Americans Are Increasingly Skeptical of AI, but We’re Using It More Than Ever


It’s our ongoing conundrum: Many US adults believe AI will have a negative impact on society. We’re increasingly skeptical of our governments’ ability to rein in the tech’s more dangerous tendencies. But we keep using AI at increasing rates.

A new study from the Pew Research Center published on Wednesday puts this dilemma into numbers. About half of US adults (49%) use chatbots, with nearly a quarter reporting they use AI daily. That’s up 16% from 2024, when just a third of US adults reported using some kind of artificial intelligence tool.

The ways we’re using AI are changing, too. Smart home devices and wearables, like smart watches and rings, are integrating AI into how they work. This gives us more everyday exposure to AI. About a third of US adults say they have a smart speaker, Pew found, and AI features are showing up in some US adults’ smart doorbells (18%), robot vacuums (13%) and even smart thermostats (11%).

pew-survey-americans-use-chatgpt-most.png

ChatGPT reigns over Gemini. Copilot beats out Meta AI, Grok and Claude.

Pew Research Center

But while we may use AI, we aren’t blind to the risks it poses. More US adults believe AI will have a negative impact on society (40%), slightly up from a similar 2025 Pew report. That’s compared to 31% who now believe AI will have an equally negative and positive impact. Only 16% say it will be positive.

Part of this change from previous years is likely because the AI tools themselves have dramatically changed, too. AI-created images and videos were once easy to spot by their 11-fingered hands and glitches; now, they’re practically indistinguishable from reality. AI slop is all over our social media feeds. Vibe coding tools are technologically eons beyond the simple chatbots that wowed us in 2022. 

As AI use grows, so do the opportunities for the tech to do harm. Nearly two-thirds of US adults (63%) believe AI is advancing too quickly, Pew found. In a recent Johns Hopkins University national survey, the majority of US adults said they want to be able to interact with other humans, not AI, in medical care (79%), legal proceedings (76%) and education (74%). Most (75%) want transparency when they’re interacting with AI; nearly three-quarters of US adults want a ban on AI impersonating people’s faces and voices.

Historically, governments have stepped in to prevent some of these more drastic tech catastrophes. But the US government has been hesitant to pass any significant laws around AI. The only significant one is the Take It Down Act, which just went into effect this spring and lets people request AI-altered images of themselves be taken down from social media. Aside from a few sporadic state laws, AI companies are largely free to set their own rules.

Watch this: AI Is Indistinguishable From Reality. How Do We Spot Fake Videos?

The Trump administration has said that bureaucratic regulations would slow down innovation and prevent the US from beating China in AI development. But recent advancements in AI capabilities have national security advisors proposing a new requirement that all new AI models must pass a government review before they’re released to the general public. Anthropic, which had a very public fight with the Department of Defense over AI, pulled its most recent Fable 5 model after cybersecurity concerns prompted sudden restrictions by the government.

AI Atlas

We’ve seen what happens when AI companies fall short. Many families have sued OpenAI, alleging that ChatGPT encouraged their children to harm themselves and ultimately die by suicide. Grok, Elon Musk’s AI, made millions of sexualized AI images of women and children without their consent earlier this year, drawing international outrage, investigations and lawsuits.

So perhaps it’s not overly surprising that 67% of US adults have little to no confidence in the US government to effectively regulate AI, Pew found. That’s slightly up from 2024. About 60% are not confident US companies will develop and use AI tools responsibly. (Only 17% of US adults have faith in the federal government in general, Pew found in 2025.)

pew-survey-ai-skepticism-political-parties-graph.png

You can see in the graph on the left how partisan views have changed over the past two years.

Pew Research Center

Republicans and Democrats have flip-flopped with each other when it comes to skepticism of federal AI regulation. In 2024, more Republicans than Democrats reported having little to no confidence in the US government to effectively regulate AI. Now, more Democrats are skeptical.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


buynowkey-gettyimages-2270986884

JuSun/ iStock / Getty Images Plus via Getty Images

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


ZDNET’s key takeaways

  • New Visa research says AI-accelerated scams are the “fastest growing source of consumer harm.”
  • Fraud is shifting from credential theft and account hijacking to social engineering tactics.
  • Visa outlines what consumers and businesses need to do to meet these threats. 

While AI’s vast potential to improve security, ramp up productivity, and reduce operational costs is being explored by countless companies, the technology is also being weaponized by cybercrooks involved in fraud and financial crime.  

Also: 5 security tactics your business can’t get wrong in the age of AI – and why they’re critical

A new report from Visa says AI is reshaping both cyberattack and defense tactics and, specifically, is compressing the fraud cycle, making it easier to dupe consumers into authorizing malicious transactions. 

AI accelerates ClickFix-like fraud

Remember ClickFix? It’s a social engineering technique, popularized in recent years, that bypasses traditional phishing defenses by exploiting psychological vulnerabilities. 

In ClickFix attacks, victims are lured into performing a malicious action themselves by being presented with a problem to solve — a problem that has an easy solution. For example, you may come across a fake malware alert on a website that urges you to open up a command prompt, copy and paste a code, and submit it to fix a PC “issue” in only a few steps. 

In reality, this “solution” leads you to execute malicious commands yourself, resulting in malware deployment, data theft, and more. 

