I tested 100x zoom on the Galaxy S26 Ultra, Pixel 10 Pro, and Razr Fold – here’s who won


s26ultra-pixel10-pro-moto-razr-fold

A man is holding the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, the Pixel 10 Pro, and the Motorola Razr Fold in front of an amusement park while conducting some long-distance photo shooting.

Adam Doud/ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


ZDNET’s key takeaways

  • We tested three smartphones in long-range zoom photography.
  • Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, Pixel 10 Pro, and Motorola Razr Fold.
  • Samsung has some catching up to do.

A couple of weeks ago, I was in the midst of reviewing the Motorola Razr Fold while on a press trip to the Grand Canyon. The Razr Fold has a Super Res Zoom feature that will take a 100x photo and clean it up pretty convincingly. So, I saw a river in the distance and pulled out the Razr Fold to grab a shot.

Also: Google Pixel vs. Samsung Galaxy: I’ve tested both brands extensively, and there’s a clear winner

Then, I remembered I had the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra in my pocket. Samsung is like the OG of super res zoom, so I decided to grab the same shot. The only problem is that the Samsung shot looked really bad, while the Motorola — the folding Motorola — came out crispy. Here are the two, side by side.

gc-galaxy-s26-ultra-motorola-razr-fold-2026-4k

Side-by-side shots taken with the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (left) and the Motorola Razr Fold (right).

Adam Doud/ZDNET

The Samsung sample is blurry and splotchy. The Razr Fold sample looks great on the small screen of the phone, but it gets a bit pixelated when you blow it up to a 100% crop. This is a theme you will notice over time.

Six Flags test

When I got home from the Grand Canyon, I wanted to see if this was a one-time thing or if this was a theme. Just for funsies, I added in another phone maker that also boasts super resolution zoom capabilities — the Pixel 10 Pro. I headed off to my local Six Flags amusement park here in Chicago and found some of the furthest shots I could find. 

Also: Samsung vs. Motorola: I’ve tested dozens of phones from both brands – here’s my choice

For comparison purposes, when possible, after shooting various objects at 100x zoom, I then grabbed a sample with my Meta Oakley HSTN glasses from as close as I could get to show you how close each phone got.

One interesting thing I noted was that when you take a super-zoom photo with the Pixel and open the photo right away, it has a little sparkle animation it plays over the photo to indicate that it’s processing. You can see that below.

sparkles

The Pixel 10 Pro shows sparkles on the screen, about halfway down, to indicate post-processing is taking place.

Adam Doud/ZDNET

My results

The Razr Fold processes the image, but in that case, it just cleans it up after a little delay, with no UI cue that anything is happening. I prefer the Pixel’s UI in that case. The Samsung S26 Ultra doesn’t seem to process the image, which I find to be incredibly ironic considering how much AI is used literally everywhere else in the phone. So, without further ado, here are the shots I took.

Also: I measured 5G signals of AT&T, T-Mobile, and Verizon in a small town – here’s what the data says

I started off by capturing a statue of Foghorn Leghorn. On the left is how he looked standing nearby. On the right is how far away I was when I took the shot — roughly 250 feet. To give you an idea of how far away I was, I’ve circled him in yellow in this image:

rooster-meta-combo

The Foghorn Leghorn statue is on the left, and the distance from where I was shooting is on the right.

Adam Doud/ZDNET

Now, here’s how the res photos turned out. I apologize for the cropping here. My tool went a little wonky, but the Galaxy S26 Ultra didn’t clean up the image at all. The Pixel 10 Pro actually did a nice, smooth job, while the Razr seems to have interpreted reflections on the statue as texture. Still, the latter two did a far superior job to the Galaxy. This point goes to the Pixel.

rooster

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (left), Pixel 10 Pro (center), Moto Razr Fold (right)

Adam Doud/ZDNET

Next, I grabbed a shot of a clock face from roughly 450 feet away. Here’s the clock face from as close as I could get.

clock-meta

Photo of the clock face taken with Meta Oakley HSTN glasses.

