I tested Bose’s Lifestyle Ultra soundbar, and it raised the ‘too much bass’ debate in my home


lusoundbar-2.jpg

Bose Lifestyle Ultra Soundbar

pros and cons

Pros

  • Excellent design
  • Great app support
  • Google Cast built-in
Cons

  • Slightly overpriced
  • Uncontrolled bass at loud volume

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


Bose has been in the home theater game for a long time, though its modern product catalog favors innovation and updates in its personal audio and wearables categories. As a result, the company’s home theater lineup has been stale, with only a few soundbars, rears, and subs to choose from.

Also: Forget the soundbar: How I upgraded my TV audio with spare Bluetooth speakers

Still, the company makes an effort to remind its consumer base of its home theater roots, and the new Lifestyle Ultra lineup, consisting of a smart speaker, soundbar, and subwoofer, shows it wants to continue its tenure in the industry. 

I spent a week with the $1,099 Lifestyle Ultra Soundbar, swapping my beloved Sonos Arc with Bose’s latest offering. With the Lifestyle Ultra Soundbar residing in the same price range as Sonos’s and Sony’s premium equivalents, Bose has big shoes to fill. 

Best bluetooth speaker deals of the week

Deals are selected by the CNET Group commerce team, and may be unrelated to this article.

Visible (and invisible) upgrades that matter

The Bose Lifestyle Ultra Soundbar debuts with a nine-driver array, with two upfiring speakers, four front-facing speakers, one dedicated center tweeter, and two horizontal speakers. On its own, the Lifestyle Ultra Soundbar delivers a 5.0.2-channel arrangement.

Under the hood, the Lifestyle Ultra Soundbar closely resembles its predecessor, the Bose Smart Ultra Soundbar, as both feature a nine-driver array. However, Bose fitted the new Lifestyle Ultra bar with an improved AI-powered speech enhancement algorithm, a microphone-enabled room-correction feature, a proprietary spatial audio upmixing software, and enhanced bass response technology.

Bose Lifestyle Ultra Soundbar in Black

Jada Jones/ZDNET

Bose gave its premium soundbar a much-welcomed facelift, introducing a glass panel along the topside and a touch-enabled dial of controls on the bar’s right side. Bose also swapped squoval edges for rounded ones, resulting in an elevated, modern look.

Overall, the soundbar is good; it does what it needs to do, especially in the midrange. The soundbar’s center channel handles dialogue very well, and Bose’s AI-powered dialogue enhancement sounds more natural than some competitors’. However, without external rear channels, the Lifestyle Ultra Soundbar struggles to deliver immersive sound on its own.

That’s too much bass

Additionally, the Lifestyle Ultra Soundbar’s bass response is weak, so the Lifestyle Ultra Subwoofer add-on is necessary for a meaningful bass response when watching movies or TV shows. The Lifestyle Ultra Subwoofer would not only add dimension to the soundbar’s lower frequencies but also offload some of the stress the soundbar would otherwise bear when handling deep bass on its own.

When watching intense scenes from “Dune: Part Two,” the rumble of the movie’s soundtrack often rattled the Lifestyle Ultra Soundbar, which in turn rattled my TV stand and produced an annoying sound. Some people may like this crashing sound effect, while others, like me, won’t.

Also: Why the ‘Subwoofer Crawl’ is the only way I found the bass sweet spot in my living room

In comparison, my standalone first-gen Arc Ultra didn’t do the same when playing the same scene from the same movie. The Sonos soundbar delivered a more controlled bass response, though Bose’s midrange reproduction was louder and clearer. 

Still, the Lifestyle Ultra Soundbar carries the same $1,100 price as the Sonos Arc Ultra, Marshall Heston 120, and Samsung HW-Q800H, all of which deliver deeper, and most importantly, tighter bass response.

One major drawback

The best thing about the Lifestyle Ultra collection is that they operate on an open ecosystem, offering multi-room audio via Google Cast and Apple AirPlay. Yet the Lifestyle Ultra collection doesn’t support backward compatibility with Bose’s older modern home theater products, which is a miss.

Though Bose doesn’t offer many home theater products in its current catalog, interoperability among all of them would be a plus; support for a wide range of devices is what gives Sonos and Sony an edge over Bose in this context. According to Bose, you can wire the Bose Bass Module 700 to the Lifestyle Ultra Soundbar — that’s it.

ZDNET’s buying advice

The Lifestyle Ultra Soundbar is good; it’s certainly the best from Bose, delivering refined sound technologies, a clean design, and an open ecosystem for Wi-Fi streaming. However, the Sonos Arc Ultra shares the same $1,099 price tag. If bigger, more theatrical sound is what you want in your living room, Sonos does it better.

Also: Your TV can sound a lot better: 7 easy but unexpected ways to improve audio quality

However, the Lifestyle Ultra Soundbar sounds great when playing music, and has plenty of smart speaker features, including Bluetooth, Apple AirPlay, Google Cast, and Alexa built in. Thus, it’s a solid option for those looking for a smart speaker that happens to be a soundbar, rather than those interested in a soundbar tuned for immersive movie-watching.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


If Game Two of their first-round playoff series with the Denver Nuggets saved the 2025-26 season for the Minnesota Timberwolves, Game Three showed why it should be saved. 

The Timberwolves were a different beast while decisively thumping the Nuggets, 113-96 Thursday night at Target Center, in a game that wasn’t nearly that close. These Wolves were the mythical creature we’d heard about in preseason lore, purposefully locked and loaded to be both marauding and staunch. They owned both ends of the court, gleefully transferring back and forth from irresistible force to immovable object. 

