A Single A-10 Warthog Aircraft Is Wildly Expensive, But That’s Not The Worst Part







As if one downed military aircraft wasn’t bad enough, the U.S. ended up losing two in the same day during its current war with Iran. The second plane hit by enemy fire on April 3, an A-10 Thunderbolt II, was in the middle of a search for the crew of the first plane, an Air Force F-15E, that was shot down earlier in the day. Fortunately, the pilot of the single-seat A-10 was rescued, but the aircraft itself is the latest casualty of the Iranian conflict. Considering just how much an A-10 costs, that’s not exactly a small loss for the United States. Even worse, there is only a finite supply of the A-10 Thunderbolt II, commonly known by its nickname, Warthog, because new ones aren’t being built anymore.

The A-10 Warthog originally rolled off the assembly line in the 1970s. At the time, the Air Force hoped to limit the cost of the plane to $15 million per unit when building the first 600 aircraft. That figure, however, is in 1970s money — today, it would be closer to $120 million for each A-10. The math gets even trickier when you consider that the Warthog that was hit over the Strait of Hormuz actually cost even more than that, because every A-10 currently in service has been upgraded over the years.

Newer weapons and other modern features have added to the cost of each A-10

A big factor in the cost of the A-10 Thunderbolt II is its weaponry. Perhaps the most distinct feature of the Warthog is its massive 30-mm, 7-barrel Gatling gun, which makes up 16% of the plane’s total weight. Originally built by General Electric, the Warthog’s Gatling gun is now produced by General Dynamics and can fire over 3,900 rounds per minute or 65 rounds per second. Since it can fire depleted uranium, armor-piercing, and high-explosive/incendiary rounds so quickly, keeping the A-10 armed only adds to its cost.

Even more expensive, though, are all the upgrades and retrofits that the Warthog has undergone over the years, some of which even surpass the plane’s original cost. These upgrades include more powerful and advanced ordnance, such as precision-guided JDAMs, incendiary cluster bombs, AGM-65 and AIM-9 missiles, unguided and laser-guided rockets, and mine-dispensing munitions, among others. Newer defensive measures, like infrared countermeasure flares, electronic countermeasure chaff, jammer pods, and illumination flares, also add to the overall cost of the Warthog.

Major upgrades to the A-10 have been as recent as 2014, including more advanced communications systems, night vision systems, and a digital situational awareness pad in the cockpit. In just the past few years, Warthog pilots have started using pricey HObIT (Hybrid Optical-based Inertial Tracker) sights mounted on their helmets, which can target up to 6 to 18 targets simultaneously. One other expensive upgrade to the Warthog is a new pair of wings, which, on average, cost between $6.4 and $7 million each. These new wings were added to the remaining flying A-10s in the Air Force’s fleet. Around 162 of these Warthogs are still in service, and that number is only diminishing.

A new A-10 Warthog hasn’t been built in over 40 years

Besides its high cost, losing a Warthog in battle is a big deal because there are only so many to go around. The last A-10 Thunderbolt II was manufactured over four decades ago — way back in 1984. As previously mentioned, approximately 162 Warthogs (designated as A-10C since being upgraded) of the original 713 that were built remain flying. Despite the limited supply, the Air Force still has no definitive plans to replace the A-10.

Part of the reason is that, despite its age, the A-10 is still a very formidable aircraft. Thanks to all of its expensive upgrades, the incredible capabilities of the A-10 Warthog make it a significant component of America’s air power, which is very important in the current geopolitical climate. While it was originally designed and built as a countermeasure to powerful Soviet tanks, there are plenty of use cases for the heavily-armed, all-weather-capable, ground-attack aircraft/close air support (CAS) plane.

Eventually, no amount of upgrades will make up for its age, however. The U.S. Air Force has openly stated its desire to retire the aircraft and redirect its budget toward the more modern F-35 Lightning II. That hasn’t happened because, again, the A-10 is still a really, really good warplane. But, eventually, something will have to take its place, especially since — as the Warthog recently shot down by Iranian forces reminds us — there is a finite number of them.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews







In the ever-shifting geopolitical sphere, China’s growing military presence and the ongoing tensions over Taiwan and the South China Sea continue to be a closely watched topic — particularly in regard to China’s ambition for naval power. In recent years, much speculation has been made over the country’s rapid military development, including the capabilities of the newest Chinese amphibious assault ships.

While there’s no denying its military advancements and buildup, much has been made about the logistical and military difficulties that China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) would face if it launched an amphibious invasion of Taiwan. However, there’s growing concern that if a Taiwan invasion were to happen, it wouldn’t just be military vessels taking part in the action, but a fleet of commercial vessels, too — including a massive new car ferries that could quickly be repurposed into valuable military transports.

While the possibility of the PLA using commercial vessels for military operations has always been on the table for a potential Taiwan invasion, the scale with which China has been expanding its commercial shipbuilding industry has become a big factor in the PLA’s projection of logistical and military power across the Taiwan Strait. It’s also raised ethical concerns over the idea of putting merchant-marked ships into combat use.

From car ferry to military transport

The rapid growth of modern Chinese industrial capacity is well known, with Chinese electric vehicle factories now able to build a new car every 60 seconds. Likewise, China has developed a massive shipbuilding industry over the last 25 years, with the country now making up more than half of the world’s shipbuilding output. It’s from those two sectors where China’s latest vehicle-carrying super vessels are emerging. 

With a capacity to carry over 10,000 new vehicles for transport from factories in Asia to destinations around the world, these ships, known as roll-on/roll-off (Ro-Ro) ferries, are now the biggest of their type in the world. The concept of the PLA putting civilian ferries into military use is not a new one, or even an idea China is trying to hide. Back in 2021, China held a public military exercise where a civilian ferry was used to transport both troops and a whole arsenal of military vehicles, including main battle tanks.

The relatively limited conventional naval lift capacity of the PLA is something that’s been pointed out while game-planning a Chinese amphibious move on Taiwan, and it’s widely expected that the PLA would lean on repurposed civilian vessels to boost its ability to move soldiers and vehicles across the Taiwan Strait. With these newer, high-capacity Ro-Ro ferries added to the fleet, the PLA’s amphibious capacity and reach could grow significantly.

A makeshift amphibious assault ship

However, even with the added capacity of these massive ferries, military analysts have pointed out that Ro-Ro ships would not be able to deploy vehicles and soliders directly onto a beach the way a purpose-built military amphibious assault ship can. Traditionally, to deploy vehicles from these ships, the PLA would first need to capture and then repurpose Taiwan’s existing commercial port facilities into unloading bases for military vehicles and equipment.

However, maybe most alarming is that satellite imagery and U.S. Intelligence reports show that, along with increasing ferry production output, the PLA is also working on a system of barges and floating dock structures to help turn these civilian ferries into more efficient military transports. With this supporting equipment in place, ferries may not need to use existing port infrastructure to bring their equipment on shore.

Beyond the general military concern over China’s growing amphibious capability, there are also ethical concerns if China is planning to rapidly put a fleet of civilian merchant vessels into military service. If the PLA were to deploy these dual-purpose vessels into direct military operations, the United States and its allies would likely be forced to treat civilian-presenting ships as enemy combatants. On top of all the other strategic challenges a Taiwan invasion would bring, the U.S. having to navigate the blurred legal lines between military and merchant vessels could potentially give China a strategic advantage amidst the fog of war.





Source link