Best streaming service for Apple fans


Verdict

Apple Music remains categorically the best music streaming service for owners of iPhones, HomePods and generally other Apple devices, and is arguably even the best option for Android users who want the best-sounding and most focused music service at the lowest monthly price. Its Individual plan undercuts Spotify’s by £2 per month, and it trumps the green streaming giant for hi-res sound quality and user friendliness too, while offering spatial audio mixes that will no doubt appeal to – or at least intrigue – many. As an overall music proposition, it is hard to beat

  • 24-bit hi-res and spatial audio

  • Engagingly clear and dynamic sound

  • Intelligent music curation and discovery

  • Extensive device support

  • Excellent value

  • No podcast or audiobook integration

  • No ‘Connect’ connectivity

  • Some features unavailable on non-Apple hardware

Key Features

  • Trusted Reviews Icon

    Review Price:
    £10.99

  • Catalogue

    On-demand music streaming of over 100 million songs

  • Platforms

    Apps for desktop, web and smartphone (iOS and Android)

  • Subscription

    Individual, Family, Student and Apple bundle plans

  • Features

    24-bit hi-res audio, spatial audio and Siri voice assistant

Introduction

Apple Music has come a long way since Tim Cook and Jimmy Iovine finally announced the tech giant’s Spotify rival to the world in 2015.

When we first reviewed the highly anticipated music streaming service, it had around 35 million songs, was baked into Apple’s ageing iTunes software, and capped audio quality at an MP3-comparable 256kbps. We loved its Spotify-beating sound, playlist curation and Beats 1 radio station, but felt that patches of clunky interface and imperfect offline listening hampered the service.

Today, the catalogue is more than three times that size, has its own app available on almost every audio device you could think of, flies the flag for 24-bit high-resolution quality, and is as operationally intuitive and seamless as they come.

Advertisement

But its competitors have hardly stood still in that time either, and arguably the music streaming playing field is now more even than ever. So where does Apple Music rank today and is it worth subscribing to? I compared it to Spotify et al to find out.


Price

  • Individual plan undercuts Spotify
  • Includes Apple Music Classical service

Gone are the days when individual subscriptions cost a tenner a month, although Apple has resisted price hikes more stubbornly than most.

An Individual subscription costs £10.99 per month, which is reduced to £5.99 for students (who also get Apple TV included in that price), while a Family plan, which grants Individual accounts to up to five people in a household, is £16.99 per month.

If you’re fully ensconced in Apple’s service ecosystem, it may well make sense to subscribe to Apple One, which bundles Apple Music, Apple TV, Apple Arcade, Apple Fitness+, Apple News+ and iCloud+ storage for a monthly fee of £18.95.

Advertisement

Every plan includes access to Apple Music Classical, a standalone app that features over five million classical tracks and a specialised composer/work/conductor search tool.

In terms of the Individual plans, those prices compare favourably to Spotify and Qobuz (£12.99), Amazon Music Unlimited and Deezer (£11.99), and price-match Tidal and YouTube Music.

Platforms

  • Integration favours Apple device users
  • Android app available and well optimised

Apple Music is accessible on a plethora of devices, from Apple hardware such as the iPhone, iPad, Apple Watch, HomePod and even Apple Vision Pro, to Android phones and tablets, Windows PCs, smart TVs, PlayStation and Xbox, and Sonos, Amazon and Google speakers.

It’s available via CarPlay and Android Auto too, and you can now play Apple Music on a web browser. There isn’t a ‘Connect’ casting feature, as offered by Spotify and Tidal, but there is, of course, AirPlay, which is extensively supported by audio hardware nowadays.

homepod2front
HomePod 2 Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Advertisement

Apple Music is not as exclusive to Apple devices as it once was, with Apple having made a concerted effort to open up the service to third-party hardware and platforms, although users of non-Apple gear do still miss out on some features.

These include Siri voice assistance, AirPlay casting (the Android app works with Google Cast instead), the Apple Music Sing karaoke function (the Android app only displays real-time lyrics), and the AI-powered AutoMix feature, which creatively transitions one song to the next (the Android app offers simpler crossfade transitions instead).

Some Apple hardware, including newer iPhones, iPads and Apple TV, can also exclusively benefit from the head-tracking spatial audio feature when listening through compatible AirPods and Beats headphones.

