6 reasons why Firefox is the better browser for most users


Firefox

Jack Wallen/ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


ZDNET’s key takeaways

  • Firefox is still alive and kicking.
  • Today’s world demands privacy and user choice.
  • Firefox would be an improvement over many users’ default browsers.

I’ve used Firefox, on and off, since it first came into being. It’s fast, customizable, bloat-free, serious about privacy and security, regularly updated, and its developers listen to users. With a brief exception back in 2010, I’ve always been happy with the browser. 

The company behind the browser is a different story. It’s worth noting that in July, 2025, I announced that I was deleting Firefox for good. That decision was based on my distaste for some of Mozilla’s actions over the years. Time does heal all wounds, however, and I found myself heading back to the open-source browser. Although I might disagree with some of Mozilla’s decisions, Firefox is still one of the best open-source browsers on the market. And given my penchant for Linux and open source, it’s hard to stay away from the browser that ships by default with most Linux distributions.

Also: Firefox just fixed my biggest annoyance with web browsers – and others should copy ASAP

That said, for many users, switching browsers is akin to changing religions or going from Coke to Pepsi. Chrome/Edge/Safari have been the defaults for years, and they are preinstalled on their respective operating systems (Chrome on Android, Edge on Windows, Safari on iOS/MacOS).

Why would you change? Isn’t Chrome “good enough”? 

Well, that’s kind of the issue. Chrome is “good enough.” But is “good enough” truly good enough anymore? I would argue that it’s not, and I’m going to back up that claim with a few reasons why I believe Firefox makes sense in today’s world.

1. Firefox isn’t developed by a major company with a vested interest

Mozilla is the company behind Firefox. Although the Mozilla Foundation is a non-profit organization, its subsidiary, the Mozilla Corporation, is a for-profit business. However, unlike Google and Chrome, Mozilla doesn’t have a vested interest in promoting related services. From my perspective, Google wants to keep users within its ecosystem, which means google.com, Google Workspaces, Android, etc. To that end, the company will do whatever it can to make that a reality.

Also: The permissions behind your AI Chrome extensions deserve a closer look – they may be spying on you

On the other hand, Mozilla doesn’t have a search engine to lock users into. Firefox doesn’t care which search engine you use, what operating system you use it on, or what productivity suite you prefer. That means Firefox isn’t going to do anything nefarious to keep me from doing what I need to do and how I need to do it.

Although Mozilla wants Firefox to become the biggest player in the browser game again, they aren’t going to do it by any means necessary.

2. Better transparency through open source

Firefox is open source. That means you can view the source code used to build the browser. You could even build your own browser, based on Firefox. But what this ultimately allows is for anyone to view the browser’s source code and see what’s going on under the hood. That’s transparency. 

Also: This one iPhone setting immediately stops all apps from tracking you – turn it off today

Yes, it takes a certain skill set to understand what’s happening in the code, but those with those skills are free to dive in. Try doing that with Chrome, Safari, or Edge. You won’t get far. Sure, you can view the Chromium code (which is what Chrome and Edge are based on), but you won’t see the proprietary bits that Google and Microsoft add to it.

For me, that obfuscation leads to mistrust. I’d much rather use a web browser that’s open and honest about what it’s doing under the hood.

3. Improved privacy

I’m not saying that Firefox is the most privacy-focused browser on the market, as that title belongs to either Brave or Tor Browser. However, Firefox is certainly more private than Chrome, Edge, or Safari. 

Also: The best secure browsers for privacy: Expert tested

Firefox’s built-in tracker blocking does a great job of preventing data collection. That doesn’t mean, however, that Firefox collects nothing. It collects limited technical and interaction data, such as performance metrics, feature usage, and IP-derived location. That data is used only to improve the browser and personalize sponsored content. It is important to understand that the data collected is anonymized and not sold to advertisers.

While Google does not sell your personal data to third parties, it doesn’t need to, because it owns the world’s largest advertising network. 

4. No deep integrations

With Chrome, Edge, and Safari, you know that you’re getting deep integrations with proprietary tools that work together to create a cohesive whole. Chrome integrates with Gemini, Docs, and Meet, syncs your account, bookmarks, and passwords, and acts as a centralized hub for data used for targeted advertising. Targeted ads are a major driver for Google, as they generate revenue.

