Microcurrent Devices: Do They Work and Are They Worth It? We Asked Skin Experts


There are many ways to take care of your skin at home with proper skincare. However, if you want to try out certain tools, such as microcurrent devices, it can be tricky to determine if it’s worth the investment. Influencers often claim they give you firmer, smoother skin and a more lifted look. At-home options from brands like NuFace, ZIIP and Therabody promise similar results, but they don’t come cheap.

If you’re thinking of getting an at-home microcurrent device, we consulted with dermatologists about how these work, what benefits you can realistically get from them and more. We also looked at how at-home tools compare against in-office treatments, so you can decide whether a microcurrent device is worth it or not.

Do microcurrent devices work?

At-home microcurrent devices aren’t cheap — costing hundreds of dollars. If you’re thinking about investing in one, you might be wondering whether they actually work. What do the experts say?

“Yes, at-home microcurrent devices can provide noticeable benefits, though they’re generally less powerful than professional-grade treatments,” said Hannah Kopelman, a dermatologist at Kopelman Aesthetic Surgery. “These devices deliver low-level electrical currents designed to stimulate facial muscles and boost circulation. Over time, this can create a temporary lifting effect and provide mild improvement in skin tone.”

While the effectiveness of at-home microcurrent devices hasn’t been thoroughly tested, some research studies show that they can provide real results. In a 2024 study, 56 people were instructed to use the Slendertone Face microcurrent device and 52 people were placed in a control group. After using the Slendertone Face device five days per week for 12 weeks, participants reported significantly better skin tone, radiance and fewer wrinkles compared to the control group. 

But before you start using an at-home microcurrent device, it’s important to set realistic expectations. 

“At-home microcurrent devices can be a beneficial part of your skin care routine, but they work best for mild improvements and maintenance, rather than dramatic changes,” Kopelman said. “For individuals looking for more immediate or pronounced results, professional treatments remain the gold standard.”

Don’t miss any of our unbiased tech content and lab-based reviews. Add CNET as a preferred Google source on Chrome.

Three panes showing my face before using the device, immediately after and five days after.

Wellness editor Anna Gragert’s results using the NuFace Trinity Plus, before, during and after.

Anna Gragert/CNET

Microcurrent device benefits

When you use an at-home microcurrent device consistently, it can have a wide range of benefits for your skin. “The main benefits include mild lifting and firming of the skin, improved circulation and enhanced lymphatic drainage, which can reduce puffiness. Some users also report that their skin looks more refreshed and radiant after consistent use,” Kopelman said.

For deeper wrinkles and significant sagging, however, Kopelman said these devices probably won’t have the same effect as professional treatments or more invasive in-office procedures.

While these at-home devices can be effective, the results aren’t one-size-fits-all. According to Dr. Robyn Gmyrek, a dermatologist at New York-based UnionDerm, “The benefits of at-home microcurrent devices vary from person to person based on age, health status and behavioral choices, like sun exposure, smoking, diet and the specific device used.”

Like with most skin care treatments and procedures, you shouldn’t expect results immediately. “With at-home devices, consistency is everything,” Gmyrek said. “I recommend using a microcurrent device daily, or at least three to five times per week. Think of it like the gym — if you don’t continue to go, you will lose the benefits.”

Potential microcurrent device side effects: Are they safe?

Generally speaking, at-home microcurrent devices are safe when used as directed. And because the microcurrents are small, the treatments shouldn’t be painful. Some side effects are possible, though.

“Some people may experience mild redness or a tingling sensation during use but this is usually temporary. However, improper use — like applying excessive pressure or using the device for longer than recommended — can lead to skin irritation or muscle fatigue,” Kopelman said.

In the 2024 study referenced above, only a few participants experienced mild skin redness during their treatments. None of the participants had any other adverse reactions, suggesting that these devices are mostly safe.

While there are dozens of at-home devices that deliver microcurrents, they’re not all created equal. Each device works differently and has unique advantages and drawbacks. If you’re in the market for an at-home microcurrent device, there are a few things you should look for, according to Gmyrek. She recommends buying a device with FDA clearance, multiple intensity levels and different functions, like the option to use LED light therapy. You should also look for a device that comes with or requires a conductive gel to properly transmit the microcurrent. Pick a device from a well-established brand with positive user and expert reviews. 