Airpods Max 2 upwards
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Catalogue

  • 100m+ song library competes with others
  • 24-bit/192kHz hi-res audio
  • Dolby Atmos-powered spatial audio
  • Apple Music 1 24/7 radio station
  • Audiobooks and podcasts are offered via separate apps

Apple Music competes on the song library front with over 100 million songs, its catalogue available in 24-bit hi-res audio. Songs with sampling rates up to 48kHz are labelled as ‘Lossless’, while tracks between 48kHz and 192kHz are flagged as ‘Hi-Res Lossless’.

Advertisement

On an iPhone, the former can be natively output via the port to connected headphones, while the latter requires an external DAC to be added to the hardware chain.

Apple wasn’t the first service to offer hi-res streaming, which was pioneered by Tidal and Qobuz during Apple Music’s formative years, but it arguably made the biggest impact in opening it up to the masses when, in 2021, it upgraded its catalogue’s audio quality to hi-res, free of charge. Amazon was forced to respond, almost immediately ditching its higher-priced hi-res tier and also bringing 24-bit quality to all subscribers, and Tidal has since followed suit.

Apple Music Bowers & Wilkins Px8 S2
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Like Tidal, Qobuz and Amazon, Apple Music offers ‘full-fat’ hi-res up to 24-bit/192kHz, while Spotify, which only added hi-res streams in late-2025, tops out at 24-bit/48kHz. Whether or not the discrepancy between those figures truly matters depends on the equipment you’re listening with.

If you stream only to Bluetooth headphones, for example, it doesn’t matter so much as Bluetooth technology cannot transmit 24-bit audio without compression anyway. Generally what matters more is how the services’ streams, regardless of their bit and sample rates, actually sound, which I’ll come to momentarily.

Thousands of songs in the catalogue are available in Apple’s Dolby Atmos-powered spatial audio, a technology that essentially creates more immersive, 3D-like mixes. It’s proprietary and goes hand-in-hand with Apple’s aforementioned head-tracking technology, although Dolby Atmos mixes are available on other services such as Tidal and Amazon.

Advertisement

Apple Music Library
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Spatial mixes tend to have a Marmite reaction, and with good reason. Some are definitely more engaging than others, whether that’s down to the song itself or the way they’ve been mixed or recorded, and some music fans simply prefer good old-fashioned stereo.

One jewel in the service’s crown is its flagship 24/7 live radio station, Apple Music 1 (formerly Beats 1), featuring daily DJ programming hosted by the likes of Zane Lowe, Travis Mills and Rebecca Judd. Apple has since expanded its radio offering with stations that appeal to broader genres – dance and electronic, ambient, country and Latino – and it’s become a significant – and significantly valuable – part of the service, with artist takeovers, interviews and in-studio performances providing a bulky on-demand offering within the ‘Radio’ section (one of only five tabs on the UI).

Apple Music Beats radio
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Curation

  • Accurate AI-driven playlists and recommendations

Music curation has become much more intelligent in recent years, and nowhere is that more evident than Apple Music. As with other services, you have AI-curated ‘stations’ offering a seamless stream of music based on particular genres and artists, and their exposure on the ‘Home’ screen adapts to your listening habits the more you use the service, as do ‘Made for you’ playlists like ‘New Music’. I’m particularly fond of the ‘Discovery Station’, which continuously plays music you haven’t played before based on your listening history.

Advertisement

Apple Music curated playlists
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

I subscribed as a ‘new’ user to see whether the initial experience had changed since my last rodeo with Apple Music, and within just two days of medium-to-heavy use, the Home screen had adapted to throw up more useful suggestions based on my tastes.

Recommendations were spot on, and I liked the mix of ‘big’, well-known names and smaller artists. ‘Favouriting’ songs, rather than just listening, seems to help this process too.

Editor-curated playlists, such as pop/R&B-focused ‘Today’s Hits’, are also updated weekly, as is Apple Music Replay, a year-end recap of, and ongoing insight into, your top tunes. Apple has of March 2026 introduced Playlist Playground, which, similar to Spotify’s, creates a playlist based on text prompts (‘laid-back songs for a sunny summer’s day’, for example) – but it’s only available in the US at the time of publish.

