iPad vs iPad Air: Which one is better?


With multiple options to choose from, deciding which iPad to invest in can be a tricky task.

Is the entry-level iPad enough to meet your tablet needs? Or should you splurge a bit more on an iPad Air? Is there enough of a difference between the two ranges to warrant the iPad Air’s higher price in the first place?

That’s where we come in. In this guide, we’ll explain the key differences between the two ranges so you can decide which will likely suit you best. 

Otherwise, make sure you visit our best iPad and best tablets roundup to see how we’ve ranked the iPads.

Price

  • The iPad sits as the most affordable model
  • The Air sits in the middle of the range

Advertisement

The latest entry-level iPad, unsurprisingly, is the cheapest in Apple’s collection, with the latest iPad 11 seeing a starting price of £329/$349 for the 128GB model. However, although Apple doesn’t tend to offer many discounts on its products, we have seen the entry-level iPad drop in price over the recent months.

SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10207771

In comparison, the iPad Air is positioned as a more premium alternative to the basic iPad, thanks to its design and Apple’s desktop-level chip, which we’ll go into more later. It certainly has the price tag to match that premium label, with a starting price of £599/$599 for the 11-inch model, while the 13-inch will set you back £799/$799.

SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10208285

Design

  • Apple has unified the design of the iPad in recent years
  • Different colour options are available on both
  • Only the Air comes in a larger 13-inch model

You might be wondering what really makes an iPad Air different, and it all starst with the design. Several key differences separate the iPad from the iPad Air, with the most obvious being their distinct designs. As its moniker suggests, the entire iPad Air range has always been relatively thin and lightweight, with the latest iPad Air M4 measuring just 6.1mm thick and starting from just 464g (for the 11-inch model). The 13-inch weighs slightly more from 616g.

Advertisement

iPad Air M3 back standing up
iPad Air M3. Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

In addition, the iPad Air also benefits from a few additional features that make it appear more premium than its iPad counterpart, with the main being a lamented display. The iPad Air M4 also comes with a more muted colour selection, including pastel Green, Blue, Starlight and Dark Grey, which is the same as its predecessor. 

Instead, the iPad 11 is made up of a brighter and more eye-catching variety including Yellow, Blue, Pink and Silver.

However, this isn’t to say that the iPad 11 or even its iPad 10 predecessor look cheap. In fact, the two undoubtedly sport a much more premium finish when compared to the iPad 9th Gen, which was stuck with thick bezels and the now old-fashioned Home button.

Performance

  • Both are capable tablet ranges
  • The latest Air uses a desktop-class M4 chip
  • The latest iPad uses the same chip as the 2023 iPhone 15

Advertisement

Arguably, the most significant difference between the iPad and iPad Air ranges is their respective chipsets. Despite both running on Apple’s own silicon, the iPad uses mobile Bionic chips, whereas the iPad Air runs on the desktop-level M-series. 

Before we explain the differences between the processors, it’s worth mentioning that this doesn’t necessarily mean the iPad Air is exactly like a laptop. In reality, although the use of the M chip means that while more intensive apps should load faster with minimal lag, the Air remains somewhat limited by iPadOS. 

The iPad Air M4 runs on the same chip found in the 2024 MacBook Air (which has since been succeeded by the MacBook Air M5). Not only does this chip make the iPad seriously powerful, allowing it to handle anything from console-level gaming to intensive tasks like LumaFusion Pro with ease, but it also enables the running of the Apple Intelligence toolkit.

iPad Air M3 displaying Image Playground
Apple Intelligence on iPad. Image Credit: Apple

In comparison, the entry-level iPad simply does not support Apple Intelligence. Whether this should be a deciding factor is debatable; however, the lack of the toolkit on the iPad does undoubtedly age the device. 

Otherwise, the iPad 11 runs on the A16 Bionic chip, which was first introduced back in 2022 with the iPhone 14 Pro and iPhone 14 Pro Max, and was then used in the iPhone 15 and iPhone 15 Plus. Sure it’s a capable chip, but it doesn’t offer the absolute best processing power. 

Advertisement

iPad 11 image
iPad 11. Image Credit: Apple

Software

  • Both the latest iPad 11 and iPad Air M4 run on iPadOS 26
  • Only the iPad Air series includes Apple Intelligence tools

There aren’t many differences between the iPad 11 and iPad Air M4’s software, as both run on the latest iPadOS 26. This means that both have the Liquid Glass design, new multitasking tools and Game Overlay for adjusting game settings and inviting friends to play, all without leaving the app.

