Do Apple’s new AirPods Max 2 beat the Airpods Pro 3? I’ve tried both, here’s my take


AirPods Max 2 in Starlight

The AirPods Max 2 and AirPods Pro 3 share the same H2 audio chip.

Jada Jones/ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


ZDNET’s key takeaways

  • The AirPods Max 2 are best-suited for Apple power users.
  • Users with only an iPhone will find more utility in the AirPods Pro 3.
  • iPhone users with mixed-device ecosystems will find more value in Sony or Bose over-ears.

The AirPods Max 2 are here, and I’m confident several people are weighing whether to buy their first pair of Apple over-ears, but a $549 asking price isn’t one to sneeze at. If it’s solely Apple’s intelligent features like Adaptive Audio, Live Translation, and Conversation Awareness that excite you, I’d say you would most benefit by investing in the AirPods Pro 3, and another brand of over-ears instead. Here’s why.

Software-wise, they’re very similar

The AirPods Pro 3 and the AirPods Max 2 share Apple’s premium H2 audio chip, meaning they offer the same software features and audio processing. Both offer Apple’s host of intelligent features including Live Translation, Adaptive Audio, exceptional noise cancellation and Transparency Mode, Personalized Volume, Camera Remote, Voice Isolation, and Siri Interactions.

Review: AirPods Max 2

Both the AirPods Pro 3 and AirPods Max 2 support Apple’s studio-quality voice recording for enhanced voice clarity across phone calls, FaceTime, Voice Memos, the Camera app, and compatible third-party applications. Additionally, both support Audio Sharing with another pair of AirPods or Beats headphones and connect to an Apple TV 4K in Spatial Audio.

What changed from generation to generation

AirPods Pro 3 and iPhone 16

Jada Jones/ZDNET

Apple upgraded the AirPods Pro 3’s acoustic structure, implementing new 10.7mm high-excursion drivers for deeper bass, a high-dynamic-range amplifier for vibrancy, and additional ports for a wider soundstage. The Pro 3’s upgraded microphones, audio processing algorithms, eartips, and acoustic structure result in improved audio performance, noise cancellation, and Transparency Mode.

They also received Apple’s second-gen U2 ultra wideband chip for more precise device location, a new shape for enhanced fit, an IP57 waterproofing upgrade, and infrared sensors to track heart rate and calories burned during a workout.

Also: AirPods Pro 3 fitness feature surprises triathlete tester – here’s what he found

The AirPods Max 2 received Apple’s advanced H2 chip, the same chip inside the AirPods Pro 3, bringing improved audio quality and a high-dynamic-range amplifier. The Max 2’s enhanced audio performance is most evident when listening to music, gaming on Apple devices, and watching with an Apple TV 4K. 

Like the 2024 USB-C version, AirPods Max 2 also supports ultra-low latency and 24-bit/48kHz lossless audio via a wired connection, comes with a Smart Case, offers the same weight distribution and fit, promises 20 hours of battery life, and comes in the same colors. 

Why I advocate for the AirPods Pro 3

AirPods Pro 3

Jada Jones/ZDNET

With just an iPhone, you can access almost everything the AirPods Pro 3 have to offer. If it’s the only Apple device you use regularly, you make a lot of phone calls, or you want a pair of Apple headphones to work out in, you’ll find more utility in the AirPods Pro 3.

The AirPods Pro 3 are Apple’s best earbuds yet, offering every smart feature it has to offer in a portable and waterproof form factor. They are highly versatile, as users can maximize their performance in the office, gym, grocery store, and at home — all in the same day. Unlike the AirPods Max 2, the AirPods Pro 3 are waterproof, have a heart rate sensor, and are easier to clean; making a better option for the gym.

Review: AirPods Pro 3

The AirPods Pro 3 have better microphone voice pickup, thanks to their placement at the bottom of the earbud stem, closer to your mouth. Their improved in-ear seal creates solid passive noise cancellation, and their upgraded noise processing creates better algorithmic noise cancellation.

I use these earbuds in all facets of my life: I wear them while I work, grocery shop, take hands-free phone calls while I drive (Transparency Mode is essential for this), and can easily pop them in and out of my pocket for quick insertion or removal.

Who I recommend the AirPods Max 2 for

AirPods Max 2 and iPhone 17

Jada Jones/ZDNET

On the other hand, the AirPods Max 2 are best for people who have an expansive Apple device ecosystem. If you regularly use an iMac, MacBook, and iPad for gaming or professional audio tasks, like to watch Apple TV privately, and have an iPhone, the AirPods Max 2 fit more snugly into your ecosystem.

Also: I used Apple Music’s new AI tool to break out of my music rut – and it worked

You can maximize the AirPods Max 2 by owning multiple Apple devices to connect them to, as each device unlocks new AirPods Max 2 capabilities. These headphones are a high-end Apple product and offer the most utility to Apple power users. Apple’s seamless device switching also lets users switch their AirPods Max’s connectivity based on which device is active, a solid feature for someone with multiple devices.

