The Timberwolves are not afraid of the San Antonio Spurs – nor should they be


One thing is certain: Jaden McDaniels won’t be talking about any “bad defenders” on the San Antonio Spurs. 

The unanimous NBA Defensive Player of the Year, Victor Wembanyam, plays for San Antonio. Wemby is a human praying mantis, seven-and-a-third feet tall with silk in his tentacles and a calm, lithe quickness that doesn’t belong to anyone else his size. His spectacular presence necessarily overshadows the other above-average defenders on the Spurs. 

The two first-round draft picks they have taken since Wemby are rugged guards, each 215 pounds. Starter Stephen Castle is six-foot six-inches, and rookie disrupter off the bench Dylan Harper is six-foot five. Veteran De’Aaron Fox is more notorious on offense, having averaged more than 21 points per game over his ten-year career and closing games well enough to capture the NBA’s first Jerry West Trophy as “Clutch Player of the Year” in the 2022-23. But a year after that, the aptly-named Fox, at six-foot, three-inches, and 185 pounds, led the NBA in steals.

The other two starters, the forwards, are capable glue. Devin Vassell was the team’s best defender until Wemby and Castle came along (and Harper may have already caught up to him), and has the instinctual wisdom to inflate his now-suppressed ego in moments of need on either side of the ball. Julian Champagnie is your prototypical “3 and D” guy who splashes 38.1% of his treys, usually from the corner, and 84.4% of his free throws. 

Off the bench, the Spurs merely boast the newly crowned Sixth Man of the Year in Keldon Johnson, who, like Vassell, makes a larger impact with a lesser role now that superior talent is aboard. Harper, who would start for most teams, also bolsters the second unit. Backup center Luke Kornet is vital, given that Wemby’s outrageous physique and outsize importance have the Spurs brain trust continually monitoring, and husbanding, his playing time. Kornet is woefully underrated because he is the teammate who subs in for Wemby rather than partaking of his magic.

Then there is Harrison Barnes, who started hundreds of games in a row for four different teams, including the dynastic Golden State Warriors for four years when he was aged 20 to 23, who was replaced in the starting lineup by Vassell more than 50 games into this season and has produced even better numbers coming off the bench. 

There really isn’t a “bad defender” in that bunch, which is why the Spurs had the NBA’s third best defense in terms of points allowed per possession to go with their third-best offense in terms of points scored per possession. They are the only team in the league to rank that highly on both sides of the ball. 

Related: Game 6: Wolves wanted it more as Jaden McDaniels, bench players propel shorthanded team past Denver Nuggets

I’m spending a lot of time lauding the Spurs because they have had a special season. For Wolves fans impatient with my dwelling, remember back two seasons ago when Minnesota quickened from 42 wins into a beastly 56 victories, the giddiness of it, with Gobert winning Defensive Player of the Year and Naz Reid capturing Sixth Man of the Year? Well, the Spurs just leaped from 38 wins to 62, with Wemby as Johnson winning the same honors, respectively. 

They are universally regarded as the only NBA opponent with a semi-realistic chance of denying the Oklahoma City Thunder a second straight championship. 

The Minnesota Timberwolves are not afraid. Nor should they be. 

They just dominated a Denver Nuggets team that had won 12 in a row to finish the regular season, had beaten them three-out-of-four in head-to-head matchups and were led by Nikola Jokic, who figures to get more MVP votes than Wemby as results are announced later this month. They lost their superstar and their ace role player halfway through their first-round matchup, then lost their ace substitute for those players and an important playmaker just before the sixth game. Didn’t matter. They dug deeper.

And so here they are, playing a Spurs juggernaut who they’ve beaten two-out-of-three in the regular season. It is undeniably a step up in class from the Nuggets and the Wolves are undeniably huge underdogs – as they were versus Denver. If they are to have any chance of pulling another stunning upset, they need to be fearless about it. They can’t beat themselves – physically, strategically or mentally. 

Fortunately, the Wolves come by this attitude honestly. Their haughtiness – highlighted by McDaniels’ trash talk, but ultimately proven in the bold, crisp thoroughness in which they held themselves the majority of time after a Game One loss – unnerved the Nuggets, who simply couldn’t mentally sustain their own self-fulfilling prophecy. 

If the Wolves are going to make this interesting, the Spurs have to be similarly tested. The Wolves have to believe, with a depth that sharpens joyful focus and promotes quick decision-making and spectacular teamwork, that they are the superior team. All three regular-season games against the Spurs were close and they won twice as many of them. They’ve been deep in the playoff grind the past two springtimes while San Antonio was mulling lottery luck and teenaged talent.

