As AI Expands, Erin Brockovich Taps Communities to Map Data Center Concerns


Data centers have become a high-stakes battleground. Amid booming demand for AI infrastructure, residents affected by water shortages, electric bill spikes and environmental dangers have increasingly clashed with developers. Community blowback, including among local and federal officials, has led to project delays and, in some cases, cancellations. 

Now, an interactive online hub launched by environmental activist Erin Brockovich could give regular folks a louder voice in the data center conversation. Brockovich became well known for fighting Pacific Gas & Electric over water contamination in Hinkley, California, with a Hollywood movie from 2000 about her activism starring Julia Roberts. 

At the center of the Brockovich AI Data Center Reporting website is an interactive, crowdsourced map of AI data centers, including those that already exist, as well as those proposed or currently under construction: 3,674 reported locations in total. Anyone can submit a report on a data center issue through the online form. Brockovich personally vets all submitted reports, removing duplicates and excluding submissions without ZIP codes from the map. 

A crowdsourced, interactive map on the website Brockovich AI Data Center Reporting currently includes 3,674 community-reported data center locations across the country. That includes data centers that are built, those under construction and proposed projects.

Brockovich Data Center Reporting

“Erin is really interested in the map being self-reported so that everyone who sends in their story can be seen and heard,” said Suzanne Boothby, an author who worked with Brockovich on her most recent book and who is executive editor of her Substack, The Brockovich Report

According to Pew Research, there are at least 3,000 working data centers in the US, and as many as 1,500 more in the works. An FAQ on the site said the map isn’t intended to include every data center in the country but rather focus on locations where community members are actively voicing concerns.

Boothby told CNET via email that one of the most difficult parts for anyone “facing environmental threats in their backyard is to feel like no one is listening.” 

Data centers have a transparency problem

According to a May 27 post titled If Data Centers Are So Great, Why Are They Being Built in Secret?, Brockovich asked people in late April to send their concerns and information about data centers in their areas. She received “a flood” of responses, and over the next month, the website’s map was populated with 2,716 pins from 3,862 reports.

Headshot of environmental activist Erin Brockovich

The environmental activist Erin Brockovich has written about water contamination in her book Superman’s Not Coming. She is now taking on data centers.

The Brockovich Report

One theme kept recurring. 

“The single most common concern — more than noise, more than water usage, more than rising utility bills — is the one word that keeps appearing in submission after submission: transparency,” Brockovich wrote.

Secrecy about data center projects, she said, leaves residents with little say in developments that could have significant impacts on where they live and work, including noise, water and electricity usage and potential health effects. The post drew comments from more than 200 readers, with one saying: “Thank you for taking on the powerful!!!!” Another comment noted that AI is consuming resources and contributing to job losses and economic disruption, saying, “Doesn’t sound like a great ‘deal’ to me.”

The rapid expansion of data centers across the country to accommodate AI compute needs has become a focal point of opposition against Big Tech, with some giants such as SpaceX discussing plans to build them in space

On June 1, Oracle and OpenAI broke ground on a $16 billion AI data center campus in Saline Township, Michigan, that has drawn community protests. Pushback on new data center proposals has led to political wrangling over whether states can restrict them. 

Close to a dozen states are considering construction moratoriums on data centers. In Maine, lawmakers passed the first statewide ban on facilities drawing more than 20 megawatts of electricity, only to be later vetoed by Governor Janet Mills.  

A recent Gallup poll found that a majority of Americans oppose data centers. 

Responding to a national issue

Brockovich’s hub centralizes news stories and videos on specific sites and projects, including several photos of data centers under construction. One image shows a cleared farmland site in Bowling Green, Ohio, making way for a complex. The site also includes key concerns about AI data centers and how communities are responding, with a list of areas where moratoriums have been passed or where voters have taken action.

Boothby said the information gives people a place to be heard, particularly those who’ve been frustrated by the bureaucracy of dealing with federal agencies such as the Environmental Protection Agency or the Department of Natural Resources.

“This map offers them a voice and hopefully launches a larger conversation so that we can all see that this issue isn’t happening in one town here or there. It’s a national issue,” Boothby said.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews






It’s easy to assume that vehicles all had internal combustion engines until very recently. Gasoline and petrol engines were the standard for decades, after all, so why would early vehicles be any different? In reality, the early days of the automobile era were more varied than you might expect, and even featured a range of electric cars. Yes, despite electric vehicles not truly taking off until the 21st century, the first electric vehicles are much older than you think; drivers in the 1900s were going around town in electric vehicles — and where there are EVs, there are charging stations.

One such station, visible in the image above, was the creation of General Electric. Formally called the mercury arc rectifier, it took alternating current and sent it through vaporized mercury in a glass tube. This converted it into direct current, which powered up the EV’s battery. The woman in the image, who’s charging a Columbia Mark 68 Victrola, is standing at the control panel, which allowed a user to adjust power levels. 

These chargers could be installed everywhere, including homes, businesses, and public parking garages, supporting the electric vehicle boom of the early 20th century. While 21st-century EV chargers have come a long way from where they were, the basic building blocks are all still there, and it’s fascinating to see.

How EV chargers have evolved since the early 20th century

EV charging has changed a lot in some ways — but not in others. At the core of it all is the aforementioned conversion from AC to DC, which still happens when you charge modern EVs at standard charging stations. The difference is that your vehicle’s on-board charger performs the conversion, not the charger. Old EV chargers took between several hours and a day to charge, and current-day units can similarly take a few hours to well over a day from empty, depending on the charger’s speed. Fast chargers, which provide DC directly, can cut this down to around an hour or less.

Old-school and modern EV chargers also differ in how they provide power to the vehicle. Mercury arc rectifiers connected directly to the negative terminal of the lead-acid battery that needed charging. Nowadays, EVs use dedicated charging ports. Battery swapping was also commonplace in the early 1900s, and companies like General Electric tried to cash in by offering to replace drivers’ old, run-down batteries with new ones for a fee. That’s not yet possible with most mainstream EVs, although companies like Stellantis have tried to introduce EV battery swapping with moderate success.

Even if they were unrefined compared to today’s models, early EVs seemed to be on to something. Why, then, did electric cars fail, and how did gasoline end up becoming the predominant power source for vehicles?

What led to the downfall of the original wave of electric cars

EVs were no mere fad in the 1900s and 1910s. According to the 1900 United States census, 1,575 of the 4,192 vehicles sold that year were electric, with the value of these early EVs — $2,873,464 — accounting for more than half of the total market value of $4,899,443. It wasn’t just EVs, either; other sources of propulsion, like steam, were also vying for a foothold in the automobile market. By the 1920s and 1930s, though, these had all been superseded by the internal combustion engine.

One of the major drawbacks of early EVs was the fact that electricity was not yet widely available. Electrical hookups were a rarity outside of major cities, limiting the use of these vehicles. The lead-acid batteries they used also had their fair share of issues. They needed to be inspected, cleaned, and repaired every few days, making them more of an inconvenience than anything. Worse yet, they had poor mileage, and, with chargers possibly out of reach, many likely didn’t want to risk being stranded while out for a drive.

Eventually, price reductions for gas cars and improvements such as electric starters and better reliability prompted buyers and automakers alike to move away from electric rides. Thus, while the best-selling EVs of 2026 show that it’s a good time for EVs, this electric boom plainly isn’t the first of its kind. Early EVs eventually fizzled out, but they still set the stage for our current fascination with electric vehicles.





Source link