Adam Doud/ZDNET

Clock faces are easier because they’re familiar. There are lots of photos of clocks, after all, so AI has more to work with. All the same, in order of blurriness, once again, Samsung was the worst, followed by the Razr, and finally followed by the Pixel, which returns a very clean image indeed.

clock

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (left), Pixel 10 Pro (center), Moto Razr Fold (right)

Adam Doud/ZDNET

Next up, I shot a stand of stuffed animal prizes from about 325 feet away. I was elevated in this case because I was standing on the platform for a nearby roller coaster. Here’s the stand from close up.

stuffy-meta

Adam Doud/ZDNET

This particular comparison is closer, and I think the Razr edges out the Pixel (no pun intended), but not by a lot. Arguably, the Pixel’s image is a bit smoother, but I think the Motorola captures the texture and lighting better.

stuffy

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (left), Pixel 10 Pro (center), Moto Razr Fold (right)

Adam Doud/ZDNET

At night

When I got home that night, I decided to stack the deck in Samsung’s favor. Ever since the Galaxy S20 Ultra, Samsung has boasted 100x zoom, and one of the best ways it manifested was in photos of the moon. So, I took all three cameras out and shot the moon on a nice dark night.

Also: I compared Verizon, T-Mobile, and AT&T 5G coverage on a road trip – and the winner surprised me

In this case, the Pixel fought me a lot. Grabbing an image of the moon proved to be really difficult. The viewfinder jumped around erratically, and in most cases, it just showed a pinpoint of light. Only when I zoomed back out and zoomed in slowly was I able to capture the photo, which ended up overexposed anyway.

moon

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (left), Pixel 10 Pro (center), Moto Razr Fold (right)

Adam Doud/ZDNET

The Razr captured an image similar to the Samsung phone — both are a tad blurry, but the Razr managed a bit more sharpness than the Samsung. On the smaller phone screen (and on social media), both photos are equally good. I think this is the key difference between AI on the Samsung phone and the other two — scene recognition. 

Also: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 vs. Pixel 10 Pro Fold vs. Motorola Razr Fold – this model wins for me

When Samsung knows what it’s looking at, it can find some great settings for a solid shot. But when it doesn’t, it just has to guess. The Razr and the Pixel both do the same, but the AI is more broad and can clean up more images.

Bottom line

Samsung is slipping behind its competitors in the super resolution zoom category, so it’s time to get caught up. It’s also important to remember that in this case, the Motorola phone is a foldable — a category that often compromises with the camera. The fact that this comparison is even possible is a testament to Motorola’s camera technology.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


If Game Two of their first-round playoff series with the Denver Nuggets saved the 2025-26 season for the Minnesota Timberwolves, Game Three showed why it should be saved. 

The Timberwolves were a different beast while decisively thumping the Nuggets, 113-96 Thursday night at Target Center, in a game that wasn’t nearly that close. These Wolves were the mythical creature we’d heard about in preseason lore, purposefully locked and loaded to be both marauding and staunch. They owned both ends of the court, gleefully transferring back and forth from irresistible force to immovable object. 

A quartet of Timberwolves deserve special mention, but it begins with Jaden McDaniels. After his team had toppled Denver to even the series at a game apiece Monday night, McDaniels used the sizable chip on his shoulder to etch some graffiti into the public discourse, casually castigating the most prominent Nuggets players by name as “bad defenders” in a matter-of-fact manner that had the media compelling him to confirm what he had just said. 

Trash talk is fleetingly fungible in the jaundiced social environment of 2026, functioning more like coupons than currency in that it needs to be rapidly leveraged before its expiration date. The common perception naturally was that McDaniels was calling out the Nuggets. But in a more subtle, profound way, he was also putting his teammates on notice. 

All season long the Timberwolves have procrastinated on their full potential, frequently demonstrating that their preseason talk about maturity and commitment was cheap. By contrast, those words uttered by McDaniels were expensive. He had just picked a fight with the opponent, leaving open the question of how many of his teammates would join him in the fray. 

That he would lead the charge was established early, after the Timberwolves’ top two scorers, Anthony Edwards and Julius Randle, had each missed a pair of open looks against Denver’s bad defenders in the game’s first 90 seconds.  

With the game still scoreless, the NBA’s best pick-and-roll combo, Nikola Jokic and Jamal Murray, were clustered around the foul line with Minnesota’s best defenders, McDaniels and Rudy Gobert. As they jammed up Jokic, McDaniels picked the ball loose and started sprint-dribbling the other way. To no one’s surprise, Donte “Ragu” DiVincenzo was also on his horse in transition, receiving a pass from McDaniels and then lobbing it back for a Jaden slam against a hapless Murray and Murray’s late-arriving teammate, Cam Johnson, who committed the foul that allowed McDaniels to finish with the “and-1” free throw. 