Also: I found a free Google Maps alternative that doesn’t track my location (or kill my phone battery)

Firefox, on the other hand, takes a minimalist approach to integrations. Yes, you can sync your Firefox account across devices, but Firefox is not deeply integrated with any particular ecosystem: not Google Drive, not iCloud, and not OneDrive.

5. AI is opt-in, not opt-out

AI’s exponential growth over the past few years has made it a part of everything. Open Chrome and you’ll find Gemini. Open Edge and you’ll find Copilot. Open Safari and you’ll find Apple Intelligence.

You can bet those browsers will continue to lean heavily into AI. To compound that issue, AI is an opt-out feature in Chrome, Edge, and Safari. On the other hand, Firefox takes an opt-in approach. By default, Firefox does not have AI turned on, so you have to manually enable it for it to work. Yes, Firefox includes AI features, but they won’t work until you enable them.

Also: I’m no Copilot fan, but these 6 new AI skills turned Edge into my favorite mobile browser

For anyone who is averse to AI, Firefox is the way to go.

6. DMA

“Every 10 seconds, someone picks Firefox through a DMA choice screen.” That’s what Mozilla had to say about the DMA.

The Digital Markets Act in Europe is designed to ensure fair competition and openness in the digital sector and targets dominant tech companies, often referred to as “gatekeepers.”

When given the choice, users will select Firefox, with over 6 million instances (again, according to Mozilla). The company also points to another study that concludes “…that Firefox daily active users were 113% higher in the EU than they would have been without the DMA.”

Also: Firefox just made it easier to separate your work and personal browsing – here’s how

In the US, users dont have that type of protection, so monopolies are free to monopolize at will.

Choice is important, but many (maybe most) US users don’t realize they have a choice. It’s pretty easy to read between the lines of this piece from Yougov.com — most users simply stick with whatever browser their operating system presents them. Some users may be aware of the alternatives, but they assume the companies behind those alternatives have their best interests in mind.

The DMA shows that understanding choice leads to change. 





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


If Game Two of their first-round playoff series with the Denver Nuggets saved the 2025-26 season for the Minnesota Timberwolves, Game Three showed why it should be saved. 

The Timberwolves were a different beast while decisively thumping the Nuggets, 113-96 Thursday night at Target Center, in a game that wasn’t nearly that close. These Wolves were the mythical creature we’d heard about in preseason lore, purposefully locked and loaded to be both marauding and staunch. They owned both ends of the court, gleefully transferring back and forth from irresistible force to immovable object. 

A quartet of Timberwolves deserve special mention, but it begins with Jaden McDaniels. After his team had toppled Denver to even the series at a game apiece Monday night, McDaniels used the sizable chip on his shoulder to etch some graffiti into the public discourse, casually castigating the most prominent Nuggets players by name as “bad defenders” in a matter-of-fact manner that had the media compelling him to confirm what he had just said. 

Trash talk is fleetingly fungible in the jaundiced social environment of 2026, functioning more like coupons than currency in that it needs to be rapidly leveraged before its expiration date. The common perception naturally was that McDaniels was calling out the Nuggets. But in a more subtle, profound way, he was also putting his teammates on notice. 

All season long the Timberwolves have procrastinated on their full potential, frequently demonstrating that their preseason talk about maturity and commitment was cheap. By contrast, those words uttered by McDaniels were expensive. He had just picked a fight with the opponent, leaving open the question of how many of his teammates would join him in the fray. 

That he would lead the charge was established early, after the Timberwolves’ top two scorers, Anthony Edwards and Julius Randle, had each missed a pair of open looks against Denver’s bad defenders in the game’s first 90 seconds.  

With the game still scoreless, the NBA’s best pick-and-roll combo, Nikola Jokic and Jamal Murray, were clustered around the foul line with Minnesota’s best defenders, McDaniels and Rudy Gobert. As they jammed up Jokic, McDaniels picked the ball loose and started sprint-dribbling the other way. To no one’s surprise, Donte “Ragu” DiVincenzo was also on his horse in transition, receiving a pass from McDaniels and then lobbing it back for a Jaden slam against a hapless Murray and Murray’s late-arriving teammate, Cam Johnson, who committed the foul that allowed McDaniels to finish with the “and-1” free throw. 

