7 Of The Best Alternatives To The Michelin Primacy Tour A/S







If you’ve shopped for tires in the last several years, you’ve no doubt run into the Michelin Primacy Tour A/S. It’s from Michelin, one of the biggest tire brands on Earth, and it’s a pretty popular tire in a fairly crowded segment. It’s a touring all-season tire, meaning it’s designed for everyday use by virtually any type of vehicle you can name across all four seasons. Thanks to this, it’s often a target for folks replacing their aging tires on their daily drivers. 

What makes this tire so special? Well, it’s highly available, it’s been around for nearly a decade, and it scores pretty well on most tests. Per Tire Rack, it gets reasonably good wet and dry traction, is good enough in wintry conditions, and it rides nicely, making it a solid all-around experience as a replacement tire. Even its treadwear is pretty decent at 540 UTQG, which means it’ll last 5.4 times longer than UTQG 100 tire, and has a treadwear warranty of six years and 55,000 miles. 

However, Michelin released the tire in 2017, and tire technology has changed quite a bit over the last 10 years. Where this was once a top option, the Michelin Primacy Tour A/S is now closer to the middle of the pack than it is the top. So, whether your local service center is out of stock or you just want to see what the market is like now, here are some pretty good alternatives to the Primacy Tour A/S. 

Hankook Kinergy 4S 2X

The Hankook Kinergy 4S 2X is a good place to start for Primacy Tour A/S alternatives. Hankook released the tire to North America in 2020, and while Hankook tires don’t always score well with tire authorities, the Kinergy 4S2 2X is one of the better options in the brand’s lineup. This is a touring all-season tire that boasts a 500 UTQG rating, which is in the same ballpark as the Primary Tour A/S, and a six-year, 60,000-mile warranty, which is also competitive with most competitors in this space. 

The Kinergy 4S 2X competes favorably in most categories when you compare reviews for both of them from the same source. Per Tyre Reviews, wet and dry grip, handling, and winter performance are all superior for the Kinergy, with the Primacy Tour A/S squeaking out a minor victory in terms of comfort. The biggest win for Hankook comes in winter conditions, where the Kinergy 4S 2X outperforms the Primacy Tour A/S by a fairly wide margin. This isn’t terribly surprising given the age of both tires, but even so, the 4S 2X stacks up well against its aging competitor. 

They’re also pretty similar in terms of price, with Hankooks being cheaper per tire by a varying among depending on the size you go with. For our comparison, a 235/55R19 Hankook costs $180 per tire while the Primacy Tour A/S costs $227 per tire in the same size.

General Grabber APT

The General Grabber APT is a bit of an outlier on this list. It’s more of an off-road tire than a touring all-season, but General makes some of the best off-road tires, and Tyre Reviews still lists it as a touring all-season on its website, so we decided to include it. Obviously, this is a tire you’d get if you want to do a bit of light off-roading alongside your concrete adventures. The treadwear warranty is pretty good for an off-road tire, sitting at six years and 60,000 miles, which is on par with Michelin. 

General stacks up pretty nicely with the Primacy Tour A/S, keeping pace or exceeding Michelin in nearly every metric. Both are similarly okay in winter conditions, but the Grabber does better in all-around traction, and they’re about even in comfort, depending on which website you ask. General’s tire has superior treadwear ratings from Tire Reviews by a fairly wide margin, so that’s something to consider alongside its off-road prowess.

Both tires are in the same ballpark in terms of price, with similar sizes going for around the same amount of money, give or take around $10 to $20 per tire. The Grabber APT is a bit more expensive per tire in a similar size, but that makes sense given that it’s designed for more heavy-duty work. In terms of age, these tires are also roughly the same, with General releasing the Grabber APT in mid-2017. 

Pirelli P7 AS Plus 3

Pirelli is a big player in tires, so it’s no surprise they’re on the list. Pirelli and Michelin are compared rather frequently by big authorities like Consumer Reports, and while Michelin usually comes out of those comparisons on top, it’s not usually by a lot. The Pirelli P7 AS Plus 3 is one of the most popular tires that the brand sells, accumulating loads of reviews across the Internet, most of which are quite positive. Pirelli backs up its tire with a six-year, 70,000-mile warranty, and with a UTQG rating of 800, there’s a lot of confidence from review websites that it’ll hit that 70,000-mile mark. 

