Why I’m ditching my cheap PC cloning software for this M.2 dock that’s highly functional


img-3357.jpg

Icy Box Docking and Clone Station

pros and cons

Pros

  • It’s a dock and a cloning station
  • Simple and reliable “one-button” HDD and SDD cloning
  • Can handle SATA and M.2 SATA/NVMe drives.
Cons

  • Requires external power for cloning
  • No time indicator for how long a cloning process will take.

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


While the average user is unlikely to handle a bare SATA HDD or M.2 drive, anyone who builds or maintains PCs, or runs their own NAS systems, will be familiar with these drives. And there inevitably comes a time when you either want to move data from one drive to another, or you need an easy way to access a bare drive from a computer without dealing with enclosures and the like.

Since I’m working hard to reduce desk clutter, if I can find a tool that does both things, I’ll go for it. And if I can get such a gadget for under $100 (because duplication stations can cost hundreds, or even thousands), then that’s a bonus. 

Also: Should you buy a solid-state battery pack in 2026? My advice after weeks of testing

Enter the Icy Box Docking and CloneStation. Icy Box is a name that’s been around for a very long time — a German brand renowned for its storage systems and RAID devices. If something has the Icy Box name on it, that’s always been a strong indicator of quality.

And this product is no exception. 

It’s a dock… and a cloning station

As the name suggests, this device functions as both a dock and a clone station. To use it as a dock, you attach a drive — the device supports 22/42/60/80mm M.2 SATA and NVMe drives, as well as 2.5-inch and 3.5-inch SATA I/II/III drives — and connect the unit to a computer, and just like that, you have access to the drive.

Check the diagram so you don't try shoving an M.2 drive in the wrong slot!

Check the diagram so you don’t shove an M.2 drive in the wrong slot.

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

The device now acts like any other external storage drive.

No screwdrivers are needed because the entire unit is tool-free — slot the drive into the appropriate connector. The only thing to be cautious about is not forcing an M.2 SATA drive into an NVMe slot or vice versa. If you go into ‘gorilla mode’ and use too much force, there’s a real risk of damaging the drive or the dock.

Also: I measured my stress levels while working with blue light glasses – and was surprised by the results

The dock is compatible with almost any operating system you throw at it, including Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and ChromeOS. 

But docks are a dime a dozen. You can pick up a simple docking station that supports most drives for under $30. What sets this product apart from the competition is its cloning feature.

The dock/cloning station will take SATA and M.2 SATA/NVMe drives.

The dock/cloning station will take SATA and M.2 SATA/NVMe drives.

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Cloning stations can be pricey because they need to be reliable. If something goes wrong and the data you’re copying gets silently corrupted, it’s particularly nasty because you might not discover the issue until you need the data. 

Some cheaper cloning stations avoid this issue by using software on a PC to move the data, but this approach requires dedicating a PC to the task and dealing with cloning software (which can be pretty mind-boggling). 

One-touch cloning

Wouldn’t it be nice to have a simple, one-button, all-in-one solution that quickly and securely moves the data?

Well, that’s exactly what this CloneStation does. And it’s a simple process.

Also: How to fully back up your Windows PC for free (even if it’s working properly today)

You connect the CloneStation to the mains adapter, hook up the drives, flip the switch on the back to set how the data is moved (DO NOT GET THIS STEP WRONG OR YOU COULD LOSE DATA), press the clone button, and away you go.

Make sure this switch is set right!

Make sure this switch is set right.

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

The CloneStation will start humming as it creates an exact bitwise copy of the source drive onto the target drive. Obviously, the target drive needs to be the same size or larger than the source drive, or the cloning process won’t work. 

Cloning can take hours, depending on the size and speed of the drives being copied, so you’ll want to set up this process on a desk. I always find that overnight is best because it removes the temptation to watch, poke, or interfere with the process.

Just leave everything alone.

Is it reliable?

Reliability and accuracy are key for cloning stations, and I’ve tested these concerns extensively with a variety of drives and combinations. 

I’d create a checksum of the source drive (a sort of digital receipt of the data on the drive) and compare it to the target drive after the copy completes. If they matched, the copying was a success. If not, something went wrong. 

Also: I cracked open cheap charging gadgets from Temu – and it was worse than I expected

And things can go wrong, really wrong. A few years ago, I was approached by a company that used a cheap cloner. Some very important data suffered silent bit rot. When the data was subsequently needed, its issues almost torpedoed the entire company.

The good news is that every drive I copied with the Icy Box device was successful, whether it was a quick 500GB, one-hour copy or a multi-terabyte, all-night operation. 

ZDNET’s buying advice

For less than $70, the Icy Box Docking and CloneStation is a great buy for those who want a cloning station for their drives (I just checked, and you can pick it up for $45 on Amazon right now). 

The device is a fast, reliable, easy-to-use hardware-based solution that works incredibly well. The fact that the device also doubles as a very capable docking station is a bonus that keeps it from disappearing into a toolbox or drawer when cloning isn’t needed.  





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


A new class-action lawsuit, filed on Monday by three teenage girls and their guardians, alleges that Elon Musk’s xAI created and distributed child sexual abuse material featuring their faces and likenesses with its Grok AI tech.

“Their lives have been shattered by the devastating loss of privacy, dignity, and personal safety that the production and dissemination of this CSAM have caused,” the filing says. “xAI’s financial gain through the increased use of its image- and video-making product came at their expense and well-being.”

From December to early January, Grok allowed many AI and X social media users to create AI-generated nonconsensual intimate images, sometimes known as deepfake porn. Reports estimate that Grok users made 4.4 million “undressed” or “nudified” images, 41% of the total number of images created, over a period of nine days. 

X, xAI and its safety and child safety divisions did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The wave of “undressed” images stirred outrage around the world. The European Commission quickly launched an investigation, while Malaysia and Indonesia banned X within their borders. Some US government representatives called on Apple and Google to remove the app from their app stores for violating their policies, but no federal investigation into X or xAI has been opened. A similar, separate class-action lawsuit was filed (PDF) by a South Carolina woman in late January.

The dehumanizing trend highlighted just how capable modern AI image tools are at creating content that seems realistic. The new complaint compares Grok’s self-proclaimed “spicy AI” generation to the “dark arts” with its ease of subjecting children to “any pose, however sick, however fetishized, however unlawful.”

“To the viewer, the resulting video appears entirely real. For the child, her identifying features will now forever be attached to a video depicting her own child sexual abuse,” the complaint reads.

AI Atlas

The complaint says xAI is at fault because it did not employ industry-standard guardrails that would prevent abusers from making this content. It says xAI licensed use of its tech to third-party companies abroad, which sold subscriptions that led abusers to make child sexual abuse images featuring the faces and likenesses of the victims. The requests ran through xAI’s servers, which makes the company liable, the complaint argues.

The lawsuit was filed by three Jane Does, pseudonyms given to the teens to protect their identities. Jane Doe 1 was first alerted to the fact that abusive, AI-generated sexual material of her was circulating on the web by an anonymous Instagram message in early December. The filing says she was told about a Discord server by the anonymous Instagram user, where the material was shared. That led Jane Doe 1 and her family, and eventually law enforcement, to find and arrest one perpetrator.

Ongoing investigations led the families of Jane Does 2 and 3 to learn their children’s images had been transformed with xAI tech into abusive material.





Source link