Cambridge Audio MSX Series Review


Verdict

The Cambridge Audio MSX Series s a capable mix of satellite speakers and a subwoofer that provides an immersive sound with tight bass, a surprisingly wide soundstage and rich mids for such a compact set of units that can be placed virtually anywhere. The treble can feel a little smooth, though, and once you add a streamer and amp, it can get a little dearer than some active units.

  • Versatile and stylish looks

  • Surprisingly weighty bass

  • Immersive for such small units

  • Treble could do with more bite

  • Can be quite expensive once you add a streamer and amp

Key Features

  • Versatile placement

    The smaller size of the main units and sub mean they can be placed in areas that other, more conventional, speakers may not be able to.

  • 2.1 system

    This Cambridge system includes both a set of stereo speakers and its own subwoofer to provide a more rounded feel.

Introduction

The Cambridge Audio MSX20 and MSX Sub 200 combo represents an intriguing proposition in the brand’s rather hefty hi-fi catalogue.

These products are essentially rehashes of the older Minx series of compact speakers and subwoofers, designed to be versatile and affordable without compromising on audio quality, so they can be placed in more challenging environments where otherwise ‘normal’ speakers couldn’t.

In that regard, it’s quite a unique option, not least for the price – the MSX20 speakers cost £99 each, with the MSX Sub 200 an additional £299. 

Advertisement

That isn’t accounting for an amp to power them, or a streamer for a complete system, although it’s still an interesting alternative to powered choices such as the Klipsch ProMedia Lumina 2.1, the dinky Kanto Uki, or even the Cambridge Audio L/R S, if you’re tight on space, or have a unique setup you want to add audio to.

I’ve been putting this combo through its paces for the last couple of weeks to see how well it performs on my sideboard.


Design

  • Surprisingly compact
  • Redesign provides a more modern look
  • Discrete colour choices

What immediately surprised me about this system was how tiny everything is – the MSX20 speakers are just 155mm high, 79mm wide and 97mm deep, meaning they can be placed virtually anywhere and take up little space on my sideboard against larger speakers.

The MSX Sub 200 is the smaller of the two Cambridge offers (there is the larger and beefier MSX Sub 300 available), but I was still quite surprised at how small it is compared to other subwoofers I’ve seen in sets with active speakers. 

Advertisement

Speakers - Cambridge Audio MSX20 and MSX Sub 200
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

The satellite speakers can work either on a table on their own, as I had them, or raised up on their own desk stands – there is also wall mounting available with hardware included in the box to help you out. Cambridge even says you can stack them on top of each other, if you want to, although having them separate will be better for stereo immersion.

The MSX20 is available in either black or white, as is the MSX Sub 200, meaning they can carry a discrete look to blend into your space. I don’t mind this, although it is a shame they don’t also come in a matching silver finish for Cambridge’s other hardware for a more unified look – I appreciate that’s a little nitpicky, though.

Subwoofer - Cambridge Audio MSX20 and MSX Sub 200
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

On the whole, I appreciate the little redesign these new models have undergone against the older Minx variants, with a new Cambridge logo and a redesigned grille on the front of both the satellite speakers and the sub, bringing them closer to Cambridge’s current portfolio.

Connectivity

  • Passive speakers connect by banana plugs
  • Subwoofer has RCA line-in and line-out
  • Best paired with a streamer and amp

Advertisement

The MSX20 is a passive speaker, and can connect to any amp or AV receiver using either the terminals on the rear, or these can unscrew to reveal slots for 4mm banana plugs, which I chose to use.

The sub houses more connectivity on its rear panel, admittedly, with RCA input and output options, plus a power cable. The input handles a streamer, for instance, while the output goes to the amplifier in this case. 

Subwoofer Connections - Cambridge Audio MSX20 and MSX Sub 200
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

For my testing, these were both Cambridge products, with the affordable MXN10 streamer (in pre-amp mode) and the MXW70 power amplifier, which is where the MSX20 speakers were plugged into.

With the MXN10 in tow, it means this system can work with the likes of Tidal Connect, Spotify Connect, Deezer, Qobuz, internet radio and a DLNA server over Cambridge’s Streammagic app, plus it can handle Bluetooth 5.0, Google Cast and AirPlay 2. It’s also Roon Ready, which is where I spent most of my time with this system.

