I let a smart planter maintain itself while I was away for 2 months – here’s the result


5.jpg

pros and cons

Pros

  • Adjusts watering to its surroundings
  • Learns how to maintain each plant
  • Long battery life
Cons

  • Bridge required
  • Costs add up with each planter

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


As a stereotypical plant-hoarding, book-loving, socially anxious millennial who writes about smart home tech for a living, I live for inventions like the LeafyPod. This smart planter lets you repot your own plant (as long as it fits) with your own potting soil, and then it basically takes care of it for you.

Also: 10 useful smart home gadgets that make life so much easier (and most are discounted)

I’ve had a Dieffenbachia in my LeafyPod for almost two months and am just now getting around to refilling its water reservoir for the first time. This, combined with app support and several months of battery on one charge make for a complete package for your plants.

If this all makes you think, why would my planters need Wi-Fi? Let me prove why the LeafyPod is such a useful invention.

Why a smart planter?

LeafyPod Smart Planter

The LeafyPod had the only plant that thrived when I couldn’t get up to water it.

Maria Diaz/ZDNET

I recently suffered a series of fractures from a fall that kept me in bed for the better part of four weeks. Since I couldn’t even get up without help, much less walk around for more than a minute or two at a time, watering my plants fell quite low on my priority list. 

Also: I stopped leaving these 7 common household devices plugged in, and my energy bill noticed

As a result, most of my plants died, including the almost $100 worth I’d bought at Lowe’s right before my injury. The only plant that’s thriving is the Dieffenbachia that’s sitting pretty in the LeafyPod. A few of my older plants survived thanks to my kids’ sporadic help and the plants’ hardiness, but none are as healthy as the Dieffenbachia.

How the LeafyPod works

LeafyPod Smart Planter

Maria Diaz/ZDNET

When I repotted that plant to the LeafyPod, I just added soil as needed and filled the water reservoir. The LeafyPod is rechargeable, so you don’t have to keep it plugged in to use it. I fully charged it before putting it in its permanent spot, and the battery is still only a third depleted after almost two months. 

When setting up the LeafyPod app, you can add the plant that you’ve potted, and it’ll tell you about its water and light needs. Once the planter is charged and set up in the app, the LeafyPod will learn to adjust its watering based on its surroundings. The planter learns whether your home is dry or humid, and how much sunlight your plant gets, so it can water it more or less often. 

Also: Oneisall Ease S1 review: Finally, a smart litter box that doesn’t cost an arm and a paw

You do need a bridge to connect the LeafyPod to the app and see your planter’s status remotely, which must remain plugged in to work. Each bridge lets you connect multiple planters (LeafyPod doesn’t specify how many), and costs $48, though you can buy it as part of the starter pack with a planter.

The app shows you all the plant’s details, how much sunlight it’s getting, and keeps a record of each watering session.

ZDNET’s buying advice

LeafyPod Smart Planter

Maria Diaz/ZDNET

After testing different types of smart planters geared more toward home agriculture, like the Plantaform and Gardyn, which require proprietary seed pods and growing medium, as well as water refills every 1 to 3 weeks. The LeafyPod is obviously a different type of smart planter than the Plantaform and Gardyn, but it’s likely a better choice for entry-level users, plant lovers, and even plant killers. 

Also: 15+ best Alexa commands to make your home work smarter (Prime not required)

The LeafyPod starter pack is currently on sale for $127, which includes a planter and a bridge. This is more expensive than an average planter, but the LeafyPod is anything but average. My recent experience proved that even if you’re a plant killer, your LeafyPod will help you redeem yourself by keeping your houseplants alive. 





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


A new class-action lawsuit, filed on Monday by three teenage girls and their guardians, alleges that Elon Musk’s xAI created and distributed child sexual abuse material featuring their faces and likenesses with its Grok AI tech.

“Their lives have been shattered by the devastating loss of privacy, dignity, and personal safety that the production and dissemination of this CSAM have caused,” the filing says. “xAI’s financial gain through the increased use of its image- and video-making product came at their expense and well-being.”

From December to early January, Grok allowed many AI and X social media users to create AI-generated nonconsensual intimate images, sometimes known as deepfake porn. Reports estimate that Grok users made 4.4 million “undressed” or “nudified” images, 41% of the total number of images created, over a period of nine days. 

X, xAI and its safety and child safety divisions did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The wave of “undressed” images stirred outrage around the world. The European Commission quickly launched an investigation, while Malaysia and Indonesia banned X within their borders. Some US government representatives called on Apple and Google to remove the app from their app stores for violating their policies, but no federal investigation into X or xAI has been opened. A similar, separate class-action lawsuit was filed (PDF) by a South Carolina woman in late January.

The dehumanizing trend highlighted just how capable modern AI image tools are at creating content that seems realistic. The new complaint compares Grok’s self-proclaimed “spicy AI” generation to the “dark arts” with its ease of subjecting children to “any pose, however sick, however fetishized, however unlawful.”

“To the viewer, the resulting video appears entirely real. For the child, her identifying features will now forever be attached to a video depicting her own child sexual abuse,” the complaint reads.

AI Atlas

The complaint says xAI is at fault because it did not employ industry-standard guardrails that would prevent abusers from making this content. It says xAI licensed use of its tech to third-party companies abroad, which sold subscriptions that led abusers to make child sexual abuse images featuring the faces and likenesses of the victims. The requests ran through xAI’s servers, which makes the company liable, the complaint argues.

The lawsuit was filed by three Jane Does, pseudonyms given to the teens to protect their identities. Jane Doe 1 was first alerted to the fact that abusive, AI-generated sexual material of her was circulating on the web by an anonymous Instagram message in early December. The filing says she was told about a Discord server by the anonymous Instagram user, where the material was shared. That led Jane Doe 1 and her family, and eventually law enforcement, to find and arrest one perpetrator.

Ongoing investigations led the families of Jane Does 2 and 3 to learn their children’s images had been transformed with xAI tech into abusive material.





Source link