DJI Osmo Pocket 4 Is a Great Vlogging Camera, but Not for the US


I’ve filmed with my DJI Osmo Pocket 3 all over the world, including up in the frozen Arctic, so I was excited to test out the latest version, the Osmo Pocket 4. The camera doesn’t make a lot of changes to what’s already a superb vlogging setup, but there are some key upgrades, from better dynamic range to a suite of new filmic color profiles. 

I’ve been using the camera for a few days, and I’m pleased with what I’ve seen so far. But before I get to the details, I must address the elephant in the room: It won’t be officially on sale in the US when it launches. It’s a murky situation; while DJI’s drones have been banned for sale in the US, the company’s other products are subject to FCC regulations that, at the very least, delay their launch.

DJI’s Osmo Nano, for example, still isn’t sold directly via DJI’s online store, but you can pick it up in major retailers like Best Buy and B&H Photo. For the Pocket 4, DJI states it “will not be available in the US market as the application for authorization is still pending.” The word “pending” suggests that the situation could change, but as of right now, it might be tough to get hold of for US shoppers. And, even if you do get your hands on one, service and support could prove tricky.

dji-osmo-pocket-4-review-5

There are two new buttons beneath the display; a digital zoom button that crops in 2x and a custom function button you can program to enable a variety of settings.

Andrew Lanxon/CNET

In the UK, the Pocket 4 will start at £445, and a Creator Combo (including an attachable fill light, wireless mic and battery handle) will set you back £549. For reference, those UK prices translate to $604 and $745, respectively. 

DJI Osmo Pocket 4: What’s new

Physically, you’d struggle to tell the difference between the new model and its predecessor. It’s marginally bigger, but it maintains the 2-inch rotating LCD and the camera unit mounted on the gimbal above. The camera has the same 20mm field of view with the same f2 aperture. Beyond that, a lot has changed. 

The camera still uses a 1-inch image sensor, but it’s a new version that offers up to 14 stops of dynamic range for better results in high-contrast situations. Its resolution maxes out at 4K (like before), but it’ll now shoot at up to 240 frames per second for silky smooth slow motion. 

There’s a variety of new color profiles built in, designed to help you get a cool-looking filmic tone for your clips without having to apply filters or presets in post-production — just pick a tone and hit record. Or if you take your color grading more seriously, it’ll shoot in 10-bit D-Log for greater flexibility than its predecessor offered. 

dji-osmo-pocket-4-review-3

A clip-on fill light is available as part of the Creator Combo. It could be handy for those times when you’re trying to record a vlog in darkness. Perhaps when exploring a haunted house. 

Andrew Lanxon/CNET

I’ve had a play with the presets and they’re fun. A little much for my tastes, though you can turn the intensity down to look more natural. I think these are great for quick footage, but if I were shooting a more involved project where I know I want the best possible quality, I’d shoot everything in D-Log to apply my own filmic tones later — and have full control over them as a result. 

Despite the aperture remaining the same, DJI reckons the Pocket 4 has superior low-light performance, thanks to advances in image processing. I’ve not had a chance to take it out in the dark yet, but I’m looking forward to putting the old and the new side by side. There’s also a new slow-shutter video mode for creative nighttime shooting, which again sounds like a fun thing to play around with. 

The Pocket 4 has a slightly larger battery than the Pocket 3 (1,545 mAh, up from 1,300 mAh), along with fast charging support, which will apparently take it from empty to 80% full in just 18 minutes. It also has 100GB of built-in storage, unlike the Pocket 3. I love this: I can’t remember how many times I’ve grabbed my camera for a day’s filming only to later realize I left the microSD card back in my computer. 

dji-osmo-pocket-4-review-2

The 100GB of built-in storage is great for those occasions when you go out without a microSD card to hand. I do that often.

Andrew Lanxon/CNET

DJI Osmo Pocket 4 Pro: Where’s the dual-lens model?

