As an Android user, this MagSafe wallet is the clearest reason why Qi2 magnets shouldn’t be ignored


vegerx5-1.jpg

Veger X5 5000mAh MagSafe wallet

ZDNET’s key takeaways

  • The Veger X5 is available now for $59.
  • It’s a MagSafe charger, wallet, and tracker with Find My in one.
  • It can only hold a few cards at a time.

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


I am an unapologetic MagSafe fanatic. If it has a circular magnet on it, I want it. I’ve used many MagSafe accessories in my time, including wallets, batteries, and other devices with tracking. But I’ve never used one with all three until now.

Also: These are the closest things to AirTags for Android users (and better in some ways)

The Veger X5 MagSafe wallet and battery is a great match for someone like me. It has a 5,000 mAh MagSafe battery, a kickstand, a wallet that can hold two or three cards (more on that in a moment), and support for Apple’s Find My. I used the Veger X5 for about a week, and it’s like the mother ship calling me home. Except for one complaint — and it’s a big one. 

The wallet’s design is pretty straightforward. The battery pack has the familiar circle of magnets on it for the magnets, there’s a USB-C port on the bottom, a power button, and five pips to show you the charge level. 

Best generators deals of the week

Deals are selected by the CNET Group commerce team, and may be unrelated to this article.

The backplate is attached to the battery with four T5 screws. It has a neat design with a kickstand that can adjust to any angle. When you open the kickstand, you can use the slot where it was as a thumb hole to slide your cards up and out. Overall, it’s a simple and effective design, except for one flaw.

When you attach the Veger X5 to the back of your phone, the battery starts powering your phone (at a max of 20W by the way). But I wonder if merging the functionality of something like a wallet, that’s always there, with a charger — a device you only need sometimes — is a mistake. 

veger x5 magsafe wallet

Adam Doud/ZDNET

What ended up happening was that my iPhone 17 Pro Max never discharged below 100%, and the charger ran out of juice because it was on all day. This point isn’t very intuitive, but if you press the battery’s button twice, it turns off charging until you actually need it. 

Initially, the wallet only held two cards — my credit card and my driver’s license. There are four T5 screws that hold the backplate of the wallet on the battery. I loosened those screws and then re-tightened them, and just like that, I could add my insurance card to the mix. But that wasn’t the biggest problem.

Also: The wireless charger I recommend to hardcore Apple fans costs just $20 (but can do a lot)

The problem I ran into was that the MagSafe magnets on the wallet are extremely weak. When you put it on your phone, it spins pretty freely and tends to slip off. Put your phone in your pocket, and it’s a virtual certainty it’ll slip off. When it does, whether it corrects itself in your pocket or you fix it yourself, the phone starts charging again. I was constantly trying to re-affix the battery to my phone. 

Regardless of this issue, the Veger X5 is proof that Android makers need to get it together with embedding Qi2 magnets for such accessories. The convenience of snapping on a MagSafe charger, kickstand, wallet, or everything all at once is a joy that, currently, only iPhone and some Google Pixel users can enjoy. Now, Samsung, OnePlus, and others need to join the fray.

ZDNET’s buying advice

Ultimately, I couldn’t continue using the Veger X5, which is a shame. It did basically everything I wanted it to, except hold all the cards I like to carry. If you only need to carry one or two cards, however, it could be a lot more practical. Just keep an eye on whether or not it’s draining the battery. Fortunately, there are thousands of other MagSafe chargers on the market for you to consider.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


A new class-action lawsuit, filed on Monday by three teenage girls and their guardians, alleges that Elon Musk’s xAI created and distributed child sexual abuse material featuring their faces and likenesses with its Grok AI tech.

“Their lives have been shattered by the devastating loss of privacy, dignity, and personal safety that the production and dissemination of this CSAM have caused,” the filing says. “xAI’s financial gain through the increased use of its image- and video-making product came at their expense and well-being.”

From December to early January, Grok allowed many AI and X social media users to create AI-generated nonconsensual intimate images, sometimes known as deepfake porn. Reports estimate that Grok users made 4.4 million “undressed” or “nudified” images, 41% of the total number of images created, over a period of nine days. 

X, xAI and its safety and child safety divisions did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The wave of “undressed” images stirred outrage around the world. The European Commission quickly launched an investigation, while Malaysia and Indonesia banned X within their borders. Some US government representatives called on Apple and Google to remove the app from their app stores for violating their policies, but no federal investigation into X or xAI has been opened. A similar, separate class-action lawsuit was filed (PDF) by a South Carolina woman in late January.

The dehumanizing trend highlighted just how capable modern AI image tools are at creating content that seems realistic. The new complaint compares Grok’s self-proclaimed “spicy AI” generation to the “dark arts” with its ease of subjecting children to “any pose, however sick, however fetishized, however unlawful.”

“To the viewer, the resulting video appears entirely real. For the child, her identifying features will now forever be attached to a video depicting her own child sexual abuse,” the complaint reads.

AI Atlas

The complaint says xAI is at fault because it did not employ industry-standard guardrails that would prevent abusers from making this content. It says xAI licensed use of its tech to third-party companies abroad, which sold subscriptions that led abusers to make child sexual abuse images featuring the faces and likenesses of the victims. The requests ran through xAI’s servers, which makes the company liable, the complaint argues.

The lawsuit was filed by three Jane Does, pseudonyms given to the teens to protect their identities. Jane Doe 1 was first alerted to the fact that abusive, AI-generated sexual material of her was circulating on the web by an anonymous Instagram message in early December. The filing says she was told about a Discord server by the anonymous Instagram user, where the material was shared. That led Jane Doe 1 and her family, and eventually law enforcement, to find and arrest one perpetrator.

Ongoing investigations led the families of Jane Does 2 and 3 to learn their children’s images had been transformed with xAI tech into abusive material.





Source link