The Slate Truck’s Starting Price Is Cheap, But I’m Still Not Convinced







After a long wait, the final specifications of the much-anticipated Slate EV are here. It will start at $24,950, making it, according to Slate, the least expensive pickup you can currently buy in the United States. Just that fact alone will likely sell a few trucks. 

Charging is done through a Tesla Supercharger-compatible NACS port and Slate says it will go from 20% to 80% in 30 minutes given up to 150 kW DC fast charging support. The range is an estimated 205 miles, putting it firmly on the low end of EVs produced in 2026 where driving between 250 and 300 miles between charges is more common for base models. The Slate’s range is comparable to that of a Hyundai Kona, but pales in comparison to other budget EVs like the new Chevy Bolt or the recently updated Nissan Leaf, which both eclipse 250 miles in range (almost 300 miles with the Leaf). 

As a truck doing truck things, the Slate has a listed payload of “around” 1,550 pounds, which puts it right in the neighborhood of other mini trucks like the Ford Maverick, which has a maximum payload of 1,500 pounds. Towing is listed at “around” 2,000 pounds, which, once again is right in line with the Maverick (although the Maverick can be optioned to have a tow capacity of 4,000 pounds). 

Paying for convenience

Where the Slate is supposed to shine are the features (or lack thereof) and customization. Notably, the two-seater Slate can be modded into a two-row SUV or sportback design reminiscent of the old mini Chevy K5 Blazer or a mini vintage Ford Bronco. Those options, of course, add to the price ($29,950 for the SUV and $31,950 for the fastback).

The base model Slate has almost no features to speak of, putting it roughly in front of a Toyota pickup from 1996 in terms of creature comforts. You don’t even get a radio in base trim. Features like armrests and the ability to pair your phone can all be added for extra money. 

The Slate also comes in one color, that is the color of slate. Interesting for an automaker, Slate encourages drivers to wrap their mini trucks and the configurator on the website offers a few options. This is reminiscent of the early days of motoring where, to keep costs down, automakers would only offer a few paint colors from the factory. Tesla operates under a similar structure when it comes to exterior paint.

Positively niche

The total lack of features and low starting price definitely has its appeal to two distinct groups of people: internet car enthusiasts who pine for simpler cars without as much infotainment or touchscreen-powered noise in a car (like me), and companies who need a fleet of cheap trucks that are easier to maintain and prepare for company livery than gas-powered trucks. The latter market, I suspect, will turn out to be the main focus of Slate’s sales goals. 

Is the Slate EV cool? Yes. Is it inexpensive? Comparatively, yes (though delivery fees are still yet to be announced). Will anyone apart from delivery companies or contracting firms buy it in large enough numbers? That remains to be seen, and I am not convinced the simplicity will appeal to a large enough swathe of non-fleet buyers to make a dent in sales of rival models, electric or otherwise.

A used Chevy Bolt, Nissan Leaf, or Hyundai Ioniq 5 has the potential to be less expensive, offer more range, and have exponentially more features than the base model Slate. It’s important to remember that crank windows and no radio (paired with a mediocre 205 mile range) makes the Slate positively niche in terms of market appeal. 





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews






It’s easy to assume that vehicles all had internal combustion engines until very recently. Gasoline and petrol engines were the standard for decades, after all, so why would early vehicles be any different? In reality, the early days of the automobile era were more varied than you might expect, and even featured a range of electric cars. Yes, despite electric vehicles not truly taking off until the 21st century, the first electric vehicles are much older than you think; drivers in the 1900s were going around town in electric vehicles — and where there are EVs, there are charging stations.

One such station, visible in the image above, was the creation of General Electric. Formally called the mercury arc rectifier, it took alternating current and sent it through vaporized mercury in a glass tube. This converted it into direct current, which powered up the EV’s battery. The woman in the image, who’s charging a Columbia Mark 68 Victrola, is standing at the control panel, which allowed a user to adjust power levels. 

These chargers could be installed everywhere, including homes, businesses, and public parking garages, supporting the electric vehicle boom of the early 20th century. While 21st-century EV chargers have come a long way from where they were, the basic building blocks are all still there, and it’s fascinating to see.

How EV chargers have evolved since the early 20th century

EV charging has changed a lot in some ways — but not in others. At the core of it all is the aforementioned conversion from AC to DC, which still happens when you charge modern EVs at standard charging stations. The difference is that your vehicle’s on-board charger performs the conversion, not the charger. Old EV chargers took between several hours and a day to charge, and current-day units can similarly take a few hours to well over a day from empty, depending on the charger’s speed. Fast chargers, which provide DC directly, can cut this down to around an hour or less.

Old-school and modern EV chargers also differ in how they provide power to the vehicle. Mercury arc rectifiers connected directly to the negative terminal of the lead-acid battery that needed charging. Nowadays, EVs use dedicated charging ports. Battery swapping was also commonplace in the early 1900s, and companies like General Electric tried to cash in by offering to replace drivers’ old, run-down batteries with new ones for a fee. That’s not yet possible with most mainstream EVs, although companies like Stellantis have tried to introduce EV battery swapping with moderate success.

Even if they were unrefined compared to today’s models, early EVs seemed to be on to something. Why, then, did electric cars fail, and how did gasoline end up becoming the predominant power source for vehicles?

What led to the downfall of the original wave of electric cars

EVs were no mere fad in the 1900s and 1910s. According to the 1900 United States census, 1,575 of the 4,192 vehicles sold that year were electric, with the value of these early EVs — $2,873,464 — accounting for more than half of the total market value of $4,899,443. It wasn’t just EVs, either; other sources of propulsion, like steam, were also vying for a foothold in the automobile market. By the 1920s and 1930s, though, these had all been superseded by the internal combustion engine.

One of the major drawbacks of early EVs was the fact that electricity was not yet widely available. Electrical hookups were a rarity outside of major cities, limiting the use of these vehicles. The lead-acid batteries they used also had their fair share of issues. They needed to be inspected, cleaned, and repaired every few days, making them more of an inconvenience than anything. Worse yet, they had poor mileage, and, with chargers possibly out of reach, many likely didn’t want to risk being stranded while out for a drive.

Eventually, price reductions for gas cars and improvements such as electric starters and better reliability prompted buyers and automakers alike to move away from electric rides. Thus, while the best-selling EVs of 2026 show that it’s a good time for EVs, this electric boom plainly isn’t the first of its kind. Early EVs eventually fizzled out, but they still set the stage for our current fascination with electric vehicles.





Source link