Why The Northrop Grumman B-21 Raider Is Smaller Than The B-2







The Northrop Grumman B-21 Raider is the newest stealth bomber to join the United States Air Force. Like its predecessor, the B-2 Spirit, the Raider is based on a flying wing design with no vertical stabilizers. Looking more like an alien craft than a bomber plane, the B-21 Raider has been in development since 2015.

From a glance, it may look like the B-2 and B-21 are roughly the same size, but the Raider is actually much smaller. The exact size is classified, and likely will be for some time, but estimates put the wingspan at around 140 feet and the length at somewhere around 55 feet. The B-2, on the other hand, has a wingspan of 172 feet and a length of 69 feet. 

The Spirit first hit the tarmac way back in the ’80s, so why is the Raider so much smaller? Well, in the case of multi-million (sometimes multi-billion) dollar aircraft and pieces of machinery, bigger isn’t always better. For one, using fewer materials to build smaller aircraft can save on costs. The Raider’s smaller size also allows it to have enhanced stealth capabilities and greater flexibility for missions in the future. 

The advantages of the B-21 Raider’s smaller size

The Raider’s size allows it to be more stealthy in combat missions. Given the much shorter wingspan and length, the radar cross section — or the area of the B-21 — that gets reflected back to enemy radar installation is much smaller, making it harder to detect. Air and Space Forces Magazine notes that the Raider’s engine inlets are placed deeper into the fuselage, giving it an overall shorter length. Overall, the advancements of two entire generations of aircraft and 21st century tech have made things more compact and upgradable compared to older aircraft like the B-2.

The cost of production is also worth considering. Each B-21 Raider is estimated to cost about $692 million to produce. That’s a hefty chunk of change, especially compared to aircraft like the supersonic Cold War B-1B Lancer bomber, which cost about $317 million each. Both of these planes, however, pale in comparison to the B-2 Spirit’s unit cost of over $2.2 billion.

There are only 20 B-2 Spirits in service, while the United States Air Force wants at least 100 Raiders to eventually join the ranks. This aircraft is supposed to eventually replace the B-2 fleet entirely and bolster the existing fleet of B-52s (a plane that has been in service since 1955). A dimensionally smaller aircraft allows Northrop Grumman, hypothetically, to make more Raiders at a lower cost than the previous B-2. It might be a boring answer, but ultimately price is also a major factor when deciding what size these aircraft will be.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


As an ardent, perhaps obsessive, Harry Potter fan, I can’t say I was thrilled when I learned HBO was rebooting the beloved film franchise as a TV show. 

Like millions of other Harry Potter enthusiasts, the books and movies have been a key part of both my adolescence and adulthood, offering a magical refuge from a not-so-dazzling Muggle world. Theme parks, Broadway shows, mega stores and audiobooks have kept the spellbinding story alive not just for my generation, but for younger Potterheads as well. 

But I never thought we’d get an on-screen retelling just a decade and a half after the films wrapped up. What was the point of doing it all again with a brand-new cast, beyond the obvious monetary gain?

Hollywood is stuck in a loop of recycling successful TV shows and movies to make an easy buck. I thought Harry Potter was safe from that phenomenon, at least for a while, given the ongoing relevance of the films. Over the years, I’ve gone to multiple Harry Potter screenings with audiences of all ages, highlighting the franchise’s broad cultural appeal across generations. Surely, there was still room for future generations to take part in something that’s brought us so much joy. 

Despite controversy surrounding author JK Rowling’s views on transgender issues, which run counter to the series’ themes of love, inclusivity and justice, Harry Potter remains a meaningful part of many fans’ lives. Its stories, characters and themes continue to resonate, fostering a sense of connection and belonging for those who have adopted the wizarding world as their own. 

Now, the enchantment of the original films would be supplanted by a shiny new TV franchise. A world that had come to life so vibrantly on screen would be repurposed before the magic had run out. I wasn’t on board with the idea at all.

But recently, something changed. 

As more details began to emerge about the upcoming TV series, I felt myself softening toward the endeavor. Starting later this year, the episodes will be released on HBO and HBO Max over a decade, with each season focusing on one of the seven books for a more in-depth telling of the story than the film adaptations. As much as I love the movies, having more time to delve into side stories and details that didn’t make it on screen the first time doesn’t sound like such a bad idea. 

When HBO dropped the first trailer for Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone this week, I felt a mixture of trepidation and curiosity. Just how familiar — or not — would this reimagined world feel? As I hit play, those feelings quickly gave way to an unexpected excitement. 

In the trailer, we glimpse the loneliness of Harry’s upbringing as he’s tossed in the cupboard under the stairs, reprimanded by his aunt and bullied by his cousin. We hear him lament how little he knew his parents. We see him take in the splendor of Hogwarts with wonder. We watch him light up as he finds joy with new friends. 

The actors playing the golden trio of Harry (Dominic McLaughlin), Ron (Alastair Stout) and Hermione (Arabella Stanton) appear well-suited for their roles, even in the brief glimpses we get of them navigating this enigmatic and enchanting world.

The iconic lightning bolt scar, the calligraphic acceptance letter, the homey Hogwarts Express — it’s all so familiar and yet entirely new. Despite my earlier hesitation, it’s thrilling to be part of this second wave of magic — even if I still see the show as a clear attempt to further profit from a successful franchise. But rather than viewing the TV series as a departure or replacement of the beloved movies, I’m choosing to see it as another way to keep the wizarding world alive through a fresh lens.

If the train is leaving the station, I might as well hop aboard and enjoy the ride. When Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone debuts in December, I’ll be watching, Butterbeer in hand. As Hagrid wisely put it, “What’s comin’ will come, an’ we’ll meet it when it does.”





Source link