I’ve spent 48 hours with the Google Home Speaker, and Gemini is off to a promising start


2.jpg

pros and cons

Pros

  • Loud, crisp sound
  • Gemini for Home with generative AI
  • Intuitive controls.
Cons

  • The microphone array doesn’t pick up voices when the music is loud
  • More expensive than Nest Mini alternatives.

more buying choices

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


The Google Home Speaker was officially released as the company’s latest take on a smart speaker, its first in six years. I’ve been testing the Google Home Speaker for nearly 48 hours, and I’ve got some interesting first impressions.

Also: This tablet replaced both my iPad and Kindle, and it’s 40% off on Amazon right now

With 360-degree audio, the Google Home Speaker offers a new audio experience compared to the Nest Audio and Nest Mini, both of which feature front-facing sound. The new experience, however, doesn’t necessarily mean it will be obviously better.

Best bluetooth speaker deals of the week

Deals are selected by the CNET Group commerce team, and may be unrelated to this article.

The new audio experience

With the Google Home Speaker, Google did away with the Nest moniker for its smart home speakers and redesigned the audio experience for its newest device. While many customers are looking forward to the new Google Home Speaker, others are concerned that the technology inside may not be enough to justify the upgrade.

Though Google says the new speaker has 2.5 times the bass of the Nest Mini, it uses a single 58mm driver. The $120 Google Nest Audio, released in 2020, has better hardware, with a 75mm mid-woofer and a 19mm tweeter. Considering that the new Google Home Speaker sits squarely in the same $100 price range as the Nest Audio, I’d say the concern is valid.

Also: I’m a smart home expert, and these security camera deals are actually worth considering

However, the specs alone don’t tell the full story. In my, albeit limited, tests, the Google Home Speaker delivers powerful, clear sound comparable to that of the Apple HomePod mini, which also features a two-inch full-range driver. It certainly surpasses the audio experience from the Nest Mini and the older Echo Dot.

Surprisingly easy controls

Google Home Speaker

Maria Diaz/ZDNET

Unlike its biggest competitors, the Google Home Speaker doesn’t have a physical control panel along the top: There are no buttons or display to control volume or play or pause. I was convinced that this would make it hard to navigate or to learn to control it without using my voice or the Google Home app, yet I was surprised that this wasn’t the case.

Google keeps it pretty simple with the Google Home Speaker: Tap the top to play or pause, and tap the lights on the sides to increase or decrease the volume. The lights turn on as soon as you tap the speaker, so you can easily see them without having to figure out what you’re doing.

The new Gemini vs. Google Assistant

Google has been committed to delivering an improved Gemini for Home experience for months, and the Google Home Speaker succeeds in this endeavor. Compared to Alexa+, its most similar competitor, Gemini in the new smart speaker is a less jarring experience right off the bat. As someone who’s used Alexa+ for months, I still haven’t gotten used to its happy-go-lucky, overly excited tone.

Also: I tried Gmail’s new Gemini Flows feature, and it’s a huge filter improvement (with one big catch)

Like the Gemini experience in Google Home, the Gemini app, and Android devices, Gemini in the Google Home Speaker is conversational without being too cheery, though it still has some quirks. Most AI companies have done away with certain quirks like the “as an AI…” responses, but not Gemini. 

This doesn’t make Gemini obsolete or mean the assistant is falling behind; it’s just something to point out.

Google Home Speaker

Maria Diaz/ZDNET

Gemini in Google Home Assistant works as well as it does elsewhere. It’s responsive without being overeager, its responses are informative and mostly accurate (which is what you can expect from any generative AI bot), and it reliably generates content. Conversations in general with the Google speaker feel more natural than any other smart device I’ve tested in my home.

These features put it leaps and bounds ahead of Siri’s performance on the HomePod and HomePod mini, which still don’t have generative AI. Plus, with Alexa+’s gratingly Pollyannaish tone, Gemini for Home has been my preferred home assistant over the past couple of days.

The letdown: microphone array

Far-field microphone arrays tend to be problematic for smart speakers, as they must balance voice input collection with the playback of music or other audio content. Every company wants the best-sounding, most powerful speaker with a smart, AI-powered voice assistant at the lowest price, and it’s no easy feat.

As a result, speakers need a strong microphone array that allows them to hear voices even with the volume turned up. The Google Home Speaker features three far-field microphones with a neural processing unit (NPU) for local sound isolation. Unfortunately, I struggled to get the Google Home Speaker to listen to me when I played music, even when I turned it down to two-thirds of the way up.

