Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro vs. Galaxy Buds 3 Pro: I tried both – here’s who should upgrade


Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro and Galaxy Buds 3 Pro earbuds outside their case.

Prakhar Khanna/ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


Samsung’s Galaxy Buds 3 Pro debuted with a new bud-and-stem design, and now, the company’s Galaxy Buds 4 Pro double down on that design with a more polished look. The blade aesthetic is out for elevated brushed nickel accents. In the process, Samsung also upgraded its sound quality, ANC performance, and comfort. 

The Galaxy Buds 4 Pro can take on industry heavyweights, including the AirPods Pro 3, Sony WF-1000XM6, and Bose QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds 2.

Also: I found true AirPods Pro rivals in these Samsung earbuds – and they’re better in several ways

But should you still consider the last-gen Galaxy Buds 3 Pro? And what’s exactly new with the latest model? I wore them for five days to find out. Here’s which pair of earbuds you should purchase this season.

Specifications

Galaxy Buds 4 Pro Galaxy Buds 3 Pro
Battery life 7 hours (ANC off); 30 hours with charging case 7 hours (ANC off); 30 hours with charging case
IP rating IP57 (dust protected and waterproof; earbuds only) IP57 (dust protected and waterproof; earbuds only)
Additional features Real-Time Interpreter, Bluetooth Super Wideband; voice commands, Siren Detect; LE Audio Real-Time Interpreter, Bluetooth Super Wideband; voice commands, Head Gestures; LE Audio
Price $250 $250


You should buy the Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro if…

Pairing the Galaxy Buds 4 Pro with the Galaxy S26 Ultra.

Prakhar Khanna/ZDNET

1. You want the best sound from Samsung

Both Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro and Buds 3 Pro sound great, but the new iteration has more character. The Buds 4 Pro’s sound is more balanced than that of Bose and Sony, thanks to a new 10.5mm dynamic driver and a 6.1mm planar magnetic tweeter with better tuning this year.

Review: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro

The Buds 4 Pro have less treble emphasis than their predecessors. You can always adjust the EQ to fine-tune your experience, but the Galaxy Buds 4 Pro deliver a wider, airier soundstage that’s more enjoyable. They are the best-sounding Samsung earbuds yet.

2. ANC performance is important to you

The Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 Pro delivered solid ANC performance, but they didn’t compare to the flagship earbuds from Bose, Sony, and Apple. That’s changed this year; the new Galaxy Buds 4 Pro offer improved ANC performance, which is on par with the AirPods Pro 3.

The fourth-gen Samsung earbuds dampen lower frequencies, such as the hum of automotive engines and air conditioners, very well. I also loved its ambient mode, which sounds more natural than last year’s model.

3. You like more premium-looking earbuds

Samsung’s blade design with the Galaxy Buds 3 Pro didn’t last long (RIP… I liked it). The angular blade design was succeeded by a more mainstream-looking Buds 4 Pro. You get a flat stem with a polished finish and easier-to-use controls. These look more premium and classy than their predecessors.

Also: Bose just gave me a compelling reason to put my AirPods Pro away for good

I loved Galaxy Buds 3 Pro’s half-transparent case, and that design element is still present on the Buds 4 Pro, albeit in a new shape. The new Samsung earbuds are more pocketable, thanks to a smaller case, but they’ll both fit your jeans’ penny pocket.

4. You want the latest features

Both Samsung earbuds have a similar feature set, including spatial audio and head gestures. However, if you have a One UI 8.5-running Galaxy phone, you can take advantage of a few new features on the Galaxy Buds 4 Pro. For instance, you get Bluetooth 6.1 support (versus Bluetooth 5.4 on Buds 3 Pro), Seamless codec support with 24-bit/96kHz audio (on compatible Galaxy phones), and impressive noise reduction during calls.

You should buy the Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 Pro if…

Galaxy Buds 3 Pro in White

Jada Jones/ZDNET

1. You like an unorthodox look

The Galaxy Buds 3 Pro weren’t for everybody, thanks to their LED-equipped design and sharp edges. But I’m sure it appeals to some consumers. If you’re one of them and want a pair of Samsung earbuds with a gamer vibe, the Buds 3 Pro are for you.

