GitHub Copilot shifts to usage-based pricing June 1 – why that’s no surprise


redcost-gettyimages-1542445208

asbe/ iStock / Getty Images Plus via Getty Images

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


ZDNET’s key takeaways

  • GitHub shifts pricing for its flagship Copilot service.
  • Under the new AI Credit approach, if you run out of credits, you can’t use the service.
  • Users who expect to see far higher prices already hate the deal. 

It’s been an open secret that people haven’t been paying anything like the full cost for their AI services. The bill’s finally coming due. GitHub announced that as of June 1, 2026, all GitHub Copilot plans will shift to usage-based billing

This is a radical change from its current premium request unit (PRU) system. Going forward, users will consume monthly allotments of GitHub AI Credits based on token consumption, including input, output, and cached tokens at published API rates. In other words, GitHub is moving to a token-based pricing model. 

Smart people saw this coming. A week ago, GitHub blocked users from getting a new GitHub Copilot subscription. GitHub also began restricting the models available from its individual subscription plans, while dropping access to Opus models entirely. Price increases were clearly on their way. 

Why? According to GitHub, it’s no longer the same service. What was once a smart programming editor has evolved into “an agentic platform capable of running long, multi-step coding sessions, using the latest models, and iterating across entire repositories.” On top of that, “Agentic usage is becoming the default, and it brings significantly higher compute and inference demands.”

GitHub claims its current premium request model is unsustainable. After all, they stated, “a quick chat question and a multi-hour autonomous coding session can cost the user the same amount,” with GitHub absorbing escalating inference costs. The usage-based model is intended to maintain long-term service reliability.

The good news is that, for now, anyway, base subscription pricesremain unchanged. Copilot Pro is staying at $10 per month, and Pro+ is at $39 per month. However, these subscriptions will now include monthly AI Credits matching their dollar value. That is, Pro subscribers receive $10 in credits, while Pro+ users receive $39. I have no idea why GitHub felt the need to spell this out. 

Code completions and Next Edit suggestions will remain included without consuming AI Credits. Users on annual plans will continue with PRU-based pricing until expiration, when they transition to Copilot Free with upgrade options, or they can convert early to monthly plans with prorated credits.

Copilot Business, $19 per user per month, and Copilot Enterprise. $39 per user per month, maintain their current pricing while adding equivalent monthly AI Credits per seat. To ease the transition, GitHub will provide promotional credits for June, July, and August 2026: Business customers receive $30 per month, and Enterprise users receive $70 per month. 

However, and this is important, in the past, when you ran out of PRUs, you simply downshifted to a less capable model. With the new AI Credits approach, when you’re out of Credits, you’re out of luck. If you want to keep working, you’ll need to pay more for Credits. 

Organizations can benefit from pooled usage across teams, eliminating stranded capacity from individual unused credits. Administrators will gain budget controls at the enterprise, cost center, and user levels, with options to allow additional purchases or cap spending when included pools are exhausted.

GitHub plans to launch a preview of the bills in early May. This will give you a look at your projected costs before the new June bills come due. 

Many users aren’t waiting to dismiss this new pricing plan as a bad deal. As one Reddit poster put it, “I don’t see companies going to be all happy if they get a 50x larger bill. People really underestimate how many tokens they use.” Another shrugged, “They could’ve just shut down Copilot completely. Literally the only reason to stay is that you’re familiar with it and are not ready to invest 30 minutes of your life to get familiar with Claude code, Codex, or whatever.”

For all the grumbling, though, it’s not like the news is surprising. People who paid attention to AI’s growing costs — memory is more expensive than ever, and gigawatt datacenters don’t build themselves — knew this was coming. 

Other companies have already started to hike their rates. For example, OpenAI increased the cost for developers using its flagship GPT-5.2 model from $1.25 per input token in the previous GPT-5.1 to $5.75. In addition, Anthropic confirmed a de facto price increase for its Claude enterprise edition on April 15 when it moved from fixed pricing to a dynamic usage-based model. 

(Disclosure: Ziff Davis, ZDNET’s parent company, filed an April 2025 lawsuit against OpenAI, alleging it infringed Ziff Davis copyrights in training and operating its AI systems.)

Like it or lump it, the day of cheap AI is almost done. I expect costs to jump by 2 to 3 times by year’s end, and I won’t be surprised if prices end up far higher than that. 





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews






Today, many U.S. gas stations have turned into giant convenience stores, allowing customers to stock up on groceries while they’re fueling up. While mainstream adoption might be relatively recent, the idea isn’t new. Love’s gas stations have been offering groceries since the mid-’70s. 

Love’s was originally founded under the name Musket Corp in 1964 by married entrepreneurs Tom and Judy Love. The first station appeared in Watonga, Oklahoma, and the chain quickly expanded from there. Love’s now operates 670 locations across the country. While the size of its network has changed massively since its early days, its ownership has not.

Since the beginning, the chain has been owned by the Love family, and it continues to be family-owned today. Though co-founder Tom Love passed away in 2023, he is survived by his wife and four children. According to Forbes’ 2025 rankings, Love’s Travel Stops is the 15th largest privately owned company in America, with a revenue of $21.6 billion.

This family ownership structure contrasts with most of its rivals, many of which are ultimately owned by foreign parent companies. Brands like Amoco, Kwik Shop, and Turkey Hill are actually owned by British companies, while Lukoil is owned by a Russian state-affiliated company.

Love’s remains based in Oklahoma

As well as remaining under its original family ownership, Love’s has also remained headquartered in the same location in Oklahoma for decades. The Love’s main office building was originally located next to a Hertz call center in The Village, Oklahoma. After Hertz shuttered operations at the site, Love’s bought the former call center in 2019 and transformed it into an extension of its headquarters. Speaking to The Oklahoman at the time, co-founder Tom Love said he started the business in The Village simply because that’s he and his wife were living at the time, shortly after they got married.

Since then, Love’s has expanded to operate in over 40 states. The chain also claims that its Love’s and Speedco locations form the largest truck maintenance network across the country, offering 1,500 maintenance bays in total. Since diesel remains the ideal fuel for long-haul trucking, all of Love’s truck stops are equipped with ample diesel pumps, but Love’s also operates a chain of Alternative Energy locations that can include hydrogen and CNG refueling facilities, plus EV charging points.





Source link