Good News: Wired Earbuds Are Back and Same as Ever


Wired headphones are back in style in 2026, with everyone from Steph Curry to Bella Hadid sporting a pair. 

I never go anywhere without mine. I’m not trying to get in on the “Wired It-Girl” trend, and I’m not nostalgic about Y2K (OK, maybe a little). I was a fan of wired earbuds long before they became a fashionable 2020s anti-tech tech product. And I’m sure I’ll continue using them after the celebrities and influencers move on to something else.

I’ve always prioritized practicality when it comes to tech. In my humble opinion, it doesn’t get much more practical than wired earbuds.

Iconic until they weren’t

Wired earbuds dominated the 2000s, thanks to MP3 players like the iPod. That decade’s iconic iPod silhouette ads showed off people grooving to their tunes, white wires bouncing up and down with every movement. Wired earbuds were both an integral and celebrated part of the MP3 experience. (Wireless headphones have been around since 2004, but whether those were any good is another story.)

Campaña Silhouette de Apple

Gabriel Sama/Apple

In 2016, Apple infamously mustered the “courage” to kill the iPhone’s headphone jack. The design decision was meant to help improve the device’s waterproofing, while pushing everyone toward a future free from the tyranny of wires. If you didn’t want to use a headphone jack dongle with your new iPhone, you had to buy AirPods.

I couldn’t have been less interested in the future AirPods were promising — especially after I learned they were $160. At the time, I was still using an iPod Touch with a headphone jack as my primary music player. Apple’s wired earbuds were simple and effective, with zero latency or pairing issues. If I needed to replace them, it would only set me back $20. 

Sure, those wires sometimes got tangled up inside my jeans pocket. But at least I didn’t have to worry about losing my earbuds. I remember seeing a meme about AirPods, shortly after their debut: “I don’t even own AirPods yet, and I’ve already dropped one down a storm drain.”

But here’s the real standout feature of wired headphones: You don’t have to charge them. Ever. You plug them into your phone or computer, and they just work. Infinite battery life.

Do we really hate wires so much, even if it means having to charge one more device?

What do you mean I have to charge my headphones?

Stop me if this sounds familiar: Your phone battery is in the single digits, and you have a long trip home without a charger. You get to a cafe, and you pull your laptop out of your bag to find it out of juice. You board an airplane, and that’s when you realize you forgot to charge your Nintendo Switch.

Oh, and your earbuds are low on battery. Actually, one of them is low on battery and the other is dead.

the top half of an iPhone 15 screen, showing apps for Weather, Voice Memos, Find My and Home Apps, with a Low Battery warning of 20% above them

NurPhoto/Getty Images

In the presmartphone days, we had separate devices for taking pictures, making calls and listening to music — and we had to make sure we charged each one. Now we have one device that can do it all, but we have new accessories that also need charging: smart watches, smart rings, smart glasses and the latest AI gadget (pins, anyone?). I don’t know about you, but I don’t want to charge a pair of headphones on top of that.  

I especially don’t want to be stuck in a situation where I can only listen to music in one ear. A common complaint about wireless earbuds is that one of them always runs out of battery or stops working before the other.

Each wireless earbud has its own lithium-ion battery. It’s the same type of battery that powers your phone or your EV, and over time, it becomes less effective at holding a charge. Even for two seemingly identical earbuds, the battery lifespan can vary.

If one of your wireless earbuds is draining quickly, you might think to solve the problem by getting a battery replacement. Think again. AirPods are notoriously difficult (read: impossible) to disassemble without damaging them, because of an ultracompact design with glued-in components. There are some exceptions, but most wireless earbuds can’t be reassembled after they’re taken apart. You just have to buy new ones.

Wired earbuds are already perfect  

gettyimages-2273293077-1

Igor Suka/Getty Images

I admit that when I got my first iPhone without a headphone jack, I was worried about how I would listen to my tunes. I didn’t want to use a dongle every time I had to plug in my earbuds. 

Thankfully, there are some affordable options that plug into modern phones. Apple makes wired earbuds with both Lightning and USB-C connectors, and I can confirm that they’re just as good as the original 3.5mm plug version. 

