I traded my Sonos Era 300 for Denon’s new home speaker – and see no reason to go back


home400cld-2.jpg

pros and cons

Pros

  • Hi-res audio support
  • Multi-room integration
  • Dolby Atmos support
Cons

  • More expensive than competitors
  • Vague EQ settings

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


Sonos has perhaps been the most recognized name in the home speaker market for some time, but Denon has something to say about that. The company recently launched its lineup of second-generation home speakers: the Denon Home 200, Home 400, and Home 600.

The Denon Home 400 is the mid-tier option in the lineup, and it’s designed to go head-to-head with the Sonos Era 300. It has a similar, larger form factor, up-firing Dolby Atmos speakers, and a slew of smart streaming features. It’s also built on the company’s HEOS multi-room audio platform, for integration with speakers from other HEOS-compatible lineups.

Also: I replaced my Sonos Era speakers with an unlikely alternative – and didn’t miss a beat

Sonos has spent years refining its smart speaker offerings, and the Era 300 is an excellent example of where it’s landed. Can Denon truly take on the likes of Sonos with competitive alternatives? I’ve been using the Denon Home 400 to find out.

Best bluetooth speaker deals of the week

Deals are selected by the CNET Group commerce team, and may be unrelated to this article.

It’s actually very smart

The HEOS multi-room platform runs things behind the scenes, and it handles things like streaming, the app experience, and so on quite well. I actually found it supported all the features I’ve come to rely on in my Sonos speakers. HEOS natively supports several music streaming platforms, including Tidal, Qobuz, Amazon Music, and more, while Apple Music connectivity relies on the speaker’s AirPlay 2. 

The Home 400 works perfectly well on its own, but you can also pair two for stereo playback or use them as wireless surround speakers alongside the Denon Home Sound Bar 550. That option is especially helpful if you want to build out a proper living room setup without running speaker wire everywhere — and it mirrors Sonos’ implementation with its soundbars. Denon also supports HEOS-compatible subwoofers for extra low-end muscle.

Denon Home 400 in Stone

Christian de Looper/ZDNET

For physical connections, there’s Wi-Fi, a USB-C port, a 3.5mm aux input, and a built-in microphone. While the HEOS ecosystem might not be as well-built as Sonos’s, in day-to-day use, HEOS works pretty well. Setup is easy, multi-room grouping is dependable, and you’ve got coverage across the major streaming services.

Music sounds excellent

Inside the Home 400, you’ll find six drivers total, including two tweeters, two 114mm (4.5-inch) woofers, and two up-firing drivers dedicated to height information. Every single one of those drivers gets its own dedicated Class D amplifier, giving the speaker precise control over each element of the sound. 

This acoustic makeup is a major upgrade over the previous-generation Home 250, which had fewer drivers and couldn’t do anything close to true Atmos playback. The Home 400 is actually the first HEOS-enabled speaker to support real Dolby Atmos music playback, using physical upfiring drivers rather than virtualized height effects.

Also: Tidal vs. Qobuz: I tried both hi-res streaming services, and they couldn’t be more different

You can hear the difference in compatible content, too. Whether you actually want to use Atmos while listening to music is another story. I sometimes find it enjoyable, but I usually prefer to stick to stereo playback. However, Atmos support does really help when you use these speakers as surrounds in a home theater setup. The immersion of 3D audio is noticeable from the surround speakers and the front channels, which can work together to enhance the height effect.

You can control the speaker’s frequency range, but it’s not very precise. To be clear, Sonos doesn’t give you very precise control either, so if you’re comparing the two, this isn’t necessarily a big drawback for this speaker specifically. You will get basic bass, treble, and height controls, so you can make heavy-handed adjustments, but the controls are a little hard to find. 

Denon Home 400

Jada Jones/ZDNET

I spent a while digging through settings before realizing I had to actually be playing audio through the speaker to control the adjustments. Once you get an understanding of the app and how it works, you’ll find it mostly easy to navigate, but it’s still not very intuitive.

If you’re an audio nerd, you’ll appreciate the better support for hi-res audio on the Denon Home 400. The Home 400 can play full 24-bit/192kHz audio natively, and if you play audio through the USB port, you can play your FLAC files. That’s ahead of the Sonos Era 300, which can accept 24-bit/192kHz audio as an input but downscales it during playback.

ZDNET’s buying advice

The Denon Home 400 is a serious home speaker that somewhat blurs the line between consumer-grade and audiophile speakers in the sub-$500 price range. True audiophiles with deep pockets won’t consider the Home 400 an audiophile-grade speaker, but casual listeners will appreciate its sound.

Also: Sonos Play vs. Sonos Move 2: Why I’d go with the $200 cheaper Bluetooth speaker

If you’re looking for immersive and full-sounding audio without paying a high price, the Denon Home 400 is absolutely worth considering. That said, whether it beats alternatives depends on your region. In some regions, like Europe, it costs the same as the Sonos Era 300, but in the US, it costs $150 more. Most people looking for a smart speaker in this class will want to save the cash and go for the Era 300, especially if they don’t care about better high-res playback.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


A new class-action lawsuit, filed on Monday by three teenage girls and their guardians, alleges that Elon Musk’s xAI created and distributed child sexual abuse material featuring their faces and likenesses with its Grok AI tech.

“Their lives have been shattered by the devastating loss of privacy, dignity, and personal safety that the production and dissemination of this CSAM have caused,” the filing says. “xAI’s financial gain through the increased use of its image- and video-making product came at their expense and well-being.”

From December to early January, Grok allowed many AI and X social media users to create AI-generated nonconsensual intimate images, sometimes known as deepfake porn. Reports estimate that Grok users made 4.4 million “undressed” or “nudified” images, 41% of the total number of images created, over a period of nine days. 

X, xAI and its safety and child safety divisions did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The wave of “undressed” images stirred outrage around the world. The European Commission quickly launched an investigation, while Malaysia and Indonesia banned X within their borders. Some US government representatives called on Apple and Google to remove the app from their app stores for violating their policies, but no federal investigation into X or xAI has been opened. A similar, separate class-action lawsuit was filed (PDF) by a South Carolina woman in late January.

The dehumanizing trend highlighted just how capable modern AI image tools are at creating content that seems realistic. The new complaint compares Grok’s self-proclaimed “spicy AI” generation to the “dark arts” with its ease of subjecting children to “any pose, however sick, however fetishized, however unlawful.”

“To the viewer, the resulting video appears entirely real. For the child, her identifying features will now forever be attached to a video depicting her own child sexual abuse,” the complaint reads.

AI Atlas

The complaint says xAI is at fault because it did not employ industry-standard guardrails that would prevent abusers from making this content. It says xAI licensed use of its tech to third-party companies abroad, which sold subscriptions that led abusers to make child sexual abuse images featuring the faces and likenesses of the victims. The requests ran through xAI’s servers, which makes the company liable, the complaint argues.

The lawsuit was filed by three Jane Does, pseudonyms given to the teens to protect their identities. Jane Doe 1 was first alerted to the fact that abusive, AI-generated sexual material of her was circulating on the web by an anonymous Instagram message in early December. The filing says she was told about a Discord server by the anonymous Instagram user, where the material was shared. That led Jane Doe 1 and her family, and eventually law enforcement, to find and arrest one perpetrator.

Ongoing investigations led the families of Jane Does 2 and 3 to learn their children’s images had been transformed with xAI tech into abusive material.





Source link