User Experience

  • Clean, colourful and easy to navigate
  • Largely consistent across devices (even Android and Windows)
  • Handy Siri integration on Apple devices

The next tab along from ‘Home’ is ‘New’, which, as you’d expect, is a gateway to newly released songs and albums, new (and newly updated) playlist curations, trending and chart music, new radio episode uploads, and culturally timely and relevant content, an example of which is a ‘Eurovision in Spatial Audio’ playlist, flagged as the event takes place within a week of my testing period.

Advertisement

Apple Music iOS app
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Along from ‘Radio’ is the ‘Library’ tab, where you can access all your local music and ‘favourited’ streams in one place, and the ‘Search’ tab, which complements a comprehensive search tool (that includes finding songs from lyrics) with shortcuts to specific categories of content, such as spatial audio, karaoke and music based on mood, genre and decade of release.

I tested Apple Music on an iPhone, iPad, a Google Pixel phone and a Windows computer and was pleasantly surprised by how consistent – and consistently excellent – the interfaces and general user experience were, much more so than when I had used the Apple Music app for Android several years prior. What was once a busy, fairly clunky UI across devices is now more or less the opposite.

While the rapid growth of AI-based curation alongside the expansion of non-music content in the streaming service world has generally resulted in increasingly dense (often borderline overwhelming) user interfaces, Apple has kept things clean and comprehensible. The wealth of content recommendations under each tab is ‘just right’, slap bang in the middle of ‘is that it?’ and ‘endless scrolling’.

Apple Music Android app
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Podcast lovers and (audio)bookworms may be frustrated that such content isn’t baked into the Apple Music app and, to some extent, offered within the subscription, as is the case with Spotify; they are instead offered in separate apps, Apple Podcasts and Apple Books. But that does allow the service to focus on its music and radio catalogue, and I, for one (admittedly not a huge podcasts or audiobooks fan), prefer that pure music-only approach. I certainly believe the interface benefits from that narrower focus.

Advertisement

On Apple devices, Siri is a useful and accurate way to control playback hands-free, too, whether you ask for songs directly or demand the voice assistant find you, say, “a good playlist for running”. You can also search for songs by reading out some lyrics (I tried this with ten songs and it found nine successfully), and since Shazam was acquired by Apple and has now been baked into Apple hardware, that has become a neat, easy way to identify music playing around you, and access it on the service.

Sound Quality

  • Hi-res audio support all the way up to 24-bit/192kHz
  • Sounds better than Spotify

Apple disrupted the market when it included hi-res streaming in the standard subscription rather than offering it within a pricier premium tier, becoming the best-value hi-res service overnight and forcing the established competitors to realign their offerings.

Hi-res support goes all the way up to 24-bit/192kHz, on par with Tidal, Qobuz and Amazon, but despite such apparent uniformity, catalogues do differ and not all streaming services sound the same.

Apple Music playback
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Apple Music has always been one of the better-sounding services, categorically second only to Qobuz, its streams pleasingly clear and open, sparkling with detail and entertainingly punchy. It’s a clean, articulate listen that sounds that bit more engaging than Spotify, despite the huge gains the world’s most popular streaming service has made to its audio quality in recent months. The extra clarity and openness are the first things to jump out, and it doesn’t take long to realise there’s a greater sense of dynamism to proceedings too.

Advertisement

If you’re listening through wired headphones for the best sound experience, it’s worth adding a dedicated DAC (digital-to-analogue converter) to your phone/laptop chain to unlock the streams available beyond 24-bit/48KHz, too. Even a relatively modest headphone/DAC combination will reveal the extra information in a 192kHz recording.

Should you buy it?

Value, sound and user experience

If you want the best combination of value, audio quality and music-focused user experience available. No longer does the Android app feel like a compromised experience, although you will benefit from the fullest feature suite by using Apple hardware.

You’re an avid podcast listener

If you are a podcast and/or audiobook fan and would like a music streaming service that integrates both, like Spotify.

Final Thoughts

Apple may have been uncharacteristically late to the game with music streaming, but it didn’t take long for its Music service to catch up to the established rivals, and today it arguably leads the pack for value thanks to its stagnant pricing, market-disrupting hi-res move, improved Android experience, highly competitive curation and appealing user interface.
 
Sure, it’s a no-brainer for owners of Apple devices, particularly iPhones and HomePods, but it also makes a strong case for itself with those who aren’t as ensconced in Apple’s hardware ecosystem.