2. You can find them on sale

The Galaxy Buds 4 Pro cost $249. While they undercut the Bose QC Ultra Earbuds 2 and Sony XM6 earbuds, they aren’t cheap. If you want a more affordable pair of flagship earbuds, keep an eye out for deals on the last-gen Buds 3 Pro. They’re still a good deal if you can find them at around $180.

Writer’s choice

The Galaxy Buds 4 Pro might seem like an iterative upgrade, but for me, they’ve been a significant step up from the last generation of Samsung earbuds. They fit me better, and I prefer the polished metal look to the all-plastic, sharp angles of the Buds 3 Pro. The fourth-gen earbuds are also easier to control and offer significant improvement in voice calls; pair this with their exceptional sound and ANC performance, and you have a winner.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Amazon Fire Phone Jeff Bezos

Bloomberg / Getty Images

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


ZDNET’s key takeaways

  • Amazon is reportedly developing a new Fire Phone.
  • The previous model had several issues, including an inferior app store experience.
  • Under new supervision (and with more experience), Amazon can do better this time.

Well, I don’t know about you, but I certainly didn’t have “new Amazon smartphone” on my 2026 bingo card. As it turns out, according to Reuters, the retailer may be developing a new smartphone, internally known as “Transformer.” 

Those familiar with the industry will instantly draw parallels to Amazon’s previous smartphone effort, the Fire Phone from 2014. Appropriately, that phone ended up as part of a fire sale about a year later.

Now, in 2026, with no fewer than five phone brands in the US — Apple, Samsung, Google, Motorola, and OnePlus — Amazon faces a lot of competition. In fairness, it also has two fewer platforms to compete against. In 2014, Windows Phone and BlackBerry were still very much part of the smartphone conversation; these days, not so much.

The AppStore problem

But there’s one mistake Amazon made in its first effort that will absolutely torpedo its chances at succeeding — the Amazon AppStore and specifically the decision to forego Google Play services. Google is simply too valuable in too many lives to not support the platform. Oh, and the Amazon AppStore is terrible.

Also: What’s right (and wrong) with the Amazon Fire Phone

It has admittedly been a few years since I last inventoried the Amazon AppStore, but when I last checked, the Amazon AppStore was a wasteland of half-supported or unsupported apps, with two notable exceptions. Finance, home control, and communication apps were either absent or had not received updates for years prior.

The only apps in the Amazon AppStore that remained up to date were productivity apps (largely powered by Microsoft) and streaming apps. Those two categories work very well on the cheap, underpowered hardware that Amazon usually launches, and that’s fine. A coffee-table tablet is a nice thing to have lying around.

A spark of hope

Amazon Fire Phone

Liam Tung/ZDNET

But a phone is another animal entirely. If a tablet is a device to entertain, a phone is a device for everything else. One of the key reasons Windows Phone failed was its lack of an app ecosystem. The Senior Vice President of Devices and Services,  Panos Panay, is very familiar with that saga, so I’m hopeful that he will make the same arguments to the powers that be at Amazon. 

Honestly, if there is anyone who I think can pull off an Amazon phone revival, it’s probably Panay, who understands design and product development better than most, and to be perfectly honest, he’s my absolute favorite product presenter.

Also: Amazon Fire Phone review: Not a great smartphone

Of course, all of this is early days. This phone is being worked on internally, and even Reuters reports that it could get the axe long before it sees the light of day. Personally, I’m intrigued by the idea, but I sincerely hope that Amazon doesn’t make this the shopping phone it tried to build in 2014. 

If Amazon just wants to make a nice, well-built smartphone, with a skin that pushes Amazon content to the fore, I’m fine with that. But leaving Google behind is a mistake that Amazon cannot afford to make again. Fool me once, and all that.

So, if this phone is to have a chance at success, it needs to embrace Google services so it can be a phone that everyone can use. Amazon has the brand power to make a phone like this work, even up against juggernauts like Apple and Samsung, but it needs to approach this correctly, lest it end up in yet another Fire phone fire sale.





Source link