GMC Sierra Vs Chevrolet Silverado: Which Truck Depreciates Faster?







Trucks tend to hold their value well compared to passenger cars, but inevitably some hold their value better than others. While Toyota’s Tacoma and Tundra trucks depreciate slower than virtually any other truck on the market, brand loyalty and practicality considerations mean that most existing GM truck owners won’t be looking to switch to a Japanese brand. Instead, they’ll most likely be considering a truck from either Chevy or GMC, with the Silverado and Sierra respectively being each brand’s signature nameplates.

The Silverado and the Sierra are virtually identical under the hood, and they’re even built in the same factory. It therefore shouldn’t come as a surprise that their depreciation rates are very similar. Across every variant, the Sierra is forecast to hold slightly more of its value over the long run, although estimates of exactly how much extra value it might hold vary between sources.

Starting with the 1500 variants of both trucks, CarEdge says that the Silverado and Sierra will depreciate an identical 43% after five years on the road. After ten years, the GMC will hold around 1% more of its initial value, according to its data. Meanwhile, iSeeCars is slightly more positive about the predicted resale value of each truck, forecasting that the Silverado will lose 39.3% of its value while the Sierra will lose only 38.2% after five years.

A similar picture emerges with HD and EV models

Sierra also comes out on top for the 2500HD and 3500HD variants, with CarEdge forecasting that a Silverado will shed 31% of its initial value after half a decade, around 1% more than an equivalent Sierra.

It predicts the 3500HD trucks will lose an even smaller percentage of their value but again places the Sierra ahead in percentage terms. Estimates from iSeeCars tell the same story, giving high value retention estimates to the 2500HD and 3500HD variants of both models, but placing the GMC marginally ahead of its Chevy sibling by a couple percentage points.

Meanwhile, it’s notoriously difficult to predict the depreciation rates of EVs, because battery technology is still developing very fast and pricing structures for some models change regularly. Still, the 2026 GMC Sierra EV is forecast to hold onto a higher percentage of its value over an equivalent Chevrolet. According to iSeeCars, the GMC will lose 54.1% of its value over five years, while the Silverado EV will lose 56.2%.

Strangely, CarEdge suggests that the electric GMC will retain almost 20% more of its value than the Chevy over the same five years. It’s possible that this anomaly has been caused by GMC dropping the base price of the Sierra EV by $28,000 for the 2026 model year, which may have artificially deflated its average new MSRP and made its depreciation appear temporarily less severe than in reality.

GMC trucks cost more but hold value better

It’s impossible to predict what further price changes Chevy and GMC might make to their EV truck lineups over the next few years, so it’s worth taking any predictions about their future valuations with a few extra grains of salt. Both the Sierra EV and the Silverado EV are likely to suffer much higher levels of depreciation than their ICE cousins, regardless of the brand they’re sold by.

Leaving aside the turbulent EV market, the pattern for combustion-engine Sierras and Silverados is clear: GMC’s trucks retain a slightly higher percentage of their value than Chevy’s trucks as they age. But GMC buyers tend to pay more on average for their trucks in the first place.

To take an example, the cheapest new 2026 Silverado 1500 is a regular cab, standard bed model and starts from $39,695 (including a $2,795 destination fee) without incentives, while the cheapest 2026 Sierra 1500 starts from $41,095. At the other end of the range, a Silverado 1500 High Country with a crew cab costs at least $69,595, while an equivalent Sierra 1500 Denali retails for $73,190. Step up to a Sierra 1500 Denali Ultimate, and you’ll be paying at least $86,190. That’s a big investment by any metric.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews







Picking the right tire can make a difference in the handling of any car, but it’s particularly important for high-performance vehicles. Michelin offers a range of performance-focused tire models, with the Pilot Super Sport tires being one popular choice. The brand says that the tire is designed for cars from the likes of Porsche, Mercedes-Benz, and Ferrari, and should perform well both on the road and on the track. Of course, manufacturer claims don’t mean much if the tire doesn’t perform well in real-world testing, but drivers consistently agree that the Pilot Super Sport lives up to the billing.

Retail chain Tire Rack has been collecting data on customer satisfaction and real-world performance for almost three decades, so it’s a great place to start when evaluating how drivers rate any popular tire model. Its survey has collected a combined 12 million miles of reported data for the Michelin Pilot Super Sport, and the results look good for the well-known French brand. The tire model received an “Excellent” rating in four out of five survey categories, with treadwear achieving a “Good” rating. That’s enough to make the Pilot Super Sport one of the top-rated tires in the Max Performance Summer tire category.

Reviews for the tire on Michelin’s website are similarly positive, with the Pilot Super Sport achieving an average rating of 4.7 out of five stars from 446 reviews at the time of writing. A total of 95% of those reviewers said that they would recommend the tire.

Most buyers should be satisfied with the Pilot Super Sport tires

The positive reviews continue at Tyre Reviews, which gives the Pilot Super Sport tires a score of 9.5 out of ten based on mixed professional and user data. Its survey rates the tire’s dry grip especially highly, although its wet grip doesn’t score quite so well. In a separate comparison test, the outlet also noted that the Pilot Super Sport tires caused slightly more understeer in a BMW M2 than the closely related Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S model.

As well as receiving strong ratings for their performance, the tires should also be long-lasting. All variants of the tire are covered by Michelin’s standard six-year warranty, and variants with a Y speed rating also receive a 30,000-mile treadwear warranty. That falls far short of the longest treadwear warranties on the market, some of which can stretch to 80,000 miles or more, but it’s still a competitive figure for a performance-oriented tire.

All this data from drivers and from Michelin itself adds up to make the Pilot Super Sport tires a highly trusted option when it comes to maximum performance tires. Add in the fact that Michelin, as a brand, has the highest levels of overall customer satisfaction on the market, and it’s safe to conclude that the vast majority of Pilot Super Sport buyers will be happy with their purchase.





Source link