Block Out the Noise. Our People’s Picks Headphone Winners Can Help Choose Your Next Pair


There are plenty of headphones to choose from. Whether you want them over-the-ear, like the AirPods Max 2 or the in-ear like the AirPods 4. Then there are countless features, like active noise cancellation and spatial audio, that almost instantly make you a audiophile while you search for the perfect pair. That endless maze of research stops here. 

Our readers chose CNET’s People’s Picks to share their favorite headphones with you. CNET’s People’s Picks is a survey-powered awards program where our readers tell us about the products they love and use the most. Listen up, here’s what they recommend. 

CNET’s People’s Picks

Viva Tung/CNET

Sony is the overall People’s Pick winner for the best headphone brand. It wins in several categories, including comfort and audio quality. Sony’s over-the-ear headphones, the WH-1000XM6 is CNET’s best headphone pick for its noise cancellation and battery life — two more awards the brand gets recognition for. 

Winner: Audio quality, active noise cancellation, battery life, comfort, deep focus and creativity, over-the-ear wireless headphones, sleep and relaxation, and video editing

Viva Tung/CNET

Apple is a household brand we’re all familiar with, and its AirPods are well-loved for a few reasons: call quality, ease of use and connectivity. Apple wins for both wireless earbuds, giving a nod to the AirPods and AirPods Pro models, but also the wired earbuds, EarPods, that Apple offers. They’re still a part of readers’ homes and heads.

Wins for: Brand loyalty, call quality, durability, earbuds, ease of use and connectivity, listening to music, audiobooks and podcasts 

Viva Tung/CNET

CNET experts say that if you want the best sound quality, wired headphones are the way to go. And readers say Sennheiser is it. Sennheiser offers high-quality wired and wireless headphones at an affordable price for audiophiles, such as the Sennheiser HD 505 and Sennheiser 660S2.

Wins for: Wired headphones 

Which headphones should you pick: wired or wireless?

Choosing between wired and wireless headphones boils down to how you want to connect to hear sound. Wired headphones mean you won’t have to worry about Bluetooth connectivity issues or battery life, whereas wireless headphones give you the freedom to avoid tangled wires and keep your phone in your pocket while using your earbuds. You’ll also want to make sure there’s a headphone jack since most smartphones don’t include it anymore. Based on CNET’s findings, most respondents have wireless earbuds.

By brand, Apple is the most popular pick for both wired and wireless earbuds, with popular models including the AirPods Pro 2, AirPods Max and AirPods Max 2. Sennheiser wins for wired headphones, while Sony wins for wireless headphones. Here’s a closer look:

Over-the-ear or in-ear headphones 

Earbuds or in-ear headphones may be a popular choice if you want something more compact and lightweight, but if you’re looking for better sound quality or plan to wear headphones for hours and want a secure fit, you may consider over-the-ear headphones.

Sony is the most popular pick for over-ear wireless headphones, with models like the WH-1000XM5 and WH-1000XM6. Bose is a close runner-up. For in-ear picks, readers love Apple’s AirPods and AirPods Pro models.

The headphone features that really matter 

Beyond choosing between wired and wireless headphones, or whether you want headphones that cover your ears, there are other features that matter on a daily basis — whether you’re commuting and taking a call or listening to music on a long flight. Here are the features that matter most, and what CNET readers recommend. 

Active noise cancellation 

Winner: Sony 
Runner-up: Bose

Active noise cancellation can make a big difference whether you’re on a call or listening to music. David Carnoy, CNET’s executive editor and headphones expert, has tested dozens of pairs of headphones, and CNET has reviews on some of the most popular picks, like the Apple AirPods Pro 3 and the Sony WH-1000XM6. It’s the buying factor you should pay close attention to. 

“Headphones and earbuds with good active noise canceling can make a real difference when it comes to shielding you from loud noise,” Carnoy says.

When it comes to active noise cancellation, Sony wins over many CNET respondents, scoring 4.39 out of 5, while Bose and Bowers & Wilkins are close runners-up — scoring 4.33 and 4.23, respectively. CNET’s best all-around headphones are the Sony WH-1000XM6 over-ear headphones, and they also have the best active noise cancellation. 

