Higher education needs to catch up to Minnesota’s modern learners


At the Phyllis Wheatley Community Center on the Northside of Minneapolis, we’ve been creating pathways for individuals to discover their strengths and take control of their futures for over a century. We’ve walked with families through hard seasons and hopeful ones. We’ve seen what opens doors — and what quietly closes them.

Unfortunately, right now, we’re watching one of the most important pathways to opportunity slip further out of reach for the very people Minnesota says it wants to lift up.

Let’s be honest about who we’re talking about.

Related: Ensuring equity across Minnesota requires revising education policy

This isn’t the 18-year-old moving into a dorm in Dinkytown. The folks we serve are working people. They’re home health aides coming off overnight shifts. They’re single moms balancing school drop-offs, work and everything else it takes to keep a household moving.

They’re young men from North Minneapolis who’ve been grinding since high school — taking jobs where they can find them but still holding onto the idea that higher education might be part of their future.

They’re not lacking drive. They’re not lacking talent. In many cases, they’ve already started college.

Across Minnesota, more than 600,000 people have some college experience but no credential. That’s not a motivation problem — that’s a systems problem. Somewhere along the way, we built a model that works for some but leaves too many others on the outside looking in.

And the biggest barrier isn’t what people think.

It’s not ambition. It’s access.

For many who we work with, education flexibility isn’t a nice-to-have — it’s the only way this works. If you’re working two shifts, you can’t be in a classroom three nights a week. If you don’t have reliable transportation, getting across the metro isn’t simple. If you’re carrying financial pressure, you can’t commit to years of full-time school with no clear payoff.

So the choice becomes real simple: find a program that fits your life — or don’t go at all.

That’s why flexible, affordable, career-aligned education matters so much. When done right — especially with accelerated pathways tied to real jobs — people can earn degrees at an accelerated pace. They can step into fields like health care, technology, and the skilled trades and see immediate gains. That’s not theory. We see it in our community. Paychecks go up. Stability improves. Families get breathing room.

And for Black and brown Minnesotans, this hits even deeper.

We know the history here. Under-resourced schools. Generational wealth gaps. Systems that weren’t built with our communities in mind. So, when something finally works — when people can actually complete a degree and move forward — we should be expanding those pathways, not making them harder to navigate.

Because when our people move forward, Minnesota moves forward.

You see it in stronger neighborhoods. You see it in reduced reliance on public systems. You see it in kids growing up in households where opportunity feels real, not theoretical.

There’s also a workforce reality we can’t ignore.

Across this state, employers are looking for talent — in health care, education, tech and the trades. At the same time, we’ve got hundreds of thousands of Minnesotans who are already partway there. They don’t need to start from scratch. They just need a system that meets them where they are and helps them finish.

That’s not a niche solution. That’s one of the smartest workforce strategies we’ve got.

At Phyllis Wheatley, we believe access to education — real access, not just in theory — is a public good. When we make it harder to reach, we don’t just slow down individuals. We hold back entire communities. We leave jobs unfilled. And we send a message, whether we mean to or not, about who this system is really built for.

The Legislature has an opportunity to change that by expanding access to flexible, online and career-connected education pathways that actually work for working adults. But that also means taking a clear-eyed look at recent, well-intentioned policy decisions that may be limiting those options today.

The Legislature has an opportunity this session to ensure that students and families continue to have access to a full range of high-quality, flexible learning options. That includes taking a thoughtful look at how recent policy changes may be narrowing pathways for institutions to partner with experienced program managers and deliver innovative programs that meet workforce needs.

Related: St. Paul teachers share how their students are really doing

While these decisions may be well-intentioned, particularly around oversight and accountability, it is worth revisiting whether they have had the unintended effect of limiting access, slowing program development, or reducing opportunities for students — especially working adults and our friends in greater Minnesota.

Lawmakers should focus on preserving flexibility for education access while maintaining strong standards, ensuring Minnesota remains competitive in attracting and retaining learners — our future workforce. 

Minnesota has never lacked talent. What we’ve lacked, at times, is the willingness to meet people where they are and build systems that reflect the reality of how folks live and work today.

Our learners are ready.

The question is whether our institutions — and our policymakers — are.

Bryan Tyner, EFO, is chief executive officer of the Phillis Wheatley Community Center. 



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


A new class-action lawsuit, filed on Monday by three teenage girls and their guardians, alleges that Elon Musk’s xAI created and distributed child sexual abuse material featuring their faces and likenesses with its Grok AI tech.

“Their lives have been shattered by the devastating loss of privacy, dignity, and personal safety that the production and dissemination of this CSAM have caused,” the filing says. “xAI’s financial gain through the increased use of its image- and video-making product came at their expense and well-being.”

From December to early January, Grok allowed many AI and X social media users to create AI-generated nonconsensual intimate images, sometimes known as deepfake porn. Reports estimate that Grok users made 4.4 million “undressed” or “nudified” images, 41% of the total number of images created, over a period of nine days. 

X, xAI and its safety and child safety divisions did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The wave of “undressed” images stirred outrage around the world. The European Commission quickly launched an investigation, while Malaysia and Indonesia banned X within their borders. Some US government representatives called on Apple and Google to remove the app from their app stores for violating their policies, but no federal investigation into X or xAI has been opened. A similar, separate class-action lawsuit was filed (PDF) by a South Carolina woman in late January.

The dehumanizing trend highlighted just how capable modern AI image tools are at creating content that seems realistic. The new complaint compares Grok’s self-proclaimed “spicy AI” generation to the “dark arts” with its ease of subjecting children to “any pose, however sick, however fetishized, however unlawful.”

“To the viewer, the resulting video appears entirely real. For the child, her identifying features will now forever be attached to a video depicting her own child sexual abuse,” the complaint reads.

AI Atlas

The complaint says xAI is at fault because it did not employ industry-standard guardrails that would prevent abusers from making this content. It says xAI licensed use of its tech to third-party companies abroad, which sold subscriptions that led abusers to make child sexual abuse images featuring the faces and likenesses of the victims. The requests ran through xAI’s servers, which makes the company liable, the complaint argues.

The lawsuit was filed by three Jane Does, pseudonyms given to the teens to protect their identities. Jane Doe 1 was first alerted to the fact that abusive, AI-generated sexual material of her was circulating on the web by an anonymous Instagram message in early December. The filing says she was told about a Discord server by the anonymous Instagram user, where the material was shared. That led Jane Doe 1 and her family, and eventually law enforcement, to find and arrest one perpetrator.

Ongoing investigations led the families of Jane Does 2 and 3 to learn their children’s images had been transformed with xAI tech into abusive material.





Source link