3 DIY Projects You Should Never Try To Do Indoors






These days, we’re all becoming more and more accustomed to remote work. Things that used to only happen within the confines of official businesses, now regularly happen in the privacy of homes everywhere. We get why someone might be envious of their friends who work from home, but not all work is suitable for the home environment.

We’re all in favor of the do-it-yourself philosophy. Most people could benefit from a few hands-on skills and DIY home repairs or projects can be a good way to save money and a fun way to fill a weekend. That said, there are some projects you should leave to the pros and others you can do, but you shouldn’t do at home.

Safety is paramount when working on any DIY project and that includes choosing the right environment. If you have any DIY projects coming down the pipe, take some time to plan before you get started and think twice about doing any of these DIY activities inside the confines of your home.

Staining wood

The world is filled with volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Many VOCs are produced naturally and usually aren’t harmful. When you catch the pleasant smell of cedar or enjoy the taste of a fresh orange, that’s thanks in large part to VOCs. However, exposure to the wrong kinds, in too high a concentration, can have a negative impact on health and safety.

Finishing wooden materials with wood stain is a way to bring out the material’s aesthetic properties and offer some protection from the elements, but applying stain inside usually isn’t recommended. 

A 2015 study in the journal Atmospheric Environment measured the quantity and duration of VOC emission from a variety of wood stains. Researchers found that solvent-based stains produce higher total VOC emissions like benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes, styrene, alpha-pinene, and camphene, and those VOCs linger longer. Only limonene is more present in water-based stains, but emissions peak earlier and fall off more rapidly. Even still, of all the stains tested, only a single water-based stain was classified as “low-emitting” and without any potential negative health effects.

While the amount and type of VOCs created and how long they stick around varies depending on the type of wood stain you’re using, it’s typically a good idea to stain wood outside in an area with plenty of ventilation.

Welding anything

While it’s possible, and even common to weld things inside, an interior space needs to meet certain conditions to be safe for it. It’s unlikely that your living room meets those requirements. Welding in any confined space comes with some inherent risks, not all of which are immediately obvious.

Unless you live in a concrete bunker, the interior of your home is probably filled with all kinds of flammable materials, from the wood in your walls to the fabric of you carpets and drapes. Welding produces a lot of heat and it can also produce sparks and drops of hot metal, all of which have the potential to start a fire. However, believe it or not, if something goes wrong while welding inside, a fire might be the least of your worries.

A fire can be seen and smelled. Welding involves the use and production of various gases which are invisible, scent-free, and capable of causing asphyxiation. Inert gases like argon are often used in the welding process and chemical reactions produced during the welding process can create other gases which displace oxygen. Because some of these gases are heavier than air, they can even pool around you. In some cases you might not even notice oxygen has dropped dangerously low until it’s too late. Welding is best done in well-ventilated areas, like outdoors or in a purpose-built space.

Painting (too much or with the wrong paint)

In the past, many paints were solvent-based and they released VOCs during application and for several days afterward. Those fumes had various potential negative health consequences, especially when exposure was significant or extended. In recent years, the paint industry has largely moved away from solvent-based paints in favor of water-based paints, but VOCs are still a concern.

A 2024 study in the journal Environmental Science & Technology Letters investigated the top 70 most sold paint brands and analyzed the compounds inside. Despite being labeled or advertised as low-VOC, 24 of those brands contained up to 11 different VOCs in concentrations as high as 20,000 parts per million. The others contained several semi-volatile organic compounds in various concentrations, highlighting the health risks still present in modern paints.

Choosing a low-VOC paint can help to reduce your risks but probably won’t eliminate them. When painting indoors, you might want to limit the amount of interior space you paint at one time, make sure to wear a respirator, and keep the air circulating. If you’re painting smaller objects like furniture, it’s probably best to take it outside for painting and leave it there until it’s dried and cured.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


As an ardent, perhaps obsessive, Harry Potter fan, I can’t say I was thrilled when I learned HBO was rebooting the beloved film franchise as a TV show. 

Like millions of other Harry Potter enthusiasts, the books and movies have been a key part of both my adolescence and adulthood, offering a magical refuge from a not-so-dazzling Muggle world. Theme parks, Broadway shows, mega stores and audiobooks have kept the spellbinding story alive not just for my generation, but for younger Potterheads as well. 

But I never thought we’d get an on-screen retelling just a decade and a half after the films wrapped up. What was the point of doing it all again with a brand-new cast, beyond the obvious monetary gain?

Hollywood is stuck in a loop of recycling successful TV shows and movies to make an easy buck. I thought Harry Potter was safe from that phenomenon, at least for a while, given the ongoing relevance of the films. Over the years, I’ve gone to multiple Harry Potter screenings with audiences of all ages, highlighting the franchise’s broad cultural appeal across generations. Surely, there was still room for future generations to take part in something that’s brought us so much joy. 

Despite controversy surrounding author JK Rowling’s views on transgender issues, which run counter to the series’ themes of love, inclusivity and justice, Harry Potter remains a meaningful part of many fans’ lives. Its stories, characters and themes continue to resonate, fostering a sense of connection and belonging for those who have adopted the wizarding world as their own. 

Now, the enchantment of the original films would be supplanted by a shiny new TV franchise. A world that had come to life so vibrantly on screen would be repurposed before the magic had run out. I wasn’t on board with the idea at all.

But recently, something changed. 

As more details began to emerge about the upcoming TV series, I felt myself softening toward the endeavor. Starting later this year, the episodes will be released on HBO and HBO Max over a decade, with each season focusing on one of the seven books for a more in-depth telling of the story than the film adaptations. As much as I love the movies, having more time to delve into side stories and details that didn’t make it on screen the first time doesn’t sound like such a bad idea. 

When HBO dropped the first trailer for Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone this week, I felt a mixture of trepidation and curiosity. Just how familiar — or not — would this reimagined world feel? As I hit play, those feelings quickly gave way to an unexpected excitement. 

In the trailer, we glimpse the loneliness of Harry’s upbringing as he’s tossed in the cupboard under the stairs, reprimanded by his aunt and bullied by his cousin. We hear him lament how little he knew his parents. We see him take in the splendor of Hogwarts with wonder. We watch him light up as he finds joy with new friends. 

The actors playing the golden trio of Harry (Dominic McLaughlin), Ron (Alastair Stout) and Hermione (Arabella Stanton) appear well-suited for their roles, even in the brief glimpses we get of them navigating this enigmatic and enchanting world.

The iconic lightning bolt scar, the calligraphic acceptance letter, the homey Hogwarts Express — it’s all so familiar and yet entirely new. Despite my earlier hesitation, it’s thrilling to be part of this second wave of magic — even if I still see the show as a clear attempt to further profit from a successful franchise. But rather than viewing the TV series as a departure or replacement of the beloved movies, I’m choosing to see it as another way to keep the wizarding world alive through a fresh lens.

If the train is leaving the station, I might as well hop aboard and enjoy the ride. When Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone debuts in December, I’ll be watching, Butterbeer in hand. As Hagrid wisely put it, “What’s comin’ will come, an’ we’ll meet it when it does.”





Source link