Acer’s new Swift laptop proves you can have too much of a good thing


dsc04938.jpg

ZDNET’s key takeaways

  • Pros: Gorgeous display, big haptic trackpad doubles as a drawing surface, battery lasts long
  • Cons: Poor webcam quality, larger trackpad has usability issues

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


Last year, Acer’s Swift 16 AI was one of the best laptops I tested. It was a sleeper hit: a solid bang-for-buck option with a fantastic battery and a gorgeous display that looked a lot more expensive than it is (on sale right now for around $900). 

The 2026 refresh of the Acer Swift 16 AI holds the same position in the lineup as a premium 16-inch, but to give it a unique identity, Acer added a few different design elements that push it further into “made-for-creatives” territory — most notably, the football field-sized trackpad that also serves as a drawing surface with the included stylus. 

Also: Dell XPS 14 (2026) review: A Windows laptop I wouldn’t mind returning to from Mac

But in trying to make this laptop stand out in the crowded mid-range price point, is Acer trying to fix something that wasn’t broken to begin with? 

Best laptop deals of the week

Deals are selected by the CNET Group commerce team, and may be unrelated to this article.

Go big or go home

The 2026 Acer Swift 16 AI is one of the first new Panther Lake laptops of the year, armed with the Intel Core Ultra X7 or X9 processor — the “X” designating the integrated Intel Arc GPU. My review unit had the Intel Core Ultra X7 Series 358H, 32GB of LPDDR5X RAM, and a 1TB PCIe Gen 5 SSD. 

Let’s address the elephant in the room: the monumental trackpad. Measuring seven inches by 4.5 inches (8.15 inches diagonally), it takes up so much room on the clamshell that it almost doesn’t look like a trackpad. That’s true, in part, as it’s also a drawing surface with the included stylus. 

Acer Swift 16 AI (2026)

Kyle Kucharski/ZDNET

Acer says it’s the world’s largest haptic trackpad, and I’m inclined to believe it. Made of Corning Gorilla Glass, it’s smooth and responsive, with exceptional feedback and support for MPP 2.5 tilt-enabled styli. It’s an impressive feat of engineering to have a haptic touchpad this big feel so well-designed. 

That said, I’m not entirely sure why Acer decided to give this laptop — formerly a versatile upper- and mid-range device — such a niche, highly specialized feature. Sure, now it imbues the device with a unique identity, but I didn’t think the Swift 16 AI necessarily needed it.

But after using the included stylus in a few different applications, I can say it would certainly be appreciated by artists or designers as an easy-access surface for sketching or drawing. With the right software, it could even replace a dedicated tablet. 

Also: I tried dozens of mice, and the Logitech MX is my clear favorite – here’s why

There are trade-offs to a trackpad/drawing surface this big, though. When typing, it’s where your hands rest, and although it has palm-rejection software, false inputs still occur. To adapt, I found myself typing with my right hand hovering over the keyboard rather than resting on it. 

The other thing is that because the trackpad extends to the very edge of the device, I often found myself activating it with my thumbs or my wrists. A subtle but functional lip between the trackpad and the edge of the device could alleviate this problem, but would require some redesigns. 

Acer Swift 16 AI (2026)

Kyle Kucharski/ZDNET

Moving past the trackpad, the other headliner is the 16-inch OLED display. Just like last year’s model, it’s crisp, bright, and vibrant, with an edge-to-edge glass construction at WQXGA+ (2880×1800) resolution and a standard 120Hz refresh rate. Just keep in mind it’s quite glossy. When it’s clean and the lighting conditions are good, it’s stunning. But harsh overhead lighting can cause reflections.

Powered by the Arc Graphics B390, there’s enough here to make for a solid gaming laptop, but like the XPS 14 — which I recently tested with the same processor — the integrated GPU doesn’t quitereplace a discrete graphics card. You will need to bring settings down in demanding games, as is the case with high-end video editing. 

Trade-offs 

Acer’s Swift lineup aims to deliver a satisfying user experience for an approachable price. One way it’s able to do this is by beefing up certain features (the gorgeous display, the big trackpad) at the expense of others. 

The physical build is another indication of its price point. It’s very thin and light, but there’s a little flex in the keyboard, plastic grills on the underside, and some palpable heat generation when the hardware is at work.  

Also: 6 WFH gadgets that leveled up my home office (and all of them are on sale)

That said, it doesn’t really feel cheap, and the hinge is sturdy, with no unnecessary wobble. More importantly, it’s light, at just 3.2 pounds. I took this laptop to work for a few weeks, and it’s a fantastic commuter’s device, sliding virtually unnoticed into my backpack. 

Another trade-off worth mentioning is the webcam, which is not as good as competitors’. I took a few calls on the 1080p FHD camera, and it was dark and grainy, with an overall cold color tone. 