The Sony XM6 over-the-ear headphones cost $428, but if you’re looking for a more affordable option, you might consider other Sony or Bose headphones with solid ANC performance or earbuds like the Bose QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen) and the Sony WF-1000XM5 — which both cost $300. 

Read more: Some of Our Favorite Sony Headphones Just Hit a Near-Record Low

Watch this: Sony WH-1000XM6 Review: Cream of the Noise-Canceling Crop

Audio quality 

Winner: Sony 
Runner-up: Bose

Listening to music is one of the most popular uses of headphones, followed by podcasts and audiobooks, so audio quality is a big deal. And while many brands may boast about their sound quality, CNET respondents have a favorite.

Sony wins again for audio quality, scoring 4.55, with Bose as a close runner-up, scoring 4.53 and Beats scoring 4.48. One potential reason for the win is Sony’s LDAC audio codec, which enables high-resolution audio. So it’s definitely one feature to look out for when choosing Sony headphones. The Sony WH-XB910N over-the-ear headphones have extra bass and support the LDAC audio codec. The Sony XM6 and XM5 are two other options. 

Battery life 

Winner: Sony 
Runner-up: JBL

Sony picks up another People’s Picks award with its battery life, scoring 4.52. Both the XM5 and the XM6 have 30 hours of battery life if the volume is set to moderate and noise cancellation is on. Otherwise, battery life can last up to 40 hours. JBL is a close runner-up in this category by scoring 4.41 and Beats scores 4.33. 

For comparison, battery life on Apple’s AirPods Pro 3 is up to 8 hours, and Bose’s Immersive Audio hurts the battery life for some of its headphones, like Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones (2nd Gen) and the Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones (2nd Gen) — both over-the-ear wireless headphones.

Brand loyalty 

Winner: Apple 
Runner-up: Sony

You may consider a brand that you’re more familiar with, especially if you already own other devices from the same brand. When it comes to brand loyalty, most Apple respondents would buy the same brand of headphones, but a newer model. But Sony and Bose headphone users are loyal to their ecosystems, too. Many Sony respondents would buy the exact same brand and model if they lost their headphones, and most Bose respondents would buy the same brand, but a newer model. Here’s a look at the top five brands. 

Watch this: AirPods Max 2 vs. Sony WH-1000XM6: Which Headphones Are Better?

Call quality 

Winner: Apple 
Runner-up: Sony

Handling calls hands-free is one of the perks of having the right headphones. However, not being able to hear on the other end, or someone not being able to hear you, can be a pain. If call quality is a big deal, CNET readers highly recommend Apple. 

Carnoy noticed good voice-calling performance in the latest Apple AirPods 4, and a slight improvement in voice isolation in Apple’s AirPods Max 2, for better calls that focus on the voice and less on background noise.  

Watch this: Hands-On with AirPods 4 and New AirPods Max

Comfort

Winner: Sony 
Runner-up: Bose

Carnoy says there’s a tendency to think that sound quality is the most important factor when buying headphones and earbuds. However, fit is most important, especially with noise-isolating earbuds featuring silicone eartips. “If you don’t get a tight seal, sound quality and noise canceling will suffer,” Carnoy says. 

Sony and Bose go head-to-head again as the closest top contenders in comfort. Sony wins for comfort with 4.44 out of 5, while Bose gets 4.25 for comfort and Sennheiser scores 4.15. Some of Sony’s over-the-ear headphones are lightweight, such as the Sony CH-520, Sony CH-720N and Sony XM4. If you’re OK with wired headphones, the Sony MDR-7506 is noted for its comfort over hours and is priced at $115. 

CNET editors also consider Bose headphones to be lightweight and very comfortable, so it’s no surprise that respondents make it a close runner-up to Sony. Both Bose’s earbuds and over-the-ear headphones are designed with comfort in mind. The Bose QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds have Fit Kit eartips for comfort, while CNET editors also like that the Bose QuietComfort Headphones are designed with comfort in mind. 

Connectivity

Winner: Apple 
Runner-up: Sony

If you’ve ever had trouble connecting your headphones to devices, CNET respondents recommend Apple for headphones that easily connect to devices, and Sony is a runner-up.  

