Can a near infrared laptop light boost my mood? I tried it to find out


img-3542.jpg

pros and cons

Pros

  • Easy to set up and use
  • Potential sunlight boost for anyone stuck inside during winter
  • Helpful for people stuck in the office all day
Cons

  • Expensive
  • Alternatives are cheaper

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


Have you been outside today? Whether it’s in the office or at home, chances are you’ve spent most of your time indoors. In fact, we spend 90% of our time inside, according to the EPA

Now, a new slate of products is available to combat our growing homebody tendencies. Why step outside when you can buy something that mimics the outdoors indoors? This latest product is a $249 device that attaches to your laptop to bathe you in infrared throughout the day. 

Also: This sunrise alarm clock improved my sleep routine, and it’s $25 off right now

SunLED, the company behind the infrared light device, known as the SunBooster SLS2000, unveiled its product earlier this year at CES. Built for desk-based workers and those living in places with long winters, the device conveniently mimics the sun’s rays (minus the actual light). 

The SunBooster emits this near-infrared (NIR) light through three LEDs. It has a motion sensor to calibrate the right distance before administering the light, as near-infrared light can be harmful if it’s too close. After a session, which can last between two and four hours, the device will turn off, show weekly progress, and NIR light intake. 

Also: Do you get enough sunlight? These new ‘near-infrared’ office gadgets could help

We all know the benefits of being in the sun. The benefits of NIR light are similar. According to SunLED, it can improve mood and reduce drowsiness. It can help reduce inflammation and boost energy.  One study found that it has beneficial metabolic and antioxidant effects. The study found that it can help in the recovery process of atherothrombotic stroke, brain injury, and neurodegeneration. Another study found that NIR light can have beneficial effects on humans in winter. And another study found that ambient exposure to NIR has positive effects on parasympathetic activity by increasing high frequency heart rate variability. 

As a desk-based worker who spends most of her day inside, I tested out the SunBooster, whose product and function sounded simple enough. I tried it out during the last chunk of a cold, dark winter. Could it boost my energy and my mood throughout the workday? I also talked to a doctor about the science behind infrared light — and whether people really need a device like this. 

Also: Waking up to a $250 alarm clock was more effective than I expected – but it’s far from perfect

Out of the box, the SunBooster is simple to set up. All it takes is a quick USB-C connection to your laptop or monitor. After setup, it took around three hours to get to 100% NIR intake completion. But if you’re at your computer all day, that time won’t feel too long. 

So, did the light boost my mood? I tested the SunBooster during the dark days of winter in the northeast, and I can’t really tell. I did feel like I was doing something good for my mood by attaching this thing to my laptop and hitting my daily intake goals. But maybe that’s the whole point. 

Family physician Dr. Mike Sevilla noted some potential dangers of misusing the SunBooster in an interview with ZDNET. Because the device sits at eye level, overexposure could have negative impacts such as cataracts. Of course, the device turns off once it has emitted a sufficient amount of NIR, so you probably won’t have the adverse effects of NIR overexposure. He also said that light therapy products and their validity can feel like “the Wild West” due to lack of independent research and regulation. 

Also: Fitbit users: You can upload medical records now for AI advice – but is that safe?

Would he buy this device? “For the price, I probably would not use this product. There are other ways to get to the goals that you want,” Sevilla said. 

There are alternatives to the SunBooster that don’t cost over $200 and deliver equally beneficial results, Sevilla said. Consider getting better sleep, improving your diet, and exercising regularly. You don’t need a device for those.

ZDNET’s buying advice 

The SunBooster worked as advertised and was very easy to set up and use. There were no issues in using the product itself, but the issue is whether you need a $249 device to mimic the sun and improve focus or boost mood. I can’t tell if I got any objective benefits from the SunBooster, but it made me feel I was doing something beneficial for my health. For those who live in cold, dark climates, this could be another tool that helps you — mentally, physically, or both — during lightless winters, especially if your work keeps you inside for most of the day. 

If you’ve exhausted all your other wellness options, it’s something to consider. But be conscious that these devices aren’t regulated and the alternatives for focus and mood cost a lot less – they might just take more time than it takes to put a light on your laptop. 





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews







In the ever-shifting geopolitical sphere, China’s growing military presence and the ongoing tensions over Taiwan and the South China Sea continue to be a closely watched topic — particularly in regard to China’s ambition for naval power. In recent years, much speculation has been made over the country’s rapid military development, including the capabilities of the newest Chinese amphibious assault ships.

While there’s no denying its military advancements and buildup, much has been made about the logistical and military difficulties that China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) would face if it launched an amphibious invasion of Taiwan. However, there’s growing concern that if a Taiwan invasion were to happen, it wouldn’t just be military vessels taking part in the action, but a fleet of commercial vessels, too — including a massive new car ferries that could quickly be repurposed into valuable military transports.

While the possibility of the PLA using commercial vessels for military operations has always been on the table for a potential Taiwan invasion, the scale with which China has been expanding its commercial shipbuilding industry has become a big factor in the PLA’s projection of logistical and military power across the Taiwan Strait. It’s also raised ethical concerns over the idea of putting merchant-marked ships into combat use.

From car ferry to military transport

The rapid growth of modern Chinese industrial capacity is well known, with Chinese electric vehicle factories now able to build a new car every 60 seconds. Likewise, China has developed a massive shipbuilding industry over the last 25 years, with the country now making up more than half of the world’s shipbuilding output. It’s from those two sectors where China’s latest vehicle-carrying super vessels are emerging. 

With a capacity to carry over 10,000 new vehicles for transport from factories in Asia to destinations around the world, these ships, known as roll-on/roll-off (Ro-Ro) ferries, are now the biggest of their type in the world. The concept of the PLA putting civilian ferries into military use is not a new one, or even an idea China is trying to hide. Back in 2021, China held a public military exercise where a civilian ferry was used to transport both troops and a whole arsenal of military vehicles, including main battle tanks.

The relatively limited conventional naval lift capacity of the PLA is something that’s been pointed out while game-planning a Chinese amphibious move on Taiwan, and it’s widely expected that the PLA would lean on repurposed civilian vessels to boost its ability to move soldiers and vehicles across the Taiwan Strait. With these newer, high-capacity Ro-Ro ferries added to the fleet, the PLA’s amphibious capacity and reach could grow significantly.

A makeshift amphibious assault ship

However, even with the added capacity of these massive ferries, military analysts have pointed out that Ro-Ro ships would not be able to deploy vehicles and soliders directly onto a beach the way a purpose-built military amphibious assault ship can. Traditionally, to deploy vehicles from these ships, the PLA would first need to capture and then repurpose Taiwan’s existing commercial port facilities into unloading bases for military vehicles and equipment.

However, maybe most alarming is that satellite imagery and U.S. Intelligence reports show that, along with increasing ferry production output, the PLA is also working on a system of barges and floating dock structures to help turn these civilian ferries into more efficient military transports. With this supporting equipment in place, ferries may not need to use existing port infrastructure to bring their equipment on shore.

Beyond the general military concern over China’s growing amphibious capability, there are also ethical concerns if China is planning to rapidly put a fleet of civilian merchant vessels into military service. If the PLA were to deploy these dual-purpose vessels into direct military operations, the United States and its allies would likely be forced to treat civilian-presenting ships as enemy combatants. On top of all the other strategic challenges a Taiwan invasion would bring, the U.S. having to navigate the blurred legal lines between military and merchant vessels could potentially give China a strategic advantage amidst the fog of war.





Source link