Trump and American decline as seen through European eyes


The best way to understand your own country can be to experience it from afar, which I recently had the chance to do while traveling in Germany, the Netherlands, England and Wales. The topic of politics, specifically the current situation in the United States, consumed most of the many hours I spent talking with lifelong friends, colleagues and even strangers.

What I heard was truly alarming and made it clear that it will take years, maybe a generation, to repair the damage done to our country’s standing in the world since President Donald Trump took office again last year. 

Having lived in western Europe on two separate occasions during the Cold War, I’m no stranger to experiencing criticism of the United States. My experience this time was entirely different. I saw genuine fear, disbelief, and horror at what had occurred both domestically and abroad in just the first year of the second Trump administration. 

They’re rightly terrified at our newfound military adventurism based largely on the president’s whims or obsessions on a particular day, which have even extended to threatened attacks on other NATO countries. Against that backdrop, more than one person asked if the United States had learned anything from Europe’s own terrible history of Nazism, fascism and authoritarianism. I didn’t have a great answer.

The line of inquiry I found most depressing was about how, after everything Americans had seen with their own eyes, so many of my fellow citizens had voted for Trump (yet again) in 2024, and how his support among voters never seems to be in danger of collapsing. I attempted to explain the inexplicable — that despite the cruelty, chaos and authoritarianism unleashed by Trump and his enablers, over 40% of American voters still support the president (as shown repeatedly in national polling data), and they always will.

For evidence of this, we need only point to the fact that the president’s approval rating has so far taken no meaningful hit from his shambolic war of choice against Iran, despite it representing the breaking of a key, almost sacred, promise he made to his supporters. 

Europeans have their own far-right, xenophobic political movements to contend with. What sets the U.S. apart, and what people in other countries do not fully appreciate, is that we are almost alone in the liberal democratic world in having such an all-encompassing right-wing media ecosystem supporting these ideologies.

I explained to people that a number of my fellow citizens who continue to support Trump spend large portions of their waking hours watching, listening to, or reading Fox News, conservative talk radio, or extreme online content, and that this has come to shape their entire “Weltanschauung,” a German word that can be loosely translated as “world view” but which has a much more profound meaning, essentially describing a particular individual’s philosophy of life. This cannot be changed easily, no matter how disastrous the resulting decisions (like voting for Trump multiple times) prove to be. 

A bright spot amid these otherwise dismal conversations was the reaction I got when telling people I’m from Minnesota, a place most people in Europe likely couldn’t have found on a map several months ago but which is now globally famous for its resistance to Trump’s authoritarian ambitions, with one of the major German dailies, Die Zeit, even running a headline designating Minneapolis as “The City That Trump Cannot Break.” 

If our country is to reclaim its place as the leader of the free world, we’d better hope that the rest of the country finds the courage to follow our state’s example. The whole world really is watching.

Ted Sherman, of St. Paul, is a global trade and supply chain professional. He studied history and German at the University of Notre Dame and business at the University of Chicago. He’s lived in Europe, speaks German and has traveled to and conducted business in dozens of countries over the years.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews







In the ever-shifting geopolitical sphere, China’s growing military presence and the ongoing tensions over Taiwan and the South China Sea continue to be a closely watched topic — particularly in regard to China’s ambition for naval power. In recent years, much speculation has been made over the country’s rapid military development, including the capabilities of the newest Chinese amphibious assault ships.

While there’s no denying its military advancements and buildup, much has been made about the logistical and military difficulties that China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) would face if it launched an amphibious invasion of Taiwan. However, there’s growing concern that if a Taiwan invasion were to happen, it wouldn’t just be military vessels taking part in the action, but a fleet of commercial vessels, too — including a massive new car ferries that could quickly be repurposed into valuable military transports.

While the possibility of the PLA using commercial vessels for military operations has always been on the table for a potential Taiwan invasion, the scale with which China has been expanding its commercial shipbuilding industry has become a big factor in the PLA’s projection of logistical and military power across the Taiwan Strait. It’s also raised ethical concerns over the idea of putting merchant-marked ships into combat use.

From car ferry to military transport

The rapid growth of modern Chinese industrial capacity is well known, with Chinese electric vehicle factories now able to build a new car every 60 seconds. Likewise, China has developed a massive shipbuilding industry over the last 25 years, with the country now making up more than half of the world’s shipbuilding output. It’s from those two sectors where China’s latest vehicle-carrying super vessels are emerging. 

With a capacity to carry over 10,000 new vehicles for transport from factories in Asia to destinations around the world, these ships, known as roll-on/roll-off (Ro-Ro) ferries, are now the biggest of their type in the world. The concept of the PLA putting civilian ferries into military use is not a new one, or even an idea China is trying to hide. Back in 2021, China held a public military exercise where a civilian ferry was used to transport both troops and a whole arsenal of military vehicles, including main battle tanks.

The relatively limited conventional naval lift capacity of the PLA is something that’s been pointed out while game-planning a Chinese amphibious move on Taiwan, and it’s widely expected that the PLA would lean on repurposed civilian vessels to boost its ability to move soldiers and vehicles across the Taiwan Strait. With these newer, high-capacity Ro-Ro ferries added to the fleet, the PLA’s amphibious capacity and reach could grow significantly.

A makeshift amphibious assault ship

However, even with the added capacity of these massive ferries, military analysts have pointed out that Ro-Ro ships would not be able to deploy vehicles and soliders directly onto a beach the way a purpose-built military amphibious assault ship can. Traditionally, to deploy vehicles from these ships, the PLA would first need to capture and then repurpose Taiwan’s existing commercial port facilities into unloading bases for military vehicles and equipment.

However, maybe most alarming is that satellite imagery and U.S. Intelligence reports show that, along with increasing ferry production output, the PLA is also working on a system of barges and floating dock structures to help turn these civilian ferries into more efficient military transports. With this supporting equipment in place, ferries may not need to use existing port infrastructure to bring their equipment on shore.

Beyond the general military concern over China’s growing amphibious capability, there are also ethical concerns if China is planning to rapidly put a fleet of civilian merchant vessels into military service. If the PLA were to deploy these dual-purpose vessels into direct military operations, the United States and its allies would likely be forced to treat civilian-presenting ships as enemy combatants. On top of all the other strategic challenges a Taiwan invasion would bring, the U.S. having to navigate the blurred legal lines between military and merchant vessels could potentially give China a strategic advantage amidst the fog of war.





Source link