The AS Plus 3 is the first tire on the list to outdo the Primacy Tour A/S in every category from both Tire Rack and Tyre Reviews. Both websites agree that the AS Plus 3 is better all-around, with the Primacy Tour A/S only really keeping up in terms of comfort and dry grip. This is a theme that will continue for the rest of the article. It’s doubly impressive that Pirelli was able to find a tire compound durable enough to last for 70,000 miles while also keeping it comfortable. 

Pirelli does make you pay for it, though, and the P7 AS Plus 3 is more expensive per tire than the Primacy Tour A/S. The price difference isn’t terrible, with the Pirelli tires being about $20 more expensive per tire on average, but that’s still $80 extra for a set. Whether or not that’s worth it is up to you.

Vredestein Quatrac Pro+

The Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ is one of the tire maker’s most popular touring all-season tires, so its inclusion on the list makes sense. This is another brand that gets pitted against the likes of Michelin and Goodyear all the time and generally comes out as a competitive brand with good tires. The Quatrac Pro+ is an excellent example. Vredestein backs up its tire with a warranty that lasts for eight years from the date of manufacture and up to 55,000 miles. If you get a fresh set of these and don’t drive too much, this is one of the longest warranties on the market. 

In terms of review scores, Vredestein smokes the Primacy Tour A/S in almost every category. Wet traction, dry traction, comfort, road feedback, and even traction over ice are all superior to the Michelin. Vredestein released this tire in 2024, so it’s also one of the newest tires on the block, and new tires mean new technology that generally outperforms the old technology. 

There are only two downsides to choosing Vredestein here. The first is the tire’s 400 UTQG rating, which means it may not last as long as the Primacy Tour A/S. That’s a bit of a bummer considering that Vredestein tires are also way more expensive per tire than Michelin, with prices easily ranging into the $300-$400 range per tire for common sizes. Premium tires come with premium price tags. 

Goodyear Assurance WeatherReady 2

It’s a fun little factoid that Lego produces more tires than any other company, but Goodyear is right up there as one of the biggest and most successful tire brands in the world. It makes several touring all-season tires, and most of them compete fairly well with the Primacy Tour A/S. For this list, we chose the Goodyear Assurance WeatherReady 2. It’s one of the brand’s latest tires, having come out in 2024, and it has some niceties like 3PMSF certification, which Michelin does not include on the Primacy Tour A/S. Goodyear’s warranty is pretty standard, offering six years and 60,000 miles of protection. 

The latest technology in the WeatherReady 2 shows here, as it performs better in every metric from its Michelin competitor, with no exceptions. It doesn’t really matter who you ask: the WeatherReady 2 is just better in every way. The biggest wins are in winter and ice traction, where Goodyear blows the Primacy Tour A/S away. Even the treadwear rating is better with a UTQG 700 score, indicating that the tire should last longer than its 60,000-mile warranty. 

It’s not a terribly fair comparison because Goodyear’s tire is seven years newer and seven years wiser, but you can buy both of these tires, so the comparison must be done. As the final nail in the coffin, Goodyear sells these tires for approximately the same price as the Primacy Tour A/S, give or take a few bucks depending on size. This one’s a winner. 

Pirelli Cinturato WeatherActive

Pirelli returns to the list once more, and with a tire that, on paper at least, outperforms even its popular P7 AS Plus 3 stablemate. The Pirelli Cinturato WeatherActive is a newer tire than the AS Plus 3, having been released in 2022. The extra year seems to have done Pirelli good, as the Cinurato is considered among the best tires in the touring all-season segment by most relevant authorities. Pirelli backs up its tire with a six-year, 60,000-mile warranty, which just barely beats out the Primacy Tour A/S and its 55,000-mile warranty. 

In terms of overall metrics, take everything we just said about the Goodyear Assurance WeatherReady 2 above and just put it all here again. The Cinturato beats the Primacy Tour A/S in every category, and some of them by a pretty wide margin, including wintry conditions, treadwear, comfort, and especially wet grip. We know this sounds like advertising, but if you look at nearly any comparison between the two, the Cinturato scores better across the board. Our hands are tied. 

The only metric where the Michelin Primacy Tour A/S comes close to the Pirelli Cinturato is in price, because they’re both roughly the same price, give or take a few bucks per tire based on size. The Primacy doesn’t save you any significant money, so if you are shopping for tires, this is a solid alternative in just about every category and for about the same price. 

