Two Companies Make Most Of The Memory Chips Inside Of Our Devices (And They’re Being Sued…Again)






If you are using any electronic gadget today, it will almost certainly have a memory chip inside. This memory is typically labeled as RAM (Random Access Memory) or DRAM (Dynamic RAM). Given the abundance of electronic devices around us, it would be natural to assume that DRAM modules are widely available. 

However, not only are memory chips incredibly difficult to manufacture, but we are also facing a severe shortage of DRAM modules as of mid 2026. This shortage has a lot to do with the fact that almost all of the memory modules in production today owe their origin to two manufactures from Korea (Samsung and SK Hynix), and one from the U.S. (Micron). Together, both the Korean giants account for around two thirds of the global memory market and operate at an absolutely mind-boggling scale. Micron Technology, while not a small player, lags behind the Koreans in size and scale, but is still considered part of the big three memory manufacturers.

On June 25, 2026, both Samsung and SK Hynix, along with Micron were named in a class action lawsuit where they are accused of willfully restricting the supply of DRAM modules to inflate prices. The lawsuit appears to be a reaction to the steep increase in RAM prices users have been experiencing since mid 2025. The crux of the lawsuit is that all three companies have redirected their attention towards manufacturing a more complex (and profitable) form of DRAM modules called HBM (High Bandwidth Memory), thereby creating an artificial shortage in the market, driving up prices for consumers.

What exactly does the lawsuit say?

The latest lawsuit against these companies has been filed by 17 plaintiffs. The crux of their argument is that the major companies involved in the DRAM industry have shifted their attention to the more lucrative high-bandwidth memory (HBM) segment, resulting in a massive reduction in the production of mainstream, consumer-focused RAM. This pivot also resulted in Micron completely exiting the consumer-focused RAM segment in 2025.

It further alleges that these companies made coordinated efforts to do so, eventually leading to the ongoing RAM shortage, and the subsequent price hike. They lawsuit goes on to add how memory prices shot up by nearly 700% in just four years. 

While the claim that these companies are colluding has yet to be proven in court, it helps to get a historical perspective. A similar lawsuit filed against these same companies in 2020 collapsed because the plaintiffs were unable to convince the court that the companies had colluded to jack prices up. It is still too early to comment on whether the current lawsuit would also end up meeting a similar fate. 

Going even further back in time, there have been instances of memory makers pleading guilty of doing the same thing they are accused of now. Those instances resulted in Samsung ending up paying a $300 million fine, and $185 million from Hynix. Other players from that era, including Infineon and Elpida were also fined $160 million and $84 million, respectively. In fact, a handful of senior executives served prison time. A notable exception was Micron, which took advantage of the Department of Justice’s leniency program and avoided prosecution entirely.

Why can’t other players move in and make more RAM?

One would think that if memory makers have redirected their attention towards High Bandwidth Memory, then perhaps new or smaller players could enter the segment and fill the void. Unfortunately, that’s where the technological wizardry required to create these components comes in.

Setting up a DRAM manufacturing facility at scale is an extremely complex and expensive task. A single facility (called a fab) alone could cost anywhere between $15 billion and $20 billion to set up — before new customers are guaranteed. Making things worse, these fabs need to be constantly upgraded. Then there are the geopolitical and supply chain challenges that may prevent companies from collaborating, developing and acquiring materials and equipment needed to set up a manufacturing facility.

Simply put, only companies possessing a staggering amount of capital and financial strength will even consider setting one up. There aren’t many that would be willing to take that kind of a financial risk.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews







Today, when one pictures a “classic Dodge Charger”, the first image that pops up is almost certainly one of the highly desirable Charger models from the late 1960s or early ’70s. Indeed, those early muscle car Chargers are iconic, playing a starring role in the “Dukes of Hazzard” television show and, somewhat more recently, “The Fast and the Furious” films. But as time ticks on, is it time to start appreciating the modern version of the Charger as a potential modern classic?

It’s now been over 20 years since Dodge brought back the Charger nameplate for a spacious four-door sedan with an optional HEMI V8 engine. While the basic Charger R/T was a potent machine for its time, Dodge really took the Charger’s game to the next level for the 2006 model year with the debut of the Charger SRT8. 

The SRT8 model used a larger version of the third-gen HEMI V8 that, combined with other performance upgrades, transformed the sedan into a serious performance car capable of running with its 1960s HEMI ancestors at the drag strip — to say nothing of its vastly superior handling and refinement. In the years that followed, Dodge would continue to improve the Charger’s performance with larger and more powerful HEMI engines, but the significance of the original Charger SRT8 is not to be overlooked.

A muscle car legend reborn for the 2000s

Today, with the modern Charger being such an established part of the car enthusiast world, it’s easy to forget some of the controversy that surrounded its mid-2000s return. Most of it focused on the fact that the beloved muscle car nameplate had been brought back for a four-door sedan rather than a retro-styled coupe. Fortunately, those people looking for that retro coupe would be satisfied by the reborn Dodge Challenger when it arrived a few years later, while the Charger went on to become a highly popular muscle sedan in its own right.

The addition of the SRT8 model to the lineup certainly helped, of course. Under the hood was the larger 6.1-liter HEMI V8, which differed from the standard 5.7-liter HEMI in several ways, not least the displacement. With the 6.1 under the hood, the SRT8 made 425 hp and 420 lb-ft of torque, easily laying down a mid-13-second quarter-mile time in Motor Trend’s hands. This was very quick by mid-2000s standards, especially considering the now-outdated five-speed automatic transmission.

But the SRT8’s performance went beyond just the drag strip. As part of the SRT transformation, Dodge also gave the car larger wheels and tires, a retuned suspension setup, and large Brembo brakes. While this didn’t necessarily make the car an agile road course weapon, it did give the SRT8 an athleticism that belied the Charger’s weight and size. 

The evolution of modern Dodge muscle

What’s even cooler about this era in Chrysler/Dodge performance history is that the Charger was just one of the four-door LX platform cars that the automaker offered with SRT badges and a powerful HEMI engine under the hood. Apart from the Charger, buyers could also choose from the more upscale, but ultimately short-lived SRT version of the Chrysler 300C sedan or the Dodge Magnum SRT8 station wagon.

The original Charger SRT8 marked the beginning of a long run of increasingly powerful, high-performance models. In the early 2010s, the Charger SRT8’s 6.1 HEMI was replaced by the larger and more powerful 6.4/392 HEMI, with that motor eventually becoming available in the less expensive Charger R/T Scat Pack. Then, of course, came the Charger SRT Hellcat, with a 707-hp, supercharged 6.2-liter that turned the car into a genuine super sedan.

So is the original Charger SRT8 a guaranteed future classic? Classified listings show that clean examples still bring decent money today, but the fact that it was followed by improved models may ultimately limit its potential for becoming a true, mega-desirable collector car. Regardless, though, the Charger SRT8’s accomplishments in modern muscle car history are not to be taken lightly.





Source link