A Single A-10 Warthog Aircraft Is Wildly Expensive, But That’s Not The Worst Part







As if one downed military aircraft wasn’t bad enough, the U.S. ended up losing two in the same day during its current war with Iran. The second plane hit by enemy fire on April 3, an A-10 Thunderbolt II, was in the middle of a search for the crew of the first plane, an Air Force F-15E, that was shot down earlier in the day. Fortunately, the pilot of the single-seat A-10 was rescued, but the aircraft itself is the latest casualty of the Iranian conflict. Considering just how much an A-10 costs, that’s not exactly a small loss for the United States. Even worse, there is only a finite supply of the A-10 Thunderbolt II, commonly known by its nickname, Warthog, because new ones aren’t being built anymore.

The A-10 Warthog originally rolled off the assembly line in the 1970s. At the time, the Air Force hoped to limit the cost of the plane to $15 million per unit when building the first 600 aircraft. That figure, however, is in 1970s money — today, it would be closer to $120 million for each A-10. The math gets even trickier when you consider that the Warthog that was hit over the Strait of Hormuz actually cost even more than that, because every A-10 currently in service has been upgraded over the years.

Newer weapons and other modern features have added to the cost of each A-10

A big factor in the cost of the A-10 Thunderbolt II is its weaponry. Perhaps the most distinct feature of the Warthog is its massive 30-mm, 7-barrel Gatling gun, which makes up 16% of the plane’s total weight. Originally built by General Electric, the Warthog’s Gatling gun is now produced by General Dynamics and can fire over 3,900 rounds per minute or 65 rounds per second. Since it can fire depleted uranium, armor-piercing, and high-explosive/incendiary rounds so quickly, keeping the A-10 armed only adds to its cost.

Even more expensive, though, are all the upgrades and retrofits that the Warthog has undergone over the years, some of which even surpass the plane’s original cost. These upgrades include more powerful and advanced ordnance, such as precision-guided JDAMs, incendiary cluster bombs, AGM-65 and AIM-9 missiles, unguided and laser-guided rockets, and mine-dispensing munitions, among others. Newer defensive measures, like infrared countermeasure flares, electronic countermeasure chaff, jammer pods, and illumination flares, also add to the overall cost of the Warthog.

Major upgrades to the A-10 have been as recent as 2014, including more advanced communications systems, night vision systems, and a digital situational awareness pad in the cockpit. In just the past few years, Warthog pilots have started using pricey HObIT (Hybrid Optical-based Inertial Tracker) sights mounted on their helmets, which can target up to 6 to 18 targets simultaneously. One other expensive upgrade to the Warthog is a new pair of wings, which, on average, cost between $6.4 and $7 million each. These new wings were added to the remaining flying A-10s in the Air Force’s fleet. Around 162 of these Warthogs are still in service, and that number is only diminishing.

A new A-10 Warthog hasn’t been built in over 40 years

Besides its high cost, losing a Warthog in battle is a big deal because there are only so many to go around. The last A-10 Thunderbolt II was manufactured over four decades ago — way back in 1984. As previously mentioned, approximately 162 Warthogs (designated as A-10C since being upgraded) of the original 713 that were built remain flying. Despite the limited supply, the Air Force still has no definitive plans to replace the A-10.

Part of the reason is that, despite its age, the A-10 is still a very formidable aircraft. Thanks to all of its expensive upgrades, the incredible capabilities of the A-10 Warthog make it a significant component of America’s air power, which is very important in the current geopolitical climate. While it was originally designed and built as a countermeasure to powerful Soviet tanks, there are plenty of use cases for the heavily-armed, all-weather-capable, ground-attack aircraft/close air support (CAS) plane.

Eventually, no amount of upgrades will make up for its age, however. The U.S. Air Force has openly stated its desire to retire the aircraft and redirect its budget toward the more modern F-35 Lightning II. That hasn’t happened because, again, the A-10 is still a really, really good warplane. But, eventually, something will have to take its place, especially since — as the Warthog recently shot down by Iranian forces reminds us — there is a finite number of them.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


A new class-action lawsuit, filed on Monday by three teenage girls and their guardians, alleges that Elon Musk’s xAI created and distributed child sexual abuse material featuring their faces and likenesses with its Grok AI tech.

“Their lives have been shattered by the devastating loss of privacy, dignity, and personal safety that the production and dissemination of this CSAM have caused,” the filing says. “xAI’s financial gain through the increased use of its image- and video-making product came at their expense and well-being.”

From December to early January, Grok allowed many AI and X social media users to create AI-generated nonconsensual intimate images, sometimes known as deepfake porn. Reports estimate that Grok users made 4.4 million “undressed” or “nudified” images, 41% of the total number of images created, over a period of nine days. 

X, xAI and its safety and child safety divisions did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The wave of “undressed” images stirred outrage around the world. The European Commission quickly launched an investigation, while Malaysia and Indonesia banned X within their borders. Some US government representatives called on Apple and Google to remove the app from their app stores for violating their policies, but no federal investigation into X or xAI has been opened. A similar, separate class-action lawsuit was filed (PDF) by a South Carolina woman in late January.

The dehumanizing trend highlighted just how capable modern AI image tools are at creating content that seems realistic. The new complaint compares Grok’s self-proclaimed “spicy AI” generation to the “dark arts” with its ease of subjecting children to “any pose, however sick, however fetishized, however unlawful.”

“To the viewer, the resulting video appears entirely real. For the child, her identifying features will now forever be attached to a video depicting her own child sexual abuse,” the complaint reads.

AI Atlas

The complaint says xAI is at fault because it did not employ industry-standard guardrails that would prevent abusers from making this content. It says xAI licensed use of its tech to third-party companies abroad, which sold subscriptions that led abusers to make child sexual abuse images featuring the faces and likenesses of the victims. The requests ran through xAI’s servers, which makes the company liable, the complaint argues.

The lawsuit was filed by three Jane Does, pseudonyms given to the teens to protect their identities. Jane Doe 1 was first alerted to the fact that abusive, AI-generated sexual material of her was circulating on the web by an anonymous Instagram message in early December. The filing says she was told about a Discord server by the anonymous Instagram user, where the material was shared. That led Jane Doe 1 and her family, and eventually law enforcement, to find and arrest one perpetrator.

Ongoing investigations led the families of Jane Does 2 and 3 to learn their children’s images had been transformed with xAI tech into abusive material.





Source link