Michelin CrossClimate 2

At the top of the hill currently is the Michelin CrossClimate 2. This may very well be Michelin’s most popular tire, and it’s one you’ll see recommended on every automobile-oriented subreddit in existence. It has thousands of reviews across the Internet, and it’s consistently compared to the other great touring all-season tires on the market. Michelin backs up its tire with a competitive warranty, giving drivers six years or 60,000 miles of coverage. They’re also widely available at most U.S. tire retailers, making them quite easy to find. 

It scores better than the Primacy Tour A/S in all categories, including all forms of traction, comfort, road feedback, and wintry conditions. Its right up there with the Goodyear WeatherReady 2 and the Pirelli Cinturato WeatherActive, with all three tires trading blows in various categories. The 640 UTQG rating is also superior to the 540 rating on the Primacy Tour A/S, meaning that the treadwear is more likely to survive until its warranty expires.

As one of the only true set it and forget it tires, the CrossClimate 2 tires are recommended for a reason. The only downside is that they are a bit more expensive than the Primacy Tour A/S, by roughly $50 or more depending on the size. That’s quite a price hike, but as thousands of customer reviews attest, many believe the premium is worth it.

Here’s how we ranked these tires

The idea for this list is to find good alternatives to the Michelin Primacy Tour A/S. To start, we looked at its category, which is either touring all-season, grand touring all-season, or premium touring all-season, depending on who you ask. From there, we looked at Tire Rack and Tyre Review metrics for tires within those categories. Any tires that performed worse were immediately discarded because there were more than enough tires that scored better so we didn’t need any compromises here. 

From there, it was just making sure the list had good candidates. We didn’t use more than two tires from any one tiremaker so as not to oversaturate the list, and we also removed tires that were similar. For example, The CrossClimate 2 has a few siblings, including the CrossClimate SUV, Agilis CrossClimate DT, and the aged out CrossClimate+ that is still listed on some retail websites despite being discontinued. Those tires were removed from contention. 

Finally, we did not take into consideration tires not reviewed by at least Tire Rack and Tyre Reviews specifically. The reason for this is because it would’ve been nearly impossible to directly compare them to the Primacy Tour A/S. We did take pro and user reviews into account, but Tire Rack and Tyre Reviews both have rating systems that made baseline comparisons more consistent before moving into the pro and user review segments.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


If Game Two of their first-round playoff series with the Denver Nuggets saved the 2025-26 season for the Minnesota Timberwolves, Game Three showed why it should be saved. 

The Timberwolves were a different beast while decisively thumping the Nuggets, 113-96 Thursday night at Target Center, in a game that wasn’t nearly that close. These Wolves were the mythical creature we’d heard about in preseason lore, purposefully locked and loaded to be both marauding and staunch. They owned both ends of the court, gleefully transferring back and forth from irresistible force to immovable object. 

A quartet of Timberwolves deserve special mention, but it begins with Jaden McDaniels. After his team had toppled Denver to even the series at a game apiece Monday night, McDaniels used the sizable chip on his shoulder to etch some graffiti into the public discourse, casually castigating the most prominent Nuggets players by name as “bad defenders” in a matter-of-fact manner that had the media compelling him to confirm what he had just said. 

Trash talk is fleetingly fungible in the jaundiced social environment of 2026, functioning more like coupons than currency in that it needs to be rapidly leveraged before its expiration date. The common perception naturally was that McDaniels was calling out the Nuggets. But in a more subtle, profound way, he was also putting his teammates on notice. 

All season long the Timberwolves have procrastinated on their full potential, frequently demonstrating that their preseason talk about maturity and commitment was cheap. By contrast, those words uttered by McDaniels were expensive. He had just picked a fight with the opponent, leaving open the question of how many of his teammates would join him in the fray. 

That he would lead the charge was established early, after the Timberwolves’ top two scorers, Anthony Edwards and Julius Randle, had each missed a pair of open looks against Denver’s bad defenders in the game’s first 90 seconds.  

