that can spread those costs across enormous production volumes can recoup the investment. And the efficient scale has grown over time as the technology required to keep pace with Moore’s Law has become increasingly difficult.

This creates natural pressure toward concentration. But concentration doesn’t eliminate competitive pressure. Where there is a whole market’s worth of profits at stake, competition is fierce, and the competitive pressure of displacement provides the discipline that keeps firms investing and innovating.

The Intel case illustrates this process. Intel dominated logic-chip manufacturing for decades, but leadership did not mean complacency. Intel invested heavily in its 10-nanometer process, spending billions on new fabrication facilities and engineering talent. The company’s problem was not lack of effort. Instead, Intel’s engineers encountered unexpected manufacturing difficulties with the new process. Yields remained low, meaning too few working chips per wafer to make production economical. Intel delayed commercial production repeatedly while trying to solve these problems.

Meanwhile, TSMC succeeded with its competing 7-nanometer process. TSMC’s engineers took different technical approaches that proved more manufacturable. When Apple needed chips for its new Mac computers, it chose TSMC’s superior process over Intel’s delayed one. AMD, which had previously used Intel-equivalent processes, switched to TSMC and gained market share with chips that outperformed Intel’s offerings.

The displacement happened through innovation, not price cuts. Customers didn’t switch because TSMC charged less (although that mattered too). They switched because TSMC’s more advanced manufacturing process enabled better chips: faster, more power-efficient, with more features per unit area. Intel’s stumble demonstrates that no firm’s position is secure. But TSMC faces the same pressure today. If TSMC fails to deliver on 2-nanometer or the generations beyond, Samsung or Intel will capture those customers.

This is Joseph Schumpeter’s “creative destruction” in action. 

Market structure is endogenous. The remaining firms and sizes are the outcome of competitive processes, not the point from which competition starts. TSMC became a big player by out-innovating Intel in a specific technological transition. 

As we point out in the paper, the regional history of the industry confirms this pattern. In the 1980s, U.S.-based firms dominated semiconductor manufacturing. Japanese manufacturers invested heavily in process technology and quality control. They achieved higher yields (more working chips per silicon wafer) than their American competitors. By the late 1980s, most American memory-chip firms had exited the market.

From the traditional structure-conduct-performance perspective, this looks like a competition failure. U.S. firms lost. The market is concentrated. But innovation accelerated. Japanese firms competed with one other to improve manufacturing processes. Then, Korean firms entered with even more aggressive investments. Samsung displaced Japanese leaders through superior manufacturing technology.

What This Means for Policy

The semiconductor industry illustrates why we need to think differently about competition in innovative industries. Standard antitrust metrics—concentration ratios, market shares, price-cost margins—can mislead enforcers about competitive conditions in industries characterized by rapid innovation and large fixed costs. These metrics assume that market structure determines competitive intensity. But in Schumpeterian industries, especially, intense competition produces concentrated structures as successful innovators capture the market, only to face displacement at the next technological transition.

When it comes to policy, antitrust authorities must understand this reality about market competition. They must ask whether the conditions for ongoing creative destruction remain intact:

  • Do incumbent firms face credible threats from potential innovators?
  • Are firms investing in next-generation technology?
  • Can new entrants or existing rivals displace leaders who stop innovating?
  • Does the market reward innovation with temporary profits that fund further investment?

For semiconductors, the answers suggest competition is working well, despite high concentration. Firms invest enormous sums in R&D. New process nodes arrive regularly. Leadership positions remain contestable. Intel’s stumbles show no firm’s leadership is permanent.

Enforcement actions that make sense in static markets will completely backfire in Schumpeterian ones. Breaking up a leading firm might destroy the scale economies needed for the massive investments that generate that innovation. Punishing profits will eliminate the incentive for risky R&D bets. The more productive approach examines whether specific practices impede the competition in innovation that disciplines incumbents, not whether a particular market structure looks too concentrated.

The semiconductor industry has maintained Moore’s Law for five decades while consolidating from dozens of manufacturers to three leading players. Concentration did not produce stagnation. Rather, it produced continuous technological progress and regular leadership transitions as firms displaced each other through innovation.

The post The Competitive Chaos Behind Moore’s Law appeared first on Truth on the Market.



Source link