Are Amazon Basics AA Batteries Better Than Costco’s? These Tests Have The Answer






We may receive a commission on purchases made from links.

Back in the days before many, if not most, home gadgets could be recharged via USB, alkaline batteries were a household staple. Two brands more or less shadowed the rest, which is why many buyers wanted to know whether Duracell or Energizer batteries ruled the roost. There is still plenty of use for AA batteries, but perhaps the question people should be asking is if Amazon Basics AAs are better than Costco’s. Both are store-brand options from extremely popular retailers and are more inexpensive than the coppertop and pink bunny brands, which is why there’s a decent chance you’ve got batteries from at least one of those retailers in your junk drawer right now.

Unless you’ve got a lot of time on your hands, the best way to truly determine which gigantic store chain makes the best AAs is to find objective results from experts who’ve thoroughly tested them. CNET built a custom rig to test the longevity and power output of batteries from four brands, including Energizer, Duracell, and Rayovac. Of the four, Amazon’s AA batteries performed the worst, and by a significant margin; interestingly, its AAA batteries topped everyone else’s.

This test raises a red flag over Amazon Basics AAs, but for whatever reason, CNET chose not to include Costco’s batteries, which are under its Kirkland Signature branding. To truly figure out which of the two is the better battery, tests that put them directly head-to-head must be used. Fortunately, at least two reputable YouTube channels with huge followings did exactly that, though in different ways. It’s a shame CNET didn’t include Kirkland in its testing for the best batteries of 2026, because according to both YouTube testers, Costco makes better AAs than Amazon.

Kirkland AA batteries are superior to Amazon Basics in pretty much every way

Project Farm has built a subscriber base of nearly 4 million by performing extensive and well-designed tests between major brands in everything from power tools to denim jeans. To test over two dozen different models of AA batteries from most major brands and then some, Project Farm conducted bounce tests, cold temperature tests, and used a battery analyzer, among other methods. Rechargeable batteries were even tested in solar lights over a period of six years!

Perhaps the most informative test was when each AA was used to power identical fans to determine which would last the longest. Scores were then given out across various metrics and eventually used to determine an overall ranking. Kirkland outperformed Amazon Basics’ alkaline batteries in every single physical test and was able to run its fan for 7 hours and 29 minutes; Amazon Basics could only run the identical model fan for 4 hours and 37 minutes. Of all the alkalines tested, Costco’s AAs tied for second in output and tied for first in 0–degree Fahrenheit testing. For the latter, Amazon Basics tied with several others for last.

Overall, Costco beat all other alkaline batteries other than Duracell and Energizer Max, sitting much higher up the list than Amazon and proving Kirkland belongs near the top of the best battery brands ranked. The YouTube channel Lumencraft came to pretty much the same conclusion, though did its testing using a Convoy T3 flashlight alongside a battery analyzer. The T3 lasted 30.45 minutes using Costco’s batteries compared to 22.67 minutes for Amazon, and Kirkland AAs were able to sustain over 175 lumens for twice as long as Amazon Basics. Lumencraft found that Kirkland also proved superior in efficiency under high-drain loads.

Amazon makes a type of AA battery that Costco doesn’t

Both Project Farm and Lumencraft included other types of AA batteries besides traditional alkaline ones, including disposable lithium batteries. For the most part, the more recent technology underlying lithium AAs proved superior to alkaline batteries in general. In addition to disposable lithium AA batteries, some brands also offer rechargeable ones that can be used in place of alkaline AA batteries over and over again — though there are some devices you should not use rechargeable batteries for like smoke alarms, as the variable discharge rate of a rechargeable battery can cause problems with operation.

Amazon doesn’t have any lithium AA batteries in its Amazon Basics line, but it does have rechargeable nickel–metal hydride (NiMH) models for sale. Two such models (standard and high-capacity) were included in Lumencraft’s tests. Naturally, Amazon Basics High-Capacity Rechargeable Batteries outlasted the standard model by nearly five minutes, as well as maintained over 125 lumens for about five minutes longer. Both sat somewhat in the middle of all the NiMHs tested, with Duracell once again proving to be the best battery maker of them all.

