DuckDuckGo is a search engine and a mobile and desktop browser, but with a DuckDuckGo subscription, a VPN is also included. The company has always promised complete privacy under its VPN, but now it has the data to back it up.
DuckDuckGo says its VPN underwent a “no-log policy audit” from the independent cybersecurity firm Securitum.
“Between October 2025 and January 2026, Securitum performed a deep-dive technical inspection, a source code review of proprietary components, and a live system analysis to verify that DuckDuckGo does not collect or retain user-identifiable data,” the company announced Thursday.
The results showed that DuckDuckGo doesn’t track VPN browsing activity, and that the company’s no-log policy is applied as promised. This means you can be confident that your private browsing is actually private. The full security report (PDF) was also shared.
A VPN, or virtual private network, hides your information while browsing and using the internet, and makes your data more secure. It also allows you to change your location as it appears to the sites and services you use, a feature often used to unlock content libraries around the world. Reputable VPN companies engage independent analysts to verify their privacy claims as a matter of good practice.
The DuckDuckGo subscription offers a competitively priced cybersecurity bundle that includes a VPN, identity theft protection, data removal service and more. The company’s VPN previously went through a security audit in 2024, with retests in 2025 that confirmed the service had fixed all vulnerabilities of medium risk or higher. This new audit focused on the privacy practices of DuckDuckGo’s VPN, which may make it more appealing to those who truly value their online privacy.
The previous model had several issues, including an inferior app store experience.
Under new supervision (and with more experience), Amazon can do better this time.
Well, I don’t know about you, but I certainly didn’t have “new Amazon smartphone” on my 2026 bingo card. As it turns out, according to Reuters, the retailer may be developing a new smartphone, internally known as “Transformer.”
Those familiar with the industry will instantly draw parallels to Amazon’s previous smartphone effort, the Fire Phone from 2014. Appropriately, that phone ended up as part of a fire sale about a year later.
Now, in 2026, with no fewer than five phone brands in the US — Apple, Samsung, Google, Motorola, and OnePlus — Amazon faces a lot of competition. In fairness, it also has two fewer platforms to compete against. In 2014, Windows Phone and BlackBerry were still very much part of the smartphone conversation; these days, not so much.
The AppStore problem
But there’s one mistake Amazon made in its first effort that will absolutely torpedo its chances at succeeding — the Amazon AppStore and specifically the decision to forego Google Play services. Google is simply too valuable in too many lives to not support the platform. Oh, and the Amazon AppStore is terrible.
It has admittedly been a few years since I last inventoried the Amazon AppStore, but when I last checked, the Amazon AppStore was a wasteland of half-supported or unsupported apps, with two notable exceptions. Finance, home control, and communication apps were either absent or had not received updates for years prior.
The only apps in the Amazon AppStore that remained up to date were productivity apps (largely powered by Microsoft) and streaming apps. Those two categories work very well on the cheap, underpowered hardware that Amazon usually launches, and that’s fine. A coffee-table tablet is a nice thing to have lying around.
A spark of hope
Liam Tung/ZDNET
But a phone is another animal entirely. If a tablet is a device to entertain, a phone is a device for everything else. One of the key reasons Windows Phone failed was its lack of an app ecosystem. The Senior Vice President of Devices and Services, Panos Panay, is very familiar with that saga, so I’m hopeful that he will make the same arguments to the powers that be at Amazon.
Honestly, if there is anyone who I think can pull off an Amazon phone revival, it’s probably Panay, who understands design and product development better than most, and to be perfectly honest, he’s my absolute favorite product presenter.
Of course, all of this is early days. This phone is being worked on internally, and even Reuters reports that it could get the axe long before it sees the light of day. Personally, I’m intrigued by the idea, but I sincerely hope that Amazon doesn’t make this the shopping phone it tried to build in 2014.
If Amazon just wants to make a nice, well-built smartphone, with a skin that pushes Amazon content to the fore, I’m fine with that. But leaving Google behind is a mistake that Amazon cannot afford to make again. Fool me once, and all that.
So, if this phone is to have a chance at success, it needs to embrace Google services so it can be a phone that everyone can use. Amazon has the brand power to make a phone like this work, even up against juggernauts like Apple and Samsung, but it needs to approach this correctly, lest it end up in yet another Fire phone fire sale.
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.