Physical connections include the RCA line output, plus a coaxial out, optical out, USB-A port and wired Ethernet.

Advertisement

Streamer & Amp Stack - Cambridge Audio MSX20 and MSX Sub 200
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

The MXW70 provides 70 watts of power into 8 ohms with the MSX20, with Hypex NCore Class D amplification that’s tuned by Cambridge’s engineers. Connectivity here includes unbalanced RCA, a pair of XLR ports, a 12V trigger in, loudspeaker connections that accept 4mm banana plugs and a power cable.

If you’re about space-saving, I think this half-width combo works well with the MSX20 and MSX Sub 200, although with the streamer at £349 and the MXW70 at £499, it can increase the cost of the overall system.

A more affordable streaming app, such as the WiiM Amp Pro, WiiM Amp Ultra or Eversolo Play can cut costs and the amount of boxes you need down, depending on the physical constraints of your space.

Sound Quality

  • Strong bass from subwoofer
  • Forward mids and excellent width
  • Treble can sometimes feel a little lost

As much as the outside of this unit has changed, the core of the MSX20 isn’t too different to the Minx satellites that preceded it. This means they benefit from Cambridge’s fourth-gen Balanced Mode Radiator, or BMR, tech, which is designed to provide balanced and engaging results from wherever you are in a room.

Advertisement

On their own, these speakers only cover the mids and treble, as they only go down to 120Hz, with the MSX Sub 200 dialled in to handle anything below that. With the subwoofer in tow, I was pleasantly surprised by the amount of bass on offer from such a small set of units.

Of course, it works best when you use the dials on the rear to set crossover, the desired phase and volume of the pounding bass, but once I’d set that up, it was set-and-forget as far as I was concerned.

Speakers - Cambridge Audio MSX20 and MSX Sub 200
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

A good example of this was Off The Wall from Michael Jackson, with its pounding groove from the subwoofer demonstrating a good extension and tight feel, while the satellite speakers handled vocals and the rest of the frequency range. Both here and with Earth, Wind & Fire’s Let’s Groove, the MSX Sub 200 felt more unified with the overall frequency response of the overall system, rather than feeling like a thud in the corner that doesn’t contribute too much.

Steven Wilson’s Luminol features some relentless bass grooves in the opening few minutes alongside a vicious drum groove and hints of guitar work that can be quite difficult for some systems to deal with. The MSX20 and MSX Sub 200 combo impressed me here with the power and strength of the bass, although it didn’t overpower the punch of the drums and guitar work.

Subwoofer Side Profile - Cambridge Audio MSX20 and MSX Sub 200
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Advertisement

The entire system provides a sound with good width and depth, as demonstrated with Luminol and Peter Gabriel’s That Voice Again in my testing. This particular cut from So features a pounding bass, rich vocal and a lot of detailed cymbal work that can be lost with systems sometimes, which isn’t the case here.

I felt the mid-range that the MSX20 provided was rich, as demonstrated with James Taylor’s October Road; his vocals and a warm acoustic guitar sit right up front in the mix, with the ensemble built around it, which was demonstrated wonderfully. In Gloria Estefan’s Get On Your Feet, her vocals sit back in the mix against percussion and electric guitar work, although each was given space and room to breathe.

Profile - Cambridge Audio MSX20 and MSX Sub 200
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

The one area I was a bit disappointed by was that the top end was quite smoothed over, lacking bite and detail, and sometimes felt a little lost against the low-end and the mid-range. For instance, in Lock All The Doors from Noel Gallagher’s High Flying Birds, the cymbal and percussion hits lacked a bit of presence, feeling a little lost against his vocals, while the competing percussion intro in Steely Dan’s Do It Again had good separation but lacked a bit of punch against other systems.

Should you buy it?

A compact and versatile system

The MSX20 and MSX Sub 200 combo works well if you’re after speakers and a sub that can be placed virtually anywhere in a room, although you will need to budget for a streamer and amp for a complete system.

This system feels a little lacking in the top-end, though, as it lacks a certain bite and sharpness against other systems.