Acer Swift 16 AI (2026)

Kyle Kucharski/ZDNET

One more thing: the onslaught of ads degrades the user experience. This is nothing new to Windows machines — which aim to get your credit card before you’ve seen your desktop for the first time — but it feels worse here. Between the antivirus software ads, Windows services, and mobile game pop-ups, Windows feels like a bloated marketplace that no one asked for. 

Also: This hidden Windows 11 feature can help you spot battery issues early – how to find it

Acer also includes a rather extensive selection of proprietary software, like camera image touch-ups (Acer PurifiedView), presence sensing, and AI-powered content summarization apps that are designed to generate product value but end up convoluting the experience.

Battery life and benchmarking

Put simply, the battery life on this machine is very good, especially given the big OLED display. I got a little over nine hours using the laptop in the office with typical work tasks at half brightness and on Wi-Fi. With a little battery management, expect it to easily last the entire workday. 

As far as performance benchmarking goes, the Swift 16 AI performs right around other Panther Lake laptops released so far in 2026, coming in just a hair under the Dell XPS 14 with the same processor. 

It’s a respectable performance, considering those laptops cost hundreds more. Their physical builds and feature sets are a little more premium, but when it comes down to performance, the Swift 16 AI keeps up. In that sense, it punches above its weight, just like its predecessor.

ZDNET’s buying advice

The 2026 Acer Swift 16 AI has traded in some of its versatility for a more creator-focused build identity with a large trackpad/drawing surface. If you’re an artist or designer seeking a functional laptop that can replace or supplement a dedicated tablet, it’s a great option. Even if you don’t use it as a drawing surface, just as a big trackpad, it’s very well engineered. 

The display is gorgeous, and paired with the performance, you get a solid laptop for the price. However, outside of these areas, the trade-offs are more evident. Namely, the underwhelming webcam, mid-speakers, and bloatware.  

Also: How to clear your Windows 11 PC cache (and why you shouldn’t wait to do it)

If the large trackpad doesn’t sound like something you’re into, I’d recommend Samsung’s Galaxy Book 6 Pro instead, or potentially Lenovo’s Yoga Pro 9i, which is $100 more but more premium. 

Its mid-range price point ($1,599 for the 16GB version, $1,899 for the 32GB) might seem on the high side, but keep in mind that this laptop is competing directly with other more premium options with the same processor, like the Dell XPS 14 and the Asus ExpertBook B9, both of which go for several hundred dollars more.   





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


A new class-action lawsuit, filed on Monday by three teenage girls and their guardians, alleges that Elon Musk’s xAI created and distributed child sexual abuse material featuring their faces and likenesses with its Grok AI tech.

“Their lives have been shattered by the devastating loss of privacy, dignity, and personal safety that the production and dissemination of this CSAM have caused,” the filing says. “xAI’s financial gain through the increased use of its image- and video-making product came at their expense and well-being.”

From December to early January, Grok allowed many AI and X social media users to create AI-generated nonconsensual intimate images, sometimes known as deepfake porn. Reports estimate that Grok users made 4.4 million “undressed” or “nudified” images, 41% of the total number of images created, over a period of nine days. 

X, xAI and its safety and child safety divisions did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The wave of “undressed” images stirred outrage around the world. The European Commission quickly launched an investigation, while Malaysia and Indonesia banned X within their borders. Some US government representatives called on Apple and Google to remove the app from their app stores for violating their policies, but no federal investigation into X or xAI has been opened. A similar, separate class-action lawsuit was filed (PDF) by a South Carolina woman in late January.

The dehumanizing trend highlighted just how capable modern AI image tools are at creating content that seems realistic. The new complaint compares Grok’s self-proclaimed “spicy AI” generation to the “dark arts” with its ease of subjecting children to “any pose, however sick, however fetishized, however unlawful.”

“To the viewer, the resulting video appears entirely real. For the child, her identifying features will now forever be attached to a video depicting her own child sexual abuse,” the complaint reads.

AI Atlas

The complaint says xAI is at fault because it did not employ industry-standard guardrails that would prevent abusers from making this content. It says xAI licensed use of its tech to third-party companies abroad, which sold subscriptions that led abusers to make child sexual abuse images featuring the faces and likenesses of the victims. The requests ran through xAI’s servers, which makes the company liable, the complaint argues.

The lawsuit was filed by three Jane Does, pseudonyms given to the teens to protect their identities. Jane Doe 1 was first alerted to the fact that abusive, AI-generated sexual material of her was circulating on the web by an anonymous Instagram message in early December. The filing says she was told about a Discord server by the anonymous Instagram user, where the material was shared. That led Jane Doe 1 and her family, and eventually law enforcement, to find and arrest one perpetrator.

Ongoing investigations led the families of Jane Does 2 and 3 to learn their children’s images had been transformed with xAI tech into abusive material.





Source link