On the Timberwolves next offensive possession, McDaniels muscled his way to two offensive rebounds, feeding Ragu off the first one for a missed three-pointer, which he corralled for the second one and executed the putback in traffic. It was McDaniels 5, Nuggets 0, setting the tone for a game in which not only did the Wolves never trail, but never let the lead go under double digits after McDaniels made a consecutive pair of driving layups eight minutes into the game. 

“Spectacular. I thought his activity offensively in the first quarter was outstanding,” said Wolves coach Chris Finch after the game. “He was inspirational.” 

Among the most inspired were McDaniels fellow wing players, Ragu and Ayo Dosunmu. Ragu is exactly the kind of player who will have your back in a squabble, and his galvanized performance seemed borne of satisfaction that someone else had clarified the mission. As usual, the Timberwolves were at their best with him on the court: +20 in the 32:54 he played, -3 in the 15:06 he sat. 

“He makes so many hustle plays, momentum plays, different styles of plays.” Finch raved. “He’ll make a shot, get a transition bucket, he’ll rebound, get a steal, blow something up. So many different plays. He’s just a basketball player.”

Related: How the Timberwolves sparked a season-saving Game 2 comeback over the Nuggets in Denver

Then there was Ayo, whose fearless, blazing, bee-lines for the bucket were quicksilver kryptonite for a Nuggets defense that is neither swift nor rugged. “I’ve been waiting for him to wake up a little bit in this series,” Finch accurately observed. “The downhill mindset that he played with all season for us was back.”

Back with the sort of multipurpose propulsion that leaves witnesses with giddy whiplash. Ayo led the team with 25 points and 9 assists in 32 minutes of time-lapse hoops, the lone blemish being three clanks from long range. Why chuck treys when you can so easily undress players in the paint? Ayo was 10-for-12 on two-pointers and none of those dozen shots came from anywhere but beneath the rim. Five of his nine dimes likewise yielded layups or dunks, which means he personally accounted for 30 of the 68 points in the paint by the Timberwolves on Thursday, doubling up the Nuggets’ 34.

Which brings us to the non-wing in Game 3’s ring of honor, Rudy Gobert. For the third straight game, Gobert blunted the supposed advantage Denver had with the magical playmaker Nikola Jokic at the controls. Suffice to say that in the last five quarters, Jokic has shot 8-for-33 from the floor. If that continues, the Nuggets are toast in this series. 

When I asked Finch after the game if the herculean job Gobert was doing on Jokic made planning his defense simpler and better thus far, he replied, “Rudy is making all of us look good right now with his defense.” 

Amen.

If there is an asterisk on this game, it would be the absence of Denver’s brutishly versatile power forward Aaron Gordon. Nuggets coach David Adelman should be given a lot of credit for his honesty and transparency in dealing with the media during his first full season at the helm, but it came back to bite him and his team during the pregame presser, when he was clearly rattled and dejected by the sudden unavailability of Gordon, whose playing status went to “probable” to “out” in a period of a few hours due to a chronic calf strain. 

Gordon is far and away his team’s best defender, making the timing of his injury especially troublesome in the wake of McDaniels laying down his marker. Rattled is a good way to describe the entire team’s performance in the first quarter, an emotional wounding that needs to heal as fast as Gordon’s body if the Nuggets are going to be competitive in a series that had dramatically been flipped on its head over the past three days. 

That the Timberwolves played with such dominance despite mediocre outings from Ant and Randle would be a good thing for both of those current cornerstones to keep in mind. Ant was beset by foul trouble and Randle had a solid second quarter, but it stood out that neither player fully embraced what so often works on offense when the Wolves are at their best: Push the pace, move the ball, move without the ball, and make quick decisions. Ant and Randle can still be first among equals and blend into that catechism if they stay attuned to the possibilities of a greater good, one that all of sudden doesn’t have to end with them being postseason fodder for the Spurs or the Thunder. 

Not when you’ve got three wings at a collective peak, with a chaser of Rudy semi-clowning the Joker. 



Source link