There are two features worth noting when connecting Apple headphones. If you have an iPhone or Apple device, you’ll press and hold a button on the headphones for a pop-up to appear on your screen, which lets you connect. However, if you have an Android device, you may need to connect via Bluetooth in your device’s settings. And if your headphones automatically connect when you open the case, if the device is recognized. 

Durability and reliability 

Winner: Apple 
Runner-up: Sony

Choosing headphones that are well-constructed and reliable can be hard just by looking at them. Chances are, you won’t know how well they’re designed until you put them to the test, whether it’s rain or dropping them. And how well they hold up over time matters just as much if you don’t plan to buy new headphones every year. 

CNET respondents shared their opinion on how durable and reliable their headphones are. When it comes to durability, most Apple owners have kept their headphones for more than three years, and respondents from other popular brands have kept their headphones for the same amount of time, including Sony and Bose.

However, if you want headphones that are reliable and can withstand incidents, CNET respondents recommend Sony and Apple because of the damage tests the headphones withstand, including heavy rain, intense sweating, dropping on concrete and accidentally being left in a hot car. 

Read more: You Should Have Exactly 3 Pairs of Headphones. Here’s Why

How you use your headphones 

Winner: Apple 
Runner-up: Sony

How you use your headphones may also determine which ones you prefer. Apple wins among respondents who primarily listen to music, podcasts and audiobooks on their headphones. Other top contenders include Bose and Sony for the same use cases. When it comes to taking calls on the go, Apple wins again, but Sony is a close runner-up, especially for video calls, where Apple wins by only one respondent. 

There are some categories where Sony shines above all other brands. Sony is the preferred headphone choice for deep focus and creative thinking, sleep and relaxation and video editing. 

Methodology

CNET commissioned Alchemer to conduct the People’s Picks survey to compile data. The survey was carried out online, and all figures are from Alchemer. The total sample comprised 1,071 adults. The figures have been weighted and are representative of all US adults (aged 18 plus). Fieldwork was undertaken April 6 – April 30, 2026. 





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


If Game Two of their first-round playoff series with the Denver Nuggets saved the 2025-26 season for the Minnesota Timberwolves, Game Three showed why it should be saved. 

The Timberwolves were a different beast while decisively thumping the Nuggets, 113-96 Thursday night at Target Center, in a game that wasn’t nearly that close. These Wolves were the mythical creature we’d heard about in preseason lore, purposefully locked and loaded to be both marauding and staunch. They owned both ends of the court, gleefully transferring back and forth from irresistible force to immovable object. 

A quartet of Timberwolves deserve special mention, but it begins with Jaden McDaniels. After his team had toppled Denver to even the series at a game apiece Monday night, McDaniels used the sizable chip on his shoulder to etch some graffiti into the public discourse, casually castigating the most prominent Nuggets players by name as “bad defenders” in a matter-of-fact manner that had the media compelling him to confirm what he had just said. 

Trash talk is fleetingly fungible in the jaundiced social environment of 2026, functioning more like coupons than currency in that it needs to be rapidly leveraged before its expiration date. The common perception naturally was that McDaniels was calling out the Nuggets. But in a more subtle, profound way, he was also putting his teammates on notice. 

All season long the Timberwolves have procrastinated on their full potential, frequently demonstrating that their preseason talk about maturity and commitment was cheap. By contrast, those words uttered by McDaniels were expensive. He had just picked a fight with the opponent, leaving open the question of how many of his teammates would join him in the fray. 

That he would lead the charge was established early, after the Timberwolves’ top two scorers, Anthony Edwards and Julius Randle, had each missed a pair of open looks against Denver’s bad defenders in the game’s first 90 seconds.  

With the game still scoreless, the NBA’s best pick-and-roll combo, Nikola Jokic and Jamal Murray, were clustered around the foul line with Minnesota’s best defenders, McDaniels and Rudy Gobert. As they jammed up Jokic, McDaniels picked the ball loose and started sprint-dribbling the other way. To no one’s surprise, Donte “Ragu” DiVincenzo was also on his horse in transition, receiving a pass from McDaniels and then lobbing it back for a Jaden slam against a hapless Murray and Murray’s late-arriving teammate, Cam Johnson, who committed the foul that allowed McDaniels to finish with the “and-1” free throw. 