The ZIIP Halo with its Electric Complex Gel on a white bathroom counter.

The ZIIP Halo with its Electric Complex Gel. 

Anna Gragert/CNET

How to use a microcurrent device at home

Before using an at-home microcurrent device, read the manufacturer’s instructions. Each device might be slightly different but here’s a general overview of how these devices should be used:

  1. Wash your face: You should always start with clean, dry skin before using a microcurrent device.
  2. Apply conductive: Most microcurrent devices require a conductive gel that allows the device to glide over your face and helps deliver the current into the deeper layers of your skin.
  3. Select the intensity level: If your device has multiple intensity settings, select the one that is right for your skin at the time of use. Start low and gradually increase once you get used to the different settings.
  4. Glide the device over your face: Using light pressure, gently move the device across your face in an upward and outward motion. You can use the device on your jawline, cheekbones, forehead and the sides of your neck (make sure to avoid the thyroid in the center).
  5. Remove the gel from your face and device: Once you’re finished, wash the gel off your face. Follow the manufacturer’s instructions for cleaning the device — generally, you can wipe off the gel with a soft, clean cloth. Then, you can continue with the next steps in your skin care routine.
  6. Repeat based on the manufacturer’s recommendation: Most at-home microcurrent devices should only be used five times per week, for 3 to 5 minutes, but some devices can be used daily. Check the instructions to see how often your device should be used for optimal results.

The best microcurrent devices we tested

To figure out which microcurrent devices are the best, CNET wellness editor Anna Gragert tested six devices over the course of two months. Based on price, modes, accessories, features, FDA clearance, cleaning instructions, app compatibility and the required conductive gel, she found the NuFace Trinity Plus to be the best microcurrent device overall. 

The NuFace Trinity Plus costs $395. It helps you track time with audible beeps, has helpful tutorials on its app and is easy to charge with its included stand. 

If you’re looking for a device with more features, such as massage and LED light therapy, the $420 TheraFace Pro is recommended. This device can also cleanse the face. Hot and cold rings are sold separately but can be used with the device. The only potential downside is that app tutorials are on the longer side and would be better with voice instructions. 

Can you overdo it with a microcurrent device? 

At-home microcurrent devices aren’t without risks and using them too often can do more harm than good. “Overuse can lead to inflammation in the skin, redness and swelling,” said Gmyrek. If that happens, you should stop using the device immediately until your side effects resolve.

“Using an at-home microcurrent device too frequently can also cause muscle fatigue, leaving the facial muscles feeling sore or overly tight. Sticking to the manufacturer’s recommended usage schedule can help avoid this issue,” added Kopelman.

Before you start using an at-home microcurrent device, read the instructions on the frequency of use, which will vary by product. For example, the Foreo Bear is designed to be used every day. However, the NuFace Trinity Plus and SkinGym Microcurrent Wand should be used five times per week for 60 days, and then up to three times per week for maintenance.

Don’t be tempted to use the device more often than what’s recommended. Experts agree that overusing won’t provide better benefits or faster results. Plus, you could end up damaging your skin in the process.

Who shouldn’t use a microcurrent device?

Although at-home microcurrent devices are typically safe, not everyone is a good candidate. 

“Individuals with certain medical conditions, such as epilepsy, a pacemaker or other implanted electrical devices, should avoid using microcurrent devices, as the electrical currents could interfere with their function,” said Kopelman.

Microcurrent devices should also be avoided during pregnancy, unless it’s cleared by a health care provider. 

A person with short black hair having a microcurrent procedure performed on their face by a professional in a light pink blouse.

Tatsiana Volkava/Getty Images

Professional vs. at-home microcurrent devices

Microcurrent is a popular offering at many medical spas and skin care clinics as a standalone treatment or an add-on to other services. According to experts, in-office treatments offer more bang for your buck.

