Anthropic’s new Claude Fable 5 is the same base model as Mythos but with guardrails attached


Anthropic's new Claude Fable 5 is a nerfed Mythos with guardrails attached

Elyse Betters Picaro / ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


ZDNET’s key takeaways

  • Anthropic is releasing Claude Fable 5 for general users.
  • Fable 5 uses Mythos-class power with safety controls.
  • Pricing is about twice that of Claude Opus 4.8.

Anthropic has announced a defanged version of its fabled (and highly restricted) Mythos large language model. Called Claude Fable 5, the company describes the new AI as “a Mythos-class model made safe for general use.”

Mythos was introduced back in April to great fanfare as a model capable of finding vulnerabilities in code that neither experienced developers nor other AIs could find.

Also: US workers are the world’s biggest AI skeptics – and it’s not just about job loss

Offered as the central component of a Manhattan Project-like team effort called Project Glasswing, Mythos was considered far too dangerous to be allowed to fall into the wrong hands. As such, the model has been made available only to Glasswing partners, including Amazon Web Services, Anthropic, Apple, Broadcom, Cisco, CrowdStrike, Google, JPMorganChase, the Linux Foundation, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Palo Alto Networks.

Up until now, Mythos was considered a preview product. Now, Anthropic is launching Claude Mythos 5, which will be available to all users with access to Mythos Preview. The company said, “We plan to expand access over time through a more systematic trusted-access program.”

No significant details were provided about any difference between Mythos Preview and Mythos 5, except that the latter appears to be the post-beta version of Mythos.

Also: Apple’s new Siri AI comes with hidden costs that power users should know of

Anthropic also released Fable 5. The company described this technology as the same underlying model as Mythos, but with safeguards. Those safeguards block responses in specific high-risk areas of cybersecurity and biology.

Yeah, the “biology” reference raised red flags. Have they seen biological weapon prompts or responses in their logs? I’ve asked Anthropic. I highly doubt they’ll answer.

Interestingly, if a Fable 5 prompt veers into one of those high-risk areas, the model drops down to Opus 4.8, which has its own restrictions. Ever since version Opus 4.7, Anthropic blocks “Activities that are almost always used maliciously and have little to no legitimate defensive application, such as mass data exfiltration or ransomware code development.”

Professionals with a security clearance from Anthropic can use Opus 4.7 and 4.8 to perform blocked security activities in the course of doing their jobs. Disclosure: I am an authorized member of Anthropic’s Cyber Verification Program, so I have access to these capabilities as part of my cyberwarfare, cyberdefense, and counterterrorism work. It’s not yet clear whether those of us certified through the Cyber Verification Program can perform blocked queries with Fable 5.

Also: I used ChatGPT to build a free PDF editor because I didn’t trust it to change my files – it’s glorious

Anthropic seems confident that Fable can’t be utilized for nefarious purposes. They said, “Early data shows at least 95% of Fable sessions run entirely on Fable’s own responses, with no fallback. We extensively red-teamed our classifiers to test their robustness against jailbreaks. Internally, we ran an external bug bounty that produced no universal jailbreaks in over 1,000 hours of testing. We then worked with external red-teaming orgs which also failed to find universal jailbreaks.”

From the announcement, we don’t have much information to share with you about Fable 5. However, Anthropic did share some customer comments about the release.

An unnamed representative of vibe-coding platform maker Base44 said, “Fable is much deeper and better at one-shotting full apps, and its tool calling is excellent.”

Also: AI can identify intimate partner violence years before people disclose it, but is that safe?

Genspark provides an all-in-one AI workspace. A representative from that company said, “Fable came out #1 on our evals, winning head-to-head against every model we tested. It was significantly stronger on the hardest tasks in the set — UI design and game coding.”

A representative from e-commerce marketplace Rakuten said, “At the highest effort, Fable reflects on and validates its own work. For us, that’s what makes highly autonomous operations possible — the extra thinking pays for itself.”

Speaking of payment, pricing for Fable 5 and the new Mythos 5 release is $10 per million input tokens and $50 per million output tokens. That’s about twice the price of Claude Opus 4.8.

Anthropic has a fairly unique rollout plan for Fable 5, based on their expectation of high demand. Here’s what the company said:

• From today through June 22, Fable 5 is included on Pro, Max, Team, and seat-based Enterprise plans at no extra cost.
• On June 23, we’ll remove Fable 5 from those plans. Using it after that will require usage credits.
• After this point-we aim to restore Fable 5 as a standard part of subscription plans. We intend to do this as quickly as we can.

Anthropic hasn’t provided any deep explanation of its naming choices for Mythos and Fable. According to Britannica, a mythos is a “complex body of sacred narratives, traditional stories, or belief systems that explain the origins of the world and cultural values.” By contrast, a fable is a “short, fictional story designed to teach a specific moral lesson.” Read into that what you wish.

I’m sure we’ll learn more about both of these releases. If my Max plan can host Fable 5, I’ll try and test it out with some coding challenges when it becomes available. So stay tuned.

Even at twice the price of Opus, would you use Claude Fable 5 for coding work if it gave you Mythos-level power with built-in safety fallbacks? Let us know in the comments below.


You can follow my day-to-day project updates on social media. Be sure to subscribe to my weekly update newsletter, and follow me on Twitter/X at @DavidGewirtz, on Facebook at Facebook.com/DavidGewirtz, on Instagram at Instagram.com/DavidGewirtz, on Bluesky at @DavidGewirtz.com, and on YouTube at YouTube.com/DavidGewirtzTV.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Flip phones are making a comeback, but most US adults aren’t convinced enough to upgrade. 