Which other over-ears to consider

Bose QuietComfort Ultra 2 in Driftwood Sand

Jada Jones/ZDNET

If you’d benefit from investing in the AirPods Pro 3 instead of the AirPods Max 2, I recommend the Bose QuietComfort Ultra (2nd Gen) as your over-ear headphones. I especially recommend this choice if your over-ear checklist includes headphones with high-performing noise cancellation, suitable for the gym and travel. 

Also: Bose’s QuietComfort Ultra shows the company still outperforms Apple in one key area

The QC Ultra 2’s lightweight design and 30 hours of battery life make ideal for hours-long wear, and their software agnosticism works just as well for iPhone users a with a tablet or laptop from another brand. Additionally, Bose upgraded the second-generation model with 16-bit/44.1kHz or 48kHz (CD standard) USB-C audio, which is generally fine for everyday listeners and some casual gamers. Any higher resolution is likely to be noticeable to those with trained ears.

Also: I wore 5 different headphones across 8 flights – here’s how each pair handled my stress tests

You can also consider the Sony WH-1000XM6, a feature-rich pair of headphones with great audio and noise-canceling capabilities. These headphones are also lighter and more portable than the AirPods Max 2, making them a better option for exercising and traveling. Sony’s XM6 headphones allow users more control over their device, offering LDAC and LC3 codecs and a detailed equalizer.

ZDNET’s buying advice

To put it simply, if your Apple ecosystem consists solely of an iPhone, the AirPods Pro 3 will give you the most bang for your buck. If you have a broad Apple ecosystem, the AirPods Max 2 deliver deep integration across your devices. 

The AirPods Max 2 are compatible with professional-quality audio across your Apple devices, but if you had gripes with the first generation’s fit and weight, battery life, or carrying case for everyday use, consider your over-ear options from Sony and Bose.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Amazon Fire Phone Jeff Bezos

Bloomberg / Getty Images

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


ZDNET’s key takeaways

  • Amazon is reportedly developing a new Fire Phone.
  • The previous model had several issues, including an inferior app store experience.
  • Under new supervision (and with more experience), Amazon can do better this time.

Well, I don’t know about you, but I certainly didn’t have “new Amazon smartphone” on my 2026 bingo card. As it turns out, according to Reuters, the retailer may be developing a new smartphone, internally known as “Transformer.” 

Those familiar with the industry will instantly draw parallels to Amazon’s previous smartphone effort, the Fire Phone from 2014. Appropriately, that phone ended up as part of a fire sale about a year later.

Now, in 2026, with no fewer than five phone brands in the US — Apple, Samsung, Google, Motorola, and OnePlus — Amazon faces a lot of competition. In fairness, it also has two fewer platforms to compete against. In 2014, Windows Phone and BlackBerry were still very much part of the smartphone conversation; these days, not so much.

The AppStore problem

But there’s one mistake Amazon made in its first effort that will absolutely torpedo its chances at succeeding — the Amazon AppStore and specifically the decision to forego Google Play services. Google is simply too valuable in too many lives to not support the platform. Oh, and the Amazon AppStore is terrible.

Also: What’s right (and wrong) with the Amazon Fire Phone

It has admittedly been a few years since I last inventoried the Amazon AppStore, but when I last checked, the Amazon AppStore was a wasteland of half-supported or unsupported apps, with two notable exceptions. Finance, home control, and communication apps were either absent or had not received updates for years prior.

The only apps in the Amazon AppStore that remained up to date were productivity apps (largely powered by Microsoft) and streaming apps. Those two categories work very well on the cheap, underpowered hardware that Amazon usually launches, and that’s fine. A coffee-table tablet is a nice thing to have lying around.

A spark of hope

Amazon Fire Phone

Liam Tung/ZDNET

But a phone is another animal entirely. If a tablet is a device to entertain, a phone is a device for everything else. One of the key reasons Windows Phone failed was its lack of an app ecosystem. The Senior Vice President of Devices and Services,  Panos Panay, is very familiar with that saga, so I’m hopeful that he will make the same arguments to the powers that be at Amazon. 

Honestly, if there is anyone who I think can pull off an Amazon phone revival, it’s probably Panay, who understands design and product development better than most, and to be perfectly honest, he’s my absolute favorite product presenter.

Also: Amazon Fire Phone review: Not a great smartphone

Of course, all of this is early days. This phone is being worked on internally, and even Reuters reports that it could get the axe long before it sees the light of day. Personally, I’m intrigued by the idea, but I sincerely hope that Amazon doesn’t make this the shopping phone it tried to build in 2014. 

If Amazon just wants to make a nice, well-built smartphone, with a skin that pushes Amazon content to the fore, I’m fine with that. But leaving Google behind is a mistake that Amazon cannot afford to make again. Fool me once, and all that.

So, if this phone is to have a chance at success, it needs to embrace Google services so it can be a phone that everyone can use. Amazon has the brand power to make a phone like this work, even up against juggernauts like Apple and Samsung, but it needs to approach this correctly, lest it end up in yet another Fire phone fire sale.





Source link