Dealerships Are Now Using AI To Find Car Problems Without Ever Opening The Hood







While AI might be killing the job market for young coders, it is also being used in other ways that complement human productivity. Take mechanics, for instance. A huge part of their job is simply exploring a vehicle to determine what the issue is, before applying their expertise and fixing it. A tool such as UVeye, which is developed by the company of the same name and declares itself to be “the MRI for cars,” could prove to be an enormous help in this part of the job.

The concept is simple: A vehicle is driven through a UVeye lane, which is kind of like the scanners you pass through in airport security lines. About 1,000 photographs are taken of the vehicle by more than 20 cameras from all kinds of angles. The end result is an in-depth analysis of everything from wheels that need to be realigned to paint scratches to rust damage, depending on the type of machine used. UVeye boasts that this is achieved “all without lifts or manual checks,” and the final report is uploaded to the cloud for easy reference. 

This tool could help a dealership flag whether any of its vehicles have issues. Or, it could help mechanics or other technicians check for any vehicle defects and cross-reference any issues that a model may have had before. Needless to say, it’s quite the process to scan each of the myriad components of a car in mere seconds. Here is how UVeye technology reportedly accomplishes it.

The different functions and types of UVeye scanning machines

According to UVeye, this technology uses three primary systems. “Artemis” thoroughly scans each tire for notable wear or damage. “Helios” inspects the frame for damage or leaks, along with any issues with crucial systems like the brakes that may need to be flagged. Lastly, “Atlas” and “Atlas Lite” determine whether there’s any damage on the outer panels, including small cosmetic issues. Between them, the aim is to provide comprehensive coverage of a vehicle’s condition. In 2022, UVeye produced the below clip, which shows how these elements work together, along with the images they produce for staff members to consult.

In April 2023, UVeye joined forces with manufacturer Hypertec to get these machines built. In September 2025, Heavy Duty Trucking Magazine reported that several hundred UVeye scanners were already at work in U.S. dealerships. The outlet also noted that bigger ones had been developed to provide “Class 6–8 trucks and buses […] an automated 17-point inspection process.” 

There are some things you should never use AI for, but UVeye seems to be a versatile and incredibly convenient system. In flagging areas in which maintenance may be needed, it can help technicians focus their time and resources where they will be most needed. UVeye continues to expand its reach, with KCRG reporting that one of its scanners was installed in Iowa for the first time in April 2026.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


A new class-action lawsuit, filed on Monday by three teenage girls and their guardians, alleges that Elon Musk’s xAI created and distributed child sexual abuse material featuring their faces and likenesses with its Grok AI tech.

“Their lives have been shattered by the devastating loss of privacy, dignity, and personal safety that the production and dissemination of this CSAM have caused,” the filing says. “xAI’s financial gain through the increased use of its image- and video-making product came at their expense and well-being.”

From December to early January, Grok allowed many AI and X social media users to create AI-generated nonconsensual intimate images, sometimes known as deepfake porn. Reports estimate that Grok users made 4.4 million “undressed” or “nudified” images, 41% of the total number of images created, over a period of nine days. 

X, xAI and its safety and child safety divisions did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The wave of “undressed” images stirred outrage around the world. The European Commission quickly launched an investigation, while Malaysia and Indonesia banned X within their borders. Some US government representatives called on Apple and Google to remove the app from their app stores for violating their policies, but no federal investigation into X or xAI has been opened. A similar, separate class-action lawsuit was filed (PDF) by a South Carolina woman in late January.

The dehumanizing trend highlighted just how capable modern AI image tools are at creating content that seems realistic. The new complaint compares Grok’s self-proclaimed “spicy AI” generation to the “dark arts” with its ease of subjecting children to “any pose, however sick, however fetishized, however unlawful.”

“To the viewer, the resulting video appears entirely real. For the child, her identifying features will now forever be attached to a video depicting her own child sexual abuse,” the complaint reads.

AI Atlas

The complaint says xAI is at fault because it did not employ industry-standard guardrails that would prevent abusers from making this content. It says xAI licensed use of its tech to third-party companies abroad, which sold subscriptions that led abusers to make child sexual abuse images featuring the faces and likenesses of the victims. The requests ran through xAI’s servers, which makes the company liable, the complaint argues.

The lawsuit was filed by three Jane Does, pseudonyms given to the teens to protect their identities. Jane Doe 1 was first alerted to the fact that abusive, AI-generated sexual material of her was circulating on the web by an anonymous Instagram message in early December. The filing says she was told about a Discord server by the anonymous Instagram user, where the material was shared. That led Jane Doe 1 and her family, and eventually law enforcement, to find and arrest one perpetrator.

Ongoing investigations led the families of Jane Does 2 and 3 to learn their children’s images had been transformed with xAI tech into abusive material.





Source link