Advertisement

Final Thoughts

The Cambridge Audio MSX20 & MSX Sub 200 is a capable mix of satellite speakers and a subwoofer that provides an immersive sound with tight bass, a surprisingly wide soundstage and rich mids for such a compact set of units that can be placed virtually anywhere. The treble can feel a little smooth, though, and once you add a streamer and amp, it can get a little dearer than some active units.

The main package here is comparable in price to the active Klipsch ProMedia Lumina 2.1, which offers better compatibility with desktop systems with USB-C and the like, and requires less effort to set up.

With this in mind, I think the MSX20 and MSX Sub 200 offer a better overall sound, with better handling of the low-end alongside an immersive sound. For a more affordable and easy-to-use passive system, this combo works rather well, although sometimes you can’t beat the simplicity and versatility afforded by the Cambridge Audio L/R S for a similar price.

How We Test

We test every speaker setup we review thoroughly over an extended period of time. We use industry-standard tests to compare features properly. We’ll always tell you what we find. We never, ever, accept money to review a product.

  • Tested over several weeks
  • Tested with real world use

FAQs

Does the Cambridge Audio MSX20 and MSX Sub 200 system have a subwoofer?

Yes, the Cambridge Audio MSX20 and MSX Sub 200 have a subwoofer with the MSX Sub 200.

Does the Cambridge Audio MSX20 and MSX Sub 200 system have a control app?

On its own, no, as the Cambridge Audio MSX20 and MSX Sub 200 system is purely built of passive speakers and a subwoofer that need wiring to other components. If you use a streamer, such as Cambridge’s own MXN10, that will offer the brand’s Streammagic app, for instance, to send audio to the speakers and sub.

Full Specs

  Cambridge Audio MSX Series Review
UK RRP £497
USA RRP $657
Manufacturer Cambridge Audio
Size (Dimensions) 210 x 232 x 220 MM
Weight 6.5 KG
Release Date 2026
First Reviewed Date 10/05/2026
Driver (s) Two BMR drivers (main units), 6.5-inch active woofer and 2x passive radiators (subwoofer)
Ports Banana plugs/terminals (main units), RCA input and output (subwoofer)
Audio (Power output) 200 W
Colours Black, White
Frequency Range 36 20000 – Hz
Subwoofer Yes
Speaker Type Hi-Fi Speaker



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


If Game Two of their first-round playoff series with the Denver Nuggets saved the 2025-26 season for the Minnesota Timberwolves, Game Three showed why it should be saved. 

The Timberwolves were a different beast while decisively thumping the Nuggets, 113-96 Thursday night at Target Center, in a game that wasn’t nearly that close. These Wolves were the mythical creature we’d heard about in preseason lore, purposefully locked and loaded to be both marauding and staunch. They owned both ends of the court, gleefully transferring back and forth from irresistible force to immovable object. 

A quartet of Timberwolves deserve special mention, but it begins with Jaden McDaniels. After his team had toppled Denver to even the series at a game apiece Monday night, McDaniels used the sizable chip on his shoulder to etch some graffiti into the public discourse, casually castigating the most prominent Nuggets players by name as “bad defenders” in a matter-of-fact manner that had the media compelling him to confirm what he had just said. 

Trash talk is fleetingly fungible in the jaundiced social environment of 2026, functioning more like coupons than currency in that it needs to be rapidly leveraged before its expiration date. The common perception naturally was that McDaniels was calling out the Nuggets. But in a more subtle, profound way, he was also putting his teammates on notice. 

All season long the Timberwolves have procrastinated on their full potential, frequently demonstrating that their preseason talk about maturity and commitment was cheap. By contrast, those words uttered by McDaniels were expensive. He had just picked a fight with the opponent, leaving open the question of how many of his teammates would join him in the fray. 

That he would lead the charge was established early, after the Timberwolves’ top two scorers, Anthony Edwards and Julius Randle, had each missed a pair of open looks against Denver’s bad defenders in the game’s first 90 seconds.  

With the game still scoreless, the NBA’s best pick-and-roll combo, Nikola Jokic and Jamal Murray, were clustered around the foul line with Minnesota’s best defenders, McDaniels and Rudy Gobert. As they jammed up Jokic, McDaniels picked the ball loose and started sprint-dribbling the other way. To no one’s surprise, Donte “Ragu” DiVincenzo was also on his horse in transition, receiving a pass from McDaniels and then lobbing it back for a Jaden slam against a hapless Murray and Murray’s late-arriving teammate, Cam Johnson, who committed the foul that allowed McDaniels to finish with the “and-1” free throw. 