Also: OpenAI’s new image watermarks make it easier to spot AI fakes – here’s how

Standard digital defenses can’t prevent us from performing malicious or destructive actions ourselves, which makes this social engineering tactic far more effective than basic drive-by downloads or standard phishing campaigns.

Apply this to finance, and the problem is this: If you authorize a transaction (fraudulent or otherwise), the responsibility lies with you — and you will most likely bear the financial cost. 

According to Visa’s Spring 2026 Biannual Threats Report, AI-enabled social engineering is becoming a serious issue for fraud prevention. 

How these scams work

Payment fraud can cost you dearly. Now that financial institutions are well aware of the risks posed to consumers by online scams, phishing, and social engineering, they often implement stringent security controls for large financial transactions. 

You may have to authorize payments before a payment request is accepted, such as by verifying yourself through an app, providing a one-time passcode, or clicking confirm.  

As a consequence, fraudsters are adopting AI and social engineering to “manipulate people into authorizing payments themselves,” according to the report, which includes using AI-generated scam content, voice impersonation, and deepfake media, to “increase both the reach and perceived credibility of scams when exploited by actors with malicious intent.”

In other words, AI is being used to generate sophisticated content that appears to come from a legitimate, trustworthy source — such as your bank — which is convincing enough for you to pay up and authorize a fraudulent transaction, thereby stripping yourself of the ID theft and banking crime guarantees that you are normally protected with by your financial provider. 

Visa says this is forcing a shift from “detect stolen credentials” to “detect and disrupt deception” for financial institutions; for the rest of us, it’s a behavioral and awareness issue that must be tackled. 

The red flags to watch out for

From July to December 2025, Visa detected nearly $1 billion in scam-related activity, including impersonation of trusted brands and companies, scams and phishing campaigns laced with financial urgency, and deception that led unwitting victims to complete transactions that appeared legitimate on the surface, but actually resulted in financial loss. 

We at ZDNET have monitored scam trends for years, and whether or not AI is involved, these are some common patterns and practices to watch out for: 

1. Cold calls

Scammers often pretend to work for trusted companies, such as your bank or wireless provider. They may try to lure you with a discount or free service in return for verification codes or account details, or they may request payment to resolve an “unpaid” bill. If you’re being cold-called, hang up. If you believe the call may be legitimate, use an official communication channel — such as the organization’s website — to confirm before you hand over a single dollar.

2. ClickFix-like tactics

ClickFix attacks are successful because they appeal to people’s problem-solving tendencies. They outline an issue and promise a quick fix with just a few steps. This can apply to financial fraud, too. Imagine you receive an email from your bank demanding an overdue payment and a discount if you act quickly — the message outlines three steps, including a link to pay or a QR code to scan, and one of the steps requires you to authorize a transaction. It causes panic and seems simple to fix, but it’s fake. Take a step back before you make any payments, think rationally, and verify through an official channel, such as your bank’s customer service line or support desk. 

Also: This cyberattack tricks you into hacking yourself. Here’s how to spot it

3. Romance scams

Financial fraud often tries to make you feel panic so you make irrational decisions, and, unfortunately, may also abuse you by engaging your emotions over the long-term. Romance scams often lead to investment and financial fraud. If someone you’ve never met asks you for money, simply say no.  

4. Nearly genuine appearance

One issue surrounding the AI is the sheer volume of AI-generated content, much of which is difficult to distinguish from real, legitimate content, including emails, images, audio, and video. If we can create images, photos, or even a more professional-sounding email using an AI assistant, remember that cybercriminals have the same tools at hand. 

Also: 5 ways to fortify your network against the new speed of AI attacks

Ever see a strange news report on social media and question its legitimacy, or suspect it might be “AI slop“? Apply that same skepticism. Even when an email looks genuine, if any financial change or payment is requested, go through an official channel to confirm it is what it appears to be.

The solution for organizations is speed

As Visa notes in its report, building advanced scam detection networks and adopting AI-backed solutions to detect and flag impersonation, social engineering, or unusual transactions can all boost fraud prevention, but speed is the key ingredient. 

Now that AI is being used for everything from social engineering to vulnerability discovery, reconnaissance, and network intrusion at a pace faster than we can defend against, businesses can’t rely on time-consuming, manual processes to handle their cybersecurity requirements or protect consumers. (Mandiant has also provided technical guidance on this topic recently.)

Also: Why AI-powered security tools are your secret weapon against tomorrow’s attacks

If AI is being weaponized, using automation — and potentially AI assistants, too — is the required shift to keep up. Automation can also take over time-consuming tasks, such as triage, freeing cybersecurity professionals to detect and respond to cyberattacks more effectively. Large language models and automated tools can complete tasks far more rapidly than humans can; as long as these tools are properly supervised, defenders can be better equipped to combat modern threats. 

“The rapid adoption of AI has fundamentally changed the economics of fraud,” says Michael Jabbara, SVP, Payment Ecosystem Risk and Control at Visa. “What once required deep technical skill can now be executed with a prompt. That reality makes intelligence-driven defenses and coordinated action across the ecosystem more critical than ever.” 

Acting quickly can help protect consumers from being scammed and may also give them the time they need to step back and consider whether they should OK that payment after all. 





Source link