3 Michelin Warranty Conditions You Should Know Before You Buy






Michelin is one of the highest-ranked major tire brands today. But people don’t always buy a new set of tires based on brand name alone. For some, it’s also about the kind of protection you get after purchase. For Michelin, that protection comes from the Michelin Promise Plan. It’s a bundled set of warranty benefits that looks pretty comprehensive from the outside. But on closer inspection, it actually has a very strict set of terms and conditions you have to respect if you want to enjoy that coverage.

Overall, the Michelin Promise Plan has three big benefits: a 60-day satisfaction guarantee, three years of free roadside assistance, and some limited mileage and workmanship warranties, too. But eligibility depends on you meeting some very specific requirements. Without checking those boxes, your Michelin Promise Plan is basically null and void. Lucky for you, we did a deep dive into all the fine print.

Requirements of the 60-day satisfaction guarantee

The 60-day satisfaction guarantee is basically the backbone of the Michelin Promise Plan. It says if you’re not completely satisfied with your tires, you can return them within 60 days for a free exchange. It’s part of the great customer service Michelin is known for, but it’s not quite as simple as it sounds. As it turns out, that flexible-looking return window looks a lot less generous once you factor in the terms and conditions of it all.

To qualify for an exchange, you need to take the tires back to the place you bought them. Not just any Michelin retailer will do. You’ll need to bring the original sales receipt, as well, so don’t lose it. Unsurprisingly, the replacement set also has to be of equal or lesser value. (Basically, you can’t try to sneak your way into an upgrade without paying the difference.) The guarantee also only applies to replacement passenger and light truck tires. Other Michelin tires have a different set of rules that exist outside the Michelin Promise Plan.

Limits of the roadside assistance program

Michelin’s roadside assistance program is another huge draw of the Promise Plan. It says you get support 24 hours a day, 365 days a year for three whole years after purchase. That includes flat tire changes, fluid delivery, lockout assistance, battery jump-starts, and towing, just to name a handful. But there’s a catch: Like the satisfaction guarantee, you only get free roadside assistance if you meet the terms and conditions.

The biggest one is this: only passenger cars and light trucks get free roadside assistance. No trailers, no RVs, and no commercial vehicles of any kind. Also, Michelin will only give you a tow if you don’t have a usable spare tire available. Even then, Michelin will only cover your towing costs up to 150 miles. You have to be towed to the nearest approved tire retailer, as well. It doesn’t cover the actual repair or replacement cost of a damaged tire, either, just the immediate roadside issue.

Mileage warranties vary by tire type

The Michelin Promise Plan also comes with a limited mileage warranty. It’s far from universal, though. Looking at the fine print, the warranty coverage you get will depend entirely on your specific tire model. Some tires carry that coveted Michelin 80,000-mile warranty, while others (like high-performance or specialty tires) come with way less than that. Not knowing what’s covered could mean the difference between a free replacement and a big bill.

Take vehicles with split fitments, for example. Because these cars have different tire sizes on their front and rear axles, they only get half the standard mileage warranty. The company says this is because they can’t be rotated as recommended. Another example: Zero-pressure or run-flat tires. Michelin gives these a hard cap of 30,000 miles, even if the standard version of the same tire comes with more coverage. That’s a long way off from the advertised 80,000 miles.

Other things to be aware of before you buy

We’ll leave you with this: a lightning round of other terms and conditions. Michelin says Original Equipment tires from 2018 model years and newer are excluded from mileage warranties. Classic tires and DOT-approved competition tires (like its performance-focused ones) don’t get warranty benefits, either. Tires used on farming, ranching, agriculture, racing, or off-road service vehicles are ineligible for most Promise Plan protections, as well. Even certain light truck tires may fall outside standard coverage if they’re being used for commercial driving.

Winter tires need proof of seasonal installation and removal to get treadwear warranty coverage. (Michelin defines “winter usage” as no earlier than September 1 and no later than April 30.) Without that proof, any claims you make on treadwear will probably get denied.

As a final point, Michelin’s standard limited warranty covers workmanship and materials and applies for the life of the original usable tread or up to six years from the date of purchase. It’s whichever comes first. That means that even lightly used tires can lose coverage faster than they lose tread depth.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


A new class-action lawsuit, filed on Monday by three teenage girls and their guardians, alleges that Elon Musk’s xAI created and distributed child sexual abuse material featuring their faces and likenesses with its Grok AI tech.

“Their lives have been shattered by the devastating loss of privacy, dignity, and personal safety that the production and dissemination of this CSAM have caused,” the filing says. “xAI’s financial gain through the increased use of its image- and video-making product came at their expense and well-being.”

From December to early January, Grok allowed many AI and X social media users to create AI-generated nonconsensual intimate images, sometimes known as deepfake porn. Reports estimate that Grok users made 4.4 million “undressed” or “nudified” images, 41% of the total number of images created, over a period of nine days. 

X, xAI and its safety and child safety divisions did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The wave of “undressed” images stirred outrage around the world. The European Commission quickly launched an investigation, while Malaysia and Indonesia banned X within their borders. Some US government representatives called on Apple and Google to remove the app from their app stores for violating their policies, but no federal investigation into X or xAI has been opened. A similar, separate class-action lawsuit was filed (PDF) by a South Carolina woman in late January.

The dehumanizing trend highlighted just how capable modern AI image tools are at creating content that seems realistic. The new complaint compares Grok’s self-proclaimed “spicy AI” generation to the “dark arts” with its ease of subjecting children to “any pose, however sick, however fetishized, however unlawful.”

“To the viewer, the resulting video appears entirely real. For the child, her identifying features will now forever be attached to a video depicting her own child sexual abuse,” the complaint reads.

AI Atlas

The complaint says xAI is at fault because it did not employ industry-standard guardrails that would prevent abusers from making this content. It says xAI licensed use of its tech to third-party companies abroad, which sold subscriptions that led abusers to make child sexual abuse images featuring the faces and likenesses of the victims. The requests ran through xAI’s servers, which makes the company liable, the complaint argues.

The lawsuit was filed by three Jane Does, pseudonyms given to the teens to protect their identities. Jane Doe 1 was first alerted to the fact that abusive, AI-generated sexual material of her was circulating on the web by an anonymous Instagram message in early December. The filing says she was told about a Discord server by the anonymous Instagram user, where the material was shared. That led Jane Doe 1 and her family, and eventually law enforcement, to find and arrest one perpetrator.

Ongoing investigations led the families of Jane Does 2 and 3 to learn their children’s images had been transformed with xAI tech into abusive material.





Source link