How We Test

I have used and tested Apple Music on multiple occasions over the past 11 years, and for this re-test I began a new account and subscription to assess its AI curation and discovery features from scratch.

I used the service across a handful of platforms – Windows desktop, web browser, iPhone, iPad and Android phone – to gauge the consistency of the user interface and feature offering, and compared sound quality to Spotify.

I used Bowers & Wilkins Px8 S2 wireless headphones, and a Beyerdynamic DT 770 Pro X wired headphone and Chord Mojo 2 DAC pairing.

  • Tested with real world use
  • Tested for a looonng time
  • Tested across multiple platforms

FAQs

Is Apple Music better than Spotify?

Apple Music sounds better than Spotify and offers spatial audio tracks, but the green streaming giant counters with audiobook and podcast integration and the option of a free tier. Which is best for you depends on your priorities and the devices you use. If you’re deep into Apple’s ecosystem, and particularly if you own an Apple HomePod wireless speaker, an Apple Music subscription feels like a no-brainer.

Does Apple Music work on Android?

Yes – and well. While the Apple Music Android app experience hasn’t always been smooth sailing, Apple has worked hard to improve the experience on non-Apple hardware. You don’t get every feature available to iOS devices – namely the Apple Music Sing karaoke and AI-powered AutoMix features and Siri integration – but the interfaces and experiences largely mirror one another.

Has iTunes been replaced by Apple Music?

Essentially, yes. While iTunes lives on as a media store and a central hub from which to play locally stored music/videos, rip CDs and manage audiobooks/podcasts, Apple has created individual apps – Music, Podcasts, and TV – from which to access its streaming services.

When is Apple Music Replay?

Similar to Spotify Wrapped, Apple Music Replay is a year-end recap of, and insight into, your top tunes and listening history. It typically drops in early December, and then updates weekly throughout the year.

Advertisement

Full Specs

  Apple Music Review
UK RRP £10.99
USA RRP $10.99
Manufacturer Apple
Release Date 2015
Catalogue Size 100m+
Offline Streaming Yes
Connectivity AirPlay 2
Resolution support Up to 24-bit/192kHz
Supported devices iPhone, iPad, Apple Watch, HomePod, Apple Vision Pro, Android phones and tablets, Windows PCs, smart TVs, PlayStation and Xbox, and Sonos, Amazon and Google speakers, CarPlay, Android Auto
Video Yes



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


If Game Two of their first-round playoff series with the Denver Nuggets saved the 2025-26 season for the Minnesota Timberwolves, Game Three showed why it should be saved. 

The Timberwolves were a different beast while decisively thumping the Nuggets, 113-96 Thursday night at Target Center, in a game that wasn’t nearly that close. These Wolves were the mythical creature we’d heard about in preseason lore, purposefully locked and loaded to be both marauding and staunch. They owned both ends of the court, gleefully transferring back and forth from irresistible force to immovable object. 

A quartet of Timberwolves deserve special mention, but it begins with Jaden McDaniels. After his team had toppled Denver to even the series at a game apiece Monday night, McDaniels used the sizable chip on his shoulder to etch some graffiti into the public discourse, casually castigating the most prominent Nuggets players by name as “bad defenders” in a matter-of-fact manner that had the media compelling him to confirm what he had just said. 

Trash talk is fleetingly fungible in the jaundiced social environment of 2026, functioning more like coupons than currency in that it needs to be rapidly leveraged before its expiration date. The common perception naturally was that McDaniels was calling out the Nuggets. But in a more subtle, profound way, he was also putting his teammates on notice. 

All season long the Timberwolves have procrastinated on their full potential, frequently demonstrating that their preseason talk about maturity and commitment was cheap. By contrast, those words uttered by McDaniels were expensive. He had just picked a fight with the opponent, leaving open the question of how many of his teammates would join him in the fray. 

That he would lead the charge was established early, after the Timberwolves’ top two scorers, Anthony Edwards and Julius Randle, had each missed a pair of open looks against Denver’s bad defenders in the game’s first 90 seconds.  

