The World’s First Warship Dubbed A ‘Super Carrier’ Wasn’t Made By The US







Modern naval warfare is built around aircraft carriers, and the current nuclear-powered behemoths are typically referred to as “super carriers.” The term fits, as they’re considerably larger than the first ships that carried and deployed planes in combat. In fact, the first aircraft carriers weren’t built for that purpose, but were designed for other uses, received a flat-top of some kind, and went on their way. The term “super carrier” came about in the lead-up to World War II, but it wasn’t for a ship belonging to the United States Navy.

The first ship to be dubbed a super carrier was the HMS Ark Royal (91) of His Majesty’s Royal Navy. The New York Times wrote an article describing Germany’s newest cruise ship, the Wilhelm Gustloff, which was the first of 20, costing $5,000,000 ($115.9 million in 2026), and compared it to the Ark Royal, which it dubbed a “super carrier.” The comparison was apt, as the Wilhelm Gustloff was comparable in size and could have been converted into an aircraft carrier, which was all the rage back in 1938.

Had that happened, the paper surmised that the German cruise ship could accommodate around 35 unspecified aircraft, which was half the amount that the Ark Royal was capable of carrying. At the time, the Ark Royal was about to undertake its sea trials, which were to begin in early May 1938. Aircraft carrier design underwent numerous innovations and advancements throughout WWII, and the Ark Royal’s designation as a “super carrier” by The New York Times was a bit off the mark in hindsight.

The HMS Ark Royal of the His Majesty’s Royal Navy

Modern aircraft carriers are incredibly heavy, weighing in at 100,000+ tons, but the HMS Ark Royal was significantly smaller. The carrier weighed approximately 22,000 tons, and it entered service in 1938. The Ark Royal served for a few years until 1941, when it was sunk by the German submarine U-81, commanded by Kapitänleutnant (Lt. U.S. Navy equivalent) Friedrich Guggenberger. The attack occurred on November 13, 1941, when the Ark Royal was operating in the vicinity of Gibraltar during Operation Perpetual.

U-81 fired a spread of four torpedoes, one of which struck its target, causing it to sink. At the time, the ship was being towed, and only one of 1,488 personnel perished in the attack, though almost all of the Ark Royal’s aircraft were lost. The ship was capable of carrying around 70 aircraft of various types and had participated in several combat operations throughout its service life. In comparison to the carriers operated by the U.S. Navy only a few years later, the Ark Royal was fairly close in size and capability to Essex-class carriers.

As for American super carriers, those wouldn’t come along until the Forrestal-class aircraft carriers entered service in 1955. They received this unofficial designation due to their size and weight, which far exceeded that of their predecessor, the Midway-class. The first ship in that class, the USS Midway (CV-41), displaced around 45,000 tons of seawater, while Forrestal-class ships displaced up to 81,000 tons.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


A new class-action lawsuit, filed on Monday by three teenage girls and their guardians, alleges that Elon Musk’s xAI created and distributed child sexual abuse material featuring their faces and likenesses with its Grok AI tech.

“Their lives have been shattered by the devastating loss of privacy, dignity, and personal safety that the production and dissemination of this CSAM have caused,” the filing says. “xAI’s financial gain through the increased use of its image- and video-making product came at their expense and well-being.”

From December to early January, Grok allowed many AI and X social media users to create AI-generated nonconsensual intimate images, sometimes known as deepfake porn. Reports estimate that Grok users made 4.4 million “undressed” or “nudified” images, 41% of the total number of images created, over a period of nine days. 

X, xAI and its safety and child safety divisions did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The wave of “undressed” images stirred outrage around the world. The European Commission quickly launched an investigation, while Malaysia and Indonesia banned X within their borders. Some US government representatives called on Apple and Google to remove the app from their app stores for violating their policies, but no federal investigation into X or xAI has been opened. A similar, separate class-action lawsuit was filed (PDF) by a South Carolina woman in late January.

The dehumanizing trend highlighted just how capable modern AI image tools are at creating content that seems realistic. The new complaint compares Grok’s self-proclaimed “spicy AI” generation to the “dark arts” with its ease of subjecting children to “any pose, however sick, however fetishized, however unlawful.”

“To the viewer, the resulting video appears entirely real. For the child, her identifying features will now forever be attached to a video depicting her own child sexual abuse,” the complaint reads.

AI Atlas

The complaint says xAI is at fault because it did not employ industry-standard guardrails that would prevent abusers from making this content. It says xAI licensed use of its tech to third-party companies abroad, which sold subscriptions that led abusers to make child sexual abuse images featuring the faces and likenesses of the victims. The requests ran through xAI’s servers, which makes the company liable, the complaint argues.

The lawsuit was filed by three Jane Does, pseudonyms given to the teens to protect their identities. Jane Doe 1 was first alerted to the fact that abusive, AI-generated sexual material of her was circulating on the web by an anonymous Instagram message in early December. The filing says she was told about a Discord server by the anonymous Instagram user, where the material was shared. That led Jane Doe 1 and her family, and eventually law enforcement, to find and arrest one perpetrator.

Ongoing investigations led the families of Jane Does 2 and 3 to learn their children’s images had been transformed with xAI tech into abusive material.





Source link