How To Know If Your Phone Is Getting The Upgrade






Android 17, the next major version of Google’s mobile operating system, is currently undergoing beta testing and is expected to be released to the general public in June 2026. Naturally, Google’s Pixel lineup will be first in line to receive this update. Unlike iOS, which is exclusive to iPhones, Android is an operating system used by countless manufacturers worldwide, and most of them like to add a little fluff of their own. This means your smartphone may get the Android 17 update anywhere from a few days to a few months after Google’s official release.

Of course, this is assuming your phone is set to receive the update in the first place. If your Android phone was released in the past two or three years, there’s a good chance that it will. The Ecodesign Requirements laid out by the European Union require every manufacturer to push operating system updates to its smartphone models for at least five years. Major Android vendors that operate in the U.S. adhere to these guidelines, with certain manufacturers like Google and Samsung going above and beyond to deliver up to seven years of major Android updates.

This means the Galaxy S26, S25, S24, and S23 series are very likely to receive the Android 17 update. This is also probably true of the Galaxy Z Fold 5 and Z Flip 5 and newer, and recent models of the Galaxy A and M-series. As for Google, the company has confirmed every phone and foldable going back to the Pixel 6a will be updated to Android 17.

What about other Android manufacturers?

Plenty of other smartphone manufacturers exist besides Samsung and Google in the Android space. However, not all of them seem to play by the EU’s rulebook — or may have found loopholes. For instance, Nothing currently promises only up to four years of major updates to its recent flagship phones. The Nothing Phone (3) and Phone (4a) series should receive Android 17. The Nothing Phone (1), Phone (2), and the CMF Phone 1 are likely to be skipped.

Motorola’s update policy is all over the place, too. The company’s website does list a software upgrade guide tool, but in our experience, it hasn’t been very helpful in displaying exactly how many years of updates a phone is set to receive. That said, newer models of the Razr and Edge series should get an Android 17 update.

Then there are the likes of OnePlus and Oppo — fortunately they do have clearer software upgrade policies. The former has a community post that details which of its phones will receive new Android updates. OnePlus offers four years of Android updates for its flagship models — so the OnePlus 11, 12, 13, and 15 should get the latest update. Its Nord series gets a little less love, though. Oppo’s flagships also get up to four years of Android updates, while its mid-range and budget-oriented smartphones get fewer. If you own an Oppo Find or Reno-series smartphone from the past two years, you should receive Android 17.

Staying up-to-date with the latest Android version

The sheer number of Android smartphones that are released each year by dozens of manufacturers has led to unavoidable fragmentation. A quick litmus test to see if your phone is eligible for the Android 17 update is to first check if it’s sitting on a newer build of Android 16. If it’s falling behind already, there’s a good chance it won’t see Android 17 either. You can check for updates on your Android smartphone, usually by navigating to Settings > System > Software Update. The exact menu names will differ from smartphone to smartphone.

Some key new features in Android 17 include a way to hide app labels on the home screen, a better way to record your screen, and the ability to use any app in a floating bubble. It’s worth noting that these are all features we’ve seen Google release in the developer builds of Android 17 so far, and the final release may treat these additions differently.

Most Android vendors also slap their own aesthetics on top of stock Android. This means the version of Android 17 on a OnePlus phone running OxygenOS will look very different from what a Pixel smartphone running Google’s Android experience will offer. On a side note, even if your phone isn’t due for the Android 17 upgrade, it likely will continue to receive security updates that are essential for patching exploits.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


A new class-action lawsuit, filed on Monday by three teenage girls and their guardians, alleges that Elon Musk’s xAI created and distributed child sexual abuse material featuring their faces and likenesses with its Grok AI tech.

“Their lives have been shattered by the devastating loss of privacy, dignity, and personal safety that the production and dissemination of this CSAM have caused,” the filing says. “xAI’s financial gain through the increased use of its image- and video-making product came at their expense and well-being.”

From December to early January, Grok allowed many AI and X social media users to create AI-generated nonconsensual intimate images, sometimes known as deepfake porn. Reports estimate that Grok users made 4.4 million “undressed” or “nudified” images, 41% of the total number of images created, over a period of nine days. 

X, xAI and its safety and child safety divisions did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The wave of “undressed” images stirred outrage around the world. The European Commission quickly launched an investigation, while Malaysia and Indonesia banned X within their borders. Some US government representatives called on Apple and Google to remove the app from their app stores for violating their policies, but no federal investigation into X or xAI has been opened. A similar, separate class-action lawsuit was filed (PDF) by a South Carolina woman in late January.

The dehumanizing trend highlighted just how capable modern AI image tools are at creating content that seems realistic. The new complaint compares Grok’s self-proclaimed “spicy AI” generation to the “dark arts” with its ease of subjecting children to “any pose, however sick, however fetishized, however unlawful.”

“To the viewer, the resulting video appears entirely real. For the child, her identifying features will now forever be attached to a video depicting her own child sexual abuse,” the complaint reads.

AI Atlas

The complaint says xAI is at fault because it did not employ industry-standard guardrails that would prevent abusers from making this content. It says xAI licensed use of its tech to third-party companies abroad, which sold subscriptions that led abusers to make child sexual abuse images featuring the faces and likenesses of the victims. The requests ran through xAI’s servers, which makes the company liable, the complaint argues.

The lawsuit was filed by three Jane Does, pseudonyms given to the teens to protect their identities. Jane Doe 1 was first alerted to the fact that abusive, AI-generated sexual material of her was circulating on the web by an anonymous Instagram message in early December. The filing says she was told about a Discord server by the anonymous Instagram user, where the material was shared. That led Jane Doe 1 and her family, and eventually law enforcement, to find and arrest one perpetrator.

Ongoing investigations led the families of Jane Does 2 and 3 to learn their children’s images had been transformed with xAI tech into abusive material.





Source link