On HCMC’s list of financial troubles, ‘charity care’ is leading culprit 


Earlier this year, people familiar with Hennepin County Medical Center’s (HCMC) dire finances started worrying publicly that the Minneapolis institution would be forced to shut down. In May, a massive legislative bailout bought time for the region’s largest safety-net hospital. But it didn’t fix the underlying causes of its troubles, high among them the skyrocketing cost of providing care to people who can’t afford it.  

Take cancer treatment, for example. It’s notoriously expensive and can even send patients in stable financial situations, with comprehensive health insurance, into medical debt. Sometimes there are legal solutions, said Erin Hartung, director of legal services for Cancer Legal Care, a nonprofit providing assistance to Minnesota cancer patients with medical debt or other financial difficulties. But sometimes there aren’t. So, her clients often look to options like one-time health care grants, food and travel assistance, or even GoFundMe.

“It’s a lot to add on top of somebody’s medical treatments that they’re already trying to navigate,” Hartung told MinnPost.

When outside options can’t cover the costs, Hartung said some clients apply to the hospitals’ financial assistance programs. For patients who qualify – some whose lives hang in the balance – the money can be lifesaving.

But for HCMC, financial assistance has become an almost impossible burden. The cost to the hospital of what is called “charity care” not only has risen to unsustainable levels in recent years, but has far outpaced what other hospitals in the state have spent. And as the number of uninsured Minnesotans rises, the hospital finds itself in an increasingly untenable position with no simple solution in sight. 

HCMC’s financial woes have been mounting for years, due in part to the shutdown of Minnesota-based health insurer UCare and changes to Medicaid eligibility brought on by the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. HCMC is set to face up to $50 million in operating losses this year alone, along with a staggering $1.7 billion in losses over the next decade, according to financial projections shared with the Hennepin County Board’s budget committee in March.

After weeks of intense discussions, Minnesota lawmakers passed an omnibus bill securing $205 million for HCMC from the state’s general fund in the final hours of the Legislative session. Starting next summer, the hospital will also have access until 2031 to a $500 million reserve account, drawn from the state’s rainy day fund.

“The stabilization funding does not resolve the long‑term impacts of HR1 or the structural deficits that uniquely challenge safety‑net hospital systems,” Hennepin County spokesperson Joshua Yetman said in an email to MinnPost. “But it does accomplish two essential things: it delivers historic support that prevents closure, and it gives us the time and stability to work with the state on durable, long‑term solutions.”

The cost to treat HCMC’s uninsured or publicly insured patients, who make up roughly 75% of Hennepin Healthcare’s patient base, according to a hospital fact sheet, are massive. Part of HCMC’s mission as a safety-net hospital is treating all patients regardless of their insurance status or ability to pay, which has led to a large share of unpaid bills.

Two major hospitals pictured here have seen their uncompensated care costs rise significantly between 2014 and 2024. North Memorial Health has bucked this trend and seen these costs tick down in the same period.

This phenomenon falls under a broader umbrella term called “uncompensated care,” said Scott Hulver, senior policy analyst with KFF, a health policy research, polling and news organization.

There are two major types of uncompensated care, Hulver explained: charity care and bad debt. Charity care, also called financial assistance, is when a hospital deducts a patient’s medical bill because they were unable to pay but qualified for financial aid. Bad debt is when a patient does not pay their bill but does not qualify for charity care.

While virtually every hospital has some amount of uncompensated care costs, HCMC’s costs represent roughly 20% of total costs statewide, Yetman said in an email.

In recent years, uncompensated care costs have skyrocketed at HCMC, where the threshold to qualify for financial assistance is lower compared to similar hospitals. 

Data from the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) shows that in 2014, the hospital had just under $24 million in uncompensated care costs. A decade later, that figure jumped to more than $90 million – an increase of almost 280%. Additionally, more than $88 million of HCMC’s $90.3 million uncompensated care price tag in 2024 was for charity care, a 47.5% increase from 2023. The remainder – about $2 million – covered bad debt.

Regions Hospital in St. Paul, another Level 1 trauma center, had $55 million in uncompensated care costs in 2024, $25 million of which was charity care. Regions did not grant an interview to MinnPost, but Jimmy Bellamy, senior communications consultant with HealthPartners, said in an email that the hospital provides the “most charity care to underserved patients in the East Metro as a safety net hospital.” Bellamy added that in recent years, Regions has seen a decline in patients on Medicaid and a rise in uninsured individuals. 

North Memorial in Robbinsdale, the other hospital in the metro area’s trifecta of Level 1 trauma centers, only spent about $2.6 million on charity care that same year. North Memorial did not respond to MinnPost’s repeated requests for comment. 

