Is YouTube included in the UK social media ban for under-16s?


The UK government announced that it will be implementing a social media ban for all those aged under 16 years old next year.

While there are still many unanswered questions, the government has listed the social media platforms that will be included in the ban. Alongside the perhaps expected platforms such as Instagram, X, Snapchat and Facebook however is YouTube. Many are surprised to see YouTube included in the ban, as the platform is self-described as a video-sharing platform rather than social media.

So, why has the government chosen to ban YouTube for under-16s? When will the ban come into full effect?

We answer everything you need to know about why YouTube is included in the UK social media ban, plus provide more information about the ban as a whole. For a broader look at the ban, visit our dedicated UK social media ban explainer, while our Home Editor Dave Ludlow explains why he thinks the ban is a good idea

The government has stated that YouTube will be included in the UK social media ban for under 16s. In addition, live-streaming will also be restricted for those under 16 too.

Advertisement

What about YouTube Kids – is that also banned?

Although the government hasn’t officially stated whether or not YouTube Kids is included in the ban, it is widely thought that it will not be banned. As reported by a so-called Whitehall Insider to the The Sun, “YouTube Kids won’t be covered.” 

YouTube Kids
YouTube Kids

YouTube Kids is essentially a filtered iteration of the standard YouTube platform, and promises to only include age-appropriate videos so children should be able to explore it freely without risk of coming across harmful content. Plus, YouTube Kids includes parental controls that allows parents to set time limits, check what kids have been watching and more.

Why is standard YouTube included but YouTube Kids excluded?

We should note that the government hasn’t explicitly stated that YouTube Kids has been excluded from the ban. However, we would assume that the decision to exclude YouTube Kids is due to the fact it only allows age-appropriate videos on the platform, and is equipped with plenty of parental controls to ensure parents and guardians can keep an eye on their children’s screen time and general use of the app.

However, many have criticised the government’s decision to include YouTube in the ban as many children use the tool purely for educational content. While YouTube Kids does promise to include “educational how-tos” and arts and crafts videos, there are many videos that although technically are family friendly and don’t contain any harmful content, won’t be included within YouTube Kids. 

Having said that, it’s worth noting that the parent account that controls YouTube Kids can share videos directly from YouTube into the YouTube Kids app.

Advertisement

Youtube television app
YouTube TV app. Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

When does the YouTube ban take effect for under-16s?

The UK government has stated that the social media ban for under 16s, which will include YouTube, should be implemented in Spring 2027. This will follow the first set of regulations which should be laid out by the end of the year. 

What other platforms are included in the ban?

At the time of writing, the government has said that alongside YouTube, the social media ban will include Instagram, X, Facebook, TikTok and Snapchat. Messaging apps like Whatsapp and Signal are not expected to be included. 

Although YouTube is described as a video-sharing platform, it is commonly considered as being a social networking service. This is mainly due to the fact that users can easily interact with others, whether that’s through replying to comments and polls or responding to channels’ posts. So, while it’s not quite as clearcut as the likes of Facebook or X, it’s still undeniably a way to communicate with others. 

Most importantly, the government sees YouTube as a form of social media which is why the platform has decided to include it in the upcoming ban.

Advertisement



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews






It’s easy to assume that vehicles all had internal combustion engines until very recently. Gasoline and petrol engines were the standard for decades, after all, so why would early vehicles be any different? In reality, the early days of the automobile era were more varied than you might expect, and even featured a range of electric cars. Yes, despite electric vehicles not truly taking off until the 21st century, the first electric vehicles are much older than you think; drivers in the 1900s were going around town in electric vehicles — and where there are EVs, there are charging stations.

One such station, visible in the image above, was the creation of General Electric. Formally called the mercury arc rectifier, it took alternating current and sent it through vaporized mercury in a glass tube. This converted it into direct current, which powered up the EV’s battery. The woman in the image, who’s charging a Columbia Mark 68 Victrola, is standing at the control panel, which allowed a user to adjust power levels. 

These chargers could be installed everywhere, including homes, businesses, and public parking garages, supporting the electric vehicle boom of the early 20th century. While 21st-century EV chargers have come a long way from where they were, the basic building blocks are all still there, and it’s fascinating to see.

How EV chargers have evolved since the early 20th century

EV charging has changed a lot in some ways — but not in others. At the core of it all is the aforementioned conversion from AC to DC, which still happens when you charge modern EVs at standard charging stations. The difference is that your vehicle’s on-board charger performs the conversion, not the charger. Old EV chargers took between several hours and a day to charge, and current-day units can similarly take a few hours to well over a day from empty, depending on the charger’s speed. Fast chargers, which provide DC directly, can cut this down to around an hour or less.

Old-school and modern EV chargers also differ in how they provide power to the vehicle. Mercury arc rectifiers connected directly to the negative terminal of the lead-acid battery that needed charging. Nowadays, EVs use dedicated charging ports. Battery swapping was also commonplace in the early 1900s, and companies like General Electric tried to cash in by offering to replace drivers’ old, run-down batteries with new ones for a fee. That’s not yet possible with most mainstream EVs, although companies like Stellantis have tried to introduce EV battery swapping with moderate success.

Even if they were unrefined compared to today’s models, early EVs seemed to be on to something. Why, then, did electric cars fail, and how did gasoline end up becoming the predominant power source for vehicles?

What led to the downfall of the original wave of electric cars

EVs were no mere fad in the 1900s and 1910s. According to the 1900 United States census, 1,575 of the 4,192 vehicles sold that year were electric, with the value of these early EVs — $2,873,464 — accounting for more than half of the total market value of $4,899,443. It wasn’t just EVs, either; other sources of propulsion, like steam, were also vying for a foothold in the automobile market. By the 1920s and 1930s, though, these had all been superseded by the internal combustion engine.

One of the major drawbacks of early EVs was the fact that electricity was not yet widely available. Electrical hookups were a rarity outside of major cities, limiting the use of these vehicles. The lead-acid batteries they used also had their fair share of issues. They needed to be inspected, cleaned, and repaired every few days, making them more of an inconvenience than anything. Worse yet, they had poor mileage, and, with chargers possibly out of reach, many likely didn’t want to risk being stranded while out for a drive.

Eventually, price reductions for gas cars and improvements such as electric starters and better reliability prompted buyers and automakers alike to move away from electric rides. Thus, while the best-selling EVs of 2026 show that it’s a good time for EVs, this electric boom plainly isn’t the first of its kind. Early EVs eventually fizzled out, but they still set the stage for our current fascination with electric vehicles.





Source link