The $30 Google TV stick may be the budget Chromecast successor we’ve been waiting for


chromecast3screenshot-2026-04-10-130726

NurPhoto / Contributor/ NurPhoto via Getty Images

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


ZDNET’s key takeaways

  • A new 4K Onn streaming stick was reportedly spotted at Walmart.
  • It could be an affordable replacement for Google Chromecast.
  • You get 4K support, Dolby Atmos, and Google TV.

It’s been about two years since Google stopped making its Chromecast streaming stick, and if you’ve been looking for a suitable replacement, your answer might finally be here. 

Walmart hasn’t announced anything official, but a new 4K streaming stick (simply called Onn 4K Streaming Device) was apparently spotted at a Walmart store, and first reported by Android Headlines. It’s not clear whether the device was supposed to be available for purchase yet or if this was an accident, but a Reddit user said they were able to purchase one and that it was mixed in with a pile of older sticks without its own price tag.

Also: Should you upgrade your Roku TV in 2026? Only if it’s to these streaming stick models

According to the Reddit post, the device costs just $30, and it supports 4K and Dolby Atmos, voice control with Gemini, and Google Cast. It runs on a quad-core Cortex-A55 CPU and an ARM Mali-G57 GPU, with 2GB of RAM and 8GB of storage. 

How does it compare?

The current 4K Roku Streaming Stick, priced at just over $40, has 1GB of RAM and 16GB of storage, so 2GB should be sufficient for 4K viewing. In addition, video playback itself doesn’t use much RAM, and most streaming apps like Disney+ and Netflix handle 4K just fine. 

There’s no confirmation that this device is for sale at all, aside from a Reddit post, but the box details match the specs revealed by androidtv-guide.com, a trusted online database of technical specifications and certifications. 

Roku Streaming Stick and Streaming Stick Plus

For context, Roku’s current lineup of 4K streaming sticks start with 1GB of RAM.

Maria Diaz/ZDNET

Overall, this is a significant improvement in resolution over the current Onn streaming stick. For comparison, that device, currently priced at $20, maxes out at 1080p, and has 1.5GB of RAM and 8GB of storage. There’s also a current 4K Streaming Device, but it’s more of a square than a compact stick (similar to the Chromecast). 

The biggest advantage of this alleged new Onn stick is that it offers 4K viewing in a compact form, with Google TV instead of Roku, in an affordable package.

Upgrading an older TV

When Google stopped making the Chromecast, it left a gap for people wanting an affordable Google TV dongle. If the details in this Reddit post are accurate, especially the price point, the Onn 4K Streaming Device could be one of the best budget streaming options on the market. 

If you’re looking to upgrade an older TV or prefer the Google ecosystem (some apps, for example, only cast to Google TV), this might be your best option available. 

Also: Why I recommend the Google TV Streamer over competing Roku and Amazon Fire models

The device might officially launch in May, which is when Walmart’s new streaming devices usually drop. If you want to keep an eye out, watch for the Onn 4K Streaming Device box that says, “Google TV with Gemini.”

I’ve reached out to Walmart for comment, and I’ll update with a response. 





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Amazon Fire Phone Jeff Bezos

Bloomberg / Getty Images

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


ZDNET’s key takeaways

  • Amazon is reportedly developing a new Fire Phone.
  • The previous model had several issues, including an inferior app store experience.
  • Under new supervision (and with more experience), Amazon can do better this time.

Well, I don’t know about you, but I certainly didn’t have “new Amazon smartphone” on my 2026 bingo card. As it turns out, according to Reuters, the retailer may be developing a new smartphone, internally known as “Transformer.” 

Those familiar with the industry will instantly draw parallels to Amazon’s previous smartphone effort, the Fire Phone from 2014. Appropriately, that phone ended up as part of a fire sale about a year later.

Now, in 2026, with no fewer than five phone brands in the US — Apple, Samsung, Google, Motorola, and OnePlus — Amazon faces a lot of competition. In fairness, it also has two fewer platforms to compete against. In 2014, Windows Phone and BlackBerry were still very much part of the smartphone conversation; these days, not so much.

The AppStore problem

But there’s one mistake Amazon made in its first effort that will absolutely torpedo its chances at succeeding — the Amazon AppStore and specifically the decision to forego Google Play services. Google is simply too valuable in too many lives to not support the platform. Oh, and the Amazon AppStore is terrible.

Also: What’s right (and wrong) with the Amazon Fire Phone

It has admittedly been a few years since I last inventoried the Amazon AppStore, but when I last checked, the Amazon AppStore was a wasteland of half-supported or unsupported apps, with two notable exceptions. Finance, home control, and communication apps were either absent or had not received updates for years prior.

The only apps in the Amazon AppStore that remained up to date were productivity apps (largely powered by Microsoft) and streaming apps. Those two categories work very well on the cheap, underpowered hardware that Amazon usually launches, and that’s fine. A coffee-table tablet is a nice thing to have lying around.

A spark of hope

Amazon Fire Phone

Liam Tung/ZDNET

But a phone is another animal entirely. If a tablet is a device to entertain, a phone is a device for everything else. One of the key reasons Windows Phone failed was its lack of an app ecosystem. The Senior Vice President of Devices and Services,  Panos Panay, is very familiar with that saga, so I’m hopeful that he will make the same arguments to the powers that be at Amazon. 

Honestly, if there is anyone who I think can pull off an Amazon phone revival, it’s probably Panay, who understands design and product development better than most, and to be perfectly honest, he’s my absolute favorite product presenter.

Also: Amazon Fire Phone review: Not a great smartphone

Of course, all of this is early days. This phone is being worked on internally, and even Reuters reports that it could get the axe long before it sees the light of day. Personally, I’m intrigued by the idea, but I sincerely hope that Amazon doesn’t make this the shopping phone it tried to build in 2014. 

If Amazon just wants to make a nice, well-built smartphone, with a skin that pushes Amazon content to the fore, I’m fine with that. But leaving Google behind is a mistake that Amazon cannot afford to make again. Fool me once, and all that.

So, if this phone is to have a chance at success, it needs to embrace Google services so it can be a phone that everyone can use. Amazon has the brand power to make a phone like this work, even up against juggernauts like Apple and Samsung, but it needs to approach this correctly, lest it end up in yet another Fire phone fire sale.





Source link