Home Depot Is Selling A Heavy-Duty Weed Puller Tool For Under $50







We may receive a commission on purchases made from links.

As sure as spring brings warmer weather and blooming flowers to the world, it also brings with it something that most yard warriors dread: weeds. Thankfully, there are many ways to remove these pesky growths that pop up in the spring and ugly up your yard and flower beds. Thankfully, there are many ways to remove weeds, ranging from shovels, trowels, and chemicals to the often-overlooked weed torches.

If you’ve got the money, you might even be able to hire robots with lasers to blast away your weed worries. However, most homeowners will no doubt opt for a more traditional method of weed removal, one of which may be a weeding device like Fiskars’ stand-up four-claw weed puller. If you’re unfamiliar with weed-pulling tools, they help users remove weeds from lawns and beds by plunging “claws” into the ground and plucking the unsightly weed from the soil. The Fiskars tool performs as such with little effort, its four claws securing and pulling weeds with a mere tilting back of the device at the point of removal. 

This convenience can be had for cheap, too: You can currently purchase the device for under $50 through Home Depot, where it’s listed for $48.98. That feels like a small price to pay for a back- and knee-saving device like this, and if you spend much time working in the yard, you know you really can’t put a price on that.

What users are saying about the Fiskars Weed Puller

The Fiskars weed puller is backed by a lifetime warranty, which makes its current sale price more appealing. Despite that, you’d be wise to do a little research on the Fiskars weed puller before you add it to your cart and head to checkout. According to users who’ve purchased the device from Home Depot, there are some factors to consider if you’re looking to add the weed puller to your lawn care arsenal, as it currently has a decent but not outstanding 4.3 out of 5-star rating from over 1,450 reviews.

For the record, the reviews are largely positive with 1,196 reviewers leaving four- or five-star reviews. Not surprisingly, ease of use is a common point of praise for the weed puller, with owners appreciating that it functions without the need to bend over and allows a user to manage weeds without even touching them. 

Many also point out the weed-puller’s low weight as a positive, though the plastic components that help keep the device light have led several others to question its heavy-duty claims. In fact, more than a few customers who’ve purchased the Fiskars weed puller claim it broke very quickly, with some even noting that their weed puller didn’t make it past the very first use. Despite those complaints, BobVila.com named the four-claw Fiskars weed puller the best one on the market.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


A new class-action lawsuit, filed on Monday by three teenage girls and their guardians, alleges that Elon Musk’s xAI created and distributed child sexual abuse material featuring their faces and likenesses with its Grok AI tech.

“Their lives have been shattered by the devastating loss of privacy, dignity, and personal safety that the production and dissemination of this CSAM have caused,” the filing says. “xAI’s financial gain through the increased use of its image- and video-making product came at their expense and well-being.”

From December to early January, Grok allowed many AI and X social media users to create AI-generated nonconsensual intimate images, sometimes known as deepfake porn. Reports estimate that Grok users made 4.4 million “undressed” or “nudified” images, 41% of the total number of images created, over a period of nine days. 

X, xAI and its safety and child safety divisions did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The wave of “undressed” images stirred outrage around the world. The European Commission quickly launched an investigation, while Malaysia and Indonesia banned X within their borders. Some US government representatives called on Apple and Google to remove the app from their app stores for violating their policies, but no federal investigation into X or xAI has been opened. A similar, separate class-action lawsuit was filed (PDF) by a South Carolina woman in late January.

The dehumanizing trend highlighted just how capable modern AI image tools are at creating content that seems realistic. The new complaint compares Grok’s self-proclaimed “spicy AI” generation to the “dark arts” with its ease of subjecting children to “any pose, however sick, however fetishized, however unlawful.”

“To the viewer, the resulting video appears entirely real. For the child, her identifying features will now forever be attached to a video depicting her own child sexual abuse,” the complaint reads.

AI Atlas

The complaint says xAI is at fault because it did not employ industry-standard guardrails that would prevent abusers from making this content. It says xAI licensed use of its tech to third-party companies abroad, which sold subscriptions that led abusers to make child sexual abuse images featuring the faces and likenesses of the victims. The requests ran through xAI’s servers, which makes the company liable, the complaint argues.

The lawsuit was filed by three Jane Does, pseudonyms given to the teens to protect their identities. Jane Doe 1 was first alerted to the fact that abusive, AI-generated sexual material of her was circulating on the web by an anonymous Instagram message in early December. The filing says she was told about a Discord server by the anonymous Instagram user, where the material was shared. That led Jane Doe 1 and her family, and eventually law enforcement, to find and arrest one perpetrator.

Ongoing investigations led the families of Jane Does 2 and 3 to learn their children’s images had been transformed with xAI tech into abusive material.





Source link