Yetman attributes the rise in uncompensated and charity care costs at HCMC to several factors, including an increase in uninsured or underinsured patients, post-pandemic hikes in clinic visits and more intensive inpatient stays, which increases the overall cost of delivered care – including treatment that goes unpaid. 

Beth Feldpush, senior vice president of advocacy and policy at America’s Essential Hospitals, representing safety-net hospitals across the country, including HCMC, said hospitals nationwide have experienced rises in patient volumes post-COVID due to individuals opting to delay treatment during the pandemic. Now, patients are coming in with more urgent needs and hospitals like HCMC are dealing with the backlog.

An additional 10 million people nationwide are projected to lose health insurance coverage due to federal changes to Medicaid, part of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, Feldpush said, citing estimates from the Congressional Budget Office. In coming years, she predicts more increases in charity care costs that will disproportionately affect HCMC and other safety-net hospitals.

“We’re going to see a lot more folks needing charity care, and at the same time that bill also cuts support for hospital funding,” Feldpush said. “Hospitals are really looking at this double whammy, where they’re going to see more people needing charity care coming in through their doors, but also they’re going to have less ability and less financial support to provide that charity care.”

HCMC also devotes more of its operating budget to charity care compared to other metro hospitals.

A KFF Health News and Minnesota Star Tribune investigation published in May found that 80% of Minnesota hospitals spent less than 1% of operating expenses on charity care, with only 24 hospitals in the state spending more than 1%. HCMC is one of them, spending 3.62% of its operating budget, the highest percentage of any hospital in the state. Charity care accounts for just over 2% of Regions’ operating budget and only 0.38% at North Memorial.

The reason may lie, in part, in HCMC’s willingness to provide financial assistance. Compared to the other Level 1 trauma centers in the metro, HCMC is much less strict with its application requirements, meaning a wider range of patients qualify. Unlike some states, Minnesota does not have standardized eligibility criteria for who qualifies for charity care.

“Hospitals vary a lot in terms of what income thresholds they allow for financial assistance, whether the hospital provides some sort of discount to the care or whether they will cover 100% of a patient’s bills,” Hulver said.

For starters, HCMC offers free care to those at or below 300% of the federal poverty level, meaning an individual making just over $45,000 a year qualifies. This is a higher income threshold than Regions and North Memorial, both of which offer free care to those at or below 200% of the FPL, meaning some patients would qualify for charity care at HCMC, but not at the other two hospitals.

Additionally, HCMC doesn’t have as many requirements to apply for charity care. The KFF/Star Tribune investigation noted the hospital only requires applicants to provide their income totals, while Regions and North Memorial require income, bank accounts and financial assets estimates.

For now, HCMC has secured funding from the Legislature that will keep it running in the short-term, but long-term stability and the ability to absorb growing uncompensated care costs remain a looming challenge.

Rep. Esther Agbaje, DFL-Minneapolis, a major player in House HCMC negotiations, told MinnPost at the Capitol in the final days of the session that the passed legislation also calls for the creation of a task force to help develop sustainable solutions for the hospital, including a new governance structure.

“I really want people to be encouraged at the fact that we want (HCMC) to be here for the long haul, and I hope they will stay here too,” Agbaje said.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


iPad Air M4 vs MacBook Neo

Maria Diaz and Kyle Kucharski/ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


With the introduction of the MacBook Neo this spring, Apple added a fresh entry-level option to its hardware lineup. Before, if you didn’t want to commit to a new MacBook Air or Pro, you were relegated to the iPad, which offers a significantly different user experience. (Or you could buy a discounted MacBook that’s a year or two old.)

Also: MacBook Neo review: My biggest concern with Apple’s near-perfect budget laptop

But all that has changed. The new MacBook Neo starts at $599 — the same price as the latest affordable iPad Air M4 with 128GB of storage, bringing the MacBook experience to an accessible price point. This puts these two devices on equal footing, but they’re very different in terms of usability. Which one is a better fit for you? Let’s break it down. 