I know it’s convenient to pair wireless earbuds with a smartwatch during a gym session and not have a wire get in the way of your reps. I know that trends and movements like Wired It-Girls come and go. But I hope this one sticks around for a while, because I want to play my favorite album or podcast without lag.

I don’t want to charge one more device; I don’t want to worry about dropping $100+ down a storm drain — and I can’t ask for a better solution than wired earbuds.

When Steve Jobs was Apple’s CEO, he liked to highlight the simplicity of new tech by saying, “It just works.” Wired earbuds are exactly that: frictionless and easy to use. Twenty years ago, they were the height of cool. Today, they still are.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews






It’s easy to assume that vehicles all had internal combustion engines until very recently. Gasoline and petrol engines were the standard for decades, after all, so why would early vehicles be any different? In reality, the early days of the automobile era were more varied than you might expect, and even featured a range of electric cars. Yes, despite electric vehicles not truly taking off until the 21st century, the first electric vehicles are much older than you think; drivers in the 1900s were going around town in electric vehicles — and where there are EVs, there are charging stations.

One such station, visible in the image above, was the creation of General Electric. Formally called the mercury arc rectifier, it took alternating current and sent it through vaporized mercury in a glass tube. This converted it into direct current, which powered up the EV’s battery. The woman in the image, who’s charging a Columbia Mark 68 Victrola, is standing at the control panel, which allowed a user to adjust power levels. 

These chargers could be installed everywhere, including homes, businesses, and public parking garages, supporting the electric vehicle boom of the early 20th century. While 21st-century EV chargers have come a long way from where they were, the basic building blocks are all still there, and it’s fascinating to see.

How EV chargers have evolved since the early 20th century

EV charging has changed a lot in some ways — but not in others. At the core of it all is the aforementioned conversion from AC to DC, which still happens when you charge modern EVs at standard charging stations. The difference is that your vehicle’s on-board charger performs the conversion, not the charger. Old EV chargers took between several hours and a day to charge, and current-day units can similarly take a few hours to well over a day from empty, depending on the charger’s speed. Fast chargers, which provide DC directly, can cut this down to around an hour or less.

Old-school and modern EV chargers also differ in how they provide power to the vehicle. Mercury arc rectifiers connected directly to the negative terminal of the lead-acid battery that needed charging. Nowadays, EVs use dedicated charging ports. Battery swapping was also commonplace in the early 1900s, and companies like General Electric tried to cash in by offering to replace drivers’ old, run-down batteries with new ones for a fee. That’s not yet possible with most mainstream EVs, although companies like Stellantis have tried to introduce EV battery swapping with moderate success.

Even if they were unrefined compared to today’s models, early EVs seemed to be on to something. Why, then, did electric cars fail, and how did gasoline end up becoming the predominant power source for vehicles?

What led to the downfall of the original wave of electric cars

EVs were no mere fad in the 1900s and 1910s. According to the 1900 United States census, 1,575 of the 4,192 vehicles sold that year were electric, with the value of these early EVs — $2,873,464 — accounting for more than half of the total market value of $4,899,443. It wasn’t just EVs, either; other sources of propulsion, like steam, were also vying for a foothold in the automobile market. By the 1920s and 1930s, though, these had all been superseded by the internal combustion engine.

One of the major drawbacks of early EVs was the fact that electricity was not yet widely available. Electrical hookups were a rarity outside of major cities, limiting the use of these vehicles. The lead-acid batteries they used also had their fair share of issues. They needed to be inspected, cleaned, and repaired every few days, making them more of an inconvenience than anything. Worse yet, they had poor mileage, and, with chargers possibly out of reach, many likely didn’t want to risk being stranded while out for a drive.

Eventually, price reductions for gas cars and improvements such as electric starters and better reliability prompted buyers and automakers alike to move away from electric rides. Thus, while the best-selling EVs of 2026 show that it’s a good time for EVs, this electric boom plainly isn’t the first of its kind. Early EVs eventually fizzled out, but they still set the stage for our current fascination with electric vehicles.





Source link