Kirkland wasn’t included in these tests because Costco currently doesn’t make any rechargeable NiMH, giving Amazon Basics an advantage by default. This is why it’s also not included in Project Farm’s rechargeable NiMH testing, which used a dozen different models to power solar lights over the course of six years. Each battery was then tested to see how much it degraded over many seasons and recharge cycles. Amazon Basics High-Capacity Rechargeable Batteries ranked dead last, performing five times as poorly as the top NiMH unit (Eneloop 1900). Kirkland seems to be very good at producing disposable alkaline AA batteries, so maybe it’s about time Costco considers entering the rechargeable market.

How were Amazon’s and Costco’s AA batteries evaluated?

The extensive testing conducted by two popular YouTube channels, Project Farm and Lumencraft, were used as a basis to determine that Costco’s Kirkland batteries are superior when compared to Amazon Basics models. These channels have strong reputations for reliable and meticulous testing of various other products as well. The producers of these tests very clearly put a lot of time and effort into performing the evaluations as well as making them as fair and balanced as possible, while also extensively documenting results for reference. The nature of the tests are described in the article above and you can also watch some of them in real time by checking out each channel’s respective video. Both sets of test results were posted within the last year to ensure that the most up-to-date versions of each brand’s batteries were measured up against one another.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews







In the ever-shifting geopolitical sphere, China’s growing military presence and the ongoing tensions over Taiwan and the South China Sea continue to be a closely watched topic — particularly in regard to China’s ambition for naval power. In recent years, much speculation has been made over the country’s rapid military development, including the capabilities of the newest Chinese amphibious assault ships.

While there’s no denying its military advancements and buildup, much has been made about the logistical and military difficulties that China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) would face if it launched an amphibious invasion of Taiwan. However, there’s growing concern that if a Taiwan invasion were to happen, it wouldn’t just be military vessels taking part in the action, but a fleet of commercial vessels, too — including a massive new car ferries that could quickly be repurposed into valuable military transports.

While the possibility of the PLA using commercial vessels for military operations has always been on the table for a potential Taiwan invasion, the scale with which China has been expanding its commercial shipbuilding industry has become a big factor in the PLA’s projection of logistical and military power across the Taiwan Strait. It’s also raised ethical concerns over the idea of putting merchant-marked ships into combat use.

From car ferry to military transport

The rapid growth of modern Chinese industrial capacity is well known, with Chinese electric vehicle factories now able to build a new car every 60 seconds. Likewise, China has developed a massive shipbuilding industry over the last 25 years, with the country now making up more than half of the world’s shipbuilding output. It’s from those two sectors where China’s latest vehicle-carrying super vessels are emerging. 

With a capacity to carry over 10,000 new vehicles for transport from factories in Asia to destinations around the world, these ships, known as roll-on/roll-off (Ro-Ro) ferries, are now the biggest of their type in the world. The concept of the PLA putting civilian ferries into military use is not a new one, or even an idea China is trying to hide. Back in 2021, China held a public military exercise where a civilian ferry was used to transport both troops and a whole arsenal of military vehicles, including main battle tanks.

The relatively limited conventional naval lift capacity of the PLA is something that’s been pointed out while game-planning a Chinese amphibious move on Taiwan, and it’s widely expected that the PLA would lean on repurposed civilian vessels to boost its ability to move soldiers and vehicles across the Taiwan Strait. With these newer, high-capacity Ro-Ro ferries added to the fleet, the PLA’s amphibious capacity and reach could grow significantly.

A makeshift amphibious assault ship

However, even with the added capacity of these massive ferries, military analysts have pointed out that Ro-Ro ships would not be able to deploy vehicles and soliders directly onto a beach the way a purpose-built military amphibious assault ship can. Traditionally, to deploy vehicles from these ships, the PLA would first need to capture and then repurpose Taiwan’s existing commercial port facilities into unloading bases for military vehicles and equipment.

However, maybe most alarming is that satellite imagery and U.S. Intelligence reports show that, along with increasing ferry production output, the PLA is also working on a system of barges and floating dock structures to help turn these civilian ferries into more efficient military transports. With this supporting equipment in place, ferries may not need to use existing port infrastructure to bring their equipment on shore.

Beyond the general military concern over China’s growing amphibious capability, there are also ethical concerns if China is planning to rapidly put a fleet of civilian merchant vessels into military service. If the PLA were to deploy these dual-purpose vessels into direct military operations, the United States and its allies would likely be forced to treat civilian-presenting ships as enemy combatants. On top of all the other strategic challenges a Taiwan invasion would bring, the U.S. having to navigate the blurred legal lines between military and merchant vessels could potentially give China a strategic advantage amidst the fog of war.





Source link