“Professional microcurrent devices used in clinical settings are much more powerful and can deliver a more significant, long-lasting lifting effect in a shorter period of time,” said Kopelman.

Additionally, professional treatments can be better personalized to your needs, potentially giving you better results faster.

“Licensed professionals are also trained to adjust settings based on your skin’s needs, which makes the treatment more customized,” said Kopelman. “At-home devices, by contrast, are designed to be safe for general use, so they deliver lower current levels and require more frequent treatments to maintain results.”

tips-health.png

At-home microcurrent devices aren’t cheap, either. FDA-cleared devices can cost anywhere from $150 to upward of $400. Most devices also require a conductive gel, which is sold separately.

However, at-home devices tend to be slightly cheaper than professional procedures. In-office microcurrent treatments often cost between $250 and $500 per session but it depends on various factors, including the type of treatment, length of treatment and your location.

The bottom line

At-home microcurrent devices can be a great addition to your skin care routine if you want to improve skin firmness, reduce puffiness and sculpt your face. But it’s important to have realistic expectations about the results. While at-home devices do work, they aren’t nearly as effective as professional treatments.

If you’re on the fence about getting an at-home microcurrent device, there are a few things you can consider. First, think about your skin goals. An at-home microcurrent device won’t get rid of deep wrinkles and it’s not an alternative to Botox, dermal fillers or skin lasers.

You should also determine how often you will realistically use the device. Here’s some advice from Gmyrek: “Be honest with yourself — if you aren’t going to use an at-home device consistently, don’t bother spending the money on it. Instead, spend that money on in-office treatments that are more effective.”

The dermatologists we contacted said that at-home microcurrent devices can be beneficial but work best for mild improvements. If you’re looking for more immediate results, you may want to consider professional treatments instead.

When used as directed, microcurrent is generally safe. However, some people may experience mild, temporary redness and tingling during use. If used incorrectly, microcurrent may cause muscle fatigue or skin irritation.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


If Game Two of their first-round playoff series with the Denver Nuggets saved the 2025-26 season for the Minnesota Timberwolves, Game Three showed why it should be saved. 

The Timberwolves were a different beast while decisively thumping the Nuggets, 113-96 Thursday night at Target Center, in a game that wasn’t nearly that close. These Wolves were the mythical creature we’d heard about in preseason lore, purposefully locked and loaded to be both marauding and staunch. They owned both ends of the court, gleefully transferring back and forth from irresistible force to immovable object. 

A quartet of Timberwolves deserve special mention, but it begins with Jaden McDaniels. After his team had toppled Denver to even the series at a game apiece Monday night, McDaniels used the sizable chip on his shoulder to etch some graffiti into the public discourse, casually castigating the most prominent Nuggets players by name as “bad defenders” in a matter-of-fact manner that had the media compelling him to confirm what he had just said. 

Trash talk is fleetingly fungible in the jaundiced social environment of 2026, functioning more like coupons than currency in that it needs to be rapidly leveraged before its expiration date. The common perception naturally was that McDaniels was calling out the Nuggets. But in a more subtle, profound way, he was also putting his teammates on notice. 

All season long the Timberwolves have procrastinated on their full potential, frequently demonstrating that their preseason talk about maturity and commitment was cheap. By contrast, those words uttered by McDaniels were expensive. He had just picked a fight with the opponent, leaving open the question of how many of his teammates would join him in the fray. 

That he would lead the charge was established early, after the Timberwolves’ top two scorers, Anthony Edwards and Julius Randle, had each missed a pair of open looks against Denver’s bad defenders in the game’s first 90 seconds.  

With the game still scoreless, the NBA’s best pick-and-roll combo, Nikola Jokic and Jamal Murray, were clustered around the foul line with Minnesota’s best defenders, McDaniels and Rudy Gobert. As they jammed up Jokic, McDaniels picked the ball loose and started sprint-dribbling the other way. To no one’s surprise, Donte “Ragu” DiVincenzo was also on his horse in transition, receiving a pass from McDaniels and then lobbing it back for a Jaden slam against a hapless Murray and Murray’s late-arriving teammate, Cam Johnson, who committed the foul that allowed McDaniels to finish with the “and-1” free throw. 