Smartphone brands are trying new phone concepts, like flip and foldable phones, to give us a bigger screen when we want it, while still maintaining the same functionality as the smartphones we’re used to. There’s the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7, for instance, and there’s even a rumor that Apple plans to release its first foldable phone

And if you remember the popular 2000s Motorola Razr, now there are rumors about the Motorola Razr 2026 — it reminds me of my old pink phone. But gone are the days of a basic keypad and a few ringtones. Smartphone brands are adding AI features, such as creating custom emoji, removing background objects from photos, and live translation. 

Yet a recent CNET survey says smartphone users aren’t sufficiently impressed by new features and concepts to consider upgrading their phones. Only 12% are motivated by AI integrations and 13% by new phone designs. Instead, price (55%) and longer battery life (52%) are the biggest drivers of their decision to get a new phone. 

If most US adults aren’t sold, why are tech brands so adamant? Let’s dive into CNET’s findings and what they mean for the future of smartphones.

  • The top three motivations for US adult smartphone owners to consider upgrading their devices are price (55%), longer battery life (52%) and more storage (38%). That’s the same top three as last year: In 2025, price was the top motivator (62%), followed by longer battery life (54%) and storage capacity (39%). 
  • Despite AI’s growing presence, only 12% of smartphone owners say AI integrations would motivate them to consider upgrading. 
  • Only 13% of smartphone owners would be motivated to consider upgrading to a new phone concept, such as a foldable or flip phone. 
  • Over half of smartphone owners (58%) experience frustration with their phone’s battery life, and 31% say their phone’s battery doesn’t hold a charge as well as it did when it was new.  

Most US adults aren’t motivated by new smartphone features and designs

Smartphone brands, like Samsung and Apple, are building in convenient features, such as a tool to remove unwanted objects from pictures, AI call screening and the ability to draft a message from a prompt. However, CNET found that US adults would consider upgrading for more practical reasons. Over half (55%) of US smartphone users are motivated by price, including 53% of Apple users and 56% of Samsung users. 

Yet brands are still exploring new concepts and features, like Apple Intelligence, a built-in AI feature. Then there’s the rumor of a book-style iPhone, potentially followed by a clamshell foldable design. But that’s not what most smartphone owners are after. 

Smartphone owners are more convinced by other design and feature factors when deciding on a new phone, such as camera features (27%) and the phone’s display or screen size (22%). Here are the top motivators to consider upgrading for all smartphone users.

Zain Awais / CNET

You’ve probably noticed the price of a basic smartphone has increased drastically over the years. Take the iPhone, for example. It was originally $600 for 4GB. But advanced features, the RAM shortage, inflation and tariffs are pushing prices even higher. Now, the baseline iPhone 17 (256 GB) is $800, and the Samsung Galaxy S26 (256 GB) starts at $900. 

There’s no way of knowing for sure, but these may be the lowest prices we’ll see on new models for a while, especially as features advance and designs become more complex. So if you’re already in the market for a new phone, you might want to think seriously about pulling the trigger now if you find a good deal.

The top upgrading motivators haven’t changed much over the years

Looking back at CNET’s survey data from 2024 and 2025, and now, people’s motivators for upgrading their phones haven’t changed much. Price, longer battery life and more storage have been top drivers in the past, and despite small dips this year, they’re still key upgrading factors.

Despite design upgrades and new features, smartphone owners are still focused on how much they’re paying and how long they can use their devices without needing a charger. Consumer sentiment about AI integrations dropped hard from 2024 to 2025, but it has edged up slightly in 2026. And smartphone owners aren’t as easily persuaded by phone color or the phone being thinner, either. 

Even with these nice-to-have capabilities, smartphone owners are looking at the basics. That includes practical features like battery life and more storage to hold their many important files, photos and apps. 

Most smartphone owners want better battery life

Taking a closer look at smartphone users’ hope for longer battery life in a new phone, over half (58%) are frustrated with their current phone’s battery life. Roughly one in three (31%) say their phone doesn’t hold a charge. 

The reality is, battery life will decline the longer you have your phone, so you may find your phone’s battery charge doesn’t last as long as it used to. Even though you can replace your phone’s battery, most phone batteries have a lifespan of two to three years before they start degrading. 

CNET Director of Editorial Content Patrick Holland examined battery life tests on over 35 current smartphones. And it’s not just iPhones that pack impressive batteries.

Based on CNET’s lab testing, the $1,200 iPhone 17 Pro Max had the best overall battery life, with a 5,088-mAh capacity. Another top performer was the $900 OnePlus 15, with a 7,300-mAh battery. 

If you’re looking for a phone with better battery life, consider one with a silicon-carbon battery to increase capacity without requiring a larger phone. The OnePlus 15, Poco F7 Ultra, OnePlus 13R and OnePlus 15R all feature silicon-carbon batteries with large capacities and all performed well in Holland’s testing. Keep in mind that other factors can impact your battery life, like your carrier’s signal, software efficiency and processor. 

Methodology

CNET commissioned YouGov Plc to conduct the survey. All figures, unless otherwise stated, are from YouGov Plc. The total sample comprised 2,486 adults, of whom 2,407 owned a smartphone. Fieldwork was undertaken from April 29 to May 1, 2026. The survey was carried out online. The figures have been weighted and are representative of all US adults (aged 18 plus). 





Source link