Wikipedia Bans AI-Generated Content, With Only Two Exceptions


For 25 years, Wikipedia has been an open-source online encyclopedia where anyone can contribute knowledge, so long as it’s grounded in reliable, verifiable sources. But as artificial intelligence tools rapidly reshape how content is created, the platform is drawing a firm line: You cannot use AI tools to create or rewrite content for Wikipedia. 

“Text generated by large language models (LLMs) often violates several of Wikipedia’s core content policies,” Wikipedia’s editing policy reads. “For this reason, the use of LLMs to generate or rewrite article content is prohibited, save for the exceptions given below.

Wikipedia cites ChatGPT and Google Gemini as examples in a footnote. 

(Disclosure: Ziff Davis, CNET’s parent company, in April filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, alleging it infringed Ziff Davis copyrights in training and operating its AI systems.) 

It’s unclear when the policy went into effect. A representative for Wikipedia did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Wikipedia’s exceptions to using AI

Wikipedia lists a few exceptions for editors and when translating articles. 

AI Atlas

Wikipedia says that editors can use AI to make basic article edits, such as typos and formatting, to articles they wrote after a Wikipedia volunteer reviewer or administrator reviews the article. 

However, even if you’re using AI to edit, Wikipedia urges caution because AI can change the meaning of some content, which may not be accurate or align with the source’s intent.

Wikipedia lets you use AI to translate articles from other language Wikipedias into English. However, translation must still follow Wikipedia’s policies, and the translator must be fluent in both English and the language of the original article to ensure accuracy. 

Enforcement is unclear

It’s no surprise that Wikipedia added this language to its policy, considering that it’s an open-source project and AI is prone to errors and plagiarism. 

Last year, the Wikimedia Foundation asked that AI companies stop scraping data from Wikipedia and use its Enterprise API, which will allow them to “use Wikipedia content at scale and sustainably without severely taxing Wikipedia’s servers, while also enabling them to support our nonprofit mission.”

No mention is made of how the rules will be enforced or how users will be disciplined if they use AI in violation of the rules. 

Wikipedia’s policy comes at a time when AI is becoming a part of our day-to-day lives. Apple Intelligence and Galaxy AI are now available on smartphones, and there are built-in AI features in the apps, websites and services we use regularly. Yet, there are mounting concerns about AI’s accuracy and the risk of hallucinations. 

Wikipedia’s decision would seem to reflect a broader tension across the internet: balancing the speed and convenience of AI-generated content with the need for human judgment and verifiable, accurate knowledge.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews







In the ever-shifting geopolitical sphere, China’s growing military presence and the ongoing tensions over Taiwan and the South China Sea continue to be a closely watched topic — particularly in regard to China’s ambition for naval power. In recent years, much speculation has been made over the country’s rapid military development, including the capabilities of the newest Chinese amphibious assault ships.

While there’s no denying its military advancements and buildup, much has been made about the logistical and military difficulties that China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) would face if it launched an amphibious invasion of Taiwan. However, there’s growing concern that if a Taiwan invasion were to happen, it wouldn’t just be military vessels taking part in the action, but a fleet of commercial vessels, too — including a massive new car ferries that could quickly be repurposed into valuable military transports.

While the possibility of the PLA using commercial vessels for military operations has always been on the table for a potential Taiwan invasion, the scale with which China has been expanding its commercial shipbuilding industry has become a big factor in the PLA’s projection of logistical and military power across the Taiwan Strait. It’s also raised ethical concerns over the idea of putting merchant-marked ships into combat use.

From car ferry to military transport

The rapid growth of modern Chinese industrial capacity is well known, with Chinese electric vehicle factories now able to build a new car every 60 seconds. Likewise, China has developed a massive shipbuilding industry over the last 25 years, with the country now making up more than half of the world’s shipbuilding output. It’s from those two sectors where China’s latest vehicle-carrying super vessels are emerging. 

With a capacity to carry over 10,000 new vehicles for transport from factories in Asia to destinations around the world, these ships, known as roll-on/roll-off (Ro-Ro) ferries, are now the biggest of their type in the world. The concept of the PLA putting civilian ferries into military use is not a new one, or even an idea China is trying to hide. Back in 2021, China held a public military exercise where a civilian ferry was used to transport both troops and a whole arsenal of military vehicles, including main battle tanks.

The relatively limited conventional naval lift capacity of the PLA is something that’s been pointed out while game-planning a Chinese amphibious move on Taiwan, and it’s widely expected that the PLA would lean on repurposed civilian vessels to boost its ability to move soldiers and vehicles across the Taiwan Strait. With these newer, high-capacity Ro-Ro ferries added to the fleet, the PLA’s amphibious capacity and reach could grow significantly.

A makeshift amphibious assault ship

However, even with the added capacity of these massive ferries, military analysts have pointed out that Ro-Ro ships would not be able to deploy vehicles and soliders directly onto a beach the way a purpose-built military amphibious assault ship can. Traditionally, to deploy vehicles from these ships, the PLA would first need to capture and then repurpose Taiwan’s existing commercial port facilities into unloading bases for military vehicles and equipment.

However, maybe most alarming is that satellite imagery and U.S. Intelligence reports show that, along with increasing ferry production output, the PLA is also working on a system of barges and floating dock structures to help turn these civilian ferries into more efficient military transports. With this supporting equipment in place, ferries may not need to use existing port infrastructure to bring their equipment on shore.

Beyond the general military concern over China’s growing amphibious capability, there are also ethical concerns if China is planning to rapidly put a fleet of civilian merchant vessels into military service. If the PLA were to deploy these dual-purpose vessels into direct military operations, the United States and its allies would likely be forced to treat civilian-presenting ships as enemy combatants. On top of all the other strategic challenges a Taiwan invasion would bring, the U.S. having to navigate the blurred legal lines between military and merchant vessels could potentially give China a strategic advantage amidst the fog of war.





Source link