On the Timberwolves next offensive possession, McDaniels muscled his way to two offensive rebounds, feeding Ragu off the first one for a missed three-pointer, which he corralled for the second one and executed the putback in traffic. It was McDaniels 5, Nuggets 0, setting the tone for a game in which not only did the Wolves never trail, but never let the lead go under double digits after McDaniels made a consecutive pair of driving layups eight minutes into the game. 

“Spectacular. I thought his activity offensively in the first quarter was outstanding,” said Wolves coach Chris Finch after the game. “He was inspirational.” 

Among the most inspired were McDaniels fellow wing players, Ragu and Ayo Dosunmu. Ragu is exactly the kind of player who will have your back in a squabble, and his galvanized performance seemed borne of satisfaction that someone else had clarified the mission. As usual, the Timberwolves were at their best with him on the court: +20 in the 32:54 he played, -3 in the 15:06 he sat. 

“He makes so many hustle plays, momentum plays, different styles of plays.” Finch raved. “He’ll make a shot, get a transition bucket, he’ll rebound, get a steal, blow something up. So many different plays. He’s just a basketball player.”

Related: How the Timberwolves sparked a season-saving Game 2 comeback over the Nuggets in Denver

Then there was Ayo, whose fearless, blazing, bee-lines for the bucket were quicksilver kryptonite for a Nuggets defense that is neither swift nor rugged. “I’ve been waiting for him to wake up a little bit in this series,” Finch accurately observed. “The downhill mindset that he played with all season for us was back.”

Back with the sort of multipurpose propulsion that leaves witnesses with giddy whiplash. Ayo led the team with 25 points and 9 assists in 32 minutes of time-lapse hoops, the lone blemish being three clanks from long range. Why chuck treys when you can so easily undress players in the paint? Ayo was 10-for-12 on two-pointers and none of those dozen shots came from anywhere but beneath the rim. Five of his nine dimes likewise yielded layups or dunks, which means he personally accounted for 30 of the 68 points in the paint by the Timberwolves on Thursday, doubling up the Nuggets’ 34.

Which brings us to the non-wing in Game 3’s ring of honor, Rudy Gobert. For the third straight game, Gobert blunted the supposed advantage Denver had with the magical playmaker Nikola Jokic at the controls. Suffice to say that in the last five quarters, Jokic has shot 8-for-33 from the floor. If that continues, the Nuggets are toast in this series. 

When I asked Finch after the game if the herculean job Gobert was doing on Jokic made planning his defense simpler and better thus far, he replied, “Rudy is making all of us look good right now with his defense.” 

Amen.

If there is an asterisk on this game, it would be the absence of Denver’s brutishly versatile power forward Aaron Gordon. Nuggets coach David Adelman should be given a lot of credit for his honesty and transparency in dealing with the media during his first full season at the helm, but it came back to bite him and his team during the pregame presser, when he was clearly rattled and dejected by the sudden unavailability of Gordon, whose playing status went to “probable” to “out” in a period of a few hours due to a chronic calf strain. 

Gordon is far and away his team’s best defender, making the timing of his injury especially troublesome in the wake of McDaniels laying down his marker. Rattled is a good way to describe the entire team’s performance in the first quarter, an emotional wounding that needs to heal as fast as Gordon’s body if the Nuggets are going to be competitive in a series that had dramatically been flipped on its head over the past three days. 

That the Timberwolves played with such dominance despite mediocre outings from Ant and Randle would be a good thing for both of those current cornerstones to keep in mind. Ant was beset by foul trouble and Randle had a solid second quarter, but it stood out that neither player fully embraced what so often works on offense when the Wolves are at their best: Push the pace, move the ball, move without the ball, and make quick decisions. Ant and Randle can still be first among equals and blend into that catechism if they stay attuned to the possibilities of a greater good, one that all of sudden doesn’t have to end with them being postseason fodder for the Spurs or the Thunder. 

Not when you’ve got three wings at a collective peak, with a chaser of Rudy semi-clowning the Joker. 



Source link