A quartet of Timberwolves deserve special mention, but it begins with Jaden McDaniels. After his team had toppled Denver to even the series at a game apiece Monday night, McDaniels used the sizable chip on his shoulder to etch some graffiti into the public discourse, casually castigating the most prominent Nuggets players by name as “bad defenders” in a matter-of-fact manner that had the media compelling him to confirm what he had just said. 

Trash talk is fleetingly fungible in the jaundiced social environment of 2026, functioning more like coupons than currency in that it needs to be rapidly leveraged before its expiration date. The common perception naturally was that McDaniels was calling out the Nuggets. But in a more subtle, profound way, he was also putting his teammates on notice. 

All season long the Timberwolves have procrastinated on their full potential, frequently demonstrating that their preseason talk about maturity and commitment was cheap. By contrast, those words uttered by McDaniels were expensive. He had just picked a fight with the opponent, leaving open the question of how many of his teammates would join him in the fray. 

That he would lead the charge was established early, after the Timberwolves’ top two scorers, Anthony Edwards and Julius Randle, had each missed a pair of open looks against Denver’s bad defenders in the game’s first 90 seconds.  

With the game still scoreless, the NBA’s best pick-and-roll combo, Nikola Jokic and Jamal Murray, were clustered around the foul line with Minnesota’s best defenders, McDaniels and Rudy Gobert. As they jammed up Jokic, McDaniels picked the ball loose and started sprint-dribbling the other way. To no one’s surprise, Donte “Ragu” DiVincenzo was also on his horse in transition, receiving a pass from McDaniels and then lobbing it back for a Jaden slam against a hapless Murray and Murray’s late-arriving teammate, Cam Johnson, who committed the foul that allowed McDaniels to finish with the “and-1” free throw. 

On the Timberwolves next offensive possession, McDaniels muscled his way to two offensive rebounds, feeding Ragu off the first one for a missed three-pointer, which he corralled for the second one and executed the putback in traffic. It was McDaniels 5, Nuggets 0, setting the tone for a game in which not only did the Wolves never trail, but never let the lead go under double digits after McDaniels made a consecutive pair of driving layups eight minutes into the game. 

“Spectacular. I thought his activity offensively in the first quarter was outstanding,” said Wolves coach Chris Finch after the game. “He was inspirational.” 

Among the most inspired were McDaniels fellow wing players, Ragu and Ayo Dosunmu. Ragu is exactly the kind of player who will have your back in a squabble, and his galvanized performance seemed borne of satisfaction that someone else had clarified the mission. As usual, the Timberwolves were at their best with him on the court: +20 in the 32:54 he played, -3 in the 15:06 he sat. 

“He makes so many hustle plays, momentum plays, different styles of plays.” Finch raved. “He’ll make a shot, get a transition bucket, he’ll rebound, get a steal, blow something up. So many different plays. He’s just a basketball player.”

Related: How the Timberwolves sparked a season-saving Game 2 comeback over the Nuggets in Denver

Then there was Ayo, whose fearless, blazing, bee-lines for the bucket were quicksilver kryptonite for a Nuggets defense that is neither swift nor rugged. “I’ve been waiting for him to wake up a little bit in this series,” Finch accurately observed. “The downhill mindset that he played with all season for us was back.”

Back with the sort of multipurpose propulsion that leaves witnesses with giddy whiplash. Ayo led the team with 25 points and 9 assists in 32 minutes of time-lapse hoops, the lone blemish being three clanks from long range. Why chuck treys when you can so easily undress players in the paint? Ayo was 10-for-12 on two-pointers and none of those dozen shots came from anywhere but beneath the rim. Five of his nine dimes likewise yielded layups or dunks, which means he personally accounted for 30 of the 68 points in the paint by the Timberwolves on Thursday, doubling up the Nuggets’ 34.

Which brings us to the non-wing in Game 3’s ring of honor, Rudy Gobert. For the third straight game, Gobert blunted the supposed advantage Denver had with the magical playmaker Nikola Jokic at the controls. Suffice to say that in the last five quarters, Jokic has shot 8-for-33 from the floor. If that continues, the Nuggets are toast in this series. 

When I asked Finch after the game if the herculean job Gobert was doing on Jokic made planning his defense simpler and better thus far, he replied, “Rudy is making all of us look good right now with his defense.” 

Amen.

If there is an asterisk on this game, it would be the absence of Denver’s brutishly versatile power forward Aaron Gordon. Nuggets coach David Adelman should be given a lot of credit for his honesty and transparency in dealing with the media during his first full season at the helm, but it came back to bite him and his team during the pregame presser, when he was clearly rattled and dejected by the sudden unavailability of Gordon, whose playing status went to “probable” to “out” in a period of a few hours due to a chronic calf strain. 

Gordon is far and away his team’s best defender, making the timing of his injury especially troublesome in the wake of McDaniels laying down his marker. Rattled is a good way to describe the entire team’s performance in the first quarter, an emotional wounding that needs to heal as fast as Gordon’s body if the Nuggets are going to be competitive in a series that had dramatically been flipped on its head over the past three days. 

That the Timberwolves played with such dominance despite mediocre outings from Ant and Randle would be a good thing for both of those current cornerstones to keep in mind. Ant was beset by foul trouble and Randle had a solid second quarter, but it stood out that neither player fully embraced what so often works on offense when the Wolves are at their best: Push the pace, move the ball, move without the ball, and make quick decisions. Ant and Randle can still be first among equals and blend into that catechism if they stay attuned to the possibilities of a greater good, one that all of sudden doesn’t have to end with them being postseason fodder for the Spurs or the Thunder. 

Not when you’ve got three wings at a collective peak, with a chaser of Rudy semi-clowning the Joker. 



Source link