How Much Fuel It Would Take For An F-35A To Fly From The US To China?







The F-35A is one of the most advanced fighter jets in the world, and there are several F-35 variants that all play a critical part in the United States military strategy. The fifth-generation fighter is operated by many of the world’s air forces, and the F-35A variant is specifically intended for stealth and combat missions. While these jets are not exactly designed with long-haul efficiency as a priority, they sometimes fly long missions or cross entire oceans. This begs the question: Just how much fuel would an F-35A burn on a flight from the U.S. to China? 

The answer to this question depends on a few factors, including the flight route. Both China and the U.S. are massive countries, so we need to narrow down a start and end point for the journey. A realistic starting point for the flight could be the Eielson Air Force Base in Alaska. This base operates the F-35A and has a Pacific-oriented mission. Let’s also assume that this is a diplomatic mission and the flight is due to land in the Shanghai Hongqiao International Airport. With that established, we can plan a flight that takes the shortest route between the two points — a distance of 4,334 miles. 

Of course, this is a distance that is far greater than the F-35A’s range, so mid-air refueling would be needed several times in this hypothetical scenario. Using the aircraft’s range and fuel capacity, along with the distance between airports, we can calculate a rough estimate of how much fuel the F-35A would burn through. Even assuming the jet is flying under ideal conditions with no headwinds or other adverse conditions to consider, it would still use thousands of gallons of fuel to make this trip.

Traveling to China from the U.S. with an F-35A would be an expensive trip

The F-35A can carry a maximum of 18,250 pounds of fuel and has a range of 1,200 nautical miles (or 1,350 miles). Dividing the total distance traveled (4,334) by the aircraft’s range (1,350) will tell us how many loads of fuel it would need for the journey (3.21). Multiply that number by the jet’s maximum fuel capacity of 18,250 pounds, and we can determine the plane would burn a total of 58,582 pounds of fuel. That means the aircraft would need to be refueled more than three times.

This is a big figure, but it’s also expressed in pounds. For the layman used to putting a few gallons in the tank of their car, there probably isn’t much context here. Assuming the flight used Jet-1A fuel, which has a density of 6.7 pounds per U.S. gallon, we can establish that such a flight would use a staggering 8,743 gallons of aviation fuel. Of course, we didn’t factor in the speed of the aircraft or air conditions that could affect this number in this back-of-the-napkin approach. We can still certainly tell, however, that this wouldn’t be a flight you’d want to repeat too often given the current price of fuel.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Amazon Fire Phone Jeff Bezos

Bloomberg / Getty Images

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


ZDNET’s key takeaways

  • Amazon is reportedly developing a new Fire Phone.
  • The previous model had several issues, including an inferior app store experience.
  • Under new supervision (and with more experience), Amazon can do better this time.

Well, I don’t know about you, but I certainly didn’t have “new Amazon smartphone” on my 2026 bingo card. As it turns out, according to Reuters, the retailer may be developing a new smartphone, internally known as “Transformer.” 

Those familiar with the industry will instantly draw parallels to Amazon’s previous smartphone effort, the Fire Phone from 2014. Appropriately, that phone ended up as part of a fire sale about a year later.

Now, in 2026, with no fewer than five phone brands in the US — Apple, Samsung, Google, Motorola, and OnePlus — Amazon faces a lot of competition. In fairness, it also has two fewer platforms to compete against. In 2014, Windows Phone and BlackBerry were still very much part of the smartphone conversation; these days, not so much.

The AppStore problem

But there’s one mistake Amazon made in its first effort that will absolutely torpedo its chances at succeeding — the Amazon AppStore and specifically the decision to forego Google Play services. Google is simply too valuable in too many lives to not support the platform. Oh, and the Amazon AppStore is terrible.

Also: What’s right (and wrong) with the Amazon Fire Phone

It has admittedly been a few years since I last inventoried the Amazon AppStore, but when I last checked, the Amazon AppStore was a wasteland of half-supported or unsupported apps, with two notable exceptions. Finance, home control, and communication apps were either absent or had not received updates for years prior.

The only apps in the Amazon AppStore that remained up to date were productivity apps (largely powered by Microsoft) and streaming apps. Those two categories work very well on the cheap, underpowered hardware that Amazon usually launches, and that’s fine. A coffee-table tablet is a nice thing to have lying around.

A spark of hope

Amazon Fire Phone

Liam Tung/ZDNET

But a phone is another animal entirely. If a tablet is a device to entertain, a phone is a device for everything else. One of the key reasons Windows Phone failed was its lack of an app ecosystem. The Senior Vice President of Devices and Services,  Panos Panay, is very familiar with that saga, so I’m hopeful that he will make the same arguments to the powers that be at Amazon. 

Honestly, if there is anyone who I think can pull off an Amazon phone revival, it’s probably Panay, who understands design and product development better than most, and to be perfectly honest, he’s my absolute favorite product presenter.

Also: Amazon Fire Phone review: Not a great smartphone

Of course, all of this is early days. This phone is being worked on internally, and even Reuters reports that it could get the axe long before it sees the light of day. Personally, I’m intrigued by the idea, but I sincerely hope that Amazon doesn’t make this the shopping phone it tried to build in 2014. 

If Amazon just wants to make a nice, well-built smartphone, with a skin that pushes Amazon content to the fore, I’m fine with that. But leaving Google behind is a mistake that Amazon cannot afford to make again. Fool me once, and all that.

So, if this phone is to have a chance at success, it needs to embrace Google services so it can be a phone that everyone can use. Amazon has the brand power to make a phone like this work, even up against juggernauts like Apple and Samsung, but it needs to approach this correctly, lest it end up in yet another Fire phone fire sale.





Source link