Big win for mining as Senate votes to remove BWCA moratorium


WASHINGTON – Despite hours of impassioned arguments from Sen. Tina Smith, the U.S. Senate ended a Biden-era moratorium on mining in the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness watershed.

The vote on Thursday removed a major hurdle for Twin Metals, which has battled to extract nickel, copper and other metals in Superior National Forest.

Twin Metals, which has tried to establish a mine in that area since 2019, will soon be able to request federal permits to restart work on that project after President Donald Trump, as expected, signs into law the resolution that would lift the 20-year moratorium.

The moratorium was put in place by the U.S. Forest Service in 2023 because of concerns over the environmental dangers of sulfide mining and the possible contamination of a favored destination for canoers and sportsmen.

But Twin Metals still has to clear a number of federal and state hurdles – including the reinstatement of federal leases cancelled by the Biden administration in 2022.

Smith began a talking filibuster Wednesday in opposition of the resolution and spoke for hours.

“If they want to go against the will of Minnesotans, then I am going to hold the Senate floor for hours to give them every opportunity to change their minds and do the right thing,” Smith said.

She said the use of the Congressional Review Act (CRA) to repeal the mining ban was “a dangerous precedent” that would allow Congress to undo any action taken by an administration.

“Future Congresses will be able to undo any order, even seven years later,” removing protections from public lands dear to both Democrats and Republicans in the Senate, Smith said. 

She warned her fellow senators “what goes around, comes around.”

A CRA can overturn federal agency rules and regulations through a joint resolution of approval in both the House and Senate and a president’s signature. That means it is not bound by the filibuster rule, which requires 60 votes to pass most legislation.

Sen. Amy Klobuchar, who is the granddaughter of an Iron Range miner, also warned that the unprecedented use of a CRA to repeal a public land order would endanger all protected lands.

“The CRA threatens the protective status of the Grand Canyon,” she said.

Minnesota’s Democratic senators also warned of the devastating environmental impact of the copper-sulfide mining near the 3 million acre Boundary Waters. 

“In 100% of the instances (these mines) have always caused pollution,” Smith said.

Smith also said removal of the moratorium was opposed by Minnesota tribes that have treaty rights to hunt, fish and harvest wild rice in the Superior National Forest and other tribes across the nation.

Smith also argued that Twin Metals, a subsidiary of Chilean mining company Antofagasta, would send any ore extracted from the Superior National Forest to smelters in China. 

But among Senate Republicans who hold a majority, the arguments of Minnesota’s Democratic senators did not win the day.

Stauber scores a win 

The resolution was approved on a 50-49 largely partisan vote on Thursday. It would not only lift the moratorium on sulfide mining in the Boundary Waters watershed, but it would also prohibit another president from re-establishing such a ban.

Yet a different Congress – with the backing of a future president – could always approve a new prohibition on mining in the Superior National Forest.

The Senate vote was a big victory for Rep. Pete Stauber, R-8th District, who sponsored the resolution that won approval in the U.S. House in January.

“A major victory for America and Minnesota’s 8th Congressional District was secured today,” a jubilant Stauber posted on X shortly after the vote. “The Senate just passed my bill to reverse Biden’s illegal mining ban in the Superior National Forest – it’s now headed to the President’s desk!  Mining is our past, our present, and our future – and the future looks bright!”

The filibuster, which gives minority Democrats leverage in the U.S. Senate, had always prevented Stauber from winning approval of his mining initiatives in that chamber.

So, Stauber turned to the CRA. Approved in 1996, the act was aimed at making federal agencies more accountable.

Congress passed the CRA to prevent a lame duck president from pushing through massive policy changes right before a new president is inaugurated. It mandates a resolution of disapproval to be considered 60 days after a rules change. But the mineral withdrawal was implemented on Jan. 26, 2023, which prompted the resolution’s opponents to call foul.

While environmentalists and conservation groups lobbied to defeat the resolution, the nation’s mining industry worked to secure its approval.

“Today we need action to reverse prior and guard against future unwarranted land grabs. We urge the Senate to pass the Congressional Review Act resolution from @RepPeteStauber reversing the improper Biden-era Minnesota land withdrawal, which blocked responsible mining on more than 220,000 acres of mineral rich land,” the National Mining Association said in a post on X Thursday. “Securing access to domestic minerals has never been more important; this CRA is a key step for national and economic security.”



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


A new class-action lawsuit, filed on Monday by three teenage girls and their guardians, alleges that Elon Musk’s xAI created and distributed child sexual abuse material featuring their faces and likenesses with its Grok AI tech.

“Their lives have been shattered by the devastating loss of privacy, dignity, and personal safety that the production and dissemination of this CSAM have caused,” the filing says. “xAI’s financial gain through the increased use of its image- and video-making product came at their expense and well-being.”

From December to early January, Grok allowed many AI and X social media users to create AI-generated nonconsensual intimate images, sometimes known as deepfake porn. Reports estimate that Grok users made 4.4 million “undressed” or “nudified” images, 41% of the total number of images created, over a period of nine days. 

X, xAI and its safety and child safety divisions did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The wave of “undressed” images stirred outrage around the world. The European Commission quickly launched an investigation, while Malaysia and Indonesia banned X within their borders. Some US government representatives called on Apple and Google to remove the app from their app stores for violating their policies, but no federal investigation into X or xAI has been opened. A similar, separate class-action lawsuit was filed (PDF) by a South Carolina woman in late January.

The dehumanizing trend highlighted just how capable modern AI image tools are at creating content that seems realistic. The new complaint compares Grok’s self-proclaimed “spicy AI” generation to the “dark arts” with its ease of subjecting children to “any pose, however sick, however fetishized, however unlawful.”

“To the viewer, the resulting video appears entirely real. For the child, her identifying features will now forever be attached to a video depicting her own child sexual abuse,” the complaint reads.

AI Atlas

The complaint says xAI is at fault because it did not employ industry-standard guardrails that would prevent abusers from making this content. It says xAI licensed use of its tech to third-party companies abroad, which sold subscriptions that led abusers to make child sexual abuse images featuring the faces and likenesses of the victims. The requests ran through xAI’s servers, which makes the company liable, the complaint argues.

The lawsuit was filed by three Jane Does, pseudonyms given to the teens to protect their identities. Jane Doe 1 was first alerted to the fact that abusive, AI-generated sexual material of her was circulating on the web by an anonymous Instagram message in early December. The filing says she was told about a Discord server by the anonymous Instagram user, where the material was shared. That led Jane Doe 1 and her family, and eventually law enforcement, to find and arrest one perpetrator.

Ongoing investigations led the families of Jane Does 2 and 3 to learn their children’s images had been transformed with xAI tech into abusive material.





Source link