However, one of the biggest differences between the two series is that the standard iPad doesn’t include any Apple Intelligence tools. So, while the iPad Air includes features such as Writing Tools, Image Playground, ChatGPT integration, photo editing tools and more.  

iPadOS 26 Liquid Glass design
iPadOS 26. Image Credit (Apple)

Having said that, whether this should be the reason you opt for an iPad Air is debatable. Apple Intelligence can be useful in certain situations, however generally it does feel as if it’s still in its infancy as a toolkit. With this in mind, although the lack of Apple Intelligence tools does age the iPad 11 and you might lament the loss further down the line, at this time we’d argue that you’re not necessarily missing out on anything.

Advertisement

Accessory support

  • Different Pencil and Keyboard accessories support with each iPad range
  • Wider choice of accessories with the Air
  • iPad Air supports more of the latest accessories

If you’re moving from the entry-level iPad to the iPad Air, then, annoyingly, there aren’t many accessories you can bring over with you. Although both the iPad 11 and iPad Air M4 support the Apple Pencil USB-C, only the iPad Air M4 supports the premium Apple Pencil Pro.

The difference with the Apple Pencil Pro is it features advanced tools such as haptic feedback, hover to preview marks before you actually put the pen on the screen, and it’s fitted with Find My too.

iPad 11 with Apple Pencil
iPad 11 with Apple Pencil. Image Credit: Apple

Both the iPad 11 and iPad 10 are compatible with Apple’s Magic Keyboard Folio, which is essentially a two-in-one case that protects your iPad’s screen when not in use but turns the tablet into a makeshift laptop with the built-in keyboard. The latest iPad Air iterations, on the other hand, have their own premium Magic Keyboard.

The latest iPad Air iterations, on the other hand, have their own premium Magic Keyboard which will set you back around £/$249.

Advertisement

Verdict

Choosing between the iPad and iPad Air essentially comes down to what you plan on using the tablet for. If you simply need a device for streaming series on the go, casual gaming and maybe the odd spot of light work, then the entry-level iPad is perfectly capable. 

On the other hand, if you need a tablet that supports more intensive apps, such as video editing and playing AAA games, and want to experiment with Apple Intelligence, then the iPad Air is undoubtedly a worthy investment. 

Plus, as it isn’t quite as expensive as the iPad Pro, the iPad Air is a solid choice if you need a bit more from the iPad but don’t necessarily want to fork out for the privilege.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


A new class-action lawsuit, filed on Monday by three teenage girls and their guardians, alleges that Elon Musk’s xAI created and distributed child sexual abuse material featuring their faces and likenesses with its Grok AI tech.

“Their lives have been shattered by the devastating loss of privacy, dignity, and personal safety that the production and dissemination of this CSAM have caused,” the filing says. “xAI’s financial gain through the increased use of its image- and video-making product came at their expense and well-being.”

From December to early January, Grok allowed many AI and X social media users to create AI-generated nonconsensual intimate images, sometimes known as deepfake porn. Reports estimate that Grok users made 4.4 million “undressed” or “nudified” images, 41% of the total number of images created, over a period of nine days. 

X, xAI and its safety and child safety divisions did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The wave of “undressed” images stirred outrage around the world. The European Commission quickly launched an investigation, while Malaysia and Indonesia banned X within their borders. Some US government representatives called on Apple and Google to remove the app from their app stores for violating their policies, but no federal investigation into X or xAI has been opened. A similar, separate class-action lawsuit was filed (PDF) by a South Carolina woman in late January.

The dehumanizing trend highlighted just how capable modern AI image tools are at creating content that seems realistic. The new complaint compares Grok’s self-proclaimed “spicy AI” generation to the “dark arts” with its ease of subjecting children to “any pose, however sick, however fetishized, however unlawful.”

“To the viewer, the resulting video appears entirely real. For the child, her identifying features will now forever be attached to a video depicting her own child sexual abuse,” the complaint reads.

AI Atlas

The complaint says xAI is at fault because it did not employ industry-standard guardrails that would prevent abusers from making this content. It says xAI licensed use of its tech to third-party companies abroad, which sold subscriptions that led abusers to make child sexual abuse images featuring the faces and likenesses of the victims. The requests ran through xAI’s servers, which makes the company liable, the complaint argues.

The lawsuit was filed by three Jane Does, pseudonyms given to the teens to protect their identities. Jane Doe 1 was first alerted to the fact that abusive, AI-generated sexual material of her was circulating on the web by an anonymous Instagram message in early December. The filing says she was told about a Discord server by the anonymous Instagram user, where the material was shared. That led Jane Doe 1 and her family, and eventually law enforcement, to find and arrest one perpetrator.

Ongoing investigations led the families of Jane Does 2 and 3 to learn their children’s images had been transformed with xAI tech into abusive material.





Source link