They can’t dwell on missing Ant; they have to be encouraged by the thought of his eventual return, be it Game Two or Game Six – the more the merrier. Donte DiVincenzo is gone for this year, but look what Ayo Dosunmu and TJ Shannon Jr. have done in his stead – next man up, indeed. 

Stealing one of the first two games would help electrify this process, as it did against Denver. Otherwise you are waiting until at least Game Five to get past the “everybody is just holding serve” narrative. 

In terms of more practical, strategic, grappling for advantage, the Wolves need Shannon and Ayo to push the pace. Thanks mostly to Wemby but also to his active supporting cast, the Spurs are ridiculously stingy when playing half-court defense, allowing an absurd 81 points per 100 possessions according to Cleaning the Glass, the website with the most authority over that statistical measure. Bones Hyland can also be a factor here, but he doesn’t have the gristle along with the gumption required to outrace and then absorb the closing in transitions after turnovers and great outlet passes. 

The Spurs will be girded against this. Coach Mitch Johnson is a marvelous motivator and tactician who is less likely to be in over his head in his first full season, as opposed to David Adelman of the Nuggets, or JJ Redick of the Lakers last year. Plus, Johnson hired Corliss Williamson for his staff, the coach successfully put in charge of transition defense for the Wolves in Minnesota recently. He’s thus a specialist not only in that discipline, but in knowing the personnel testing the veracity of his methods in San Antonio. 

No matter. The Wolves have consistently proven they are better when playing faster. Now they face a team that will choke you out if you play slower. Can’t happen. 

Related: How the Timberwolves sparked a season-saving Game 2 comeback over the Nuggets in Denver

The Wolves also need all three members of their starting frontcourt to have elevated and variegated games in this series; to be both resilient in quality and flexible in approach. 

Begin with Julius Randle. The Spurs defense is built around Wemby (and when he’s out, Kornet) and a phalanx of wing players who are rugged and adept in rotation, but none of them come closer than 25 pounds to Randle’s 250. Bully ball against Wemby is a fool’s errand unless the ball is flying around the half court and shooting decisions waste no time in the flow. Peak Randle is capable of that, just as peak Randle memorably did a great job defending Wemby in their second matchup of the season, giving the mantis’ gangly frame no space to even get his appendages positioned to shoot over him the way he shoots over everybody.

That said, Rudy Gobert deserves the first chance at trying to cut Wemby down to mortal size. Gobert was less of a positive factor against the Spurs than he was against other teams this season. The Wolves outscored the Spurs 108-67 in the fourth quarter of their three meetings and yet Rudy logged a grand total of 4:25 in those final stanzas. 

In the first matchup, Wemby was injured and didn’t play. The Wolves engineered a massive comeback, outscoring San Antonio 36-19 in the fourth quarter, when Finch benched Gobert and went with a zone that had Jaden McDaniels in the middle, alternately guarding the jitterbug Fox and protecting the rim as the “big” man. In the second game, Wemby was back but Gobert played only that 4:25 in a 33-18 Wolves fourth quarter due to Randle’s defense on him, among other factors. And in the third game, Gobert was out with a bruised hip, as the Wolves 39-30 fourth-quarter edge was the culmination of a shootout between Ant (55 points) and Wemby (39 points) – still not enough to gain a season sweep, as the Spurs gained the win.

Even so, the comprehensive mastery by which Gobert limited Jokic’s peak production in the first round of these playoffs – and many games where Jokic had embarrassed him in prior seasons – earns him the nod. But Minnesota’s successful experiments, in games where Wemby did and didn’t play, provides a plethora of backup options. It is a mantra of Wolves coach Chris Finch that you have to give great players different looks. Wemby has rapidly qualified. 

Even if and when he returns, a fully healthy Ant will be missed. He scored more than twice as many points as any of his teammates in the three regular-season matchups. As mentioned, Ayo and Shannon on the go and Randle in a gyroscopic half-court passing affair as perhaps the best plausible substitutes. But, as with Gobert’s defense, shouldn’t Finch allow some recency bias to see if Jaden McDaniels really is making serious progress on those Scottie Pippen comps? 

Game Six was so Peak Jaden that you have to see how much of it is sustainable. (Ditto Ayo’s 43-point masterpiece in Game Four.) Those rocking-chair floaters that are McDaniels’ signature shot from the midrange would likely be devoured by Wemby as efficiently as the spousal heads become the “signature” breakfast of the praying mantis after procreation. But this may be the perfect time to see if the delightfully successful feeds, footwork, finesse and fury the McDaniels flexed on offense can be at least somewhat repeatable against an elite team in a high-stakes game. 