Specifications

iPad Air M4 (11-inch)

MacBook Neo 

Display

11-inch Liquid Retina display, 500 nits brightness, 264 ppi

13-inch Liquid Retina display, 500 nits brightness

Weight

1.03 pounds (465 grams)

2.7 pounds (1.23 kg)

Processor

Apple M4  

Apple A18 Pro

RAM/Storage 12GB of memory with 128GB-1TB storage 8GB of memory, 256GB-512GB storage
Battery Up to 10 hours of web surfing and watching video on Wi-Fi, 9 hours on 5G Up to 11 hours of web surfing, 16 hours video streaming
Camera Landscape 12MP Center Stage camera, 12MP wide camera, 4K video 1080p FaceTime HD camera, HD video recording
Connectivity Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 6, 5G Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 6
Price Starting at $599 Starting at $599

You should buy the iPad Air M4 if…

iPad Air (2026)

Maria Diaz/ZDNET

1. You want the touchscreen experience

It might seem obvious, but the iPad is fundamentally different than a MacBook as a touch device. iPadOS is optimized for touch or use with an Apple Pencil, and as such, offers a more tactile, intuitive form of interaction. 

iPads are so popular because they don’t really feel like “computers” — the ability to tap, drag, and zoom with your fingers directly is like working with a physical object. This makes them great for younger kids, older folks, or anyone with visual impairments. 

Read the review: iPad Air M4

For artists who want the tactile experience and don’t need the MacBook Pro’s processing power, the iPad Air offers a much more accessible middle ground, with a vivid display and stylus support for sketching, illustrating, and iterating on designs. 

2. You’re an artist or creator 

iPad Air M4

Kerry Wan/ZDNET

The iPad Air M4 features a 12MP Center Stage camera, 4K video recording at up to 30 fps, and a better display, making it better for creators who want to shoot photos or videos. The smaller, thinner frame is way more conducive to shooting content, and stylus support makes for fast, intuitive image editing. 

Additionally, the M4 processor in the iPad Air has 12GB of unified memory to work with, alongside an eight-core CPU and nine-core GPU (compared to a six-core and five-core in the Neo), bringing significantly more processing power to the table.

3. You want a better display 

The MacBook Neo opened up a new entry point into the MacBook line, but its display is not as flashy as those on the MacBook Air or Pro. The iPad is a much better option for anyone who wants a brilliant display, but doesn’t need the top-of-the-line processing power in the MacBook Pro. 

Also: MacBook Neo vs. MacBook Air: I compared Apple’s new laptops, and here’s my winner

The gorgeous tandem OLED display on the iPad has 264 pixels per inch and an optional nano-texture display, offering a brighter, more vivid image. This benefits artists, but it’s also a better choice for streaming movies, as video content looks crisper and more realistic. 

You should buy the MacBook Neo if…

Apple MacBook Neo in silver

Kyle Kucharski/ZDNET

1. You want the MacBook experience 

The Neo delivers a satisfying MacBook experience, though there are some trade-offs. I’ve written about this at length, but Apple did a great job balancing build and features, retaining the best features from more powerful MacBooks, but keeping the cost low with more modest hardware. 

For example, you don’t get backlighting on the Neo’s keyboard, but the keys still feel functional. The Neo’s trackpad is not haptic, but it is still better than many other Windows PC in the price range. 

Also: After using MacBook Neo, it’s clear Windows needs to rethink its PC strategy (and fast)

The result is a laptop that feels almost identical to a MacBook Air or Pro on the surface — its only limitation being its processing power. If you’re using it for what it’s designed for — everyday tasks, working out of the browser, and using Apple’s iPhone integrations — it feels great. 

2. You want a device for work 

MacBook Neo Citrus

Kerry Wan/ZDNET

On that note, if you’re looking for something to use for work-related tasks, the Neo is a better option. It runs the same operating system as a MacBook Pro, with a keyboard and mouse that offer better functionality for work-related tasks. Although you can certainly get a keyboard for the iPad Air and connect it to a wide range of accessories, MacOS is simply better for productivity tasks, while iPadOS shines with creative tasks, tablet gaming, and media. 

3. You want the more price-efficient option

Both the MacBook Neo and iPad Pro start at $599, but the Neo is a little more cost-effective. If the iPad Air M4 is a high-performing niche device, the Neo is more entry-level but also more versatile. The Neo has trade-offs as mentioned, but for the majority of users who want a MacBook for non-demanding workloads, it’s going to feel nearly identical to a higher-specced Mac.

Writer’s choice

I’ve used both products, and personally, I prefer the Neo. It’s a little more of a generalist device, but the pros (low cost, bang for buck) heavily outweigh the cons (lower-end hardware). Compared to other Windows PCs at a similar price point, the Neo offers a very competitive experience, especially if you’re an iPhone user, as it comes with the full suite of iPhone integrations, like Continuity and Phone Mirroring. 

Also: Microsoft was right about the future of PCs – it just took the MacBook Neo to prove it

If you’re an artist or creator committed to a device for those workflows, the iPad Air M4 is a better choice. But for essentially everyone else, the Neo is a better option. Even though the iPad is better for younger kids, the Neo is a commendable entry point into the MacBook ecosystem that scales up to some of the most powerful consumer laptops on the market today.





Source link