I Downloaded An App That Pays You To Play Games. Here’s How Much I Made






As someone who is deeply connected to the mobile world, it’s always fun to try out experiments here or there. There is no shortage of apps that claim to pay out real money for playing them. I tried one out a while back, and I ended up paying in much more than I ever got back. That was a casino-style solitaire app that would pay you out based on how quickly and completely you finished a game against other players.

As it turns out, I wasn’t very good at that and ended up burning through $25 in less than two days. That was not a great experience. But a new challenger emerged from the shadows: Testerup. It’s an app available on iOS and Android that tracks your progress as you play a curated list of games.

Each of these games has certain goals you can achieve to accumulate more earnings. One website I saw described these rewards as “high-friction” and yeah, that really tracks. But the nice thing is, it doesn’t require any initial investment, and you can play some fun games along the way.

One big red flag is that the app requires you to earn $50 before you can get your first payout. I’m not in love with that part, but I’ve been playing games from Testerup exclusively for about 45 days now. Here’s what the experience has been like.

Signing up and picking games

When you first sign up, you just select a username and password like any other app. One big caveat here which affects me, but probably won’t affect you, is that the app only works from a single device. You can’t load the app up in multiple devices and switch between them. That’s an issue for me as a phone reviewer, so I loaded the app on my iPhone 17 Pro Max, which is my “north star” phone — it’s the one I always carry regardless of what I’m reviewing.

From there, you get a list of games that you can install, but crucially, you do not get to see what the rewards are until you install the game and play it for a few minutes. That’s not amazing. Each app has a list of “potential rewards” you can earn, but I’ll just spoil it for you right now: If you don’t plan to spend every waking moment playing this one game, you will not earn those rewards. One game I played asked for you to reach level 200 within 24 hours for a $3.00 bonus. Meanwhile, you get $0.10 for reaching level 25. That is the much more likely payout.

Personally, I got pretty addicted to a game called “Gecko Out.” Another popular one for me was called “Arrows.” For those games, I earned $7.90 and $3.40 respectively. Therein lies the problem. These two games, that I’ve been playing for 45 days, have netted me just over one fifth of what I need to cash out.

Is it a scam?

So, here’s the thing — It’s hard to say that Testerup is a “scam.” I haven’t earned any actual money from the game because after 45 days, I’m still at $20.45. I have no idea if I’ll ever reach the mythical $50, and we’ll see what happens when I do, but I don’t anticipate that’ll happen any time soon.

The app has a 4.0 score on TrustPilot. Most of the negative comments there and on Reddit revolve around achieving that high income within the boundaries of the $0.50 or less earnings on level goals. That’s a fair point. I think the next time I try an experiment like this, I’ll aim for an app that doesn’t have a threshold. I know they exist — I’ve been served many ads for them while playing these games and the irony is not lost on me.

At the end of the day, I discovered a couple new fun games to play, and I didn’t have to pay money in, so that’s good. But I can’t say for sure whether or not Testerup pays out, and I think given the rewards the app offers, $50 is a pretty high bar.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Amazon Fire Phone Jeff Bezos

Bloomberg / Getty Images

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


ZDNET’s key takeaways

  • Amazon is reportedly developing a new Fire Phone.
  • The previous model had several issues, including an inferior app store experience.
  • Under new supervision (and with more experience), Amazon can do better this time.

Well, I don’t know about you, but I certainly didn’t have “new Amazon smartphone” on my 2026 bingo card. As it turns out, according to Reuters, the retailer may be developing a new smartphone, internally known as “Transformer.” 

Those familiar with the industry will instantly draw parallels to Amazon’s previous smartphone effort, the Fire Phone from 2014. Appropriately, that phone ended up as part of a fire sale about a year later.

Now, in 2026, with no fewer than five phone brands in the US — Apple, Samsung, Google, Motorola, and OnePlus — Amazon faces a lot of competition. In fairness, it also has two fewer platforms to compete against. In 2014, Windows Phone and BlackBerry were still very much part of the smartphone conversation; these days, not so much.

The AppStore problem

But there’s one mistake Amazon made in its first effort that will absolutely torpedo its chances at succeeding — the Amazon AppStore and specifically the decision to forego Google Play services. Google is simply too valuable in too many lives to not support the platform. Oh, and the Amazon AppStore is terrible.

Also: What’s right (and wrong) with the Amazon Fire Phone

It has admittedly been a few years since I last inventoried the Amazon AppStore, but when I last checked, the Amazon AppStore was a wasteland of half-supported or unsupported apps, with two notable exceptions. Finance, home control, and communication apps were either absent or had not received updates for years prior.

The only apps in the Amazon AppStore that remained up to date were productivity apps (largely powered by Microsoft) and streaming apps. Those two categories work very well on the cheap, underpowered hardware that Amazon usually launches, and that’s fine. A coffee-table tablet is a nice thing to have lying around.

A spark of hope

Amazon Fire Phone

Liam Tung/ZDNET

But a phone is another animal entirely. If a tablet is a device to entertain, a phone is a device for everything else. One of the key reasons Windows Phone failed was its lack of an app ecosystem. The Senior Vice President of Devices and Services,  Panos Panay, is very familiar with that saga, so I’m hopeful that he will make the same arguments to the powers that be at Amazon. 

Honestly, if there is anyone who I think can pull off an Amazon phone revival, it’s probably Panay, who understands design and product development better than most, and to be perfectly honest, he’s my absolute favorite product presenter.

Also: Amazon Fire Phone review: Not a great smartphone

Of course, all of this is early days. This phone is being worked on internally, and even Reuters reports that it could get the axe long before it sees the light of day. Personally, I’m intrigued by the idea, but I sincerely hope that Amazon doesn’t make this the shopping phone it tried to build in 2014. 

If Amazon just wants to make a nice, well-built smartphone, with a skin that pushes Amazon content to the fore, I’m fine with that. But leaving Google behind is a mistake that Amazon cannot afford to make again. Fool me once, and all that.

So, if this phone is to have a chance at success, it needs to embrace Google services so it can be a phone that everyone can use. Amazon has the brand power to make a phone like this work, even up against juggernauts like Apple and Samsung, but it needs to approach this correctly, lest it end up in yet another Fire phone fire sale.





Source link