Can A $40 Knockoff DeWalt Chainsaw Beat The $130 Original? This Test Found Out







A range of brands make cordless pruning saws, and they’re potentially a very handy addition to your arsenal of outdoor tools. Much like its long-standing rivals Milwaukee and Makita, DeWalt makes a pruning saw that has been copied by knockoff brands that use the same interchangeable batteries as the real thing. A test by Project Farm put all of these saws to the test to see how they performed in a variety of situations, and surprisingly, the knockoff versions of some big-name tools performed impressively well, with the knockoff DeWalt saw not far behind its legitimate counterpart.

In a test that timed how long each saw took to cut through 2×8 lumber, the knockoff DeWalt couldn’t match the real DeWalt saw, with the former taking 5.72 seconds while the latter took just 2.87 seconds. However, the knockoff still outperformed a genuine Makita saw, which took 5.93 seconds to make the same cut.

Another test was designed to see how much downward force each saw could take without stalling. The knockoff DeWalt stalled at 10 pounds, and the real DeWalt stalled at 21 pounds, comfortably beating its counterfeit counterpart. However, Ryobi and Craftsman’s saws both outperformed the real DeWalt, hitting over 30 pounds of downward force before stalling, while the Milwaukee saw that Project Farm tested hit 94 pounds and still didn’t stall, making it the winner by a large margin.

In one key area, the knockoff DeWalt beat the real thing

In terms of pure performance, the real DeWalt ranked mostly above its knockoff counterpart, but in efficiency, the knockoff claimed a surprise victory. Project Farm calculated the runtime per amp-hour of each saw, and the real DeWalt managed 1.38 minutes, the second worst of the test group. Meanwhile, the knockoff DeWalt could run for 1.72 minutes with the same amount of power.

The knockoff could also make significantly more cuts through a hardwood log per amp hour, achieving 10.4 cuts compared to the real DeWalt’s 8.1 cuts. However, both were far behind the best in class, with the Milwaukee saw delivering 41.5 cuts per amp hour. Kobalt took the second-place spot with 31.7 cuts per amp hour. Project Farm’s final combined ranking saw the knockoff DeWalt finish only one place behind the legitimate DeWalt saw, although both were roundly beaten by rivals from Milwaukee, Kobalt, and Ryobi. That might seem surprising considering the major price difference between the two.

However, despite their close ranking in the test, you still probably shouldn’t buy knockoff DeWalt tools. Their lack of warranty and inconsistent production standards can potentially mean you end up spending more money in the long run, and in some cases, knockoffs may even pose a safety risk. Buyers looking for the best-performing pruning chainsaw would be better off considering a rival tool from another major chainsaw brand, or coughing up the cash for the real DeWalt saw, even if it isn’t the best in class.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews







In the ever-shifting geopolitical sphere, China’s growing military presence and the ongoing tensions over Taiwan and the South China Sea continue to be a closely watched topic — particularly in regard to China’s ambition for naval power. In recent years, much speculation has been made over the country’s rapid military development, including the capabilities of the newest Chinese amphibious assault ships.

While there’s no denying its military advancements and buildup, much has been made about the logistical and military difficulties that China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) would face if it launched an amphibious invasion of Taiwan. However, there’s growing concern that if a Taiwan invasion were to happen, it wouldn’t just be military vessels taking part in the action, but a fleet of commercial vessels, too — including a massive new car ferries that could quickly be repurposed into valuable military transports.

While the possibility of the PLA using commercial vessels for military operations has always been on the table for a potential Taiwan invasion, the scale with which China has been expanding its commercial shipbuilding industry has become a big factor in the PLA’s projection of logistical and military power across the Taiwan Strait. It’s also raised ethical concerns over the idea of putting merchant-marked ships into combat use.

From car ferry to military transport

The rapid growth of modern Chinese industrial capacity is well known, with Chinese electric vehicle factories now able to build a new car every 60 seconds. Likewise, China has developed a massive shipbuilding industry over the last 25 years, with the country now making up more than half of the world’s shipbuilding output. It’s from those two sectors where China’s latest vehicle-carrying super vessels are emerging. 

With a capacity to carry over 10,000 new vehicles for transport from factories in Asia to destinations around the world, these ships, known as roll-on/roll-off (Ro-Ro) ferries, are now the biggest of their type in the world. The concept of the PLA putting civilian ferries into military use is not a new one, or even an idea China is trying to hide. Back in 2021, China held a public military exercise where a civilian ferry was used to transport both troops and a whole arsenal of military vehicles, including main battle tanks.

The relatively limited conventional naval lift capacity of the PLA is something that’s been pointed out while game-planning a Chinese amphibious move on Taiwan, and it’s widely expected that the PLA would lean on repurposed civilian vessels to boost its ability to move soldiers and vehicles across the Taiwan Strait. With these newer, high-capacity Ro-Ro ferries added to the fleet, the PLA’s amphibious capacity and reach could grow significantly.

A makeshift amphibious assault ship

However, even with the added capacity of these massive ferries, military analysts have pointed out that Ro-Ro ships would not be able to deploy vehicles and soliders directly onto a beach the way a purpose-built military amphibious assault ship can. Traditionally, to deploy vehicles from these ships, the PLA would first need to capture and then repurpose Taiwan’s existing commercial port facilities into unloading bases for military vehicles and equipment.

However, maybe most alarming is that satellite imagery and U.S. Intelligence reports show that, along with increasing ferry production output, the PLA is also working on a system of barges and floating dock structures to help turn these civilian ferries into more efficient military transports. With this supporting equipment in place, ferries may not need to use existing port infrastructure to bring their equipment on shore.

Beyond the general military concern over China’s growing amphibious capability, there are also ethical concerns if China is planning to rapidly put a fleet of civilian merchant vessels into military service. If the PLA were to deploy these dual-purpose vessels into direct military operations, the United States and its allies would likely be forced to treat civilian-presenting ships as enemy combatants. On top of all the other strategic challenges a Taiwan invasion would bring, the U.S. having to navigate the blurred legal lines between military and merchant vessels could potentially give China a strategic advantage amidst the fog of war.





Source link