Also: I got a 50% off Fire TV Stick this Prime Day, and I’m watching these top streaming deals

This means I have to go up to the speaker and pause the music by tapping the top, which isn’t a terrible inconvenience, but it defeats the purpose of having a voice-activated smart speaker.

ZDNET’s buying advice (for now)

Google Home Speaker

Amazon Echo Dot (left), Google Home Speaker (center), Apple HomePod mini (right).

Maria Diaz/ZDNET

Compared to its direct competitors, the Google Home Speaker is a strong contender that outperforms the fourth-generation Amazon Echo Dot and, in some cases, can beat the newer Echo Dot Max

Compared to the Apple HomePod Mini, Google’s latest speaker falls a bit flat on audio and can’t beat Apple’s microphone performance and quality. However, Google’s speaker has Gemini, a hands-free generative AI assistant, while the HomePod mini is, for now, still stuck with the older version of Siri. That alone may sell the Google speaker for many of you.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews






It’s easy to assume that vehicles all had internal combustion engines until very recently. Gasoline and petrol engines were the standard for decades, after all, so why would early vehicles be any different? In reality, the early days of the automobile era were more varied than you might expect, and even featured a range of electric cars. Yes, despite electric vehicles not truly taking off until the 21st century, the first electric vehicles are much older than you think; drivers in the 1900s were going around town in electric vehicles — and where there are EVs, there are charging stations.

One such station, visible in the image above, was the creation of General Electric. Formally called the mercury arc rectifier, it took alternating current and sent it through vaporized mercury in a glass tube. This converted it into direct current, which powered up the EV’s battery. The woman in the image, who’s charging a Columbia Mark 68 Victrola, is standing at the control panel, which allowed a user to adjust power levels. 

These chargers could be installed everywhere, including homes, businesses, and public parking garages, supporting the electric vehicle boom of the early 20th century. While 21st-century EV chargers have come a long way from where they were, the basic building blocks are all still there, and it’s fascinating to see.

How EV chargers have evolved since the early 20th century

EV charging has changed a lot in some ways — but not in others. At the core of it all is the aforementioned conversion from AC to DC, which still happens when you charge modern EVs at standard charging stations. The difference is that your vehicle’s on-board charger performs the conversion, not the charger. Old EV chargers took between several hours and a day to charge, and current-day units can similarly take a few hours to well over a day from empty, depending on the charger’s speed. Fast chargers, which provide DC directly, can cut this down to around an hour or less.

Old-school and modern EV chargers also differ in how they provide power to the vehicle. Mercury arc rectifiers connected directly to the negative terminal of the lead-acid battery that needed charging. Nowadays, EVs use dedicated charging ports. Battery swapping was also commonplace in the early 1900s, and companies like General Electric tried to cash in by offering to replace drivers’ old, run-down batteries with new ones for a fee. That’s not yet possible with most mainstream EVs, although companies like Stellantis have tried to introduce EV battery swapping with moderate success.

Even if they were unrefined compared to today’s models, early EVs seemed to be on to something. Why, then, did electric cars fail, and how did gasoline end up becoming the predominant power source for vehicles?

What led to the downfall of the original wave of electric cars

EVs were no mere fad in the 1900s and 1910s. According to the 1900 United States census, 1,575 of the 4,192 vehicles sold that year were electric, with the value of these early EVs — $2,873,464 — accounting for more than half of the total market value of $4,899,443. It wasn’t just EVs, either; other sources of propulsion, like steam, were also vying for a foothold in the automobile market. By the 1920s and 1930s, though, these had all been superseded by the internal combustion engine.

One of the major drawbacks of early EVs was the fact that electricity was not yet widely available. Electrical hookups were a rarity outside of major cities, limiting the use of these vehicles. The lead-acid batteries they used also had their fair share of issues. They needed to be inspected, cleaned, and repaired every few days, making them more of an inconvenience than anything. Worse yet, they had poor mileage, and, with chargers possibly out of reach, many likely didn’t want to risk being stranded while out for a drive.

Eventually, price reductions for gas cars and improvements such as electric starters and better reliability prompted buyers and automakers alike to move away from electric rides. Thus, while the best-selling EVs of 2026 show that it’s a good time for EVs, this electric boom plainly isn’t the first of its kind. Early EVs eventually fizzled out, but they still set the stage for our current fascination with electric vehicles.





Source link