On the Timberwolves next offensive possession, McDaniels muscled his way to two offensive rebounds, feeding Ragu off the first one for a missed three-pointer, which he corralled for the second one and executed the putback in traffic. It was McDaniels 5, Nuggets 0, setting the tone for a game in which not only did the Wolves never trail, but never let the lead go under double digits after McDaniels made a consecutive pair of driving layups eight minutes into the game. 

“Spectacular. I thought his activity offensively in the first quarter was outstanding,” said Wolves coach Chris Finch after the game. “He was inspirational.” 

Among the most inspired were McDaniels fellow wing players, Ragu and Ayo Dosunmu. Ragu is exactly the kind of player who will have your back in a squabble, and his galvanized performance seemed borne of satisfaction that someone else had clarified the mission. As usual, the Timberwolves were at their best with him on the court: +20 in the 32:54 he played, -3 in the 15:06 he sat. 

“He makes so many hustle plays, momentum plays, different styles of plays.” Finch raved. “He’ll make a shot, get a transition bucket, he’ll rebound, get a steal, blow something up. So many different plays. He’s just a basketball player.”

Related: How the Timberwolves sparked a season-saving Game 2 comeback over the Nuggets in Denver

Then there was Ayo, whose fearless, blazing, bee-lines for the bucket were quicksilver kryptonite for a Nuggets defense that is neither swift nor rugged. “I’ve been waiting for him to wake up a little bit in this series,” Finch accurately observed. “The downhill mindset that he played with all season for us was back.”

Back with the sort of multipurpose propulsion that leaves witnesses with giddy whiplash. Ayo led the team with 25 points and 9 assists in 32 minutes of time-lapse hoops, the lone blemish being three clanks from long range. Why chuck treys when you can so easily undress players in the paint? Ayo was 10-for-12 on two-pointers and none of those dozen shots came from anywhere but beneath the rim. Five of his nine dimes likewise yielded layups or dunks, which means he personally accounted for 30 of the 68 points in the paint by the Timberwolves on Thursday, doubling up the Nuggets’ 34.

Which brings us to the non-wing in Game 3’s ring of honor, Rudy Gobert. For the third straight game, Gobert blunted the supposed advantage Denver had with the magical playmaker Nikola Jokic at the controls. Suffice to say that in the last five quarters, Jokic has shot 8-for-33 from the floor. If that continues, the Nuggets are toast in this series. 

When I asked Finch after the game if the herculean job Gobert was doing on Jokic made planning his defense simpler and better thus far, he replied, “Rudy is making all of us look good right now with his defense.” 

Amen.

If there is an asterisk on this game, it would be the absence of Denver’s brutishly versatile power forward Aaron Gordon. Nuggets coach David Adelman should be given a lot of credit for his honesty and transparency in dealing with the media during his first full season at the helm, but it came back to bite him and his team during the pregame presser, when he was clearly rattled and dejected by the sudden unavailability of Gordon, whose playing status went to “probable” to “out” in a period of a few hours due to a chronic calf strain. 

Gordon is far and away his team’s best defender, making the timing of his injury especially troublesome in the wake of McDaniels laying down his marker. Rattled is a good way to describe the entire team’s performance in the first quarter, an emotional wounding that needs to heal as fast as Gordon’s body if the Nuggets are going to be competitive in a series that had dramatically been flipped on its head over the past three days. 

That the Timberwolves played with such dominance despite mediocre outings from Ant and Randle would be a good thing for both of those current cornerstones to keep in mind. Ant was beset by foul trouble and Randle had a solid second quarter, but it stood out that neither player fully embraced what so often works on offense when the Wolves are at their best: Push the pace, move the ball, move without the ball, and make quick decisions. Ant and Randle can still be first among equals and blend into that catechism if they stay attuned to the possibilities of a greater good, one that all of sudden doesn’t have to end with them being postseason fodder for the Spurs or the Thunder. 

Not when you’ve got three wings at a collective peak, with a chaser of Rudy semi-clowning the Joker. 



Source link