On the Timberwolves next offensive possession, McDaniels muscled his way to two offensive rebounds, feeding Ragu off the first one for a missed three-pointer, which he corralled for the second one and executed the putback in traffic. It was McDaniels 5, Nuggets 0, setting the tone for a game in which not only did the Wolves never trail, but never let the lead go under double digits after McDaniels made a consecutive pair of driving layups eight minutes into the game. 

“Spectacular. I thought his activity offensively in the first quarter was outstanding,” said Wolves coach Chris Finch after the game. “He was inspirational.” 

Among the most inspired were McDaniels fellow wing players, Ragu and Ayo Dosunmu. Ragu is exactly the kind of player who will have your back in a squabble, and his galvanized performance seemed borne of satisfaction that someone else had clarified the mission. As usual, the Timberwolves were at their best with him on the court: +20 in the 32:54 he played, -3 in the 15:06 he sat. 

“He makes so many hustle plays, momentum plays, different styles of plays.” Finch raved. “He’ll make a shot, get a transition bucket, he’ll rebound, get a steal, blow something up. So many different plays. He’s just a basketball player.”

Related: How the Timberwolves sparked a season-saving Game 2 comeback over the Nuggets in Denver

Then there was Ayo, whose fearless, blazing, bee-lines for the bucket were quicksilver kryptonite for a Nuggets defense that is neither swift nor rugged. “I’ve been waiting for him to wake up a little bit in this series,” Finch accurately observed. “The downhill mindset that he played with all season for us was back.”

Back with the sort of multipurpose propulsion that leaves witnesses with giddy whiplash. Ayo led the team with 25 points and 9 assists in 32 minutes of time-lapse hoops, the lone blemish being three clanks from long range. Why chuck treys when you can so easily undress players in the paint? Ayo was 10-for-12 on two-pointers and none of those dozen shots came from anywhere but beneath the rim. Five of his nine dimes likewise yielded layups or dunks, which means he personally accounted for 30 of the 68 points in the paint by the Timberwolves on Thursday, doubling up the Nuggets’ 34.

Which brings us to the non-wing in Game 3’s ring of honor, Rudy Gobert. For the third straight game, Gobert blunted the supposed advantage Denver had with the magical playmaker Nikola Jokic at the controls. Suffice to say that in the last five quarters, Jokic has shot 8-for-33 from the floor. If that continues, the Nuggets are toast in this series. 

When I asked Finch after the game if the herculean job Gobert was doing on Jokic made planning his defense simpler and better thus far, he replied, “Rudy is making all of us look good right now with his defense.” 

Amen.

If there is an asterisk on this game, it would be the absence of Denver’s brutishly versatile power forward Aaron Gordon. Nuggets coach David Adelman should be given a lot of credit for his honesty and transparency in dealing with the media during his first full season at the helm, but it came back to bite him and his team during the pregame presser, when he was clearly rattled and dejected by the sudden unavailability of Gordon, whose playing status went to “probable” to “out” in a period of a few hours due to a chronic calf strain. 

Gordon is far and away his team’s best defender, making the timing of his injury especially troublesome in the wake of McDaniels laying down his marker. Rattled is a good way to describe the entire team’s performance in the first quarter, an emotional wounding that needs to heal as fast as Gordon’s body if the Nuggets are going to be competitive in a series that had dramatically been flipped on its head over the past three days. 

That the Timberwolves played with such dominance despite mediocre outings from Ant and Randle would be a good thing for both of those current cornerstones to keep in mind. Ant was beset by foul trouble and Randle had a solid second quarter, but it stood out that neither player fully embraced what so often works on offense when the Wolves are at their best: Push the pace, move the ball, move without the ball, and make quick decisions. Ant and Randle can still be first among equals and blend into that catechism if they stay attuned to the possibilities of a greater good, one that all of sudden doesn’t have to end with them being postseason fodder for the Spurs or the Thunder. 

Not when you’ve got three wings at a collective peak, with a chaser of Rudy semi-clowning the Joker. 



Source link