On the Timberwolves next offensive possession, McDaniels muscled his way to two offensive rebounds, feeding Ragu off the first one for a missed three-pointer, which he corralled for the second one and executed the putback in traffic. It was McDaniels 5, Nuggets 0, setting the tone for a game in which not only did the Wolves never trail, but never let the lead go under double digits after McDaniels made a consecutive pair of driving layups eight minutes into the game. 

“Spectacular. I thought his activity offensively in the first quarter was outstanding,” said Wolves coach Chris Finch after the game. “He was inspirational.” 

Among the most inspired were McDaniels fellow wing players, Ragu and Ayo Dosunmu. Ragu is exactly the kind of player who will have your back in a squabble, and his galvanized performance seemed borne of satisfaction that someone else had clarified the mission. As usual, the Timberwolves were at their best with him on the court: +20 in the 32:54 he played, -3 in the 15:06 he sat. 

“He makes so many hustle plays, momentum plays, different styles of plays.” Finch raved. “He’ll make a shot, get a transition bucket, he’ll rebound, get a steal, blow something up. So many different plays. He’s just a basketball player.”

Related: How the Timberwolves sparked a season-saving Game 2 comeback over the Nuggets in Denver

Then there was Ayo, whose fearless, blazing, bee-lines for the bucket were quicksilver kryptonite for a Nuggets defense that is neither swift nor rugged. “I’ve been waiting for him to wake up a little bit in this series,” Finch accurately observed. “The downhill mindset that he played with all season for us was back.”

Back with the sort of multipurpose propulsion that leaves witnesses with giddy whiplash. Ayo led the team with 25 points and 9 assists in 32 minutes of time-lapse hoops, the lone blemish being three clanks from long range. Why chuck treys when you can so easily undress players in the paint? Ayo was 10-for-12 on two-pointers and none of those dozen shots came from anywhere but beneath the rim. Five of his nine dimes likewise yielded layups or dunks, which means he personally accounted for 30 of the 68 points in the paint by the Timberwolves on Thursday, doubling up the Nuggets’ 34.

Which brings us to the non-wing in Game 3’s ring of honor, Rudy Gobert. For the third straight game, Gobert blunted the supposed advantage Denver had with the magical playmaker Nikola Jokic at the controls. Suffice to say that in the last five quarters, Jokic has shot 8-for-33 from the floor. If that continues, the Nuggets are toast in this series. 

When I asked Finch after the game if the herculean job Gobert was doing on Jokic made planning his defense simpler and better thus far, he replied, “Rudy is making all of us look good right now with his defense.” 

Amen.

If there is an asterisk on this game, it would be the absence of Denver’s brutishly versatile power forward Aaron Gordon. Nuggets coach David Adelman should be given a lot of credit for his honesty and transparency in dealing with the media during his first full season at the helm, but it came back to bite him and his team during the pregame presser, when he was clearly rattled and dejected by the sudden unavailability of Gordon, whose playing status went to “probable” to “out” in a period of a few hours due to a chronic calf strain. 

Gordon is far and away his team’s best defender, making the timing of his injury especially troublesome in the wake of McDaniels laying down his marker. Rattled is a good way to describe the entire team’s performance in the first quarter, an emotional wounding that needs to heal as fast as Gordon’s body if the Nuggets are going to be competitive in a series that had dramatically been flipped on its head over the past three days. 

That the Timberwolves played with such dominance despite mediocre outings from Ant and Randle would be a good thing for both of those current cornerstones to keep in mind. Ant was beset by foul trouble and Randle had a solid second quarter, but it stood out that neither player fully embraced what so often works on offense when the Wolves are at their best: Push the pace, move the ball, move without the ball, and make quick decisions. Ant and Randle can still be first among equals and blend into that catechism if they stay attuned to the possibilities of a greater good, one that all of sudden doesn’t have to end with them being postseason fodder for the Spurs or the Thunder. 

Not when you’ve got three wings at a collective peak, with a chaser of Rudy semi-clowning the Joker. 



Source link