With the game still scoreless, the NBA’s best pick-and-roll combo, Nikola Jokic and Jamal Murray, were clustered around the foul line with Minnesota’s best defenders, McDaniels and Rudy Gobert. As they jammed up Jokic, McDaniels picked the ball loose and started sprint-dribbling the other way. To no one’s surprise, Donte “Ragu” DiVincenzo was also on his horse in transition, receiving a pass from McDaniels and then lobbing it back for a Jaden slam against a hapless Murray and Murray’s late-arriving teammate, Cam Johnson, who committed the foul that allowed McDaniels to finish with the “and-1” free throw. 

On the Timberwolves next offensive possession, McDaniels muscled his way to two offensive rebounds, feeding Ragu off the first one for a missed three-pointer, which he corralled for the second one and executed the putback in traffic. It was McDaniels 5, Nuggets 0, setting the tone for a game in which not only did the Wolves never trail, but never let the lead go under double digits after McDaniels made a consecutive pair of driving layups eight minutes into the game. 

“Spectacular. I thought his activity offensively in the first quarter was outstanding,” said Wolves coach Chris Finch after the game. “He was inspirational.” 

Among the most inspired were McDaniels fellow wing players, Ragu and Ayo Dosunmu. Ragu is exactly the kind of player who will have your back in a squabble, and his galvanized performance seemed borne of satisfaction that someone else had clarified the mission. As usual, the Timberwolves were at their best with him on the court: +20 in the 32:54 he played, -3 in the 15:06 he sat. 

“He makes so many hustle plays, momentum plays, different styles of plays.” Finch raved. “He’ll make a shot, get a transition bucket, he’ll rebound, get a steal, blow something up. So many different plays. He’s just a basketball player.”

Related: How the Timberwolves sparked a season-saving Game 2 comeback over the Nuggets in Denver

Then there was Ayo, whose fearless, blazing, bee-lines for the bucket were quicksilver kryptonite for a Nuggets defense that is neither swift nor rugged. “I’ve been waiting for him to wake up a little bit in this series,” Finch accurately observed. “The downhill mindset that he played with all season for us was back.”

Back with the sort of multipurpose propulsion that leaves witnesses with giddy whiplash. Ayo led the team with 25 points and 9 assists in 32 minutes of time-lapse hoops, the lone blemish being three clanks from long range. Why chuck treys when you can so easily undress players in the paint? Ayo was 10-for-12 on two-pointers and none of those dozen shots came from anywhere but beneath the rim. Five of his nine dimes likewise yielded layups or dunks, which means he personally accounted for 30 of the 68 points in the paint by the Timberwolves on Thursday, doubling up the Nuggets’ 34.

Which brings us to the non-wing in Game 3’s ring of honor, Rudy Gobert. For the third straight game, Gobert blunted the supposed advantage Denver had with the magical playmaker Nikola Jokic at the controls. Suffice to say that in the last five quarters, Jokic has shot 8-for-33 from the floor. If that continues, the Nuggets are toast in this series. 

When I asked Finch after the game if the herculean job Gobert was doing on Jokic made planning his defense simpler and better thus far, he replied, “Rudy is making all of us look good right now with his defense.” 

Amen.

If there is an asterisk on this game, it would be the absence of Denver’s brutishly versatile power forward Aaron Gordon. Nuggets coach David Adelman should be given a lot of credit for his honesty and transparency in dealing with the media during his first full season at the helm, but it came back to bite him and his team during the pregame presser, when he was clearly rattled and dejected by the sudden unavailability of Gordon, whose playing status went to “probable” to “out” in a period of a few hours due to a chronic calf strain. 

Gordon is far and away his team’s best defender, making the timing of his injury especially troublesome in the wake of McDaniels laying down his marker. Rattled is a good way to describe the entire team’s performance in the first quarter, an emotional wounding that needs to heal as fast as Gordon’s body if the Nuggets are going to be competitive in a series that had dramatically been flipped on its head over the past three days. 

That the Timberwolves played with such dominance despite mediocre outings from Ant and Randle would be a good thing for both of those current cornerstones to keep in mind. Ant was beset by foul trouble and Randle had a solid second quarter, but it stood out that neither player fully embraced what so often works on offense when the Wolves are at their best: Push the pace, move the ball, move without the ball, and make quick decisions. Ant and Randle can still be first among equals and blend into that catechism if they stay attuned to the possibilities of a greater good, one that all of sudden doesn’t have to end with them being postseason fodder for the Spurs or the Thunder. 

Not when you’ve got three wings at a collective peak, with a chaser of Rudy semi-clowning the Joker. 



Source link