With the game still scoreless, the NBA’s best pick-and-roll combo, Nikola Jokic and Jamal Murray, were clustered around the foul line with Minnesota’s best defenders, McDaniels and Rudy Gobert. As they jammed up Jokic, McDaniels picked the ball loose and started sprint-dribbling the other way. To no one’s surprise, Donte “Ragu” DiVincenzo was also on his horse in transition, receiving a pass from McDaniels and then lobbing it back for a Jaden slam against a hapless Murray and Murray’s late-arriving teammate, Cam Johnson, who committed the foul that allowed McDaniels to finish with the “and-1” free throw. 

On the Timberwolves next offensive possession, McDaniels muscled his way to two offensive rebounds, feeding Ragu off the first one for a missed three-pointer, which he corralled for the second one and executed the putback in traffic. It was McDaniels 5, Nuggets 0, setting the tone for a game in which not only did the Wolves never trail, but never let the lead go under double digits after McDaniels made a consecutive pair of driving layups eight minutes into the game. 

“Spectacular. I thought his activity offensively in the first quarter was outstanding,” said Wolves coach Chris Finch after the game. “He was inspirational.” 

Among the most inspired were McDaniels fellow wing players, Ragu and Ayo Dosunmu. Ragu is exactly the kind of player who will have your back in a squabble, and his galvanized performance seemed borne of satisfaction that someone else had clarified the mission. As usual, the Timberwolves were at their best with him on the court: +20 in the 32:54 he played, -3 in the 15:06 he sat. 

“He makes so many hustle plays, momentum plays, different styles of plays.” Finch raved. “He’ll make a shot, get a transition bucket, he’ll rebound, get a steal, blow something up. So many different plays. He’s just a basketball player.”

Related: How the Timberwolves sparked a season-saving Game 2 comeback over the Nuggets in Denver

Then there was Ayo, whose fearless, blazing, bee-lines for the bucket were quicksilver kryptonite for a Nuggets defense that is neither swift nor rugged. “I’ve been waiting for him to wake up a little bit in this series,” Finch accurately observed. “The downhill mindset that he played with all season for us was back.”

Back with the sort of multipurpose propulsion that leaves witnesses with giddy whiplash. Ayo led the team with 25 points and 9 assists in 32 minutes of time-lapse hoops, the lone blemish being three clanks from long range. Why chuck treys when you can so easily undress players in the paint? Ayo was 10-for-12 on two-pointers and none of those dozen shots came from anywhere but beneath the rim. Five of his nine dimes likewise yielded layups or dunks, which means he personally accounted for 30 of the 68 points in the paint by the Timberwolves on Thursday, doubling up the Nuggets’ 34.

Which brings us to the non-wing in Game 3’s ring of honor, Rudy Gobert. For the third straight game, Gobert blunted the supposed advantage Denver had with the magical playmaker Nikola Jokic at the controls. Suffice to say that in the last five quarters, Jokic has shot 8-for-33 from the floor. If that continues, the Nuggets are toast in this series. 

When I asked Finch after the game if the herculean job Gobert was doing on Jokic made planning his defense simpler and better thus far, he replied, “Rudy is making all of us look good right now with his defense.” 

Amen.

If there is an asterisk on this game, it would be the absence of Denver’s brutishly versatile power forward Aaron Gordon. Nuggets coach David Adelman should be given a lot of credit for his honesty and transparency in dealing with the media during his first full season at the helm, but it came back to bite him and his team during the pregame presser, when he was clearly rattled and dejected by the sudden unavailability of Gordon, whose playing status went to “probable” to “out” in a period of a few hours due to a chronic calf strain. 

Gordon is far and away his team’s best defender, making the timing of his injury especially troublesome in the wake of McDaniels laying down his marker. Rattled is a good way to describe the entire team’s performance in the first quarter, an emotional wounding that needs to heal as fast as Gordon’s body if the Nuggets are going to be competitive in a series that had dramatically been flipped on its head over the past three days. 

That the Timberwolves played with such dominance despite mediocre outings from Ant and Randle would be a good thing for both of those current cornerstones to keep in mind. Ant was beset by foul trouble and Randle had a solid second quarter, but it stood out that neither player fully embraced what so often works on offense when the Wolves are at their best: Push the pace, move the ball, move without the ball, and make quick decisions. Ant and Randle can still be first among equals and blend into that catechism if they stay attuned to the possibilities of a greater good, one that all of sudden doesn’t have to end with them being postseason fodder for the Spurs or the Thunder. 

Not when you’ve got three wings at a collective peak, with a chaser of Rudy semi-clowning the Joker. 



Source link