Who Jaden guards in this series is less fraught, although somewhat complicated. It is probably Fox, but then where is the matchup on the Spurs roster for Bones or Mike Conley? How Finch decides to weaponize his defense against what is indeed the third-rated offense in the NBA – and best of anyone, after the All-Star break – is a compelling subplot here.

How will it turn out? If the Wolves win one of the first two in San Antonio, I’d guess the Spurs in seven. If San Antonio sweeps the first two, Spurs in five. If the Wolves win the first two, Wolves in six. 

Then again, I called the Nuggets in 6 for my first-round prediction and we saw how that turned out.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


There are a ton of laptops on the market at any given moment and almost all of those models are available in multiple configurations to match your performance and budget needs. If you’re feeling overwhelmed with options when looking for a new laptop, it’s understandable. To help simplify things for you, here are the main things you should consider when you start looking.

Price

The search for a new laptop for most people starts with price. If the statistics that chipmaker Intel and PC manufacturers hurl at us are correct, you’ll be holding onto your next laptop for at least three years. If you can afford to stretch your budget a little to get better specs, do it. That stands whether you’re spending $500 or more than $1,000. In the past, you could get away with spending less upfront with an eye toward upgrading memory and storage in the future. Laptop makers are increasingly moving away from making components easily upgradable, so again, it’s best to get as much laptop as you can afford from the start.

Generally speaking, the more you spend, the better the laptop. That could mean better components for faster performance, a nicer display, sturdier build quality, a smaller or lighter design from higher-end materials or even a more comfortable keyboard. All of these things add to the cost of a laptop. I’d love to say $500 will get you a powerful gaming laptop, for example, but that’s not the case. Right now, the sweet spot for a reliable laptop that handles average work, home office or school tasks is between $700 and $800 and a reasonable model for creative work or gaming is upward of about $1,000. The key is to look for discounts on models in all price ranges so you can get more laptop capabilities for less.

Operating system

Choosing an operating system is part personal preference and part budget. For the most part, Microsoft Windows and Apple MacOS do the same things (save for gaming, where Windows is the winner), but they do them differently. Unless there’s an OS-specific application you need, get the one you feel most comfortable using. If you’re not sure which that is, head to an Apple store or a local electronics store and test them out. Or ask friends or family to let you test theirs for a bit. If you have an iPhone or iPad and like it, chances are you’ll like MacOS, too.

In price and variety (and PC gaming), Windows laptops win. If you want MacOS, you’re getting a MacBook. Apple’s MacBooks regularly top our best lists, the least expensive one is the M1 MacBook Air for $999. It is regularly discounted to $750 or $800, but if you want a cheaper MacBook, you’ll have to consider older refurbished ones.

Windows laptops can be found for as little as a couple of hundred dollars and come in all manner of sizes and designs. Granted, we’d be hard-pressed to find a $200 laptop we’d give a full-throated recommendation to but if you need a laptop for online shopping, email and word processing, they exist.

If you are on a tight budget, consider a Chromebook. ChromeOS is a different experience than Windows; make sure the applications you need have a Chrome, Android or Linux app before making the leap. If you spend most of your time roaming the web, writing, streaming video or using cloud-gaming services, they’re a good fit.

Size

Remember to consider whether having a lighter, thinner laptop or a touchscreen laptop with a good battery life will be important to you in the future. Size is primarily determined by the screen — hello, laws of physics — which in turn factors into battery size, laptop thickness, weight and price. Keep in mind other physics-related characteristics, such as an ultrathin laptop isn’t necessarily lighter than a thick one, you can’t expect a wide array of connections on a small or ultrathin model and so on.

Screen

When deciding on a screen, there are a myriad number of considerations, like how much you need to display (which is surprisingly more about resolution than screen size), what types of content you’ll be looking at and whether you’ll be using it for gaming or creative work.

You really want to optimize pixel density; that is, the number of pixels per inch the screen can display. Although other factors contribute to sharpness, a higher pixel density usually means a sharper rendering of text and interface elements. (You can easily calculate the pixel density of any screen at DPI Calculator if you don’t feel like doing the math, and you can also find out what math you need to do there.) I recommend a dot pitch of at least 100 pixels per inch as a rule of thumb.