The Osmo Pocket 4 I’ve been testing is broadly similar to the Pocket 3, but with most specs bumped up slightly. But the rumor mill has been churning for months about a “Pro” version of the Pocket 4, which, according to alleged “leaked photos,” will feature a larger camera module with multiple lenses — likely including a telephoto zoom option, similar to the multilens setups seen on most phone cameras.

DJI has remained silent on the matter, with no mention of a Pro model in its launch materials; whether this more full-featured camera ever arrives remains to be seen. Personally, I’d love to see a Pro version feature an even bigger sensor and even interchangeable lenses, as DJI offers with its Ronin 4D. I won’t hold my breath, though. 

dji-osmo-pocket-4-review-4

The various filmic color profiles are handy for adding a bit of extra flair to your footage.

Andrew Lanxon/CNET

DJI Osmo Pocket 4: Should you buy it?

If you already have the Pocket 3, I don’t think there’s a significant reason to upgrade to the new model (which is good news for potential buyers in the US). Sure, you might see marginal gains in dynamic range and perhaps battery life, but otherwise the video you’ll be capturing will be broadly the same. 

However, if you’re still using the much older Osmo Pocket 2, or if you’re considering getting one for the first time ahead of your upcoming summer vacation, then the Pocket 4 has a lot going for it. I’ll be spending a lot more time testing it over the coming weeks and months to see how well it performs in both pro and enthusiast environments and how it compares with its new rivals, the Mission 1 series from GoPro. 





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


A new class-action lawsuit, filed on Monday by three teenage girls and their guardians, alleges that Elon Musk’s xAI created and distributed child sexual abuse material featuring their faces and likenesses with its Grok AI tech.

“Their lives have been shattered by the devastating loss of privacy, dignity, and personal safety that the production and dissemination of this CSAM have caused,” the filing says. “xAI’s financial gain through the increased use of its image- and video-making product came at their expense and well-being.”

From December to early January, Grok allowed many AI and X social media users to create AI-generated nonconsensual intimate images, sometimes known as deepfake porn. Reports estimate that Grok users made 4.4 million “undressed” or “nudified” images, 41% of the total number of images created, over a period of nine days. 

X, xAI and its safety and child safety divisions did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The wave of “undressed” images stirred outrage around the world. The European Commission quickly launched an investigation, while Malaysia and Indonesia banned X within their borders. Some US government representatives called on Apple and Google to remove the app from their app stores for violating their policies, but no federal investigation into X or xAI has been opened. A similar, separate class-action lawsuit was filed (PDF) by a South Carolina woman in late January.

The dehumanizing trend highlighted just how capable modern AI image tools are at creating content that seems realistic. The new complaint compares Grok’s self-proclaimed “spicy AI” generation to the “dark arts” with its ease of subjecting children to “any pose, however sick, however fetishized, however unlawful.”

“To the viewer, the resulting video appears entirely real. For the child, her identifying features will now forever be attached to a video depicting her own child sexual abuse,” the complaint reads.

AI Atlas

The complaint says xAI is at fault because it did not employ industry-standard guardrails that would prevent abusers from making this content. It says xAI licensed use of its tech to third-party companies abroad, which sold subscriptions that led abusers to make child sexual abuse images featuring the faces and likenesses of the victims. The requests ran through xAI’s servers, which makes the company liable, the complaint argues.

The lawsuit was filed by three Jane Does, pseudonyms given to the teens to protect their identities. Jane Doe 1 was first alerted to the fact that abusive, AI-generated sexual material of her was circulating on the web by an anonymous Instagram message in early December. The filing says she was told about a Discord server by the anonymous Instagram user, where the material was shared. That led Jane Doe 1 and her family, and eventually law enforcement, to find and arrest one perpetrator.

Ongoing investigations led the families of Jane Does 2 and 3 to learn their children’s images had been transformed with xAI tech into abusive material.





Source link