Because of the way Windows and MacOS scale for the display, you’re frequently better off with a higher resolution than you’d think. You can always make things bigger on a high-resolution screen, but you can never make them smaller — to fit more content in the view — on a low-resolution screen. This is why a 4K, 14-inch screen may sound like unnecessary overkill but may not be if you need to, say, view a wide spreadsheet.

If you need a laptop with relatively accurate color that displays the most colors possible or that supports HDR, you can’t simply trust the specs — not because manufacturers lie, but because they usually fail to provide the necessary context to understand what the specs they quote mean. You can find a ton of detail about considerations for different types of screen uses in our monitor buying guides for general purpose monitors, creators, gamers and HDR viewing.

Processor

The processor, aka the CPU, is the brains of a laptop. Intel and AMD are the main CPU makers for Windows laptops, with Qualcomm as a new third option with its Arm-based Snapdragon X processors. Both Intel and AMD offer a staggering selection of mobile processors. Making things trickier, both manufacturers have chips designed for different laptop styles, like power-saving chips for ultraportables or faster processors for gaming laptops. Their naming conventions will let you know what type is used. You can head over to Intel or AMD for explanations so you get the performance you want. Generally speaking, the faster the processor speed and the more cores it has, the better the performance will be.

Apple makes its own chips for MacBooks, which makes things slightly more straightforward. Like Intel and AMD, you’ll still want to pay attention to the naming conventions to know what kind of performance to expect. Apple uses its M-series chipsets in Macs. The entry-level MacBook Air uses an M1 chip with an eight-core CPU and seven-core GPU. The current models have M2-series silicon that starts with an eight-core CPU and 10-core GPU and goes up to the M2 Max with a 12-core CPU and a 38-core GPU. Again, generally speaking, the more cores it has, the better the performance.

Battery life has less to do with the number of cores and more to do with CPU architecture, Arm versus x86. Apple’s Arm-based MacBooks and the first Arm-based Copilot Plus PCs we’ve tested offer better battery life than laptops based on x86 processors from Intel and AMD.

Graphics

The graphics processor handles all the work of driving the screen and generating what gets displayed, as well as speeding up a lot of graphics-related (and increasingly, AI-related) operations. For Windows laptops, there are two types of GPUs: integrated (iGPU) or discrete (dGPU). As the names imply, an iGPU is part of the CPU package, while a dGPU is a separate chip with dedicated memory (VRAM) that it communicates with directly, making it faster than sharing memory with the CPU.

Because the iGPU splits space, memory and power with the CPU, it’s constrained by the limits of those. It allows for smaller, lighter laptops, but doesn’t perform nearly as well as a dGPU. There are some games and creative software that won’t run unless they detect a dGPU or sufficient VRAM. Most productivity software, video streaming, web browsing and other nonspecialized apps will run fine on an iGPU.

For more power-hungry graphics needs, like video editing, gaming and streaming, design and so on, you’ll need a dGPU; there are only two real companies that make them, Nvidia and AMD, with Intel offering some based on the Xe-branded (or the older UHD Graphics branding) iGPU technology in its CPUs.

Memory

For memory, I highly recommend 16GB of RAM (8GB absolute minimum). RAM is where the operating system stores all the data for running applications and it can fill up fast. After that, it starts swapping between RAM and SSD, which is slower. A lot of sub-$500 laptops have 4GB or 8GB, which in conjunction with a slower disk can make for a frustratingly slow Windows laptop experience. Also, many laptops now have the memory soldered onto the motherboard. Most manufacturers disclose this but if the RAM type is LPDDR, assume it’s soldered and can’t be upgraded.

Some PC makers will solder memory on and also leave an empty internal slot for adding a stick of RAM. You may need to contact the laptop manufacturer or find the laptop’s full specs online to confirm. Check the web for user experiences because the slot may still be hard to get to, it may require nonstandard or hard-to-get memory or other pitfalls.

Storage

You’ll still find cheaper hard drives in budget laptops and larger hard drives in gaming laptops. Faster solid-state drives have all but replaced hard drives in laptops and can make a big difference in performance. Not all SSDs are equally speedy, and cheaper laptops typically have slower drives. If the laptop only comes with 4GB or 8GB of RAM, it may end up swapping to that drive and the system may slow down quickly while you’re working.

Get what you can afford and if you need to go with a smaller drive, you can always add an external drive or two down the road or use cloud storage to bolster a small internal drive. The exception is gaming laptops: I don’t recommend going with less than a 512GB SSD unless you really like uninstalling games every time you want to play a new game.





Source link